Is it that the scoring is so imbalanced, you don't start enough IDP players, or a combo of the two? I have really hated any IDP league I have been in where they have essentially been an afterthought. It just makes it so meaningless.
Its actually balanced from O to D starters, 2QB, 2 RB, 2WR, TE, K, 2 DL, 3LB, 2 DB. Its not meaningless, just a lot easier to find a DB who can get you 10-15 ppg. And with FAAB, you can always find a guy not on any radar, or people get frustrated and cut a guy like JOK, whereas few/none will cut Garrett Wilson if he struggles early. Typically the team that wins the league has 2-3 offensive players who are hot in December, and sometimes their IDP players are barely average.
10th QB last year had 350 pts, #1 LB had 319
10th RB had 275 pts, #1 DB had 222
10th WR had 249, #1 DL had 191
So it is imbalanced scoring wise, but we arent changing, commish wont change without a league wide vote and its been voted down 2x already to increase IDP scoring. I think people dont want to put in the effort, and we all know IDP players arent as important as offense. I might keep 3 WRs even though usually only start 2(QB byes weeks might start 3). Deebo, Allen and ARod(I like him this year). I will try to trade Deebo when teams in my league start paying attention. Hopefully he signs with SF by then.