What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who is the All-Time Home Run King (1 Viewer)

?

  • Hank Aaron

    Votes: 27 47.4%
  • OTHER

    Votes: 30 52.6%

  • Total voters
    57
I don't know why I keep reading this thread. The leaderboard hasn't changed since 9/5/2007.
Scoreboards sometimes take an annoyingly long time to update. Think of how long it took Galileo in to convince Rome that the earth was round. It takes time for people to get over their dogma. "See, it says right there 762 Home Runs, he's the King." "See, just look at the ground at your feet. Look off to the horizon. The earth is flat!"Sometimes a lot of people who feel stuck take a while to develop fluid reasoning abilities. Your time will come.
 
I don't know why I keep reading this thread. The leaderboard hasn't changed since 9/5/2007.
Scoreboards sometimes take an annoyingly long time to update. Think of how long it took Galileo in to convince Rome that the earth was round. It takes time for people to get over their dogma. "See, it says right there 762 Home Runs, he's the King." "See, just look at the ground at your feet. Look off to the horizon. The earth is flat!"Sometimes a lot of people who feel stuck take a while to develop fluid reasoning abilities. Your time will come.
Mike Gallego?
 
What about the old pitchers who cut the balls, and used some grease, or paper on the ball?

Face it Bonds was a stud before he blew up like a balloon, and even after... the amount of skill it takes to make contact to put shots like those out is crazy. Juice or not, he hit more homeruns in MLB history than anyone, and if juice was more common back in the day, we woulda been talking about other players being juiced in that era instead of now. It allowed him to hit the ball further not make better contact. Also he has never tested positive for roids, so if you are basing it off moral ground, maybe you should keep the moral of law in mind with innocent until proven guilty. And he obstructed justice, which will get overturned at appeal, if not he was not convicted of roids. So dont be a hipocrate and preech moral, when you have none if your convicting a man without a court saying he is guilty.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top