What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Updated Mock Draft (1 Viewer)

Zimm

Footballguy
Here is my updated mock draft, I will be adding a 2nd and 3rd round within the next few days and this will be my last mock before the draft next week! Enjoy :banned:

Mock Draft

*Update* Round 2 and 3 have been added* - I do understand there are some reaches and certain players falling, but reaches and players dropping happen on draft day.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eagles need a CB? Wouldn't the Bengals be a more likely trading partner for the Jags?
Asante Samuel won't be back this year and DRC is a free agent at the end of the season. Claiborne would learn the nickle for year one and then assume the LCB spot year 2.
 
I like your mock. Somewhat outside the box but it took into account team tendencies and needs. It probably won't play out this way but I like your thinking. :thumbup:

 
Yeah, always nice to see people go out on a limb. Don't see the Iggles going CB, and don't see the Brownies trading out of the 1.04 pick unless they are just overwhelmed. I firmly believe they will go Richardson, suck it up for another year with McCoy at QB, and then look at a deeper QB class next year if needed. Also, if Dre Kirkpatrick is still available at Detroit's pick, and they don't take it, I'm going to go all-Hulk on them... :hot:

 
i do not see the packers spending a first round pick on a tight end ted thomson will find one working in a deli department somewhere and turn him into a supermegastar so sorry brohan not happening

 
'pantherclub said:
KC aint moving up for Tannerhill. Sorry bro
i do not see the packers spending a first round pick on a tight end ted thomson will find one working in a deli department somewhere and turn him into a supermegastar so sorry brohan not happening
K.C is the most likely team that would move up for Tannehill..."Sorry bro" Cassell isn't the answer. And i almost panicked when i read about the Packers going TE, But i have them taking Chandler Jones you misread my friend. I have Houston taking Fleener.
 
at least you ended the idiocy of the packers taking a RB in your updated draft. There is out of the box and then there is no rational basis

 
'pantherclub said:
KC aint moving up for Tannerhill. Sorry bro
i do not see the packers spending a first round pick on a tight end ted thomson will find one working in a deli department somewhere and turn him into a supermegastar so sorry brohan not happening
K.C is the most likely team that would move up for Tannehill..."Sorry bro" Cassell isn't the answer. And i almost panicked when i read about the Packers going TE, But i have them taking Chandler Jones you misread my friend. I have Houston taking Fleener.
i was not saying that you had them taking a te i was just saying that it probably wont happen and they probably wont take a punter in the first round either just as a heads up always trying to help out a fellow brohan that is the swc way of the samuri
 
at least you ended the idiocy of the packers taking a RB in your updated draft. There is out of the box and then there is no rational basis
RB is still a huge need for the Packers....I don't get how that is idiotic it is a team need but you have to go BPA when your a team like the Packers. There is a lot of Center and Pass Rush depth in this draft compared to the RB class. That is why i have 3 RB's going in round 1.
 
Looking forward to seeing rounds 2 and 3 to put it all in perspective but I would be happy with Blackmon and Martin in the current state. I am not a Blackmon hater but I am a hater of taking him at 4. I flat out love Martin. While he's not the best in any category I think he is a more complete back than Miller or Wilson and I don't put him that far behind Richardson. Part of me really wants to stay they and make sure we get an elite talent but I would be happy with a haul of picks like this. If a scenario like this happened expect the Browns to move up again at some point. This would mean we had 15 picks in this draft. Instead of taking 15 rookies draft picks to camp I expect them to package some of these and get some of the guys in the 2-4 range that they covet. Lots of holes to fill and we have quite a bit of ammo to make it happen. :thumbup:

ETA: kudos to you for going out of the norm a bit and putting out a Mock with some creative thinking.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
at least you ended the idiocy of the packers taking a RB in your updated draft. There is out of the box and then there is no rational basis
RB is still a huge need for the Packers....I don't get how that is idiotic it is a team need but you have to go BPA when your a team like the Packers. There is a lot of Center and Pass Rush depth in this draft compared to the RB class. That is why i have 3 RB's going in round 1.
DL, a pass rushing LB and safety are much bigger needs than RB. The Packers already have one of the best offenses with a plug ins at RB. If the draft was weak in those areas then the bpa which very well could be a RB makes sense. However there is alot of value at the end of round 1 at the Packers positions of need that's why the RB picks earlier didn't make alot of sense.
 
Interesting, thanks for the effort. If the Patriots trade out of the first round, they will most likely demand a 2013 1st round pick, that's just how they roll.

 
at least you ended the idiocy of the packers taking a RB in your updated draft. There is out of the box and then there is no rational basis
RB is still a huge need for the Packers....I don't get how that is idiotic it is a team need but you have to go BPA when your a team like the Packers. There is a lot of Center and Pass Rush depth in this draft compared to the RB class. That is why i have 3 RB's going in round 1.
DL, a pass rushing LB and safety are much bigger needs than RB. The Packers already have one of the best offenses with a plug ins at RB. If the draft was weak in those areas then the bpa which very well could be a RB makes sense. However there is alot of value at the end of round 1 at the Packers positions of need that's why the RB picks earlier didn't make alot of sense.
:goodposting: Exactly. Only if Trent Richardson fell down the board might the Packers consider taking a RB (ala Aaron Rodgers). The only other way a RB would show up as BPA is if every team before them took only DE/DL/OLB/Safety. Since that is not going to happen, there will be plenty of defensive players who are better before any of the RB's.
 
at least you ended the idiocy of the packers taking a RB in your updated draft. There is out of the box and then there is no rational basis
RB is still a huge need for the Packers....I don't get how that is idiotic it is a team need but you have to go BPA when your a team like the Packers. There is a lot of Center and Pass Rush depth in this draft compared to the RB class. That is why i have 3 RB's going in round 1.
DL, a pass rushing LB and safety are much bigger needs than RB. The Packers already have one of the best offenses with a plug ins at RB. If the draft was weak in those areas then the bpa which very well could be a RB makes sense. However there is alot of value at the end of round 1 at the Packers positions of need that's why the RB picks earlier didn't make alot of sense.
:goodposting: Exactly. Only if Trent Richardson fell down the board might the Packers consider taking a RB (ala Aaron Rodgers). The only other way a RB would show up as BPA is if every team before them took only DE/DL/OLB/Safety. Since that is not going to happen, there will be plenty of defensive players who are better before any of the RB's.
My dream scenario involves the Pack getting Lamichael James in the 3rd round.
 
Yeah, always nice to see people go out on a limb. Don't see the Iggles going CB, and don't see the Brownies trading out of the 1.04 pick unless they are just overwhelmed. I firmly believe they will go Richardson, suck it up for another year with McCoy at QB, and then look at a deeper QB class next year if needed. Also, if Dre Kirkpatrick is still available at Detroit's pick, and they don't take it, I'm going to go all-Hulk on them... :hot:
I can see the Eagles going CB. They've been looking to move Samuel since last offseason. DRC didn't really inspire a ton of confidence, plus he's a FA after this year. They could be looking at next year with their pick. I would love to see them trade up for Claiborne, but more likely they'll stay where they are or move up slightly (say 10-12 range) and get Gilmore if anything. If not CB, they will probably go DT. Outside shot at Tannehill or Kuechly.
 
at least you ended the idiocy of the packers taking a RB in your updated draft. There is out of the box and then there is no rational basis
RB is still a huge need for the Packers....I don't get how that is idiotic it is a team need but you have to go BPA when your a team like the Packers. There is a lot of Center and Pass Rush depth in this draft compared to the RB class. That is why i have 3 RB's going in round 1.
DL, a pass rushing LB and safety are much bigger needs than RB. The Packers already have one of the best offenses with a plug ins at RB. If the draft was weak in those areas then the bpa which very well could be a RB makes sense. However there is alot of value at the end of round 1 at the Packers positions of need that's why the RB picks earlier didn't make alot of sense.
:goodposting: Exactly. Only if Trent Richardson fell down the board might the Packers consider taking a RB (ala Aaron Rodgers). The only other way a RB would show up as BPA is if every team before them took only DE/DL/OLB/Safety. Since that is not going to happen, there will be plenty of defensive players who are better before any of the RB's.
My dream scenario involves the Pack getting Lamichael James in the 3rd round.
I don't think James will be around in the 3rd round when they pick so they would have to trade up to get James or Pead which i think will be gone. Last year the Packers missed out on the top RB prospects that were said to "Fall" in the draft that didn't and reached on a project 3rd down RB in Alex Green. If i am the Packers i want a ground and pound game for the 4th quarter because i don't think i would want to get in a shoot out with the Pats or Saints to often. With that being said i could see them looking towards Chris Polk in round 2 as well, but once again they may have to move up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would love :wub: if Upshaw :wub: actually fell to the Stillers. Don't see it happening. :(
that draft is whack.
that draft is whack.
The real draft will also be whack, just in a different whackway.
I could see Upshaw falling out of the first round entirely...scouts have seemed to be hammering his pass rush ability and after watching a lot of film on him he really does struggle vs tackles by using bad technique and leverage. Most of his sacks have come from broken plays/vs TE's and RB protections. If he falls past the NE,GB,Houston teams i could see him going to the Colts in the 2nd round. And what the hell is wack? I don't know if that is good or bad anymore and if it is good or bad please enlighten me,because i do love opinions on the draft just don't care for the this sucks and no explanation. At least i know for a few months now that Packer fans have hated on that pick for awhile and i know and respect their very own opinion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have added my round 3 to the database....I am considering a 4th and 5th round, but we will see how much time i have to do it and yeah Streeter is a reach but he would be the perfect decoy for the Patriots offense to send a 6'4 guy that runs a 4.4 deep once in awhile.

 
This is the old mock someone moved it to a different location. The right mock is back to being displayed because i was kind of wondering why Randle or Mercilus were brought up. And the CB class is very deep and Jenkins may even slip to round 3. And as for Mercilus i really don't see him being a first round pick and the Giants OL is a mess so they need some help there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tampa getting Richardson, Jenkins, and David in the first three rounds is an ideal scenario from a need and talent standpoint. I would be ecstatic.

I'm just not sure how willing they'll be to take another troubled young man in the secondary with their recent problems concerning Talib and Tanard Jackson.

I honestly think Keuchly could be in play at #5 if Richardson is unavailable and they can't trade back. I haven't seen anyone mock him there, nor have I heard any chatter from One Buc Place about him. Mason Foster has recently been working out on the outside in mini camps. Tampa's current LB corps is atrocious. Regardless whether or not the pundits think Keuchly is worthy of the fifth overall pick, I still think he could be in play if Tampa sees him as the face of their defense for years to come.

If he becomes a great MLB nobody will care if Dominik reached a few spots to grab him.

 
Tampa getting Richardson, Jenkins, and David in the first three rounds is an ideal scenario from a need and talent standpoint. I would be ecstatic.

I'm just not sure how willing they'll be to take another troubled young man in the secondary with their recent problems concerning Talib and Tanard Jackson.

I honestly think Keuchly could be in play at #5 if Richardson is unavailable and they can't trade back. I haven't seen anyone mock him there, nor have I heard any chatter from One Buc Place about him. Mason Foster has recently been working out on the outside in mini camps. Tampa's current LB corps is atrocious. Regardless whether or not the pundits think Keuchly is worthy of the fifth overall pick, I still think he could be in play if Tampa sees him as the face of their defense for years to come.

If he becomes a great MLB nobody will care if Dominik reached a few spots to grab him.
I really don't see Kuechly as a reach at 5, I have watched him play for several years at Boston College and he's stood out for me from day one even when he was a Freshman splitting snaps. He was always a split second behind Herzlich getting to the ball and then starting getting to the ball before him. One NFL team is going to be lucky to have such a talented and humble LB.
 
Zero chance the Chargers take an OT in the first round. Zero.
No Bruce Irvin?
That is completely wrong one of the Chargers biggest needs is OT...And i know they have needs on the DL and pass rushers, but OLine seems to be a bigger need. No Bruce Irvin because his off the field issues and i just see too many talented OLB prospects ranked ahead of him to be in the top 100 picks. But i did think about him going to the Raiders in the 3rd round just because that is a reach they could pull off since they need pass rushers.
 
Tampa getting Richardson, Jenkins, and David in the first three rounds is an ideal scenario from a need and talent standpoint. I would be ecstatic.

I'm just not sure how willing they'll be to take another troubled young man in the secondary with their recent problems concerning Talib and Tanard Jackson.

I honestly think Keuchly could be in play at #5 if Richardson is unavailable and they can't trade back. I haven't seen anyone mock him there, nor have I heard any chatter from One Buc Place about him. Mason Foster has recently been working out on the outside in mini camps. Tampa's current LB corps is atrocious. Regardless whether or not the pundits think Keuchly is worthy of the fifth overall pick, I still think he could be in play if Tampa sees him as the face of their defense for years to come.

If he becomes a great MLB nobody will care if Dominik reached a few spots to grab him.
I really don't see Kuechly as a reach at 5, I have watched him play for several years at Boston College and he's stood out for me from day one even when he was a Freshman splitting snaps. He was always a split second behind Herzlich getting to the ball and then starting getting to the ball before him. One NFL team is going to be lucky to have such a talented and humble LB.
Agree 100%. I don't think anyone can really be considered a reach when you're getting the top rated player at the weakest position on your team. This Buc fan would welcome Keuchly with open arms.I've just found it interesting that nobody has mocked him to the Bucs at the 5 spot. Of course, ideally you'd like to trade back and grab him, but I honestly think he could be rated higher than Claiborne on Tampa's board. They signed Wright, Ronde is returning, and they expect Talib back as well. LB is a much greater need at this point.

I suspect he and Dominik covet Richardson, but Keuchly could be a nice consolation prize.

 
Here is my updated mock draft, I will be adding a 2nd and 3rd round within the next few days and this will be my last mock before the draft next week! Enjoy :banned:

Mock Draft

*Update* Round 2 and 3 have been added* - I do understand there are some reaches and certain players falling, but reaches and players dropping happen on draft day.
Nice that you are predicting some trades, those are always fun to see.There is close to a zero chance the Browns will take a TE that high.

You have them going WR, RB, QB, RT wwhihc addresses a bunch of offensive needs.

TE really isn't a big need.

I'd argue for another WR or some help on defense like David the nebraska LB that yuo have going immeditely afetr the Browns take Allen.

 
I have added my round 3 to the database....I am considering a 4th and 5th round, but we will see how much time i have to do it and yeah Streeter is a reach but he would be the perfect decoy for the Patriots offense to send a 6'4 guy that runs a 4.4 deep once in awhile.
i would really like to see rounds 4 and 5 added
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top