Tom Skerritt
Footballguy
Obviously this will depend your league's on scoring rules, but is there a general consensus?
Last year I was the first to take a D/ST with Seattle in the 4th round of a 14-team league. Ended up being a good move. Seattle was solid and consistent pretty much all year. Also, fairly valuable in my league. Scoring heirarchy for my league usually ends up looking like this:
1. QB - (top scoring QBs ~400 total pts, obvious outliers with Peyton and Brees)
2. RB/Flex/WR - (250 each)
3. D/ST (200)
4. K (170)
5. TE (160, not including Jimmy Graham... he ruins off the curve)
Is Seattle going to be drafted earlier based on their dominance from last year? If your D/ST position is valuable in your league, at what point do you reach?
Last year I was the first to take a D/ST with Seattle in the 4th round of a 14-team league. Ended up being a good move. Seattle was solid and consistent pretty much all year. Also, fairly valuable in my league. Scoring heirarchy for my league usually ends up looking like this:
1. QB - (top scoring QBs ~400 total pts, obvious outliers with Peyton and Brees)
2. RB/Flex/WR - (250 each)
3. D/ST (200)
4. K (170)
5. TE (160, not including Jimmy Graham... he ruins off the curve)
Is Seattle going to be drafted earlier based on their dominance from last year? If your D/ST position is valuable in your league, at what point do you reach?