Which Side Wins Trade - PPR (1 Viewer)

[notoriousbill]

Kamara and Akers. Has Taylor, Etienne and Gibson. Starters will be Taylor and Kamara with Etienne as Flex.

Edwards, Mostert and Pollard Has Drake and Edmunds. Starters will be Edwards and Mostert. Flex will depend

 

[tlovyankee]

I believe top row wins

 

[Gally]

So it's Kamara/Akers for Edwards/Mostert/Pollard?


I like the Edwards side by quite a bit. I don't think Kamara is much better than Edwards ROS and adding in Mostert (who is a solid RB2) and Pollard (who has RB1 upside with a Zeke injury) and it's that side easily.

 

[notoriousbill]

I traded away Edwards/Mostert/Pollard for Kamara/Akers.

I copuld never hit on the week that Pollard does well. With Taylor, he's a must start IMO. Now Etienne is in that category. I figured getting a RB like Kamara that there's no question of when to start was helpful. Otherwise, I'd be rotating, probably incorrectly depending on the week, between Mostert, Edwards and Pollard. It's a good problem but when you pick wrong it sucks...

Thanks for your opinions!

 

[Gally]

I copuld never hit on the week that Pollard does well. With Taylor, he's a must start IMO. Now Etienne is in that category. I figured getting a RB like Kamara that there's no question of when to start was helpful. Otherwise, I'd be rotating, probably incorrectly depending on the week, between Mostert, Edwards and Pollard. It's a good problem but when you pick wrong it sucks...

Until Taylor goes down again and ETN breaks down with the increased workload. You can can never have too many RB's and I don't think Edwards is much below Kamara for ROS. So I would have locked in Edwards until he proves otherwise. It may work out for you but one injury and you are much worse off. I hope it works for you.

 

[sos32]

Definitely Edward/Pollard/Mostert. Like Gally said, having too many RBs is never a bad thing