What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who's hottest? (1 Viewer)

Who's hottest?

  • 1

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • 2

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 5 41.7%

  • Total voters
    12
Are all of these chicks legal? 
Doubtful. Why does it matter?
Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately. :shrug:
It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.
Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.
:lmao: Link to where it's illegal to take, possess or distribute a picture of ANYONE in their swimsuit?
See bolded part of my response. Was responding to his argument that public place makes the picture legal. Better argument is obviously that there is nothing illegal about taking pictures of clothed women.
I think his point was that because the activity was occurring in a public place (in this case, a hotel swimming pool with lots of people around) it was presumambly legal.
I still just think it goes to content. If the picture also showed R. Kelly urinating on them, then the fact it was taken by a swimming pool (with a lot of people around) would not be relevant.ETA: At least as far as distribution of the picture is concerned. Obviously, R. Kelly would have public indecency charges, etc.
STOP POSTING LEGAL #### IN A WHO'S HOTTEST THREAD.That not why we here.

 
I have met #4 before. She's 17 and from the Dallas area.

Will I get the beat down if I post her myspace page? She is someone's daughter, afterall.

 
I have met #4 before. She's 17 and from the Dallas area.

Will I get the beat down if I post her myspace page? She is someone's daughter, afterall.
If she's 17, save her the onslaught of i-stalking that will ensue if you post it here.
 
I have met #4 before. She's 17 and from the Dallas area.

Will I get the beat down if I post her myspace page? She is someone's daughter, afterall.
when is her birthday?Is 17 the legal age in Texas?

 
I have met #4 before. She's 17 and from the Dallas area.

Will I get the beat down if I post her myspace page? She is someone's daughter, afterall.
when is her birthday?Is 17 the legal age in Texas?
No idea when her birthday is. Yes, 17 is the legal age of consent in Texas.
 
I have met #4 before.  She's 17 and from the Dallas area.

Will I get the beat down if I post her myspace page?  She is someone's daughter, afterall.
when is her birthday?Is 17 the legal age in Texas?
No idea when her birthday is. Yes, 17 is the legal age of consent in Texas.
I am not sure I see the problem. If that is what you want to do.
 
I don't see this thread lasting long by the way. Just a hunch. And it has little to do with the myspace page.

 
If there were more pictures for people to review, I'm sure #4 would be getting more love.
I agree with the need for more pictures. Set up us the album.
:popcorn:
There are TONS of pics on her myspace page. And yes, she would be getting more love. :wub:
OK, I'll be the Good Samaritan here. PM the page to me and I'll tell you if it should be posted.
It's not like there are naked pics on there or anything. I just didn't know if posting a myspace page of a 17yo chick is frowned on around these parts.
 
Judging from the rest of the pics, she is definitely hotter than the original pic lets on. So are many of the other girls, too.

 
Judging from the rest of the pics, she is definitely hotter than the original pic lets on.  So are many of the other girls, too.
Enough to change your vote?
Probably not. She's a little thin for my tastes, but is still a good lookin gal. Something tells me I could probably utilize her "friend" section on MySpace to identify others from the pic.
 
#3 is over 18. And that initial pic does her ZERO justice. I'd post it, but am somewhat concerned that it could obviously lead to pages of those under 18. Not really in the mood for a timeout right now. However, my PM's are up.

 
#3 is over 18. And that initial pic does her ZERO justice. I'd post it, but am somewhat concerned that it could obviously lead to pages of those under 18. Not really in the mood for a timeout right now. However, my PM's are up.
The mods can correct me but it is not your fault if we click on links off your initial link. As long as the initial link is SFFBG then what happens after that is not your fault.
 
#3 is over 18. And that initial pic does her ZERO justice. I'd post it, but am somewhat concerned that it could obviously lead to pages of those under 18. Not really in the mood for a timeout right now. However, my PM's are up.
#3 is my friend's cousin. And she is not 18, I don't think, even though it says she is on myspace. That pic of her that was posted here was so bad that I didn't even regognize her. She looks a lot like Hillary Duff.
 
Going through these myspace pages makes me think two things:

1. I am so pissed I was born when I was and not 10 years later.

2. I just had a son. My friend had a great comment on that: Now you only have to worry about one ####. If you had a girl, you'd have to worry about all of them.

 
A few people have had me send them PMs.  No feedback?
Send me a PM, I'll offer feedback :coffee: Received OM, thanks CG

#4 - cute but still would not get my vote(and I'm partial to dark hair)

#3 - Not a Fan, face is meh

#7 - Very Hot, Might cause me to change vote from #2 but I'd need to see more of #2 to decide.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
With the number of people that now have the PM's I'd expect some further identification of the girls from the original picture. Get to work, slackers!!!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top