Is it that the scoring is so imbalanced, you don't start enough IDP players,  or a combo of the two?   I have really hated any IDP league I have been in where they have essentially been an afterthought.  It just makes it so meaningless.  
		
		
	 
Its actually balanced from O to D starters, 2QB, 2 RB, 2WR, TE, K, 2 DL, 3LB, 2 DB.   Its not meaningless, just a lot easier to find a DB who can get you 10-15 ppg.   And with FAAB, you can always find a guy not on any radar, or people get frustrated and cut a guy like JOK, whereas few/none will cut Garrett Wilson if he struggles early.  Typically the team that wins the league has 2-3 offensive players who are hot in December, and sometimes their IDP players are barely average.
10th QB last year had 350 pts, #1 LB had 319
	10th RB had 275 pts, #1 DB had 222
	10th WR had 249, #1 DL had 191
So it is imbalanced scoring wise, but we arent changing, commish wont change without a league wide vote and its been voted down 2x already to increase IDP scoring.   I think people dont want to put in the effort, and we all know IDP players arent as important as offense.   I might keep 3 WRs even though usually only start 2(QB byes weeks might start 3).   Deebo, Allen and ARod(I like him this year).   I will try to trade Deebo when teams in my league start paying attention.   Hopefully he signs with SF by then.