What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

When is the last time a dome team won 2+ games away (1 Viewer)

ChrisCooleyFan

Footballguy
The Rams The Colts and The Saints are the only dome teams to win a Super Bowl. I know the Saints the year they won, had home field advantage. Did the Colts and Rams as well? I know its fun to watch these teams, but it just seems like these teams can't win outside in the playoffs. The Falcons also a dome team played in the Super Bowl, but I believe they had home field as well.

 
The '06 Colts won at Baltimore and "at" Dolphin Stadium. The '99 Rams had home field advantage through the playoffs. The '98 Falcons won both their games in domes (at home and at Minnesota).

 
Don't buy into this yet ... sample size isn't big enough. Plus, home teams are typically higher seeds and broadly better than any visiting teams -- that will make macro-level trends hard to analyze. How do you tease out "losing due to being a dome team" versus "losing because of playing away at a better opponent"?

 
I remember the Falcons in 2002 being the first team ever to beat the Packers in Lambeau Field (with Vick) but they lost the following week against the Eagles. :(

 
When is the last time a grass team won 2+ games away during the playoffs? It's quite hard to do.

It's not as if grass teams are going on the road and winning due to their familiarity with the field conditions.

A dome team may be at a disadvantage but playing on the road is a far greater disadvantage for any team.

 
Or maybe there are just more grass teams. Remember when no dome team had ever won a superbowl and we heard about it every year? Kurt Warner put an end to that.

Just more talking head BS. It's definitely a factor, but the field conditions are really a minor factor compared to the actual talent, home/away and time zones.

 
Or maybe there are just more grass teams. Remember when no dome team had ever won a superbowl and we heard about it every year? Kurt Warner put an end to that.

Just more talking head BS. It's definitely a factor, but the field conditions are really a minor factor compared to the actual talent, home/away and time zones.

 
Or maybe there are just more grass teams. Remember when no dome team had ever won a superbowl and we heard about it every year? Kurt Warner put an end to that.Just more talking head BS. It's definitely a factor, but the field conditions are really a minor factor compared to the actual talent, home/away and time zones.
Just going through the last 4 post seasons (miinus the super bowls), dome teams are 0-6 on the road, while outdoor teams are 15-17. Wouldn't really call that a minor factor.
 
'Short Corner said:
'Truman said:
Or maybe there are just more grass teams. Remember when no dome team had ever won a superbowl and we heard about it every year? Kurt Warner put an end to that.Just more talking head BS. It's definitely a factor, but the field conditions are really a minor factor compared to the actual talent, home/away and time zones.
Just going through the last 4 post seasons (miinus the super bowls), dome teams are 0-6 on the road, while outdoor teams are 15-17. Wouldn't really call that a minor factor.
That's really an unfair sample size:6 games to 32.
 
'Short Corner said:
'Truman said:
Or maybe there are just more grass teams. Remember when no dome team had ever won a superbowl and we heard about it every year? Kurt Warner put an end to that.Just more talking head BS. It's definitely a factor, but the field conditions are really a minor factor compared to the actual talent, home/away and time zones.
Just going through the last 4 post seasons (miinus the super bowls), dome teams are 0-6 on the road, while outdoor teams are 15-17. Wouldn't really call that a minor factor.
That's really an unfair sample size:6 games to 32.
That doesn't make any difference.
 
I remember the Falcons in 2002 being the first team ever to beat the Packers in Lambeau Field (with Vick) but they lost the following week against the Eagles. :(
It took 5 turnovers by the Packers for them to do it.
 
I wonder if there's a statistical difference in how dome teams perform on the road in December against teams with winning records versus the rest of the season? That would be more telling to me than the limited sample size we have on dome teams in the playoffs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder if there's a statistical difference in how dome teams perform on the road in December against teams with winning records versus the rest of the season? That would be more telling to me than the limited sample size we have on dome teams in the playoffs.
Advanced NFL Stats is running a series on weather and outcomes as this thread happens. I've found this *their/his site and Football Outsiders to be really good sources of information for football-related things. Brian Burke - the proprietor of Advanced NFL Stats - also did a study about dome/southern teams on the road in Decemeber, which might directly answer your post.

http://www.advancednflstats.com/2007/11/nfl-home-field-advantage-by-climate-2.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or maybe there are just more grass teams. Remember when no dome team had ever won a superbowl and we heard about it every year? Kurt Warner put an end to that.Just more talking head BS. It's definitely a factor, but the field conditions are really a minor factor compared to the actual talent, home/away and time zones.
Just going through the last 4 post seasons (miinus the super bowls), dome teams are 0-6 on the road, while outdoor teams are 15-17. Wouldn't really call that a minor factor.
That's really an unfair sample size:6 games to 32.
That doesn't make any difference.
it makes a huge difference.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top