What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Navy collisions stoke cyber threat concerns (1 Viewer)

Righetti

Footballguy
The Pentagon won’t yet say how the USS John S. McCain was rammed by an oil tanker near Singapore, but red flags are flying as the Navy’s decades-old reliance on electronic guidance systems increasing looks like another target of cyberattack.

The incident – the fourth involving a Seventh Fleet warship this year – occurred near the Strait of Malacca, a crowded 1.7-mile-wide waterway that connects the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea and accounts for roughly 25 percent of global shipping.

“When you are going through the Strait of Malacca, you can’t tell me that a Navy destroyer doesn’t have a full navigation team going with full lookouts on every wing and extra people on radar,” said Jeff Stutzman, chief intelligence officer at Wapack Labs, a New Boston, New Hampshire, cyber intelligence service.

“There’s something more than just human error going on because there would have been a lot of humans to be checks and balances,” said Stutzman, a former information warfare specialist 

Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. John Richardson, did not rule out cyber intrusion or sabotage as a cause of the fatal collision. “No indications right now ... but review will consider all possibilities,” Richardson said in a tweet on Monday.

On Jan. 31, a guided missile cruiser, the USS Antietam, ran aground off the coast of Japan. On May 9, another cruiser, USS Lake Champlain, was struck by a South Korean fishing vessel.

In the wee hours of June 17, a destroyer, the USS Fitzgerald, a $1.5 billion vessel bristling with electronics, collided with a container ship, resulting in the deaths of seven sailors. The commanding officer and two other officers were formally removed from duties.

“I don’t have proof, but you have to wonder if there were electronic issues,” Stutzman said.

Todd E. Humphreys, a professor at the University of Texas and expert in satellite navigation systems, echoed a similar concern: “Statistically, it looks very suspicious, doesn’t it?”

These irregularities are affecting the shipping industry too.

In a little noticed June 22 incident, someone manipulated GPS signals in the eastern part of the Black Sea, leaving some 20 ships with little situational awareness. Shipboard navigation equipment, which appeared to be working properly, reported the location of the vessels 20 miles inland, near an airport.

That was the first known instance of GPS “spoofing,” or misdirection.

Much more serious than jamming, spoofing interferes with location even as computer screens offer normal readouts. Everything looks normal – but it isn’t.

“We saw it done in, I would say, a really unsubtle way, a really ham-fisted way. It was probably a signal that came from the Russian mainland,” Humphreys said.

Such spoofing once required expensive equipment and deep software coding skills. But Humphreys said it can now be done with off-the-shelf gear and easily attainable software.

“Imagine the English Channel, one of the most highly trafficked shipping lanes in the world, and also subject to bad weather. Hundreds and hundreds of ships are going back and forth. It would be mayhem if the right team came in there and decided to do a spoofing attack,” Humphreys said.

The U.S. military uses encrypted signals for geolocation of vessels, rather than commercial GPS. Humphreys said there is no indication that faulty satellite communications were a culprit in the USS McCain accident.

Global shipping also was disrupted following a worldwide attack June 27 that hit hundreds of thousands of computers. Shipping giant A.P. Moller-Maersk was reduced to manual tracking of cargo amid the attack, and its chief executive Soren Skou this month announced losses of up to $300 million.

Most global trade occurs on the high seas, and the number of ocean-going ships has quadrupled in the past quarter century. Ships are also getting larger. The largest container ship now can carry more than 21,000 20-foot containers.

Autonomous ships operated by computers are on the near-term horizon. The world’s first crewless ship, an electric-powered vessel with capacity for 100 to 150 cargo containers, will begin a 37-mile route in southern Norway with limited crew next year, transitioning to full autonomy in 2020.

Most ships avoid collision through the use of a global protocol known as Automatic Identification System, or AIS. Beacons aboard ships transmit vessel name, cargo, course and speed, and readouts aboard ships display other vessels in the vicinity.

But the AIS system is known to be vulnerable.

“You can send an AIS beacon out and claim just about whatever you like. You can make a phantom ship appear,” Humphreys said.

It’s not just cargo carriers that rely on GPS and AIS beacons.

“Passenger shipping organizations and cruise lines … can be easily impacted,” said Eduardo E. Cabrera, chief cybersecurity officer at Trend Micro, a Tokyo-based cybersecurity firm.

Other factors can cause breeches on shipboard systems. Stutzman said crews rotate constantly, meaning shipboard log-on procedures are often simple and shared widely. Moreover, ship crews often download quantities of movies, books, and music while onshore to fight boredom while at sea, often linking to onboard networks and exposing them to viruses.

http://amp.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article168470432.html

 
The problem I see is our ships are sailing blind.  They are totally dependent upon what their GPS and radar equipment are telling them and have very limited visual tools to augment these systems.  Despite what you see in movies, our big navy ships lack good infra-red and visual cameras to see what is happening around them.  They really need sensors in the IR and Visual spectrum which can provide them with a panoramic view of what is around them instead of blind reliance on what the radars tell them.  I mean they can look out windows and have watch standers but it is highly inefficient and prone to miss things under night time or fog conditions. 

 
I think there might be something to this cyber warfare.  The amount of navy accidents seems to be unprecedented in modern times of peace 

 
Between how our Air Force and our Navy really are the core of our military advantage and might....this is more than a little troublesome. We'd better get this figured out fast.

 
Definitely a serious concern.  And the hacking didn't stop there, as the author's reference to those harrowing shipboard breeches indicates.  Electronic hacking of maritime navigation, and now poor fashion choice in seafaring pants?  Geez.  :ph34r:

 
Seems weird that this paragraph was buried and glossed over:

 The U.S. military uses encrypted signals for geolocation of vessels, rather than commercial GPS. Humphreys said there is no indication that faulty satellite communications were a culprit in the USS McCain accident.

Combined with people being removed from their post on the USS Fitzgerald, it seems highly unlikely that cyber warfare had anything to do with either of those collisions.

Seems like a scare article with not a whole lot of proof to back up any of their claims.

 
Seems weird that this paragraph was buried and glossed over:

Combined with people being removed from their post on the USS Fitzgerald, it seems highly unlikely that cyber warfare had anything to do with either of those collisions.

Seems like a scare article with not a whole lot of proof to back up any of their claims.
A lot of speculation that does not really match the facts.  Firing more officers is not the answer though.  Navy needs to look at systems and gaps in those systems. 

 
Do you need gps to see a ship 5x the size of the titanic?  

Guys at the helm are lazy and not doing their job. 

 
Do you need gps to see a ship 5x the size of the titanic?  

Guys at the helm are lazy and not doing their job. 
It's not that simple in that straight.  These are big ships with limited mobility there plus these ships don't just stop on a dime.  To put this in some perspective, that straight is just a tad wider the the Hudson in NYC and on heavy use day (which is probably mild use in Asia) it gets cramped there with ships waiting to be unloaded.  I can't imagine what happens with 2 way traffic of even larger ships all fighting for space.  

 
It's not that simple in that straight.  These are big ships with limited mobility there plus these ships don't just stop on a dime.  To put this in some perspective, that straight is just a tad wider the the Hudson in NYC and on heavy use day (which is probably mild use in Asia) it gets cramped there with ships waiting to be unloaded.  I can't imagine what happens with 2 way traffic of even larger ships all fighting for space.  
Agreed plus if our ships are relying mostly on radar for their vision and a hacker could hack into an ancient US radar system and make a vessel completely disappear from that radar screen, you could see how something like this could happen. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not that simple in that straight.  These are big ships with limited mobility there plus these ships don't just stop on a dime.  To put this in some perspective, that straight is just a tad wider the the Hudson in NYC and on heavy use day (which is probably mild use in Asia) it gets cramped there with ships waiting to be unloaded.  I can't imagine what happens with 2 way traffic of even larger ships all fighting for space.  
Ok, well don't let an amateur that isn't qualified to operate a SeaDoo run a billion dollar cruiser through a shipping lane.  

 
Agreed plus if our ships are relying mostly on radar for their vision and a hacker could hack into an ancient US radar system and make a vessel completely disappear from that radar screen, you could see how a hacker could make something like this happen. 
What are we talking about vanishing here?  They hit a giant tanker.  The only way that thing disappears is if it crosses the bermuda triangle.

 
What are we talking about vanishing here?  They hit a giant tanker.  The only way that thing disappears is if it crosses the bermuda triangle.
Maybe I did a poor job of making my point.  I'm not a naval expert so I'm talking out of my ### but I do understand how radar works and I also understand that radars can be jammed.  If the destroyer Captain was relying solely on radar to tell him if other vessels are around him and his radar was jammed from seeing the tanker until it was too late, this could possibly explain the collision to me.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe I did a poor job of making my point.  I'm not a naval expert so I'm talking out of my ### but I do understand how radar works and I also understand that radars can be jammed.  If the destroyer Captain was relying solely on radar to tell him if other vessels are around him and his radar was jammed from seeing the tanker until it was too late, this could possibly explain the collision to me.  
If it is being jammed, the ship would be aware of the jamming signal. 

 
The problem I see is our ships are sailing blind ...  I mean they can look out windows and have watch standers but it is highly inefficient and prone to miss things under night time or fog conditions. 
Sounds like an issue that drone technology can perhaps help with. Send out "eyes" in all directions.

 
If it is being jammed, the ship would be aware of the jamming signal. 
Right, but then what do they rely on?  GPS?  And if the GPS signal was being spoofed, how would they know if their attention is focused on finding out why the radar is being jammed?  I would assume they also have human lookouts but again this shouldn't have happened.   I don't know what the reason is but I suspect something more than human error is going on.  I just can't believe they weren't at already heightened awareness levels after the incident which just happened in June.

 
Right, but then what do they rely on?  GPS?  And if the GPS signal was being spoofed, how would they know if their attention is focused on finding out why the radar is being jammed?  I would assume they also have human lookouts but again this shouldn't have happened.   I don't know what the reason is but I suspect something more than human error is going on.  I just can't believe they weren't at already heightened awareness levels after the incident which just happened in June.
The article says they don't use GPS. They use their own encrypted signal for guidance. And they use the AIS system to track where other ships are.

I don't know exactly how the AIS system works or how it has been compromised in the past, but the article seems to indicate that it can be spoofed to create ghost ships. Which sucks, but isn't the same as making a ship disappear. 

 
It takes two vessels to have a collision.  It seems like it would be easier to spoof the unencrypted signal to the commercial ship to send it off course into the destroyer. :shrug:

 
It's not that simple in that straight.  These are big ships with limited mobility there plus these ships don't just stop on a dime.  To put this in some perspective, that straight is just a tad wider the the Hudson in NYC and on heavy use day (which is probably mild use in Asia) it gets cramped there with ships waiting to be unloaded.  I can't imagine what happens with 2 way traffic of even larger ships all fighting for space.  
http://campus.hesge.ch/commodity_trading/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Strait-of-Malacca-01_crop.jpg

 
The article says they don't use GPS. They use their own encrypted signal for guidance. And they use the AIS system to track where other ships are.

I don't know exactly how the AIS system works or how it has been compromised in the past, but the article seems to indicate that it can be spoofed to create ghost ships. Which sucks, but isn't the same as making a ship disappear. 
Right, however AIS does use GPS though.  Here's how AIS works per the US Coast Guard's site :

Each AIS system consists of one VHF transmitter, two VHF TDMA receivers, one VHF DSC receiver, and standard marine electronic communications links (IEC 61162/NMEA 0183) to shipboard display and sensor systems (AIS Schematic). Position and timing information is normally derived from an integral or external global navigation satellite system (e.g. GPS) receiver, including a medium frequency differential GNSS receiver for precise position in coastal and inland waters. Other information broadcast by the AIS, if available, is electronically obtained from shipboard equipment through standard marine data connections. Heading information and course and speed over ground would normally be provided by all AIS-equipped ships. Other information, such as rate of turn, angle of heel, pitch and roll, and destination and ETA could also be provided.

AIS normally works in an autonomous and continuous mode, regardless of whether it is operating in the open seas or coastal or inland areas. Transmissions use 9.6 kb GMSK FM modulation over 25 or 12.5 kHz channels using HDLC packet protocols. Although only one radio channel is necessary, each station transmits and receives over two radio channels to avoid interference problems, and to allow channels to be shifted without communications loss from other ships. The system provides for automatic contention resolution between itself and other stations, and communications integrity is maintained even in overload situations.

Each station determines its own transmission schedule (slot), based upon data link traffic history and knowledge of future actions by other stations. A position report from one AIS station fits into one of 2250 time slots established every 60 seconds. AIS stations continuously synchronize themselves to each other, to avoid overlap of slot transmissions. Slot selection by an AIS station is randomized within a defined interval, and tagged with a random timeout of between 0 and 8 frames. When a station changes its slot assignment, it pre-announces both the new location and the timeout for that location. In this way new stations, including those stations which suddenly come within radio range close to other vessels, will always be received by those vessels.

The required ship reporting capacity according to the IMO performance standard amounts to a minimum of 2000 time slots per minute, though the system provides 4500 time slots per minute. The SOTDMA broadcast mode allows the system to be overloaded by 400 to 500% through sharing of slots, and still provide nearly 100% throughput for ships closer than 8 to 10 NM to each other in a ship to ship mode. In the event of system overload, only targets further away will be subject to drop-out, in order to give preference to nearer targets that are a primary concern to ship operators. In practice, the capacity of the system is nearly unlimited, allowing for a great number of ships to be accommodated at the same time.

The system coverage range is similar to other VHF applications, essentially depending on the height of the antenna. Its propagation is slightly better than that of radar, due to the longer wavelength, so it’s possible to “see” around bends and behind islands if the land masses are not too high. A typical value to be expected at sea is nominally 20 nautical miles. With the help of repeater stations, the coverage for both ship and VTS stations can be improved considerably.

The system is backwards compatible with digital selective calling systems, allowing shore-based GMDSS systems to inexpensively establish AIS operating channels and identify and track AIS-equipped vessels, and is intended to fully replace existing DSC-based transponder systems.

 
Just heard on the radio that there was a steering failure reported immediately before the incident that they were working to fix at the time of the collision and that they had been having issues with steering off and on going into the incident.  

So maybe this time it was more of a maintenance issue.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top