Organized Chaos
Footballguy
Good for youi think i just grew a pocket protector by opening this...
Good for youi think i just grew a pocket protector by opening this...
I've got Roadrunner too, this blows.....Download: 2324 kbpsUpload: 360 kbps' date='Aug 9 2006, 09:00 PM' post='5304644']Last Resultownload Speed: 3477 kbps (434.6 KB/sec transfer rate)Upload Speed: 361 kbps (45.1 KB/sec transfer rate)Roadrunner
Decided to upgrade the DSL to the max package. I pay $10 more per month for....1327 Kbs Download431 Kbs UploadI think part of the problem is that the modem I'm using is fairly old. Guess I'll call AT&T tomorrow and request a new modem.Atlanta, GADownload: 1284 KbsUpload: 312 KbsDallas, TXDownload: 1286 KbsUpload: 315 KbsHey, at least DSL consistently sucks.
Checked and I'm getting 37/10 on TW Extreme (supposed to be 30/5).Just noticed last night Comcast is 39mbps. Too bad I only enjoy it 5 nights a month. Guess it is worth the extra $10/mo for BLAST!
So if I'm only getting 39 on blast does that mean I'm wasting my money? I don't know what the non-blast speed is.Comcast both at work and home:
Home with Blast! 90MBs Down, 5 MBs up
work 18 Down, 4 Up
PHone with ATT 4GLTE - varies wildly... but about 8-15 down, and 2-3 up
varies by area, but i'd say you need to call and say you aren't getting blast level speeds... before i got blast i was getting nearly 30 down and 5 up.So if I'm only getting 39 on blast does that mean I'm wasting my money? I don't know what the non-blast speed is.Comcast both at work and home:
Home with Blast! 90MBs Down, 5 MBs up
work 18 Down, 4 Up
PHone with ATT 4GLTE - varies wildly... but about 8-15 down, and 2-3 up
Whenever I run the tests on speakeasy and/or ookla, I get in the 40-50 Mbps range for download.My Internet speed test results are,
Download Speed: 18.89 Mbps
Upload Speed:0.795 Mbps.
I perform this test from ScanMySpeed.com
what did you have before? that's really not goodjust had uverse internet installed. went from crawling at 1.7/.42 to 12/1.41
i'm interested to see the difference. where will i notice it the most?
Interesting that a new guy with 7 posts would bump an ancient thread and be pimping an unreliable site few people use. speedtest.net or any of the other reputable sites are fine. 60M down/7M up.jhib said:Whenever I run the tests on speakeasy and/or ookla, I get in the 40-50 Mbps range for download.sahana said:My Internet speed test results are,
Download Speed: 18.89 Mbps
Upload Speed:0.795 Mbps.
I perform this test from ScanMySpeed.com
On this one, I got 90 on the first run, 50 on the second, and 203 on the third.
some ancient dsl crap. i have direct tv, so no cable internet. the fiber optics don't reach all the way to my house yet, so no fiosDentist said:what did you have before? that's really not goodDA RAIDERS said:just had uverse internet installed. went from crawling at 1.7/.42 to 12/1.41
i'm interested to see the difference. where will i notice it the most?
uverse has long been known as the worst internet of most of the choices... cable internet is much much faster
I'll say this for Comcast... they did some changes in the last 6 months that really upped my network speed.Download Speed: 1292 kbps (161.5 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 423 kbps (52.9 KB/sec transfer rate)
How the heck is everyone SOO much faster? I am on cable as well.
yeah.. i was jealous of the people in my city who had google fiber, but then comcast really upped the speed, hard.. i know the GIG is faster than nearly 100MB down, but with most of my devices on wifi the speed is limited by my wireless routers anyway.. and honestly 30-50 MB down is plenty and it's sickI'll say this for Comcast... they did some changes in the last 6 months that really upped my network speed.Download Speed: 1292 kbps (161.5 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 423 kbps (52.9 KB/sec transfer rate)
How the heck is everyone SOO much faster? I am on cable as well.
Buy your own and it will pay for itself in a year.TWC is supposedly mailing me a new cable modem soon to triple my speed.
Yup. That site certainly doesn't look legit, based on report from scamadviser.Interesting that a new guy with 7 posts would bump an ancient thread and be pimping an unreliable site few people use. speedtest.net or any of the other reputable sites are fine. 60M down/7M up.jhib said:Whenever I run the tests on speakeasy and/or ookla, I get in the 40-50 Mbps range for download.sahana said:My Internet speed test results are,
Download Speed: 18.89 Mbps
Upload Speed:0.795 Mbps.
I perform this test from ScanMySpeed.com
On this one, I got 90 on the first run, 50 on the second, and 203 on the third.
probably on the internet.DA RAIDERS said:just had uverse internet installed. went from crawling at 1.7/.42 to 12/1.41
i'm interested to see the difference. where will i notice it the most?
More attention from hot chicks.DA RAIDERS said:just had uverse internet installed. went from crawling at 1.7/.42 to 12/1.41
i'm interested to see the difference. where will i notice it the most?
Good catch guys. If you note this kind of behavior, be sure to use the Report button so we know.jhib said:Yup. That site certainly doesn't look legit, based on report from scamadviser.Interesting that a new guy with 7 posts would bump an ancient thread and be pimping an unreliable site few people use. speedtest.net or any of the other reputable sites are fine. 60M down/7M up.jhib said:Whenever I run the tests on speakeasy and/or ookla, I get in the 40-50 Mbps range for download.sahana said:My Internet speed test results are,
Download Speed: 18.89 Mbps
Upload Speed:0.795 Mbps.
I perform this test from ScanMySpeed.com
On this one, I got 90 on the first run, 50 on the second, and 203 on the third.
One of the guy's other posts recommends another sketchy site (some other version of whois.com).
Update 8 years laterTo take the speed test, choose the server nearest and furthest from your location.
http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/
My results are from my home connection
New York
Download Speed: 22697 kbps (2837.1 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 713 kbps (89.1 KB/sec transfer rate)
1-Yes-longer the signal has to travel the weaker it will getAnyone know anything about cable amps fixing pixilation? I've always had trouble with pixilation on one of my TVs on some channels. I thought for a long time it was the cable company not giving enough bandwidth to certain channels, esp since there were less watched channels. For example, it's hard to watch KC-Oakland right now on NFLN with all the pixilation, but UNC-Duke on ESPN is fine. The TV is on the third floor. The TVs on the first and second floor are fine. On the first floor where the cable comes in the house, there is Viewsonics 608c 8 port amplifier. I also checked and I have R6 cable and not R59, as someone suggested that might be the issue.
So my two questions:
Is it possibly/likely that the pixilation issue is due to the long run of cable, even with an amp, and not the cable company's bandwidth on certain channels?
If so, is it possibly to use a second amp where the cable comes out of the wall on the third floor, before it goes into the cable box?
TIA for any ideas/help.