I don't think either is patriotic or unpatriotic.
If a few hundred more people in Florida voted for Gore the world would be much, much different today. Just sayin.They are both equally useless.
Agreed. This is like one of those FantasyCurse polls that I am not satisfied with either of the choices presented.I don't think either is patriotic or unpatriotic.
It was all pre planned broIf a few hundred more people in Florida voted for Gore the world would be much, much different today. Just sayin.
Not everyone can stand for the anthemNot everyone's allowed to vote. Everyone can stand for the anthem.
I don't think either is patriotic or unpatriotic.
I'm just wanted to show that I still know how to quote multiple posts. Some people seem to struggle with it.If a person is quoted but nothing is added does that mean you agree with their post? If so, why not just Like it? Just asking.
Patriotic = expressing devotion and support for one's country.I don't think either is patriotic or unpatriotic.
"Not standing" is not a sign of disrespect.Of course it is unpatriotic to disrespect the symbol and anthem of one's country.
Of course it is. That is the point. He is not happy with how this country treats blacks and is showing his unhappiess with the country. What are you not seeing?"Not standing" is not a sign of disrespect.
It's not disrespectful to remain seated when a song is played.Of course it is. That is the point. He is not happy with how this country treats blacks and is showing his unhappiess with the country. What are you not seeing?"Not standing" is not a sign of disrespect.
It is fine when it is a song. But when it is specifically the national anthem, you are suppose to stand to show respect. So when you do not stand in an attempt to send a message, what message are you sending? This is really not that hard.It's not disrespectful to remain seated when a song is played.
Arbitrary patriotism is meaningless. If someone had decided 100 years ago that "kneeling down" was the proper way to show respect to the anthem, you would be railing on anyone who had the audacity to stand.It is fine when it is a song. But when it is specifically the national anthem, you are suppose to stand to show respect. So when you do not stand in an attempt to send a message, what message are you sending? This is really not that hard.It's not disrespectful to remain seated when a song is played.
How is it arbitrary? Protocol of proper behavior to show respect is documented in the US Code, passed by Congress and signed by the president. You can not get any less abritrary than that. He even expained his purpose. "I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color."Arbitrary patriotism is meaningless. If someone had decided 100 years ago that "kneeling down" was the proper way to show respect to the anthem, you would be railing on anyone who had the audacity to stand.
US Code dictates that you must put your right hand over your heart during the anthem. Hardly anyone does that, especially athletes. Where is your outrage?How is it arbitrary? Protocol of proper behavior to show respect is documented in the US Code, passed by Congress and signed by the president.Arbitrary patriotism is meaningless. If someone had decided 100 years ago that "kneeling down" was the proper way to show respect to the anthem, you would be railing on anyone who had the audacity to stand.
I have willfully decided to not vote for any candidate in a particular race before. I still showed up to vote for others.I'm not voting because both candidates suck.
My vote on this poll is "your face"
My tactic is using his own words to define what and why he did it. I know it is hard for you to comprehend such reasoning.US Code dictates that you must put your right hand over your heart during the anthem. Hardly anyone does that, especially athletes. Where is your outrage?
Or are you employing the liberal tactic of situational ethics?
You said it was unpatriotic to disrespect the anthem of a country.My tactic is using his own words to define what and why he did it. I know it is hard for you to comprehend such reasoning.US Code dictates that you must put your right hand over your heart during the anthem. Hardly anyone does that, especially athletes. Where is your outrage?
Or are you employing the liberal tactic of situational ethics?
BTW, I am not showing outrage. I am just stating a simple fact.
I am not outraged. Get over yourself. I am not going to argue idiotic semantics with you. It is what it is and he stated his reason which was not to show respect to this country, which by definition is unpatriotic. It is ####### stupid to argue this.You said it was unpatriotic to disrespect the anthem of a country.
Then you cited US code as the arbiter of how "respect" is defined.
I'm simply pointing out that almost every player in the NFL is violating US code. Yet you are completely silent on their blatant display of "disrespect".
If you're going to cite the US Code as the justification for your outrage, then you should apply it equally instead of selectively. Otherwise your point is meaningless.
If you had originally written, "Kaepernick is unpatriotic based on what he stated," then I wouldn't have posted anything.I am not outraged. Get over yourself. I am not going to argue idiotic semantics with you. It is what it is and he stated his reason which was not to show respect to this country, which by definition is unpatriotic. It is ####### stupid to argue this.You said it was unpatriotic to disrespect the anthem of a country.
Then you cited US code as the arbiter of how "respect" is defined.
I'm simply pointing out that almost every player in the NFL is violating US code. Yet you are completely silent on their blatant display of "disrespect".
If you're going to cite the US Code as the justification for your outrage, then you should apply it equally instead of selectively. Otherwise your point is meaningless.
His words put the actions in context. I love how fools keep claiming I am 'wrong' when they have zero case. Whatever bud. ByeIf you had originally written, "Kaepernick is unpatriotic based on what he stated," then I wouldn't have posted anything.
But you didn't write that originally, did you?
No. Because you decided to make the claim that Kaepernick was unpatriotic based on his violation of US Code.
And that, my friends, is why you're wrong_mx.