I love the draft dominator. I've used it the last couple of years and have found it to be a great tool for preparing and conducting drafts. However, there are a couple of issues that I have with it.
Most significantly, it doesn't seem to do a very good job of taking into account position scarcity, which your real life human competition will do. What I'm mostly referring to is the tendency for Draft Dominator to value receivers just as much, if not more so, than running backs in PPR leagues.
I am noticing that if I plug in my standard projection, and then follow Draft Dominators advice on who I should take, I end up taking receivers much earlier than my opponents, and am left with weak running backs. Here is how DD ranks the top 15 players in PPR leagues:
1. Ladainian Tomlinson
2. Steven Jackson
3. Larry Johnson
4. Frank Gore
5. Brian Westbrook
6. Steve Smith
7. Torry Holt
8. Joseph Addai
9. Chad Johnson
10. Reggie Bush
11. Willie Parker
12. Reggie Wayne
13. Marvin Harrison
14. Peyton Manning
15. Larry Fitzgerald
Now, you'll notice here that these rankings are pretty far off from where most people would project these receivers to go, even in 1 PPR leagues, and pretty far off from how these players are likely to be actually drafted. You'll also notice that Shaun Alexander and Rudi Johnson aren't even on the list, but that's besides the point.
What I'm getting at is that I fear that if I rely on Draft Dominator to help be select which player has the most value at each position, and if my draft selection is the in the bottom half of the first round, I will end up with stud receivers in the first two rounds, but pretty weak running backs to round out my starting roster.
Have any of you guys noticed this tendency of DD overvaluing WR's, or otherwise potentially leading you astray if you're drafting from certain positions?
Now, I'm not necessarily saying that drafting two stud WR's in the first two rounds is necesarily a bad move, but we all know it's pretty darn risky.
Thoughts?
Most significantly, it doesn't seem to do a very good job of taking into account position scarcity, which your real life human competition will do. What I'm mostly referring to is the tendency for Draft Dominator to value receivers just as much, if not more so, than running backs in PPR leagues.
I am noticing that if I plug in my standard projection, and then follow Draft Dominators advice on who I should take, I end up taking receivers much earlier than my opponents, and am left with weak running backs. Here is how DD ranks the top 15 players in PPR leagues:
1. Ladainian Tomlinson
2. Steven Jackson
3. Larry Johnson
4. Frank Gore
5. Brian Westbrook
6. Steve Smith
7. Torry Holt
8. Joseph Addai
9. Chad Johnson
10. Reggie Bush
11. Willie Parker
12. Reggie Wayne
13. Marvin Harrison
14. Peyton Manning
15. Larry Fitzgerald
Now, you'll notice here that these rankings are pretty far off from where most people would project these receivers to go, even in 1 PPR leagues, and pretty far off from how these players are likely to be actually drafted. You'll also notice that Shaun Alexander and Rudi Johnson aren't even on the list, but that's besides the point.
What I'm getting at is that I fear that if I rely on Draft Dominator to help be select which player has the most value at each position, and if my draft selection is the in the bottom half of the first round, I will end up with stud receivers in the first two rounds, but pretty weak running backs to round out my starting roster.
Have any of you guys noticed this tendency of DD overvaluing WR's, or otherwise potentially leading you astray if you're drafting from certain positions?
Now, I'm not necessarily saying that drafting two stud WR's in the first two rounds is necesarily a bad move, but we all know it's pretty darn risky.
Thoughts?