Sorry, but I don't consider Michael Vick to be elite: history Pretty much agree with the others, and going into the final this week with Romo against Rodgers.This thread kind of tells me its worth picking an elite QB in the 1st or 2d round, as Brees, Brady, and Rodgers are generally getting to the final four/final two.
The only elite QB that really failed was Vick. That's a 75% succes rate for elite QBs making the final four.
In contrast, picking RBs or WRs in the first few rounds and waiting on a second tier QBs seems less likely to work out, at least this year (Romo, Stafford = success; Rivers, Schaub, Ryan, Big Ben, Sanchez = fail).
You would have to analyze a lot more closely to draw a firm conclusion but my sense is that it's worth grabbing an elite QB earlier more than loading up on elite RBs and WRs.
Create a poll with the top 14 scoring QBs, as well as an "Other" selectionTop 14 in ESPN standard scoringRodgers, Brees, Newton, Brady, Stafford, Romo, Manning, Ryan, Rivers, Sanchez, Roethlisberger, Fitzpatrick, Vick, Tebowwell I made a "poll" like someone suggested but it only allows 15 choicesthis thread is a good idea but kind of useless since you want to see stats from it and can't unless someone sits here for an hour adding up each responseMy main $$ league:RodgersBreesRomoBrady(Romo and Brees in the championship)