I realize the thread title said "teams that may surprise," but I can tell we are on a fantasy football message board. I think the importance of RB's in fantasy warps us into thinking they are more important to NFL teams than they really are. By my count, no less than 18 teams have been mentioned by posters that would consider taking a RB in the first two rounds in this thread. On average, 5 RB's are taken in the first two rounds every year, and if IIRC, only about 16 or 17 RB's are generally drafted every year in all rounds.
Some comments:
CAR - 2 years removed from drafting a 1st round RB and you're already going to draft another 1st rounder? (The only time I can think of this ever happening was when NO drafted Duece after Ricky's first two dissappointing years and Ditka's traded away all those Saints picks. Can anyone think of any other time?)
NE - same thing as CAR plus Sammy Morris back from injury?
SD - a team 1 game away from the superbowl is going to spend their 1st on a backup to the greatest RB in the league and to replace a former 6th rounder? And in a year when everyone admits RB is a very deep position?
CIN - the #10 offense and #27 defense in the league is going to spend a 1st when they have Rudi, Watson, Perry, & Irons?
GB - spent a 2nd on a RB last year and had Grant emerge?
To this I would counter:2007 1.07 Adrian Peterson (Chester Taylor)
2006 1.02 Reggie Bush (Deuce McAllister)
2006 1.27 DeAngelo Williams (Deshaun Foster)
2004 1.24 Steven Jackson (Marshall Faulk)
2004 1.26 Chris Perry (Rudi Johnson)
2003 1.23 Willis McGahee (Travis Henry)
2003 1.27 Larry Johnson (Priest Holmes)
One of the big problems I have with mock drafts is that they often operate under the assumption that teams will automatically use their pick to fill one of their most glaring needs. In reality, teams will often take the best player available even if he plays a position that looks like a minor need.
Did you really expect Steven Jackson to be a St. Louis Ram? Did you think the Bengals would take Chris Perry? Did you think the Chiefs would take Larry Johnson at a time when Priest Holmes was a Pro Bowler? Did you expect the Bills to take McGahee coming off a 1,400 rushing yard season by Travis Henry?
I can easily conceive of a scenario where a team like San Diego or Carolina drafts a back. Looking at the specific teams you mentioned:
CAR - Williams is totally untested as a starter. Some people have questioned his power and his inside running. Fox seems to prefer power backs over scat backs, as evidenced by his loyalty to Stephen Davis and Deshaun Foster. It's not difficult to imagine this team falling in love with Mendenhall or Stewart. Oh yeah...and this team has no depth whatsoever at RB with Foster out of town.
NE - Maroney and Morris. Here's another word that starts with "m": mediocre. That's what these guys are. If the team thinks Darren McFadden is an Adrian Peterson type impact player then would they really pass on him because they have Laurence Maroney? I don't think so.
SD - LaDainian Tomlinson was the best RB in the league over the last half decade. Next season he'll be a 29 year old RB with almost 3,000 career touches. He's coming off an injury-plagued playoffs and he has no backup to speak of. It's not hard to understand why the Chargers might consider a RB. A rookie might look useless right now, but he could be starting in another year or two. No one plays forever.
GB - Grant looks like a player, but so did Chris Brown. This is another team with a lot of question marks at the RB position. Do they have some talented guys? Sure. Do they have a surefire 300 carry RB? Not really. If Stewart is there in the late first round and they have him graded as a top 10 player in the draft, who knows what will happen?
Bottom line is that the draft almost never works out the way we envision it. So while I agree that not every team with a possible need at RB will use a top 60 pick on a runner, I think it's highly likely that some of the top RB prospects in this class will land in unexpected situations. It happens every year.