Updated Offer - Owner Now Offered Baldwin for Booker (1 Viewer)

[Helmet Head]

UPDATE:  The owner has now offered Baldwin for Booker.  Thoughts?

12 Team PPR Redraft League.  We start 2 WRs, 2 RBs, and 1 Flex (RB, WR, TE).  Current record is 4-5

I have been offered Diggs for Ware, but I would counter and ask for Baldwin.  

My current RBs are:

Demarco Murray, Devontae Booker, Spencer Ware, Isaiah Crowell, Charcandrick West, and Derrick Henry

My current WRs are:

A.J. Green, Terrelle Pryor, Dontrelle Inman, and Chris Hogan

I've typically starting Green and Pryor

Should I continue as is or make a trade?  I would want Baldwin, but if the owner will only do Diggs, would you even do that?

Thanks for the help.

HH

 

[Helmet Head]

Hoping to get some feedback before tonight's game.  If no trade, then I will keep Pryor in my lineup.  If I do a trade, I will replace him with Baldwin.

Any thoughts are appreciated.  Thanks!

HH

 

[Gally]

Who is James Baldwin?   Hahahaha.

I would not trade Ware for Diggs or Doug Baldwin.  He is a RB1 with no competition on touches on a team that uses him in the passing game and running game.  Your WR's are fine as a starting two as Pryor is a solid WR2.  Keep Ware.  I would offer up Booker or Crowell for one of those two though.

 

[Helmet Head]

Who is James Baldwin?   Hahahaha.

I would not trade Ware for Diggs or Doug Baldwin.  He is a RB1 with no competition on touches on a team that uses him in the passing game and running game.  Your WR's are fine as a starting two as Pryor is a solid WR2.  Keep Ware.  I would offer up Booker or Crowell for one of those two though.

Now that is funny.  Long day.  The other owner's name is James.  lol.  I know better.

Thanks for the response and feedback.

 

[Helmet Head]

The owner has now offered Baldwin for Booker.

Should I make this trade?  Your thoughts are welcomed and appreciated.

Thanks,

HH

 

[xBlazingSaddles]

Booker for Baldwin would be a much better deal for you than Ware for Baldwin.  That being said I still don't think I'd make the deal with your current roster.  If you trade away Booker than you're forced to start Crowell almost every week and he's someone you only want to start with great matchups for him and for Cleveland. It is nice that he's got 3+ receptions each of the last 2 games after doing nothing in that aspect of the game earlier in the season.  

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/751017-looking-for-trade-help/

 

[Gally]

Booker for Baldwin would be a much better deal for you than Ware for Baldwin.  That being said I still don't think I'd make the deal with your current roster.  If you trade away Booker than you're forced to start Crowell almost every week and he's someone you only want to start with great matchups for him and for Cleveland. It is nice that he's got 3+ receptions each of the last 2 games after doing nothing in that aspect of the game earlier in the season.  

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/751017-looking-for-trade-help/

I would disagree that making the trade forces you to start Crowell.  If you make the trade you start Ware & Murray at RB and put Baldwin in the Flex (with Pryor and Green at the WR spots).  I think Baldwin is superior to either Crowell or Booker in that spot.  I think that is an easy accept. 

 

[xBlazingSaddles]

I would disagree that making the trade forces you to start Crowell.  If you make the trade you start Ware & Murray at RB and put Baldwin in the Flex (with Pryor and Green at the WR spots).  I think Baldwin is superior to either Crowell or Booker in that spot.  I think that is an easy accept. 

I can see that working but I think Ware's ROS floor and ceiling are a good amount higher than Baldwin's or Diggs so I still wouldn't make the trade. 

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/751090-possible-trade/

 

[Gally]

I can see that working but I think Ware's ROS floor and ceiling are a good amount higher than Baldwin's or Diggs so I still wouldn't make the trade. 

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/751090-possible-trade/

True but the trade was changed so it was Booker for Baldwin....not Ware for Baldwin....You would start Murray/Ware/Green/Pryor/Baldwin which is a better lineup than putting Booker in place of Baldwin.  That is why I think the trade is a no brainer accept.

I am not sure why you are comparing Ware to Baldwin or Diggs.

 

[xBlazingSaddles]

Lol my bad, forgot booker was being traded now. Tough call. If booker ends up getting the most of the touches ROS then he has more upside than Baldwin, but if Bibbs starts getting 40% or more of the touches then Baldwin probably outscores Booker ROS.