What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Whatcha readin now? (book, books, reading, read) (8 Viewers)

D_House said:
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.

No Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthy was a real fast read since I watched the movie a couple times and the movie is very faithful to the book. I must say I enjoy McCarthy a lot - he writes not only beautiful prose, but very efficient. He can pack a lot of emotional punch with little dialog. The Coens captured that really well in the film, and this is one case where I think the film is equal to the book.
recently became a big fan of phillip **** (i read do androids dream of electric sheep a long time ago, but forgot much of it)... the three stigmata of palmer eldritch was probably the most mind blowing sci fi i have ever read... got the american library edition (four novels - with three novels discussed here plus ubik... i have to finish MITHC & ubik... also have the sequel, five novels sitting on my bookshelf)...mentioned earlier, moon is a harsh mistress is imo definitely heinlein's best (i must have read 20-30 novels by him)... that is saying a lot, because heinlein is arguably the greatest sci fi writer of all time...

more recently, i like the cyberpunk genre...

neuromancer - gibson

snow crash, diamond age & cryptonomicon by stephenson

altered carbon (& rest of takeshi kovacs trilogy) by morgan

also, greg egan has some interesting ideas, better conceptually than in terms of his characterization, plotting & as a pure writer, in the thematically similar permutation city & diaspora (may have influenced morgan, though imo morgan a far better overall writer, in terms of building vast, believable, internally self-consistent WORLDS, societies, cultures, ala, for instance, brave new world by aldous huxley)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Broncoholic said:
I'll add that after reading that book I have no interest in climbing a mountain over 20k.
Did you before?
I love climbing up the 14ers here in Colorado, and have always been intrigued by that people that climb the really big mountains. There's always that wonder if I could summit a McKinley. Krackaur's descriptions of the hardships involved with high altitude climbing really makes one think.
 
I have seen Neuromancer and Cryptonomicon metioned a lot around here. Would these be enjoyable to someone not really into computers and technology?

And I just love Bob Magaw's stream of consciousness posts.

 
Broncoholic said:
anborn said:
just finished into thin air by krackaur... for those who had recommended it in this thread, thanks... solid book for anyone who likes mountaineering, climbing, or enjoys great adventure tragedy.
Funny, I just finished it last night myself, and came to post.The part with Rob Hall's radio calls to his wife were heartbreaking. I'll add that after reading that book I have no interest in climbing a mountain over 20k.
I actually had the opposite reaction. That book made me respect the mountain more than ever, which in turn makes me more interested in climbing it.Of course, the fact that I am not a climber and have a wife that has officially ruled out any dangerous hobbies for me makes it a moot point.
 
I have seen Neuromancer and Cryptonomicon metioned a lot around here. Would these be enjoyable to someone not really into computers and technology?And I just love Bob Magaw's stream of consciousness posts.
Shuke I've almost universally loved the books you've mentioned here - I think we have similar tastes. Can't speak for Neuromancer, but Cryptonomicon is one of my all-timers and I'm a complete user when it comes to tech. The cyber-punk stuff is easy enough to wade through and even comprehend, and the plot(s) is/are just fantastic. Highly recommend it.
 
shuke said:
I have seen Neuromancer and Cryptonomicon metioned a lot around here. Would these be enjoyable to someone not really into computers and technology?And I just love Bob Magaw's stream of consciousness posts.
thanx, shuke...we're definitely kindred spirits in terms of our appreciation for all things lynchian... :bag:neuromancer imo can absolutely be appreciated on its own merits without needing a PHD in computers from cal tech... it was probably THE seminal work in the cyberpunk genre (though you could say some of the already discussed works by sci fi luminaries heinlein in moon is a harsh mistress, with a central character being a lunar computer that convincingly becomes sentient, and phillip ****, with do androids dream of electric sheep, anticipated it & were loose precursors), and his early imaginings, vision & articulation of a global internet-like virtual reality that could be neurologically jacked into did have a profound influence on the likes of MIT artificial intelligence guru/legend marvin minsky, among many others... but in terms of the narrative vehicle, it has more in common with a raymond chandler hard boiled detective novel or film noir... think of a confluence of the futuristic world & sensibilities of the wachowski bros. matrix trilogy (they MUST have read gibson), with a philip marlowe-like detective set loose & unleashed inside it... gibson handles pacing like nobody's business (among the most relentlessly paced novels i've ever experienced), it reads like an out of control freight train... once you get going, very hard to put down...as to stephenson, personally i would start with snow crash & diamond age, though cryptonomicon is my favorite (just maybe not the best place to start, if dipping your toes into the genre)...scooby gang is adamant that the so called baroque cycle is his best work... for myself, coming from a sci fi background, i prefer the earlier cyberpunk works... i like history, too (baroque cycle historical novels), but i miss stephenson's powerful forward directed imagination in his sci fi genre works, & i also miss his brilliant & wickedly sardonic & droll wit... (admittedly i have never gotten very far into the baroque trilogy, started 2-3 times but keep putting down, but at least in the beginning, it is grimly serious)...cryptonomicon for one thing is huge (something like 1,100 pages?) & is not exactly cyberpunk... it is also historical fiction, but much more recent... it actually has two intertwined timelines & sets of family-related characters that intersect... like every stephenson novel i've read, it is an amazing, mind-expanding & interdisciplinary tour-de-force, that combines cryptography, WW II history, an undersea optical fiber telecom cable laying operation, a cutting edge data "crypt"/haven internet business startup, nazi war gold... its not exactly a prerequisite to have at least some passing knowledge & interest in WW II history & cryptography, but it probably helps... the broader plot can be appreciated on its own merits, & as i think may have been alluded to above, you can skip the crypto parts if they become too dense or tedious... among his cyberpunk works (& again, this is only marginally or tangentially cyberpunk, that would be the contemporary setting half, with the other half set in WW II and being more historical fiction), i would say this is definitely his most mature work & satisfying if you have the patience to make it to the payoff at the end... the way he complexly but deftly interweaves the characters & timelines is astounding and maybe the best narrative structure of its kind i've ever experienced (especially as he builds towards the climax)...it might imo be better to start with the shorter & less demanding snow crash & diamond age (not that they are for dummies, exactly :D )... snow crash is the most like neuromancer, ostensibly about virtual reality (an even hotter topic in the 90s)... but in a typically, characteristic fashion, it is very wide-ranging & interdisciplinary in conception & scope, improbably bringing together strands from linguistics, neurology, babylonian/assyrian mythology... not sure what that sounds like, but i could see how that might sound kind of hokey, but he pulls it off imo... it is set in a near future/quasi-present world which i could best describe as "balkanized", where the US has become splintered & fragmented (not sure if it is stated, but i don't think it is so much in the wake of a nuclear as an economic/social/cultural holocaust)... imo, the beginning IS a bit hokey, as one of the characters is a messenger that travels by "pooning" (as in harpooning) unsuspecting/unwilling cars with a futuristic rollerskates & magnetic lasso-like get up, but it isn't essential to the plot (part of the atmosphere & tone), & it quickly gets going... the villain is a larger than life character named raven, a hulking aleutian islander that has a nuclear bomb strapped to a motorcycle sidecar, and throws a devastating, glass-like spear that is only a molecule thick at the point or tip... maybe this is too much detail, it is much more coherent than it may sound based on my description, but i wanted to include enough detail to pique interest without revealing spoilers... diamond age ostensibly about nanotechnology, set in the slightly further future... i like it better than snow crash & find it a more mature work, but slightly less so in execution than crypto... it is about a futuristic, highly interactive & cutting edge (even for the time - it is a prototype) book of instruction that an engineer has been commisioned to make by a high level executive (in this future, stephenson employs definite echoes that hark back to victorian-era themes & social stratification), which he does, but illegally duplicates for his daughter (i think)... without divulging plot details, it accidentally/unintentionally falls into the hands of a commoner & underpriviliged young girl... what happens from there i found compelling to watch unfold... the heroine becomes profoundly transformed & empowered to effect unexpected societal/cultural changes, in a simultaneously improbable/believable fashion... HIGHLY recommended... all of these works are self contained, so based on whatever descriptions may have piqued your interest more (if any? :) ), there is no reason you couldn't read them in any order you want... they don't presuppose previous foundational knowledge, in the sense of learning math, for instance...read all these 2-3 times and not close to tiring of them... guessing i'll read them again in the future (i tend to read favorite books multiple times, interspersed with new stuff, rather than read ALL new stuff just because it is new, because playing the percentages, most new stuff almost by definition highly unlikely to be as good as the stuff at my personal apex)...heinlein for many years was my favorite sci fi author... i still have immense respect for him, & he is still & probably always will be at/near the top (especially his best work, like moon is a harsh mistress, time enough for love, stranger in a strange land, etc), but i have to say in recent years i think stephenson has surpassed him as my personal favorite... probably because he is as or nearly as brilliant in his hard science descriptive powers, it is more contemporary (which probably sounds funny, since heinlein certainly wrote about the future... what i mean by that is stephenson had the benefit of still being alive now, & having the opportunity to be informed by & incorporate into his writing, later, even more cutting edge science), and his far more ascerbic sense of humor, witheringly impaling whatever he trains his societal/cultural lens/sensibilities on (closing with a yogi berra-esque worthy metaphor-mixing salad/collage)...HOT ROD YOUR HEAD WITH CYBERPUNK!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I finished State of Fear by Michael Crichton last night. Terrible. Setting the science and his agenda aside, the story was just brutal and there was absolutely nothing compelling to it at all. One of the worst books in the genre I've ever read, and by far Crichton's worst book. I'll probably go ahead and read Next just to finish out his catalog, but I can't say that I'm really looking forward to it.

 
beer 30 said:
Descending From The Clouds: A Memoir of Combat in the 505 Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82d Airborne Division by Stephen Wurst

Wurst, a rifleman, spent the most of World War II in the European Theater of Operations as a squad leader or platoon sergeant in Company F, 505. He made three of the four regimental combat jumps, dropping into Italy, Normandy, and Holland. Highlights include his baptism of fire in Italy during the Battle of Arnone; the jump on D-Day and the liberation of Ste. Mère Eglise (for which he was awarded a Purple Heart); a grueling month of combat in the hedgerows of Normandy (a second Purple Heart); the ferocious battle with the SS for the highway bridge at Nijmegen, Holland (Silver Star); and survival in the Ardennes, where he found himself as point man on his twentieth birthday, in a long, bitter march toward the shoulder of the Bulge.

Wurst's narrative, set against a carefully researched historical background, offers a unique view of the heat of battle as experienced by a noncommissioned officer in the 82nd Airborne Division. Initial chapters chronicle his training before mobilization, when he lied about his age (15) to the National Guard in Erie, Pennsylvania, and his later experience in a heavy weapons company of the 112th Infantry Regiment, 28th Infantry Division. In 1941, Wurst was on a truck returning from First Army maneuvers in the Carolinas to Indiantown Gap Military Reservation when he heard the news of the attack at Pearl Harbor. He recounts life at Camps Livingston and Beauregard in Louisiana, and at the newly formed Parachute School at Fort Benning, Georgia, where he was stationed in the infamous "Frying Pan" area.

Descending from the Clouds portrays the passage from innocence to experience. Wurst begins as a 135-pound kid marching down his hometown streets in the National Guard, wearing the remnants of a World War I uniform and pulling by hand a water-cooled .30-caliber machine-gun mounted on a wooden cart. Five years later, he is a hardened platoon sergeant, leading his troopers through the frozen killing fields of "Death Valley" in Germany's Huertgen Forest.

His story is the story of the coming of age of the American military: fewer than twenty men per company who started with the 505 in the Frying Pan returned home .
:kicksrock: I'll check this out. I just finished a book recently that concentrated heavily on a few men from the 505th 82nd, including Sgt. Jesse Adams and the very famous CG "Slim" Jim Gavin.

 
I finished State of Fear by Michael Crichton last night. Terrible. Setting the science and his agenda aside, the story was just brutal and there was absolutely nothing compelling to it at all. One of the worst books in the genre I've ever read, and by far Crichton's worst book. I'll probably go ahead and read Next just to finish out his catalog, but I can't say that I'm really looking forward to it.
Next is better, but not by very much IMO. State Of Fear was probably his worst one. Perhaps Timeline or Airframe were worse, but it's a close call. I think Crichton's problem was that he set the bar so high so early in his career. Then he tried to churn out a novel every two years or so and they never quite reached the earlier standard he had set.
 
I just finished these books. I haven't read through this thread and these aren't new books, so forgive me if these are repeats, but these are really good books:

River of Doubt by Candice Millard. This is the true story of Teddy Roosevelt's descent down an uncharted river in South America.

The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafón. This is a worldwide best selling book originally written in Spanish and published in 2001. It was published in English in 2004. A prequel to this book was just written by the author and published in Spanish and is yet to be published in English. This is a mystery about a boy trying to uncover facts about the author of a book that he read as a child.

 
The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafón. This is a worldwide best selling book originally written in Spanish and published in 2001. It was published in English in 2004. A prequel to this book was just written by the author and published in Spanish and is yet to be published in English. This is a mystery about a boy trying to uncover facts about the author of a book that he read as a child.
Great book. Fermin is an all-time great character.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
scooby gang is adamant that the so called baroque cycle is his best work... for myself, coming from a sci fi background, i prefer the earlier cyberpunk works... i like history, too (baroque cycle historical novels), but i miss stephenson's powerful forward directed imagination in his sci fi genre works, & i also miss his brilliant & wickedly sardonic & droll wit... (admittedly i have never gotten very far into the baroque trilogy, started 2-3 times but keep putting down, but at least in the beginning, it is grimly serious)...
And he's right. Top 10 book for me.The Baroque Cycle also has some of the funniest moments in all of Stephenson's work. Half-Cocked Jack is one of the best characters in literature ever.

 
How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=s...s=how+we+decide

Non fictional account of neuroscience brought to life with examples that include Tom Brady throwing a pass in the Superbowl, how Parkinson's patients become compulsive gamblers, and more.

I'm only a couple chapters in but I'm really enjoying this. It's remarkably light reading with lots of stories intermixed with just enough wonky science to make you feel smart.

 
How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=s...s=how+we+decide

Non fictional account of neuroscience brought to life with examples that include Tom Brady throwing a pass in the Superbowl, how Parkinson's patients become compulsive gamblers, and more.

I'm only a couple chapters in but I'm really enjoying this. It's remarkably light reading with lots of stories intermixed with just enough wonky science to make you feel smart.
If you like this style then I'd recommend Carl Elliott's Better Than Well.
 
One book I did recently finish is White Noise by Delilo, which I liked quite a bit.
That's one of my favorite American novels. I love how Delillo refuses to give you a plot for the first 3/4ths of the book, and even ominously announces that "all plots lead deathward," then he throws a shtick detective-mystery plot at you in one segment at the back.

Right now I'm about 2/3rds of the way through Mark Z. Danielewsk's House of Leaves. It's much better than I anticipated. You always go into an overtly "experimental" book expecting way too much gimmicky nonsense, but Danielewski successful transcends half his gimmick with really good storytelling. The other half of his gimmicks simply WORK, and work well. At one point the characters enter a labyrinth, and Danielewski fractures the narrative with multiple footnotes within footnotes within footnotes, some reading sideways, some reading upside down, other reading backwards (I had to use a mirror to read the effing book).....all to the point that you literally become "lost" in the text and stop and wonder, "Holy crap, where the hell was I again?"--- just as if you'd gotten lost in a labyrinth.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One book I did recently finish is White Noise by Delilo, which I liked quite a bit.
That's one of my favorite American novels. I love how Delillo refuses to give you a plot for the first 3/4ths of the book, and even ominously announces that "all plots lead deathward," then he throws a shtick detective-mystery plot at you in one segment at the back.

Right now I'm about 2/3rds of the way through Mark Z. Danielewsk's House of Leaves. It's much better than I anticipated. You always go into an overtly "experimental" book expecting way too much gimmicky nonsense, but Danielewski successful transcends half his gimmick with really good storytelling. The other half of his gimmicks simply WORK, and work well. At one point the characters enter a labyrinth, and Danielewski fractures the narrative with multiple footnotes within footnotes within footnotes, some reading sideways, some reading upside down, other reading backwards (I had to use a mirror to read the effing book).....all to the point that you literally become "lost" in the text and stop and wonder, "Holy crap, where the hell was I again?"--- just as if you'd gotten lost in a labyrinth.
Fixed.
 
Just finished The Sparrow by Maria Doria Russell. If you liked "Life of Pi" or enjoy looking at religion in a new way or just like good sci-fi...try this one out. It's a story about a group that made first contact on a new planet in the not too distant future. The build-up is a little long and the "pay-off" is fairly obvious...but the questions it hits and the philosophy of "God's Will" is very interesting. Not an all-time great here, but I'd certainly recommend it to somebody who liked Pi or read "The Shack". It's an easy, quick read...and I don't think you'll be disappointed.
Thanks for the heads up on this book! Really enjoyed it and it's sequel Children of God. Found the weaving of sci-fi with religion and the loss of faith very compelling in these books. Currently reading Soon I Will Be Invincible by Austin Grossman. A novel about superheroes and a super villian they're fighting. Interesting story but the meat comes from the super villian narrative. The super hero side has been falling pretty flat, although it does have it's moments.

Won't be confused for great literature, but's a quick read and I'd recommend it to anyone with a passing interest in the superhero genre.

 
One book I did recently finish is White Noise by Delilo, which I liked quite a bit.
That's one of my favorite American novels. I love how Delillo refuses to give you a plot for the first 3/4ths of the book, and even ominously announces that "all plots lead deathward," then he throws a shtick detective-mystery plot at you in one segment at the back.

Right now I'm about 2/3rds of the way through Mark Z. Danielewsk's House of Leaves. It's much better than I anticipated. You always go into an overtly "experimental" book expecting way too much gimmicky nonsense, but Danielewski successful transcends half his gimmick with really good storytelling. The other half of his gimmicks simply WORK, and work well. At one point the characters enter a labyrinth, and Danielewski fractures the narrative with multiple footnotes within footnotes within footnotes, some reading sideways, some reading upside down, other reading backwards (I had to use a mirror to read the effing book).....all to the point that you literally become "lost" in the text and stop and wonder, "Holy crap, where the hell was I again?"--- just as if you'd gotten lost in a labyrinth.
Fixed.
:goodposting: LOVE this book.

Stay far, far, far away from Only Revolutions though. Terrible.

 
Picked up a classic yesterday and just couldnt put it down.

A Walk Across America - Peter Jenkins

Twenty-five years ago, a disillusioned young man set out on a walk across America. This is the book he wrote about that journey -- a classic account of the reawakening of his faith in himself and his country.

"I started out searching for myself and my country," Peter Jenkins writes, "and found both." In this timeless classic, Jenkins describes how disillusionment with society in the 1970s drove him out onto the road on a walk across America. His experiences remain as sharp and telling today as they were twenty-five years ago -- from the timeless secrets of life, learned from a mountain-dwelling hermit, to the stir he caused by staying with a black family in North Carolina, to his hours of intense labor in Southern mills. Many, many miles later, he learned lessons about his country and himself that resonate to this day -- and will inspire a new generation to get out, hit the road and explore.
 
Reading three books right now, all that I've read before, but felt like reading again:

Hemingway - A Farewell to Arms

Gabriel Garcia Marquez - 100 Years of Solitude

Ralph Ellison - Invisible Man (haven't read this one for 8 years, so I'm looking forward to it)

 
Reading the new book by one of my favorite authors Christopher Moore.

Fool

I'm reading it on the new, free Kindle iphone app.

If you have never read him before I suggest picking up

Lamb

and

Fluke

all of his are great, but those are my two favorite. One of the few authors that can litterally make me lol while reading.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading three books right now, all that I've read before, but felt like reading again:

Gabriel Garcia Marquez - 100 Years of Solitude
Have you read Love in the Time of Cholera yet? It's damn good. Not as good as 100 years, but close.
Ralph Ellison - Invisible Man (haven't read this one for 8 years, so I'm looking forward to it)
One of the top 5 American novels, ever. It took him 8 years to write it, and if you ever get a chance to see his notes, you'll know why. Everything is symbolically mapped....to the point of inanity. Half the symbols he wanted to communicate get lost - thankfully too, or else this could have been a wretched novel. It's as if the better part of him (the part that loved storytelling) constantly saved him from producing a crappy self-conscious narrative. It's also no wonder he never produced another novel (and the partial one published after his death is mediocre at best).

What a weird, weird writer. He was brilliant, but clearly more comfortable writing essays than fiction.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading three books right now, all that I've read before, but felt like reading again:

Gabriel Garcia Marquez - 100 Years of Solitude
Have you read Love in the Time of Cholera yet? It's damn good. Not as good as 100 years, but close.
Ralph Ellison - Invisible Man (haven't read this one for 8 years, so I'm looking forward to it)
One of the top 5 American novels, ever. It took him 8 years to write it, and if you ever get a chance to see his notes, you'll know why. Everything is symbolically mapped....to the point of inanity. Half the symbols he wanted to communicate get lost - thankfully too, or else this could have been a wretched novel. It's as if the better part of him (the part that loved storytelling) constantly saved him from producing a crappy self-conscious narrative. It's also no wonder he never produced another novel (and the partial one published after his death is mediocre at best).

What a weird, weird writer. He was brilliant, but clearly more comfortable writing essays than fiction.
Nope have not read Love in the Time of Cholera, but have been meaning to pick it up forever. I always seem to forget when I'm at the bookstore. And I agree wholeheartedly about Invisible Man. It is truly a masterpiece. I last read it at the age of 17, so I'm hoping it will be even better this second time around.

 
Just finished Moscow-Petushki Moscow-Petushki by Venedikt Erofeev.

Pretty funny book about a russian guy who gets drunk on a train ride to Petushki. During his trip he talks a lot about alcohol, politics and society in the Soviet Union.

 
Watch You Bleed: The Saga of Guns N' Roses by Stephen Davis

Read this and listen to Appetite for Destruction & Live Like a Suicide. Axl is truly ####ed up, amazing any of these guys are still alive. Duff McKagan took $50k from his Appetite royalties and gave them to a friend to invest in a couple of start ups that were all the rave in Seattle. . .Microsoft and Starbucks. Turned into about $15 million according to the book.

 
Just finished The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein.

Meh. The only interesting character in the story was Mike, the self-aware supercomputer. Most of the novel was taken up by long winded descriptions of subversive tactics involving the lunar colony "Loonies" who are determined to declare their independence from Earth. As for the other main characters, the callousness they displayed in killing earthlings erased any warmth or sympathetic feelings for their situation.

After reading reviews about the book I was expecting a lot more. Even the Libertarian themes that were supposed to be prevalent in the story were half hearted.

 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
 
Just finished Man's Search For Meaning....amazing book. Very inspring and can see it being a great influential book on a lot of people.
I'm just finishing this up too. Excellent book. There are plenty of books on the topic, but this one is without a doubt the easiest breakdown of the existential vacuum to digest. Highly applicable to everyone, but whenever I try to explain it to my friends I just get blank looks.
 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.

No Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthy was a real fast read since I watched the movie a couple times and the movie is very faithful to the book. I must say I enjoy McCarthy a lot - he writes not only beautiful prose, but very efficient. He can pack a lot of emotional punch with little dialog. The Coens captured that really well in the film, and this is one case where I think the film is equal to the book.
recently became a big fan of phillip **** (i read do androids dream of electric sheep a long time ago, but forgot much of it)... the three stigmata of palmer eldritch was probably the most mind blowing sci fi i have ever read... got the american library edition (four novels - with three novels discussed here plus ubik... i have to finish MITHC & ubik... also have the sequel, five novels sitting on my bookshelf)...
I have this same volume by ****. Weirdly, Three Stigmata was my least favorite of the four by far. I ranked them1. Man in the High Castle

(gap)

2. Ubik

3. Androids

(gap)

4. Stigmata

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading the new book by one of my favorite authors Christopher Moore.

Fool

I'm reading it on the new, free Kindle iphone app.

If you have never read him before I suggest picking up

Lamb

and

Fluke

all of his are great, but those are my two favorite. One of the few authors that can litterally make me lol while reading.
Big fan of Christopher Moore and I've read all of his books. Fool is good so far. I don't think Lamb is a good entry point though. I'd suggest "Lust Lizard of Melancholy Cove" instead. I think Lamb works better if you already get his sense of humor.
 
Finished The Book of the Dead by Preston and Child last night, book seven in the Pendergast series. With the exception of Still Life With Crows, every book in the series is really, really good.

While I wasn't sold on Pendergast as a character in the early ones, the last three books (unofficially the Diogenes trilogy) cemented him as one of my favorites (along with Jack Reacher).

My only complaints are that Nora and Margo are basically the same character, and that Constance is terrible.

 
igbomb said:
Finished The Book of the Dead by Preston and Child last night, book seven in the Pendergast series. With the exception of Still Life With Crows, every book in the series is really, really good.While I wasn't sold on Pendergast as a character in the early ones, the last three books (unofficially the Diogenes trilogy) cemented him as one of my favorites (along with Jack Reacher).My only complaints are that Nora and Margo are basically the same character, and that Constance is terrible.
:rofl: Margo and Nora ARE the same, you're right. I constantly get them confused. Constance doesn't bother me so much, although it is kind of a "what?" character.Noticed the other day that another Pendergast is due out early this summer.
 
I have just reread (and highly enjoyed) the following books from the 1950's:

The Desperate Hours by Joseph Hayes

A Kiss Before Dying by Ira Levin

Marjorie Morningstar by Herman Wouk

Hawaii by James Michener

 
Finished The Book of the Dead by Preston and Child last night, book seven in the Pendergast series. With the exception of Still Life With Crows, every book in the series is really, really good.While I wasn't sold on Pendergast as a character in the early ones, the last three books (unofficially the Diogenes trilogy) cemented him as one of my favorites (along with Jack Reacher).My only complaints are that Nora and Margo are basically the same character, and that Constance is terrible.
:rofl: Margo and Nora ARE the same, you're right. I constantly get them confused. Constance doesn't bother me so much, although it is kind of a "what?" character.Noticed the other day that another Pendergast is due out early this summer.
I don't think they ever intended the two to cross paths when they first created them so they are both your strong, career-driven women competing in a man's world characters. I think that's why they basically removed Margo from the story in the last two books. And you nailed it with Constance. Her actions just make no sense. She goes from this meek mousy character to, without giving anything away, a totally different character.
 
Finished The Book of the Dead by Preston and Child last night, book seven in the Pendergast series. With the exception of Still Life With Crows, every book in the series is really, really good.While I wasn't sold on Pendergast as a character in the early ones, the last three books (unofficially the Diogenes trilogy) cemented him as one of my favorites (along with Jack Reacher).My only complaints are that Nora and Margo are basically the same character, and that Constance is terrible.
:rofl: Margo and Nora ARE the same, you're right. I constantly get them confused. Constance doesn't bother me so much, although it is kind of a "what?" character.Noticed the other day that another Pendergast is due out early this summer.
I don't think they ever intended the two to cross paths when they first created them so they are both your strong, career-driven women competing in a man's world characters. I think that's why they basically removed Margo from the story in the last two books. And you nailed it with Constance. Her actions just make no sense. She goes from this meek mousy character to, without giving anything away, a totally different character.
Are these good reads? I went on Amazon to read some summaries and it seems like Indiana Jones-ish adventure stories which I dig. I see the first book is Relic which looks like it can be good.At the moment i'm finishing Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman, good fantasy fairytale type story.
 
Finished The Book of the Dead by Preston and Child last night, book seven in the Pendergast series. With the exception of Still Life With Crows, every book in the series is really, really good.While I wasn't sold on Pendergast as a character in the early ones, the last three books (unofficially the Diogenes trilogy) cemented him as one of my favorites (along with Jack Reacher).My only complaints are that Nora and Margo are basically the same character, and that Constance is terrible.
:rofl: Margo and Nora ARE the same, you're right. I constantly get them confused. Constance doesn't bother me so much, although it is kind of a "what?" character.Noticed the other day that another Pendergast is due out early this summer.
I don't think they ever intended the two to cross paths when they first created them so they are both your strong, career-driven women competing in a man's world characters. I think that's why they basically removed Margo from the story in the last two books. And you nailed it with Constance. Her actions just make no sense. She goes from this meek mousy character to, without giving anything away, a totally different character.
Are these good reads? I went on Amazon to read some summaries and it seems like Indiana Jones-ish adventure stories which I dig. I see the first book is Relic which looks like it can be good.At the moment i'm finishing Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman, good fantasy fairytale type story.
Most of the stories take place in New York at the Museum of Natural History. And while Pendergast is nothing, personality-wise, like Indiana Jones, he's a quiet, cultured bad###. At the very least, I would suggest to check out Relic. It's a really good start to the 'series' (most of the books only tie-in are the same recurring characters and can be read on their own). Preston and Child are the best thriller writers going.If you're looking more for the indestructible hero on far-flung adventures, try Clive Cussler's earlier Dirk Pitt books (anything from the 80s or 90s).
 
recently became a big fan of phillip **** (i read do androids dream of electric sheep a long time ago, but forgot much of it)...
I loved some films based on his work (Blade Runner, Total Recall, Minority Report) but I've never read one of his novels. Any particular one, other than the three listed above, that would be a solid first read?
Reading the new book by one of my favorite authors Christopher Moore.
For whatever reason the covers of his books are eye catching but I could never bring myself to purchase one of them. What other author are his books similar too? (Chuck Palahniuk?) Same question as above, any particular one that would be a solid first read?
Read Gang Leader for a Day a little while back. If you liked this section of Freakonomics, then this is a must-read.
Loved Freakonomics. The blog is a very good read as well. I may have to check this out.
 
I'm getting stared on North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell.

I got about 8 chapters into Angels and Demons a few years ago but didn't finish it cuz I only had it in eBook format. Now, with the movie coming out, I want to read it again.

 
Just finished The Devil's Shepherd by Stephen Hartov. Pretty cool book about Israeli special agents. A little too sentimental, but an enjoyable read. Hartov seems to know his stuff too; he's Israeli military.

Just started Heat Lightning by John Sanford. It's the 2nd Virgil Flowers mystery, which is a spin-off of the Lucas Davenport series. If you're into police/detective mysteries, the "Prey" series by Sanford is must-read. Flowers is pretty good as well.

 
I'm on a Toni Morrison binge right now and I'm loving every minute of it. If you've never read her or tried to read Beloved and hated it, I suggest you give her a chance. Song of Solomon, Sula, and The Bluest Eye are far better than Beloved, which I thought was pretty damn good. If you had to pick one, I'd go with Song of Solomon.

I'm going to finish up with her newest, A Mercy, and then I'll take a break for a while. Her books may have pretty names but there's nothing pretty about the mayhem she creates. Mothers killing their children. Children killing their mothers. Women trying to murder the men they love. Best friends trying to kill each other. Her books are beautifully written with great plots and unimaginable horrors.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top