What Do You Think Mike Peterson's ADP Will Be? (1 Viewer)

[Islander]

Trying to gage Mike Peterson's value in 2007 here. The only 2007 rankings I have seen are Bloom's dynasty rankings on this site. Peterson is LB22. Of course this is dynasty, but if Bloom had to do redraft 2007 rankings today, I am assuming the rank would not be very different.

What do you think Peterson's ADP will be? Note that this is slightly different than asking where you would rank him. If you want to avoid injured guys, that's fine, but you know very well his ADP will not be rock bottom. And if you really like Peterson, you know his ADP won't be as high as your personal ranking due to the injury.

My prediction: since his ADP was LB5 this year, he will be a year older, coming off season-ending injury, I would say LB15 in 2007.

Opinions?

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Trying to gage Mike Peterson's value in 2007 here. The only 2007 rankings I have seen are Bloom's dynasty rankings on this site. Peterson is LB22. Of course this is dynasty, but if Bloom had to do redraft 2007 rankings today, I am assuming the rank would not be very different. What do you think Peterson's ADP will be? Note that this is slightly different than asking where you would rank him. If you want to avoid injured guys, that's fine, but you know very well his ADP will not be rock bottom. And if you really like Peterson, you know his ADP won't be as high as your personal ranking due to the injury.My prediction: since his ADP was LB5 this year, he will be a year older, coming off season-ending injury, I would say LB15 in 2007. Opinions?

Probably somewhere between 10-15, where we fall from the bonafide LB1s to the very very good LB2s.