Novel: The Stand - I think I've read it about 4-5 times now.Collection: The Bachman Books - Not short stories, but The Long Walk is the best work of King's I've ever readMacArtist said:igbomb said:No worries of that happening. I've read 15-20 of his other books and am actually slowly reading all of his novels/collections (non-audio) in publication order. Next up is Thinner from 1984.MacArtist said:IMO, as a huge Stephen King fan, this is easily his worst book by far. If you haven't read his other books, please don't judge him on this one book.The Eyes of the Dragon - Stephen King
Kind of a miss for me. It was a quick read so it wasn't too painful, but the story was just dull. I get that he was trying to just write a simple fairy tale style story, but it wasn't the least bit compelling.So far, which one would you say has been your favorite book?
Best: Dark Tower series, The Shining, The Stand, It, The Long Walk, The Talisman.Worst: From a Buick 8, The Tommyknockers, The Dark Half (although I'm not giving up on it)What would you say King's best books are? I've read Pet Sematary, IT and Duma BeachMacArtist said:IMO, as a huge Stephen King fan, this is easily his worst book by far. If you haven't read his other books, please don't judge him on this one book.The Eyes of the Dragon - Stephen King
Kind of a miss for me. It was a quick read so it wasn't too painful, but the story was just dull. I get that he was trying to just write a simple fairy tale style story, but it wasn't the least bit compelling.
So the Dark Tower series and The Gunslinger series are the same thing? And thanks to everyone for their input. Sounds like The Stand will be my next King book and then I'll start the seriesBest: Dark Tower series, The Shining, The Stand, It, The Long Walk, The Talisman.Worst: From a Buick 8, The Tommyknockers, The Dark Half (although I'm not giving up on it)What would you say King's best books are? I've read Pet Sematary, IT and Duma BeachMacArtist said:IMO, as a huge Stephen King fan, this is easily his worst book by far. If you haven't read his other books, please don't judge him on this one book.The Eyes of the Dragon - Stephen King
Kind of a miss for me. It was a quick read so it wasn't too painful, but the story was just dull. I get that he was trying to just write a simple fairy tale style story, but it wasn't the least bit compelling.
I think that Salem's Lost is his best book and perhaps the perfect vampire story.What would you say King's best books are? I've read Pet Sematary, IT and Duma BeachMacArtist said:IMO, as a huge Stephen King fan, this is easily his worst book by far. If you haven't read his other books, please don't judge him on this one book.The Eyes of the Dragon - Stephen King
Kind of a miss for me. It was a quick read so it wasn't too painful, but the story was just dull. I get that he was trying to just write a simple fairy tale style story, but it wasn't the least bit compelling.
Easily the scariest damn book i've ever read. Anyone into audiobooks?Darth Cheney said:I think that Salem's Lost is his best book and perhaps the perfect vampire story.What would you say King's best books are? I've read Pet Sematary, IT and Duma BeachMacArtist said:IMO, as a huge Stephen King fan, this is easily his worst book by far. If you haven't read his other books, please don't judge him on this one book.The Eyes of the Dragon - Stephen King
Kind of a miss for me. It was a quick read so it wasn't too painful, but the story was just dull. I get that he was trying to just write a simple fairy tale style story, but it wasn't the least bit compelling.
It's actually better than it sounds. I can't remember much about it other than really liking it and being surprised by it.And my next book club book sounds like something I'll surely hate: The History of Love
About 3/4 finished and really enjoying it.How is this? is it comparable to any other books you've read in the genre?In the middle of How we Decide, by Jonah Lehrer.
Thinner was a great book.No worries of that happening. I've read 15-20 of his other books and am actually slowly reading all of his novels/collections (non-audio) in publication order. Next up is Thinner from 1984.MacArtist said:IMO, as a huge Stephen King fan, this is easily his worst book by far. If you haven't read his other books, please don't judge him on this one book.The Eyes of the Dragon - Stephen King
Kind of a miss for me. It was a quick read so it wasn't too painful, but the story was just dull. I get that he was trying to just write a simple fairy tale style story, but it wasn't the least bit compelling.
Well, I was really pumped to get going on it. It came highly recommended. However, I'm now about 3/4 through it and losing steam.He cites some great studies and gives some very good insight into the human mind. However, he seems to beat some points into the ground at times, which has slowed my interest a bit.How is this? is it comparable to any other books you've read in the genre?In the middle of How we Decide, by Jonah Lehrer.
cool. I'll check it out. I found Pinker books more thorough and detailed but also less user-friendly (i.e. written more like a scientist, less like a novelist).Well, I was really pumped to get going on it. It came highly recommended. However, I'm now about 3/4 through it and losing steam.He cites some great studies and gives some very good insight into the human mind. However, he seems to beat some points into the ground at times, which has slowed my interest a bit.How is this? is it comparable to any other books you've read in the genre?In the middle of How we Decide, by Jonah Lehrer.
Overall, it's a good read. He brings up some interesting stories and examples from the sports world, and poker world.
Up next for me is: How the Mind Works by Steven Pinker.
This was a NY Times book of the year, but I can't recommend it. The pace is glacial and repetitive, and Pamuk's protagonist is unsympathetic and uninteresting. There's some interesting insight into current events in Turkey and the East-West conflict in general, but it's not worth trudging through the story for.Now reading: Snow by Orhan Pamuk
cool. I'll check it out. I found Pinker books more thorough and detailed but also less user-friendly (i.e. written more like a scientist, less like a novelist).Well, I was really pumped to get going on it. It came highly recommended. However, I'm now about 3/4 through it and losing steam.He cites some great studies and gives some very good insight into the human mind. However, he seems to beat some points into the ground at times, which has slowed my interest a bit.How is this? is it comparable to any other books you've read in the genre?In the middle of How we Decide, by Jonah Lehrer.
Overall, it's a good read. He brings up some interesting stories and examples from the sports world, and poker world.
Up next for me is: How the Mind Works by Steven Pinker.
Very interesting but not "exciting" readsStarted reading this series after I got hooked on the tv show "Legend of the Seeker" that is based on these books. 1st one was okay, I think I would have liked it better had I not seen the 1st season of the show and already knew most of the plot. The 2nd book was outstanding and the 3rd was a decent followup if a bit short and abruptly ended. Look forward to reading the rest.For a fantasy/adventure series, I'm surprised how grown up the books are. Goodkind doesn't pull his punches in the descriptions of battles or sex. In the 2nd book there is a whole chapter devoted to the discovery of the aftermath of a city that fell to a siege. Decapitated bodies everywhere, women raped, some disturbing imagery.Last night I finished Wizard's First Rule by Terry Goodkind - my wife has been bugging me to read the series so that is book one. It was pretty good too.
Almost finished with The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen. Exactly my kind of fiction, which is to say it is about human nature, depressing (as reality often is), and brilliantly written. Franzen follows a family, relaying their lives in minute detail. In doing so, he reveals great insight into why they are the way they are, why they do the things they do. It's the book I've always wanted to write.
Top 10 of the decade for me. I agree with what you wrote, but you forgot to mention how damned funny it is at times. I was damned near crying at times it was so funny.Verdict?I liked it. Nowhere near as good as Sotweed, but I appreciated what he was going for.Started Giles Goat-Boy.
Just got back into it today after putting it down for about a week. So far so good. Very dense—like Sot-Weed—which makes the fact that I'm reading it mostly on the train less than ideal. I'm going to miss a lot of nuance, but I'll plow forward nonetheless.Unrelated:Verdict?I liked it. Nowhere near as good as Sotweed, but I appreciated what he was going for.Started Giles Goat-Boy.
I liked How We Decide a lot. It's like Malcolm Gladwell, except a little more rooted in science and a little less quick to make sweeping societal generalizations based on small studies and one or two anecdotal examples. Though I liked Outliers a lot, as well.My favorite thing in How We Decide was the part discussing that people think they carefully weigh all the evidence on both sides of a question before making an informed, unbiased decision. In fact, they usually come to an immediate snap judgment, and subsequently disregard evidence contrary to their pre-formed opinion while embracing evidence that supports it. That one chapter has saved me hours of aggravation in the political threads here and in discussions with other people (especially my family) -- It made me understand that no amount of arguing is going to make me accept the arguments/evidence presented by people whose views are contrary to my own, just as they aren't going to accept the case I make in support of my views. So why bother?Well, I was really pumped to get going on it. It came highly recommended. However, I'm now about 3/4 through it and losing steam.He cites some great studies and gives some very good insight into the human mind. However, he seems to beat some points into the ground at times, which has slowed my interest a bit.How is this? is it comparable to any other books you've read in the genre?In the middle of How we Decide, by Jonah Lehrer.
Overall, it's a good read. He brings up some interesting stories and examples from the sports world, and poker world.
Up next for me is: How the Mind Works by Steven Pinker.
Couldn't get through this one. I enjoyed parts but didn't think it was worth the effort to try to keep track of all the characters. Especially when so many characters had the same name as other's.100 Years of Solitude. What a fantastic book.
Ditto for me -- read about 80 pages then quit. I didn't care for the writing style. I loved the story, though.Couldn't get through this one. I enjoyed parts but didn't think it was worth the effort to try to keep track of all the characters. Especially when so many characters had the same name as other's.100 Years of Solitude. What a fantastic book.
Read this one at my GB Cosjobs suggestion. Very good - his style takes liberally from Chuck Pahlunizaiakaisik (sp), but it was well worth the read. I didn't find it as deep as "House" meets "Sopranos" simply because its about a doctor/mob hitman. It actually came across to me - via footnotes and leaving out big chunks of detail - like a hostile version of Dave Eggers "A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius." But a very good read nonetheless.Just finished Superfreakenomics. Good, but not great. Ends abruptly. But it was worth reading.Reading Bill SImmons "Book of Basketball" right now. a great read for fans of basketball or Simmons.Hoping to get to "Ham on Rye" or "Blood Meridian" after I'm done with Simmons.I just finished Beat the Reaper by Josh Bazell based on recommendations here. Great book, fast paced, as someone on Amazon said like 'House' meets 'The Sopranos'. The last book I enjoyed that much was Battle Royale.I'm about to start the last of the Dexter book series. If you enjoy the Showtime series, I recommend the books. I think they're good, not great, but a fun and easy read. It usually only takes me a couple nights to finish each one.
This was great. Reminded me a bit of Nabokov with the unreliable narrator and shifts in time. I'd recommend it if you like reading the 'classics'.Now reading A Scanner Darkly by Philip K. **** while on the bus and A People's History of the USA by the late Howard Zinn at home.Now reading The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford, and so far I am loving it.
Slog indeed. Would benefit from a decent editor. It was the first King book I've read in 15 years, picked it up from a recommendation on here. The story was fine, spoon feeding it to me was disappointing. The guy is a master story teller and created some great characters in this book but when he treats the reader like they are 12 it's a little off-putting. Probably take another 15 year break from King.I'm reading King's Under the Dome currently, and am finding it a bit of a slog.
Set in Yorkshire around the time of the Ripper murders, they are singularly brutal noir fictions, whose stark titles — 1974, 1977, 1980 and 1983 — sit in ironic contrast to the dense horrors within. Through stories of missing schoolgirls, mutilated prostitutes, cancerously corrupt police and epidemic brutality, they conjure up a cumulative stench that is not easily forgotten. Peace’s Yorkshire, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, is hell. From: http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol...icle5766044.ece
Those people you've heard that from are idiots.Just started Everything is Illuminated by Jonathan Safran Foer. Too early to form an opinion on it, though I've heard it's more gimmicky than substantive. That makes me a little apprehensive.
I couldn't get through two pages of this a night before falling asleep. This read like an early, raw work by Koontz or Lansdale. Which is surprising, since King wrote this in '89. 2/10.Just started Snuff by Chuck Palahniuk. Great stuff, as always.King's The Dark Half has been on my shelf for years so I guess I'll go with that.Not sure what's next.
Really? I thought this book was horrendous. It's the only Palahniuk book I've read and that likely isn't going to change anytime soon.shuke said:Just started Snuff by Chuck Palahniuk. Great stuff, as always.
Bailed on this one until the weekend. It's clear that it's a book that requires more than the 15-30 minutes I get to read each night during the week. In the meantime, I picked up A Drink Before the War by Dennis Lehane. I'm about 100 pages in and really liking it. And having read several reviews that call this his weakest work, I think I'm going to read a lot of Lehane.Just started Everything is Illuminated by Jonathan Safran Foer. Too early to form an opinion on it, though I've heard it's more gimmicky than substantive. That makes me a little apprehensive.
So far, bigSet in Florida's Ten Thousand Islands region, the novel contains three parts, each corresponding to one of the three source novels originally published in the 1990's: "Killing Mr. Watson," "Lost Man's River," and "Bone By Bone."
Book One is based on Killing Mr. Watson, and is a collection of various first-person accounts about the notorious planter's rise to power and eventual death at the hands of his neighbors. The first scene describes Watson being gunned down by an armed posse on the shore of Chokoloskee Island, the narrative then jumps back to describe Watson's arrival in the Ten Thousand Islands and proceeds chronologically back to its starting point.
Book Two is based on Lost Man's River. This section tells the story of Watson's youngest son, an alcoholic historian who tries to reconstruct his father's life in order to determine whether or not he was really a murderer and outlaw.
Book Three is based on Bone By Bone and is a first-person account in the words of Edgar Watson himself. The main character tells his entire life story from his own point of view, from his childhood in South Carolina to his fatal encounter with his neighbors on the edge of the Florida Everglades.

Lots of ideas for you in this thread if you take the time to go through it. Beat the Reaper is a fun, easy read.I have about 30 hours of travel time next week and could use suggestions on something I could pick up from the library that is fluffy, no-brainer page turner type book. Grisham, Patterson and Crichton would be similar authors. No sci-fi or fantasy please.
Do you need to read the source novels first to get into this one?Currently reading Shadow Country by Peter Matthiessen.
So far, bigSet in Florida's Ten Thousand Islands region, the novel contains three parts, each corresponding to one of the three source novels originally published in the 1990's: "Killing Mr. Watson," "Lost Man's River," and "Bone By Bone."
Book One is based on Killing Mr. Watson, and is a collection of various first-person accounts about the notorious planter's rise to power and eventual death at the hands of his neighbors. The first scene describes Watson being gunned down by an armed posse on the shore of Chokoloskee Island, the narrative then jumps back to describe Watson's arrival in the Ten Thousand Islands and proceeds chronologically back to its starting point.
Book Two is based on Lost Man's River. This section tells the story of Watson's youngest son, an alcoholic historian who tries to reconstruct his father's life in order to determine whether or not he was really a murderer and outlaw.
Book Three is based on Bone By Bone and is a first-person account in the words of Edgar Watson himself. The main character tells his entire life story from his own point of view, from his childhood in South Carolina to his fatal encounter with his neighbors on the edge of the Florida Everglades.![]()
I don't think so; Shadow Country is comprised of the source novels. From what I understand, a bit of rework was done, but this is the trilogy.Do you need to read the source novels first to get into this one?Currently reading Shadow Country by Peter Matthiessen.
So far, bigSet in Florida's Ten Thousand Islands region, the novel contains three parts, each corresponding to one of the three source novels originally published in the 1990's: "Killing Mr. Watson," "Lost Man's River," and "Bone By Bone."
Book One is based on Killing Mr. Watson, and is a collection of various first-person accounts about the notorious planter's rise to power and eventual death at the hands of his neighbors. The first scene describes Watson being gunned down by an armed posse on the shore of Chokoloskee Island, the narrative then jumps back to describe Watson's arrival in the Ten Thousand Islands and proceeds chronologically back to its starting point.
Book Two is based on Lost Man's River. This section tells the story of Watson's youngest son, an alcoholic historian who tries to reconstruct his father's life in order to determine whether or not he was really a murderer and outlaw.
Book Three is based on Bone By Bone and is a first-person account in the words of Edgar Watson himself. The main character tells his entire life story from his own point of view, from his childhood in South Carolina to his fatal encounter with his neighbors on the edge of the Florida Everglades.![]()
Who's got time to read though? Seriously, I went through the last 5 pages and didn't see anything that met my criteria and I figured that 5 pages was a reasonable sample of the rest of the thread. I read Beat the Reaper several weeks ago and thought it was good.bigbottom said:Lots of ideas for you in this thread if you take the time to go through it. Beat the Reaper is a fun, easy read.ODoyleRules said:I have about 30 hours of travel time next week and could use suggestions on something I could pick up from the library that is fluffy, no-brainer page turner type book. Grisham, Patterson and Crichton would be similar authors. No sci-fi or fantasy please.