Officer Pete Malloy
Footballguy
Ham: How long did you work a s pizza delivery guy?
This is pretty much like putting some change in a guy's cup at the bus stop, except this guy is on the Internet and getting national coverage.fantasycurse42 said:A gofundme page has raised $25k for this guy, we are such a stupid nation.
Some. There was a major lawsuit against Dominos in the 80s, because of a fatal accident that was blamed on a driver speeding to make the 30 minutes or less guarantee. To guard against liability, most chains will likely formally train and document that they told the drivers not to exceed posted speed limits - as policy. It would take an extra ten minutes tops to train a group of drivers on a policy of counting any cash, identifying any gap between the bill and received amount and formally confirming a tip. That practice would eliminate outlier events where the customer is to blame (like here) by absorbing the responsibility for clarity. I don't understand why that's so controversial a concept. I also don't get why I can't hold the opinion that a process could improve things without also acknowledging the fault and inappropriateness of the dealership.What sort of training do you think the average delivery driver gets? What do you think goes into that process or the hiring process of these fine chaps?Mr. Ham said:It's a simple policy that should always be followed, like when most retail establishments say, "out of ten" or "out of twenty" when handed a bill. It's not needlessly complicated, because it Ian complicated at all. Here's the amount, here's what you gave me. How much change?
Dealership people were horrible. But what I described eliminates the potential for trouble. Therefore, I don't really get the criticism of it.
If that's the policy and there was confusion, then retraining of the employee is in order.
Yeah, he likes it deep and raw.So just the tip is bothering you?He explained that they were all throwing in money and the guy took off without even asking if they wanted change. The assumption of a tip is what bothers me.Not to mention the whole handing him a $5 bill if they expected $7 in return.It was $7 and change. With probably 4 pizzas plus drinks, I think about $1-2 per pizza sounds about right for the tip.They were ###holes but the pizza guy made no attempt to give them change. He took $50 and left.Girl in the green hat radio interview
"I want that guy's job" DB guy interview - does himself no favors by doubling down on the dumb
According to an earlier post, someone from the dealership claimed that they'd sold cars as a result of this. I'd go for unlawful use of likeness in advertising and claim he's entitled to some of the profit they made.What kind of damages has the driver suffered?Mario Kart said:Some legal eagle would have to confirm here but what are the chances that the driver file a lawsuit against the dealership? He didn't give permission to be filmed or uploaded onto the Internet. He didn't ask to be put into this position by the dealership. If they blurred out his face, I can side with the dealership but they didn't do that.
What kind of damages could be sought if possible?
YepIf it was a $50 bill, attempt to make change. If the bill is 42.xx, and they give 2 $20 & 2 $5, I would assume its a tip. If you wanted change, 2 $20 and 1 $5, then you make the change. Overpaying with extra bills indicates tipping.They were ###holes but the pizza guy made no attempt to give them change. He took $50 and left.Girl in the green hat radio interview
"I want that guy's job" DB guy interview - does himself no favors by doubling down on the dumb
You would if your boss told you to go back.No way in hell would i have went back.... tell those humps they can come pick it up at the parlor.How'd that call go?
"Yeah, we ordered $42.xx worth of food and the driver left with a $7 tip. We need him back here right away with our change."
Because it doesn't improve things. You're cutting off your nose to spite your face. You are over complicating a simple event because of a very rare group of idiots. You'd be adding time to the process for no reason. 99.9999% of the time your policy would be unnecessary, awkward and downright silly and only adding valuable time to a delivery persons door duties when food is sitting around getting cold. This driver did everything you're proposing without making some sort of formal declaration. These people were such a-holes that they insisted the driver return to the store after the fact for a few dollars. These people were so stupid that they put the whole thing online for the world to see all by themselves. This incident does not dictate a change in policy. It deserves a shake of the head, a deep exhale and the realization that there are some people out there who are just dipsh-ts.I don't understand why that's so controversial a concept. I also don't get why I can't hold the opinion that a process could improve things without also acknowledging the fault and inappropriateness of the dealership.
This does not appear to be a chain driver, its a local mom and pop. So yes, I would assume there is some degree of training there to your point. What percentage of delivery is done by Dominos/Papa Johns I couldn't speculate. I would GUESSTIMATE its 50/50 chain/mom and pop, and I would further speculate mom and pops have a lot less of the ingrained structure you're seeking. Because the fundamental nature of this job is, its not a career and there is high turnover. Who wants to invest the time in this process. I know for a fact with dominos if you aspire to owning a franchise, you have to do defacto apprenticeship as a driver so you might see an uptick in quality.Some. There was a major lawsuit against Dominos in the 80s, because of a fatal accident that was blamed on a driver speeding to make the 30 minutes or less guarantee. To guard against liability, most chains will likely formally train and document that they told the drivers not to exceed posted speed limits - as policy. It would take an extra ten minutes tops to train a group of drivers on a policy of counting any cash, identifying any gap between the bill and received amount and formally confirming a tip. That practice would eliminate outlier events where the customer is to blame (like here) by absorbing the responsibility for clarity. I don't understand why that's so controversial a concept. I also don't get why I can't hold the opinion that a process could improve things without also acknowledging the fault and inappropriateness of the dealership.What sort of training do you think the average delivery driver gets? What do you think goes into that process or the hiring process of these fine chaps?Mr. Ham said:It's a simple policy that should always be followed, like when most retail establishments say, "out of ten" or "out of twenty" when handed a bill. It's not needlessly complicated, because it Ian complicated at all. Here's the amount, here's what you gave me. How much change?
Dealership people were horrible. But what I described eliminates the potential for trouble. Therefore, I don't really get the criticism of it.
If that's the policy and there was confusion, then retraining of the employee is in order.
At the risk of catching hell, I'll play devil's advocate with respect to the bolded. Just because they gave him two 20s and two 5s doesn't in and of itself make it clear that "any remainder" was a tip. If the bill was $42 and change, and they intended to tip him $4, it would make perfect sense to give him two 20s and two 5s and expect a few singles back. Of course, the onus is on the person paying to ask for a few bucks back, so I have no problem with the delivery guy's actions. At all. That being said, were I in the delivery guy's position, I probably would have confirmed that they didn't need anything back.And it would be different if they handed him three 20s or even two twenties and a ten, then there would be a grey area that may require someone to ask about a tip. However, the fact they paid more than the bill with the first five, makes it clear any remainder was a tip.
If you read that yelp review and thought that was real then you...According to an earlier post, someone from the dealership claimed that they'd sold cars as a result of this. I'd go for unlawful use of likeness in advertising and claim he's entitled to some of the profit they made.What kind of damages has the driver suffered?Mario Kart said:Some legal eagle would have to confirm here but what are the chances that the driver file a lawsuit against the dealership? He didn't give permission to be filmed or uploaded onto the Internet. He didn't ask to be put into this position by the dealership. If they blurred out his face, I can side with the dealership but they didn't do that.
What kind of damages could be sought if possible?
Really all I'm saying. Whether it's a policy or common sense... I've ordered delivery enough (hundreds of times) to have a perspective, and most drivers behave according to what I suggested. Granted, it's been awhile since I paid cash, but I used to. I recall the awkward gesture that drivers would make as they separated anything paid above the total and postured as if they were going to hand it back, before you tell them what if anything you want. I never once remember a driver pocketing the wad, turning heel and walking to the car. Granted, I was usually managing the process, but I recall working in an office where the payment process was less than organized, and it requires a bit more help and patience from the driver. This seems like a situation that would have benefited from a simple confirmation of the desired tip amount.I'm not blaming the driver, mind you. Just saying there are things he could have done better.At the risk of catching hell, I'll play devil's advocate with respect to the bolded. Just because they gave him two 20s and two 5s doesn't in and of itself make it clear that "any remainder" was a tip. If the bill was $42 and change, and they intended to tip him $4, it would make perfect sense to give him two 20s and two 5s and expect a few singles back. Of course, the onus is on the person paying to ask for a few bucks back, so I have no problem with the delivery guy's actions. At all. That being said, were I in the delivery guy's position, I probably would have confirmed that they didn't need anything back.And it would be different if they handed him three 20s or even two twenties and a ten, then there would be a grey area that may require someone to ask about a tip. However, the fact they paid more than the bill with the first five, makes it clear any remainder was a tip.
Yeah, that's what I thought.Ham: How long did you work a s pizza delivery guy?
Don't understand your point.Yeah, that's what I thought.Ham: How long did you work a s pizza delivery guy?
That I'm giving you?Punitive.What kind of damages has the driver suffered?Mario Kart said:Some legal eagle would have to confirm here but what are the chances that the driver file a lawsuit against the dealership? He didn't give permission to be filmed or uploaded onto the Internet. He didn't ask to be put into this position by the dealership. If they blurred out his face, I can side with the dealership but they didn't do that.
What kind of damages could be sought if possible?
You don't see me telling you how to do post production (or whatever) do you?Don't understand your point.Yeah, that's what I thought.Ham: How long did you work a s pizza delivery guy?
and oddly, you reemphasize his point.Don't understand your point.Yeah, that's what I thought.Ham: How long did you work a s pizza delivery guy?
Just need to look at the reviews before this happened. Place was the bottom of the barrel of used car lots. Doesn't surprise me these are the people working there.So the owner apologized and the Green Hat lady said he had just come back a few days ago. I might've given the owner the benefit of the doubt and said maybe he has a bunch of idiots working for him but him and his son are good people.
But Green Hat lady says on the radio that the owner told her she's fired but she's not really fired; she can come back next week after this blows over.
Not to mention the ignorant Finance Manager on the radio too. Leadership starts at the top and it appears the Owner is as dumb as his employees.
You know who else comes out looking bad in all of this? The lady dj from fun107 who participated in the interviews. What an annoying twit. I disliked her more than green hat and almost as much as finance guy.Girl in the green hat radio interview
"I want that guy's job" DB guy interview - does himself no favors by doubling down on the dumb