fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
Pick 1
Last edited by a moderator:
Until the Canadians get here17-0
Will it stay unanimous?
well?That's like asking if I would rather give a BJ or receive a BJ
Right up there with bacon and Fred Phelps dying23-0 now. Have you found the elusive "thing that the entire FFA can agree on"?
We were 156-4 on picking your nose... I thought that was as close as we could ever get.23-0 now. Have you found the elusive "thing that the entire FFA can agree on"?
Aaaaand, just like that, someone has messed it up.We were 156-4 on picking your nose... I thought that was as close as we could ever get.23-0 now. Have you found the elusive "thing that the entire FFA can agree on"?
Well?That's like asking if I would rather give a BJ or receive a BJ
Well?That's like asking if I would rather give a BJ or receive a BJ
You're Canadian - you're opinion doesn't count.Inferior players playing an inferior game in a lottery type setup is much more entertaining than watching the best players in world.![]()
Ooh BURN!You're Canadian - you're opinion doesn't count.Inferior players playing an inferior game in a lottery type setup is much more entertaining than watching the best players in world.![]()
Are you saying they are equally entertaining or both suck? I love soccer but you watch the MLS - how you not be entertained by this?null
Watching the last four minutes of a basketball game is only slightly less painful than a case of hemorrhoids.Are you saying they are equally entertaining or both suck? I love soccer but you watch the MLS - how you not be entertained by this?null
Watching the first 86 minutes of a soccer game is slightly less painful than being shot in the groin.Watching the last four minutes of a basketball game is only slightly less painful than a case of hemorrhoids.Are you saying they are equally entertaining or both suck? I love soccer but you watch the MLS - how you not be entertained by this?null
He's bitter that Andrew Wiggins lost today.You're Canadian - you're opinion doesn't count.Inferior players playing an inferior game in a lottery type setup is much more entertaining than watching the best players in world.![]()
FIXEDfantasycurse42 said:WatchingChristo said:Watching the last four minutes of a basketball game is only slightly less painful than a case of hemorrhoids.AAABatteries said:Are you saying they are equally entertaining or both suck? I love soccer but you watch the MLS - how you not be entertained by this?Christo said:nullthe first 86 minutes ofa soccer game is slightly less painful than being shot in the groin.
The last minute especially. Foul...go to the monitor to see how much time should be left on the clock (a 5 minute process)...free throws...time out...score...see how much time is left on the clock...foul...see how much time should be left on the clock. free throws...time out...missed shot...foul...see how much time is left on the clock...Christo said:Watching the last four minutes of a basketball game is only slightly less painful than a case of hemorrhoids.AAABatteries said:Are you saying they are equally entertaining or both suck? I love soccer but you watch the MLS - how you not be entertained by this?Christo said:null
Agree... something has to be done about the pacing at the end of the games... it's gross... it's like what you watched in the first 36-38 minutes is a different game in a close game environment than the last 2-4 minutes with the fouling and the time-outs and all that... its truly horrid.Christo said:Watching the last four minutes of a basketball game is only slightly less painful than a case of hemorrhoids.AAABatteries said:Are you saying they are equally entertaining or both suck? I love soccer but you watch the MLS - how you not be entertained by this?Christo said:null
March Madness accepts too many teams - the rule of thumb should be that if the school has no business winning the title, they should not be in the playoff... no more than 32 teams should make march madneess.
The best team is the team that wins. HTHThe NBA playoffs (other than allowing too many teams - 4 per conference would be fine) is the best playoff system in any sport.
The NBA does a more consistent job of any major sport league pro or college at crowning its best team of the year as its playoff champion thanks to a 7 game playoff system.
I prefer it when playoffs crown the best team.... so that's more entertaining to me.
But of course the A.D.D./Bracket crowd who root for the little random schools to pull of their unbelievable upset prefer the one-off format of March Madness.
March Madness accepts too many teams - the rule of thumb should be that if the school has no business winning the title, they should not be in the playoff... no more than 32 teams should make march madneess.
March Madness's 1-off format allows for upsets that wouldn't happen in a best of 3/5 format and thus compromise the audience from seeing better matchups down the road.
March madness is better for casual fans who take delight in David/Goliath stories... but for real fans of basketball, there is little to be gained from this format and it is an insult to the fans of the regular season.
#8 seed is the lowest to ever win it, right? we have YEARS of data to prove this.. so why are we expanding this tournament?March Madness accepts too many teams - the rule of thumb should be that if the school has no business winning the title, they should not be in the playoff... no more than 32 teams should make march madneess.![]()
you've never been viewing a 1-off event or participated in an event yourself where you lost a match that you just KNEW if it was played 100 times that you'd win 80-90 of them?The best team is the team that wins. HTH
The question was what's the most entertaining so who cares about crowning the "best" team as champ. March Madness is great because it exposes a lot of the media darling teams and just the craziness of it all makes it amazing. Go sit in a Vegas sportsbook for some March Madness games and you'll see why its the best playoff system in any sport.The NBA playoffs (other than allowing too many teams - 4 per conference would be fine) is the best playoff system in any sport.
The NBA does a more consistent job of any major sport league pro or college at crowning its best team of the year as its playoff champion thanks to a 7 game playoff system.
I prefer it when playoffs crown the best team.... so that's more entertaining to me.
But of course the A.D.D./Bracket crowd who root for the little random schools to pull of their unbelievable upset prefer the one-off format of March Madness.
March Madness accepts too many teams - the rule of thumb should be that if the school has no business winning the title, they should not be in the playoff... no more than 32 teams should make march madneess.
March Madness's 1-off format allows for upsets that wouldn't happen in a best of 3/5 format and thus compromise the audience from seeing better matchups down the road.
March madness is better for casual fans who take delight in David/Goliath stories... but for real fans of basketball, there is little to be gained from this format and it is an insult to the fans of the regular season.
Been to Vegas during round 1... man the sportsbook was packed.The question was what's the most entertaining so who cares about crowning the "best" team as champ. March Madness is great because it exposes a lot of the media darling teams and just the craziness of it all makes it amazing. Go sit in a Vegas sportsbook for some March Madness games and you'll see why its the best playoff system in any sport.The NBA playoffs (other than allowing too many teams - 4 per conference would be fine) is the best playoff system in any sport.
The NBA does a more consistent job of any major sport league pro or college at crowning its best team of the year as its playoff champion thanks to a 7 game playoff system.
I prefer it when playoffs crown the best team.... so that's more entertaining to me.
But of course the A.D.D./Bracket crowd who root for the little random schools to pull of their unbelievable upset prefer the one-off format of March Madness.
March Madness accepts too many teams - the rule of thumb should be that if the school has no business winning the title, they should not be in the playoff... no more than 32 teams should make march madneess.
March Madness's 1-off format allows for upsets that wouldn't happen in a best of 3/5 format and thus compromise the audience from seeing better matchups down the road.
March madness is better for casual fans who take delight in David/Goliath stories... but for real fans of basketball, there is little to be gained from this format and it is an insult to the fans of the regular season.
nhl?The NBA playoffs (other than allowing too many teams - 4 per conference would be fine) is the best playoff system in any sport.
The NBA does a more consistent job of any major sport league pro or college at crowning its best team of the year as its playoff champion thanks to a 7 game playoff system.
.
This is ridiculous... It should be an arm wrestling challenge between the equipment managers.What's the "NBA"?
As for college basketball, I think it'd be much more fun if they did away with March Madness and just let coaches vote on who they thought the best team was.
Team with hottest goalie in the NHL playoffs = :championship:nhl?The NBA playoffs (other than allowing too many teams - 4 per conference would be fine) is the best playoff system in any sport.
The NBA does a more consistent job of any major sport league pro or college at crowning its best team of the year as its playoff champion thanks to a 7 game playoff system.
.
I don't think they award the Stanley Cup on good looks.Team with hottest goalie in the NHL playoffs = :championship:nhl?The NBA playoffs (other than allowing too many teams - 4 per conference would be fine) is the best playoff system in any sport.
The NBA does a more consistent job of any major sport league pro or college at crowning its best team of the year as its playoff champion thanks to a 7 game playoff system.
.