STOP POSTING LEGAL #### IN A WHO'S HOTTEST THREAD.That not why we here.I still just think it goes to content. If the picture also showed R. Kelly urinating on them, then the fact it was taken by a swimming pool (with a lot of people around) would not be relevant.ETA: At least as far as distribution of the picture is concerned. Obviously, R. Kelly would have public indecency charges, etc.I think his point was that because the activity was occurring in a public place (in this case, a hotel swimming pool with lots of people around) it was presumambly legal.See bolded part of my response. Was responding to his argument that public place makes the picture legal. Better argument is obviously that there is nothing illegal about taking pictures of clothed women.Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Link to where it's illegal to take, possess or distribute a picture of ANYONE in their swimsuit?