I'm surprised only one vote for SF so far.I'm really looking forward to the NE/HOU and NE/SF matchups later this year.I still like SF even though they have 1 loss and Atl and Hou do not.
It sounds like Brian Cushing is done for the year. I would give them just a slight downgrade.Falcon fan here. On a neutral field I think Houston could beat everyone in the NFL. my vote is for them.
A. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
Crabtree looks like a new player this year. I credit that to Moss in a lot of ways. It's been stated numerous times that he has taken Crabtree under his wing and greatly helped him to develop as a pro. I think Moss' leadership and wisdom are being overlooked. Manningham can take the top off a D which has greatly helped as well. Maybe Moss will be used more as the year goes on but I'm not counting on that.no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
Apparently you missed Kyle Williams two punt returns (or lack thereof) that cost SF the game.no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
I thought they were the best - losing Cushing is a monstrous loss. No depth at LB at all and Watt is is only one man (albeit a superman). The Cushing loss moves Falcons to the top of the heap IMHO.It sounds like Brian Cushing is done for the year. I would give them just a slight downgrade.Falcon fan here. On a neutral field I think Houston could beat everyone in the NFL. my vote is for them.
They're just warming up. Talent-wise the Texans passing game should be one of the best in the league.They're bottom 10 in attempts, but top 2 in NY/A. They're relying on their run game and defense, but they haven't really needed to throw much yet.I used to think it was Houston because of their passing game, but at this point, I'm not sure their passing game is any better than San Francisco's. Statistically, it's a dead heat or in SF's favor.
I think SF's D is better and their special teams are definitely better. Their coaching is a zillion times better, so I'll go SF as long as Smith continues to be very good.
I agree. Though I doubt they would get votes. Kind of like Balt. They deserve to be mentioned but are currently getting 0 votes.NYG need to be an option.
You could say the same about SF's schedule. They have played one winning team and they lost to them.I'm surprised the Texans are getting so many votes. They certainly look the part, but playing 4 of your 5 games against Miami, Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Jets can make you look pretty good.They've yet to play a team with a winning record and the one decent team they've played (Denver) they performed about the same as Atlanta and New England.
First let me say that it is a small sample size all the way around ...Houston and Atlanta have won every game regardless of who they played.I choose Houston at this point over Atlanta.I don't know how you can pick SF here ... They have a loss in a game which they played poorly in ... in all phases and they deserved to lose. They made Christian Ponder look like a HoFer ...The Giants do not deserve any consideration here. They have looked horrible in what should have been two easy wins against "bad" competition; they could easily be 1-4 ...The Ravens should have 3 losses. The replacement refs literally gave them the game against New England. Against KC they were extremely fortunate on several different plays ... the botched snap to Cassel, the blow to Cassel [no unsportsmanlike? if that had been manning or brady ...], the McCluster OPI was not OPI at all as the ball had not been thrown and the Raven defender initiated contact with extended arms ... and finally the ball placement for Rice's 1st down was questionable ... or else KC wins!I still like SF even though they have 1 loss and Atl and Hou do not.
Funny, nobody ever said that about the Patriots all those years they were beating up on crappy opponents. The default position was "They're the Patriots, they can beat anyone."The Texans are the best team right now, but the loss of Cushing is a huge blow.I'm surprised the Texans are getting so many votes. They certainly look the part, but playing 4 of your 5 games against Miami, Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Jets can make you look pretty good.They've yet to play a team with a winning record and the one decent team they've played (Denver) they performed about the same as Atlanta and New England.
I disagree at the moment. That defense still needs some work, and they have some health concerns to address first. Nice test this weekend out in the Bay Area.NYG need to be an option.
I think that San Fran will be hard to beat, you can lay that game on Alex but there was 2 botched punts, and the so called non fumble bt Bradshaw that won that game. San Francisco gave that game to giants just like Baltimore gave the game to the patriots, I am predicting ravens 49ers superbowl.no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
Thanks for not skimping on the size of your avatar. A lot of people could learn from you.Funny, nobody ever said that about the Patriots all those years they were beating up on crappy opponents. The default position was "They're the Patriots, they can beat anyone."The Texans are the best team right now, but the loss of Cushing is a huge blow.I'm surprised the Texans are getting so many votes. They certainly look the part, but playing 4 of your 5 games against Miami, Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Jets can make you look pretty good.They've yet to play a team with a winning record and the one decent team they've played (Denver) they performed about the same as Atlanta and New England.
NYG need to be an option.
The only teams that deserve to be in this poll are Houston (the best), San Fran and Atlanta.
But if they had lost to the Jets and Broncos, those teams would be over .500, and then people would say, "They can't beat winning teams."I'm surprised the Texans are getting so many votes. They certainly look the part, but playing 4 of your 5 games against Miami, Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Jets can make you look pretty good.They've yet to play a team with a winning record and the one decent team they've played (Denver) they performed about the same as Atlanta and New England.
Rank Team1 San Francisco 49ers2 Atlanta Falcons3 Houston Texans4 Chicago Bears5 Baltimore Ravens6 Minnesota Vikings7 New York Giants8 New England Patriots9 St. Louis Rams10 Arizona Cardinals11 Seattle Seahawks12 San Diego Chargers13 Pittsburgh Steelers14 Denver Broncos15 Washington Redskins16 Cincinnati Bengals17 Miami Dolphins18 New Orleans Saints19 Indianapolis Colts20 Philadelphia Eagles21 Green Bay Packers22 Dallas Cowboys23 New York Jets24 Oakland Raiders25 Tampa Bay Buccaneers26 Buffalo Bills27 Detroit Lions28 Carolina Panthers29 Jacksonville Jaguars30 Tennessee Titans31 Cleveland Browns32 Kansas City Chiefs
Thing is if the 49ers passing game had done ANYTHING from the 2nd half of that game on they wouldn't have been in a position for Kyle Williams to cough up the game. In that sense you could argue that the Niners' passing ineptitude in that game was one of the biggest reasons why they lost (Niners fan/Smith fan talking here)As for this poll I'd say it's a dead heat between Houston and San Francisco, with Atlanta a little behind. Voted for SF because I'm a shameful homer, but it could go either way.Apparently you missed Kyle Williams two punt returns (or lack thereof) that cost SF the game.no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
Right, but the "losing teams" SF have beaten include Detroit and Green Bay, and it seems most people don't think they're as bad as their record would indicate. As someone pointed out up above, this is a dumb criticism this early in the year anyway, because if Buffalo, NYJ or GB had beaten the 49ers, they'd have a winning record right now. So it's a lose-lose argument for the 49ers. The fact is that those teams have a losing record (partly) because the 49ers beat them. Houston barely beat the Jets last night. San Francisco destroyed the Jets last week, and then destroyed the Bills this week. They're putting up video game scores right now - yes, the Jets and Bills are bad, but that's what "the best team in the NFL" is supposed to do to bad teams, not escape with a 6 point win.I think SF is the best team right now, despite the one loss. They're just clicking on all cylinders, and will face a nice test this week against the Giants.You could say the same about SF's schedule. They have played one winning team and they lost to them.I'm surprised the Texans are getting so many votes. They certainly look the part, but playing 4 of your 5 games against Miami, Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Jets can make you look pretty good.They've yet to play a team with a winning record and the one decent team they've played (Denver) they performed about the same as Atlanta and New England.
thisThing is if the 49ers passing game had done ANYTHING from the 2nd half of that game on they wouldn't have been in a position for Kyle Williams to cough up the game. In that sense you could argue that the Niners' passing ineptitude in that game was one of the biggest reasons why they lost (Niners fan/Smith fan talking here)As for this poll I'd say it's a dead heat between Houston and San Francisco, with Atlanta a little behind. Voted for SF because I'm a shameful homer, but it could go either way.Apparently you missed Kyle Williams two punt returns (or lack thereof) that cost SF the game.no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.
If the playoffs started next week I think we'd be looking at a Harbaugh bowl. But you're right that if the question is best team through 5 weeks, it's Houston.If we're picking who deserves the title of "best team right now" based on the 5 games played, I think you have to go with Houston. (I voted this)If we're guessing the SB winner, I would shade toward SF.
Question about the Falcons. I have Julio, but I don't really watch them all that closely every week.
They looked pretty damn good last year also. Then they got to the Meadowlands in the playoffs, and the Giants defensive line absolutely abused Atlanta's O-line on their way to a laughable 24-2 beating.
My question is, what has changed for Atlanta? OC, passing more, teams knew when ATL was running seemed very telegrpahed under Mularkey
If they meet the Giants (or another physical team like the Giants) in the playoffs, do we have reason to suspect anything will be different? possibly if the game is at home, Oline play across the league is terrible right now
Is Ryan getting the ball out quicker under Dirk Koetter than he did under Mike Mularkey? Has their offensive line improved at all?
To me, their best chance, obviously, is to keep plugging along to make sure every playoff game is in the Georgia Dome. YES!
Giants (even while banged up) are better than at least a couple of the teams that are on the listI agree. Though I doubt they would get votes. Kind of like Balt. They deserve to be mentioned but are currently getting 0 votes.NYG need to be an option.
1st half: 2/7, 79 yards, 1 TD2nd half/OT: 10/19, 117 yards, 1 TDno he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter.
Somehow NYG recovered 4 of 5 fumbles in that game. Eli also threw a pass so bad, two 49ers collided and didn't intercept the pass.Apparently you missed Kyle Williams two punt returns (or lack thereof) that cost SF the game.no he didnt, vs NYG he couldnt complete a pass after the 3rd quarter. He made alot of plays vs NO, but I would call that D anywhere near "good" he basically has the same weapons though, Mario Manningham is his only upgrade, I dont see Moss doing much so far, maybe they are saving him, but Crabtree, VDavis, Gore were all there last yearA. Smith got it done last year in the playoffs w/o the weapons he has now.SF biggest problem will be can their passing game make a play in the playoffs when they need too? If they play a really good D like chicago or if NYG gets there D rolling Im not sure Alex Smith can get it done.houston is the most complete team.