Who's your D for week 16? (1 Viewer)

[gman74]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

 

[harryhood]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage.

I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

Around 10, I think.

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

Would you mind rattling off your top five or ten ranked Ds for this week in here? No projections necessary.

 

[Trap Play]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

Would you mind rattling off your top five or ten ranked Ds for this week in here? No projections necessary.

Yes, I would be very interested in seeing that list as well. I haven't been too enamored with the FBG defensive projections this season either. It seems to me FBG would be wise to find a Kickermania equivalent to defensive projections, as not having a second opinion on the subject has been a major liability for me this season.

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

Would you mind rattling off your top five or ten ranked Ds for this week in here? No projections necessary.

I'd say Dallas and Pittsburgh are must plays. I think they'll both expose one-dimensional O's this week. The Jets are close, with their big plays guys + LWash, and the chance of weather playing a role in Seattle this week. The next tier would be teams like Minnesota, who is hot, but loses Fat Pat, Houston just because Oakland is so bad and they are playing with a lot of pride right now, Baltimore, because even in a bad matchup they are still a threat, Philly, because Washington is on the ropes and they're an attack D, and the Giants, for the same reason as Baltimore.Cleveland, Cincy, New England, and Arizona could all be viable plays if the weather forecasts hold and those games are played in bad conditions.This is off the top of my head, I'll think about it some more and check in later today.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

Would you mind rattling off your top five or ten ranked Ds for this week in here? No projections necessary.

I'd say Dallas and Pittsburgh are must plays. I think they'll both expose one-dimensional D's this week. The Jets are close, with their big plays guys + LWash, and the chance of weather playing a role in Seattle this week. The next tier would be teams like Minnesota, who is hot, but loses Fat Pat, Houston just because Oakland is so bad and they are playing with a lot of pride right now, Baltimore, because even in a bad matchup they are still a threat, Philly, because Washington is on the ropes and they're an attack D, and the Giants, for the same reason as Baltimore.Cleveland, Cincy, New England, and Arizona could all be viable plays if the weather forecasts hold and those games are played in bad conditions.This is off the top of my head, I'll think about it some more and check in later today.

This is why you're the people's FBG staff member. Deciding between Minny and Houston right now. Glad to hear you like both of them.

 

[scientist]

The next tier would be teams like Minnesota, who is hot, but loses Fat Pat, Houston just because Oakland is so bad and they are playing with a lot of pride right now, Baltimore, because even in a bad matchup they are still a threat, Philly, because Washington is on the ropes and they're an attack D, and the Giants, for the same reason as Baltimore.Cleveland, Cincy, New England, and Arizona could all be viable plays if the weather forecasts hold and those games are played in bad conditions.This is off the top of my head, I'll think about it some more and check in later today.

In a league where Points Against matter (10 to -10), Minny is really my only play this week. The only other option from this list is Cincy. And while the Browns and the weather might be atrocious, I just don't think I can start Cincy in the SB.

 

[GiantsRule]

Surprised (but happy) that Sigmund said the Giants were a good play this week. Even though they are a fantastic real-life defense, they've actually been below average as a fantasy defense especially these last few weeks. Their only sack against Philly came when McNabb tripped over his own feet and the 3 of the 4 sacks they got vs. Romo were a gift as he was fighting temporary pain.

Delhomme is subject to mistakes though so hopefully they'll take advantage on the stat sheet and in the final result.

 

[footballnerd]

The Redskins' giddy 6-2 start, as Campbell was in the midst of a streak of 271 passes without an interception (a franchise record), only led to a nauseating somersault in their fortunes, and now struggling at 7-7 and finding it difficult to score, he has become a chief scapegoat.

"I think we're worn down, it's been a long season, it was a long training camp, and learning a new system week in and week out, it can be draining," Campbell said. "The whole Redskins organization, that's something we're going through, a lot of changes, and it takes time for things to come together. You look at the good teams, they build it up. It doesn't just come overnight."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...8121703984.html

Just decided to go with PHI D over HOU.

 

[hacman]

Lot of Lions love the last couple of days, but the Saints are explosive when they run the offense through Lance Moore instead of Reggie Bush. Bush is on IR, so I expect the Saints will be up early and they have a defense that can get turnovers with the lead.

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Surprised (but happy) that Sigmund said the Giants were a good play this week. Even though they are a fantastic real-life defense, they've actually been below average as a fantasy defense especially these last few weeks. Their only sack against Philly came when McNabb tripped over his own feet and the 3 of the 4 sacks they got vs. Romo were a gift as he was fighting temporary pain.Delhomme is subject to mistakes though so hopefully they'll take advantage on the stat sheet and in the final result.

Part of the reason I like the Giants is that this team seems to know how to focus when they need to, and also their whole attitude changes with jacobs (and I expect Jacobs to play). Tuck and Kiwi should force Delhomme into some mistakes. The only real X factor is whether Eli plays so badly that they get in a hole early and Carolina can just pound Williams and Stewart.

 

[Ron_Mexico]

No expert here. I have the Jets, the Cards, and the Dolphins. On the wire are NE and Hou who have both been mentioned here. Without bombing you with our league's scoring for defensive teams, it's pretty standard with considerations for fumbles, interceptions and defensive TD's, of course, and points and yardage against. I don't remember which week Oakland changed it's coach, but I went back to week 10. To my surprise, (Scoring systems are relative.) these are the defensive scores each week vs Oakland:

week 10 - Panthers D scores - 17 points

11 - @Miami D scores - 15

12 - @ Denv D scores 3

13 - KC - 15

14 - @ SD - 18

15 - NE - 13

Here's where you have to trust my analysis, but I'm pretty happy with 9 or 10 points, minimally. In my league the top defense (Ravens) this year averaged almost 14 points per week, with the Steelers and Eagles closer to 13. The 12th highest D (Cards) averaged almost 11 for whatever average is worth. The Texans scored a bit more than 8 per week. The bottom team, the Lions, have averaged a tad more than 6 per week. I'm starting to like Houston with its offense clicking vs Oakland. Now do I have the ballz to play them?

Check these Defensive scores in your own leagues.

I love your analysis here and just to give another perspective from my league which doesnt count yardage:Week 10 -Panthers D scores -18 pts against Raiders (1FF, 5 sacks, 2 Ints, 6pts allowed)

Week 11: Miami D scores 9 points (6 sacks, 15 pts allowed) yes, six sacks...

Week 12: Denver scores ZERO (Denver D is raked 32nd Def/ST in my league)

Week 13: KC D scores 17 points (1 Def TD, 2 Fumble Rec, 13pts allowed_

Week 14: SD scores 18 points (3 Ints, 1 Forced Fumble, 3 sacks, 7 points allowed)

Week 15: NE scores 12 points ( 1 Def TD, 1 Int, 2 Sacks, 1 Blocked Extra Pt, 26 pts allowed)

I must thank Boss Superman, for as I just broke down defenses against the Raiders,

I can see clearly that I WILL start Houston D in the Superbowl, and IMO, you should too.

Combining this with.....

December 18, 2008, 01:09

Raiders :: WR, TE, LB

Raiders Update: WRs Lelie, Curry Doubtful

David White, San Francisco Chronicle - [Full Article]

The Raiders will likely be without starting receivers Ashley Lelie (calf) and Ronald Curry (turf toe). Both are listed as doubtful for Week 16 against the Titans. Second-year receiver Johnnie Lee Higgins and rookie Chaz Schilens will likely start, with backups Jonathan Holland and Todd Watkins hoping to make their first NFL catches. In addition, TE Zach Miller (shoulder) and FB Luke Lawton (concussion) were limited in practice Wednesday. Also, the team released LB Robert Thomas and signed WR D.J. Hall to the practice squad.

.... and Houston Texans are the answer this week.

Go with kicker Kris Brown as well.

 

[GiantsRule]

Surprised (but happy) that Sigmund said the Giants were a good play this week. Even though they are a fantastic real-life defense, they've actually been below average as a fantasy defense especially these last few weeks. Their only sack against Philly came when McNabb tripped over his own feet and the 3 of the 4 sacks they got vs. Romo were a gift as he was fighting temporary pain.Delhomme is subject to mistakes though so hopefully they'll take advantage on the stat sheet and in the final result.

Part of the reason I like the Giants is that this team seems to know how to focus when they need to, and also their whole attitude changes with jacobs (and I expect Jacobs to play). Tuck and Kiwi should force Delhomme into some mistakes. The only real X factor is whether Eli plays so badly that they get in a hole early and Carolina can just pound Williams and Stewart.

Good point. Just grabbed Cincy to stash away just in case I wake up Sunday more indecisive than I already am.My concerns about starting a team like Cincy is that they're on the road and as bad as Dorsey is, he's not giving up big points to opposing defenses. On Monday, the Eagles AT HOME only got one interception off of him and didn't record a 2nd sack until late in the 4th quarter. Yes the Eagles scored on their lone pick and kept the Browns to just 10 points. But I was a little disappointed in just how few defensive stats the Eagles logged in that game. And the week before, Tennessee only got one sack on Dorsey. On the bright side, if there's a blizzard, the potential for points against could be huge (10 for a shutout, 8 for 3-6 points scored, 6 for up to 13 points scored; no PA bonus once opponent reaches 24, but no negative points either). And both defenses could get credit for sacks because of slip and falls.Regarding personal preference, even though I've ripped other fantasy owners for considering "last licks" as part of their lineup decision process, it's hard to overlook in the championship game. I have an opportunity to have three players going when my opponent is done: Steve Smith (Car) and Giants D on Sunday night and Ryan Grant on Monday night. While having a decent RB and a top 3 WR on deck is good security, having a defense that's capable (but unlikely) to compile defensive stats adds to the cause. Again, it's all a mental thing as the game being played at 1 p.m. or even tonight wouldn't make a difference in the fantasy score (and I don't buy into the "teams play different on national TV" philosophy).Good luck to all.

 

[ourmanflint]

No expert here. I have the Jets, the Cards, and the Dolphins. On the wire are NE and Hou who have both been mentioned here. Without bombing you with our league's scoring for defensive teams, it's pretty standard with considerations for fumbles, interceptions and defensive TD's, of course, and points and yardage against. I don't remember which week Oakland changed it's coach, but I went back to week 10. To my surprise, (Scoring systems are relative.) these are the defensive scores each week vs Oakland:

week 10 - Panthers D scores - 17 points

11 - @Miami D scores - 15

12 - @ Denv D scores 3

13 - KC - 15

14 - @ SD - 18

15 - NE - 13

Here's where you have to trust my analysis, but I'm pretty happy with 9 or 10 points, minimally. In my league the top defense (Ravens) this year averaged almost 14 points per week, with the Steelers and Eagles closer to 13. The 12th highest D (Cards) averaged almost 11 for whatever average is worth. The Texans scored a bit more than 8 per week. The bottom team, the Lions, have averaged a tad more than 6 per week. I'm starting to like Houston with its offense clicking vs Oakland. Now do I have the ballz to play them?

Check these Defensive scores in your own leagues.

I love your analysis here and just to give another perspective from my league which doesnt count yardage:Week 10 -Panthers D scores -18 pts against Raiders (1FF, 5 sacks, 2 Ints, 6pts allowed)

Week 11: Miami D scores 9 points (6 sacks, 15 pts allowed) yes, six sacks...

Week 12: Denver scores ZERO (Denver D is raked 32nd Def/ST in my league)

Week 13: KC D scores 17 points (1 Def TD, 2 Fumble Rec, 13pts allowed_

Week 14: SD scores 18 points (3 Ints, 1 Forced Fumble, 3 sacks, 7 points allowed)

Week 15: NE scores 12 points ( 1 Def TD, 1 Int, 2 Sacks, 1 Blocked Extra Pt, 26 pts allowed)

I must thank Boss Superman, for as I just broke down defenses against the Raiders,

I can see clearly that I WILL start Houston D in the Superbowl, and IMO, you should too.

Combining this with.....

December 18, 2008, 01:09

Raiders :: WR, TE, LB

Raiders Update: WRs Lelie, Curry Doubtful

David White, San Francisco Chronicle - [Full Article]

The Raiders will likely be without starting receivers Ashley Lelie (calf) and Ronald Curry (turf toe). Both are listed as doubtful for Week 16 against the Titans. Second-year receiver Johnnie Lee Higgins and rookie Chaz Schilens will likely start, with backups Jonathan Holland and Todd Watkins hoping to make their first NFL catches. In addition, TE Zach Miller (shoulder) and FB Luke Lawton (concussion) were limited in practice Wednesday. Also, the team released LB Robert Thomas and signed WR D.J. Hall to the practice squad.

.... and Houston Texans are the answer this week.

Go with kicker Kris Brown as well.

by all regarding Houston.I currently have them slated to start in one of my Super Bowls. Dallas in the other.

I also see that Kickermania has Kris Brown ranked #1.

 

[moose162]

Houston looks like a great play..But would you guys even pick them up if you had the Titans D going against the Steelers?

 

[sportsphysio]

No expert here. I have the Jets, the Cards, and the Dolphins. On the wire are NE and Hou who have both been mentioned here. Without bombing you with our league's scoring for defensive teams, it's pretty standard with considerations for fumbles, interceptions and defensive TD's, of course, and points and yardage against. I don't remember which week Oakland changed it's coach, but I went back to week 10. To my surprise, (Scoring systems are relative.) these are the defensive scores each week vs Oakland:

week 10 - Panthers D scores - 17 points

11 - @Miami D scores - 15

12 - @ Denv D scores 3

13 - KC - 15

14 - @ SD - 18

15 - NE - 13

Here's where you have to trust my analysis, but I'm pretty happy with 9 or 10 points, minimally. In my league the top defense (Ravens) this year averaged almost 14 points per week, with the Steelers and Eagles closer to 13. The 12th highest D (Cards) averaged almost 11 for whatever average is worth. The Texans scored a bit more than 8 per week. The bottom team, the Lions, have averaged a tad more than 6 per week. I'm starting to like Houston with its offense clicking vs Oakland. Now do I have the ballz to play them?

Check these Defensive scores in your own leagues.

I love your analysis here and just to give another perspective from my league which doesnt count yardage:Week 10 -Panthers D scores -18 pts against Raiders (1FF, 5 sacks, 2 Ints, 6pts allowed)

Week 11: Miami D scores 9 points (6 sacks, 15 pts allowed) yes, six sacks...

Week 12: Denver scores ZERO (Denver D is raked 32nd Def/ST in my league)

Week 13: KC D scores 17 points (1 Def TD, 2 Fumble Rec, 13pts allowed_

Week 14: SD scores 18 points (3 Ints, 1 Forced Fumble, 3 sacks, 7 points allowed)

Week 15: NE scores 12 points ( 1 Def TD, 1 Int, 2 Sacks, 1 Blocked Extra Pt, 26 pts allowed)

I must thank Boss Superman, for as I just broke down defenses against the Raiders,

I can see clearly that I WILL start Houston D in the Superbowl, and IMO, you should too.

Combining this with.....

December 18, 2008, 01:09

Raiders :: WR, TE, LB

Raiders Update: WRs Lelie, Curry Doubtful

David White, San Francisco Chronicle - [Full Article]

The Raiders will likely be without starting receivers Ashley Lelie (calf) and Ronald Curry (turf toe). Both are listed as doubtful for Week 16 against the Titans. Second-year receiver Johnnie Lee Higgins and rookie Chaz Schilens will likely start, with backups Jonathan Holland and Todd Watkins hoping to make their first NFL catches. In addition, TE Zach Miller (shoulder) and FB Luke Lawton (concussion) were limited in practice Wednesday. Also, the team released LB Robert Thomas and signed WR D.J. Hall to the practice squad.

.... and Houston Texans are the answer this week.

Go with kicker Kris Brown as well.

:( by all regarding Houston.I currently have them slated to start in one of my Super Bowls. Dallas in the other.

I also see that Kickermania has Kris Brown ranked #1.

So if you had the option to choose, who would it be: Houston @ Oak or Dallas vs. Baltimore?

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Houston looks like a great play..But would you guys even pick them up if you had the Titans D going against the Steelers?

Titans D - Haynesworth = middle of the pack

 

[Ron_Mexico]

No expert here. I have the Jets, the Cards, and the Dolphins. On the wire are NE and Hou who have both been mentioned here. Without bombing you with our league's scoring for defensive teams, it's pretty standard with considerations for fumbles, interceptions and defensive TD's, of course, and points and yardage against. I don't remember which week Oakland changed it's coach, but I went back to week 10. To my surprise, (Scoring systems are relative.) these are the defensive scores each week vs Oakland:

week 10 - Panthers D scores - 17 points

11 - @Miami D scores - 15

12 - @ Denv D scores 3

13 - KC - 15

14 - @ SD - 18

15 - NE - 13

Here's where you have to trust my analysis, but I'm pretty happy with 9 or 10 points, minimally. In my league the top defense (Ravens) this year averaged almost 14 points per week, with the Steelers and Eagles closer to 13. The 12th highest D (Cards) averaged almost 11 for whatever average is worth. The Texans scored a bit more than 8 per week. The bottom team, the Lions, have averaged a tad more than 6 per week. I'm starting to like Houston with its offense clicking vs Oakland. Now do I have the ballz to play them?

Check these Defensive scores in your own leagues.

I love your analysis here and just to give another perspective from my league which doesnt count yardage:Week 10 -Panthers D scores -18 pts against Raiders (1FF, 5 sacks, 2 Ints, 6pts allowed)

Week 11: Miami D scores 9 points (6 sacks, 15 pts allowed) yes, six sacks...

Week 12: Denver scores ZERO (Denver D is raked 32nd Def/ST in my league)

Week 13: KC D scores 17 points (1 Def TD, 2 Fumble Rec, 13pts allowed_

Week 14: SD scores 18 points (3 Ints, 1 Forced Fumble, 3 sacks, 7 points allowed)

Week 15: NE scores 12 points ( 1 Def TD, 1 Int, 2 Sacks, 1 Blocked Extra Pt, 26 pts allowed)

I must thank Boss Superman, for as I just broke down defenses against the Raiders,

I can see clearly that I WILL start Houston D in the Superbowl, and IMO, you should too.

Combining this with.....

December 18, 2008, 01:09

Raiders :: WR, TE, LB

Raiders Update: WRs Lelie, Curry Doubtful

David White, San Francisco Chronicle - [Full Article]

The Raiders will likely be without starting receivers Ashley Lelie (calf) and Ronald Curry (turf toe). Both are listed as doubtful for Week 16 against the Titans. Second-year receiver Johnnie Lee Higgins and rookie Chaz Schilens will likely start, with backups Jonathan Holland and Todd Watkins hoping to make their first NFL catches. In addition, TE Zach Miller (shoulder) and FB Luke Lawton (concussion) were limited in practice Wednesday. Also, the team released LB Robert Thomas and signed WR D.J. Hall to the practice squad.

.... and Houston Texans are the answer this week.

Go with kicker Kris Brown as well.

by all regarding Houston.I currently have them slated to start in one of my Super Bowls. Dallas in the other.

I also see that Kickermania has Kris Brown ranked #1.

So if you had the option to choose, who would it be: Houston @ Oak or Dallas vs. Baltimore?

I just picked up Kris Brown and the Houston D.The Raiders are a total farce of a team which has given up completely.

Now take away both starting WRs from the equation, with Russell at QB

playing from behind all day.

I love the Houston D this Sunday.

love

 

[Evilhomer3k]

Anyone playing Pitt with confidence @ Tenn??

How much confidence? I went with Washington vs Cincinatti last week over Pitt vs Baltimore. That cost me 14 points (our league scores 5 points for a team win). Pittsburgh got me through the regular season so I am likely going with them. Collins will throw some interceptions and I think it will be a similar game as last week. I'm going with Pittsburgh but I'm not super confident. Houston vs Oakland is a very tempting matchup.

 

[the spanker]

Surprised (but happy) that Sigmund said the Giants were a good play this week. Even though they are a fantastic real-life defense, they've actually been below average as a fantasy defense especially these last few weeks. Their only sack against Philly came when McNabb tripped over his own feet and the 3 of the 4 sacks they got vs. Romo were a gift as he was fighting temporary pain.Delhomme is subject to mistakes though so hopefully they'll take advantage on the stat sheet and in the final result.

Part of the reason I like the Giants is that this team seems to know how to focus when they need to, and also their whole attitude changes with jacobs (and I expect Jacobs to play). Tuck and Kiwi should force Delhomme into some mistakes. The only real X factor is whether Eli plays so badly that they get in a hole early and Carolina can just pound Williams and Stewart.

Good point. Just grabbed Cincy to stash away just in case I wake up Sunday more indecisive than I already am.My concerns about starting a team like Cincy is that they're on the road and as bad as Dorsey is, he's not giving up big points to opposing defenses. On Monday, the Eagles AT HOME only got one interception off of him and didn't record a 2nd sack until late in the 4th quarter. Yes the Eagles scored on their lone pick and kept the Browns to just 10 points. But I was a little disappointed in just how few defensive stats the Eagles logged in that game. And the week before, Tennessee only got one sack on Dorsey. On the bright side, if there's a blizzard, the potential for points against could be huge (10 for a shutout, 8 for 3-6 points scored, 6 for up to 13 points scored; no PA bonus once opponent reaches 24, but no negative points either). And both defenses could get credit for sacks because of slip and falls.Regarding personal preference, even though I've ripped other fantasy owners for considering "last licks" as part of their lineup decision process, it's hard to overlook in the championship game. I have an opportunity to have three players going when my opponent is done: Steve Smith (Car) and Giants D on Sunday night and Ryan Grant on Monday night. While having a decent RB and a top 3 WR on deck is good security, having a defense that's capable (but unlikely) to compile defensive stats adds to the cause. Again, it's all a mental thing as the game being played at 1 p.m. or even tonight wouldn't make a difference in the fantasy score (and I don't buy into the "teams play different on national TV" philosophy).Good luck to all.

I"m going to start the Browns D over the NYG D I think. It's hard to say what I'll get, but especially in a league that counts return yards (like mine), I like that upside. The Bengals are allowing the most points to opposing fantasy Ds over the last 6 weeks. And if weather is nasty even better at home for the Browns. Cribbs is due for a Kickoff return for a TD.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

Around 10, I think.

Huh?

 

[Ron_Mexico]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been :X

Around 10, I think.

Huh?

Correct, Houston is ranked at #10 defense this week.I was surprised. I really thought they would be top 3 or 5.

 

[footballnerd]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

Around 10, I think.

Huh?

Correct, Houston is ranked at #10 defense this week.I was surprised. I really thought they would be top 3 or 5.

Take it for what its worth but ESPN's TMR ranks HOU D #1 this week.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

Around 10, I think.

Huh?

I guess that was a little confusing. Projections have Houston as DST #10.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

Around 10, I think.

Huh?

I guess that was a little confusing. Projections have Houston as DST #10.

Got it.With regard to projections, I also was disappointed this year. I don't analyze this stuff to the extent many others do, but what do you guys think about FBGs projections, as a whole. And what others do/did you use?Sorry about the hijack, but I have been wondering about this...

 

[footballnerd]

Full projections are up

If the projections say Houston is a good play I will look for other options. The emailed projections this season have been

Around 10, I think.

Huh?

I guess that was a little confusing. Projections have Houston as DST #10.

Got it.With regard to projections, I also was disappointed this year. I don't analyze this stuff to the extent many others do, but what do you guys think about FBGs projections, as a whole. And what others do/did you use?Sorry about the hijack, but I have been wondering about this...

I get a feel for rankings using FBG and ESPN's Mathew Berry and Eric Karabell only, and none are ever the same. Then you just go with your own research and gut instincts after seeing their ranks. I seem to usually like FBG rankings more.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Thanks. I might have to compare a little more next year. I guess I'm just frustrated at some changes I made that didn't pan out, and I usually don't do that.

 

[footballnerd]

In week 14 I had MJD in my lineup, then last min decided to follow FBG rankings and went with Dunn. MJD ended up getting 20pts, Dunn got 7 and I lost my playoff game by 9. In the next round my team scored more than the team I would of played, meaning I should be in the Super Bowl.

In the end you gotta go with your own gut.

 

[Desert_Power]

No expert here. I have the Jets, the Cards, and the Dolphins. On the wire are NE and Hou who have both been mentioned here. Without bombing you with our league's scoring for defensive teams, it's pretty standard with considerations for fumbles, interceptions and defensive TD's, of course, and points and yardage against. I don't remember which week Oakland changed it's coach, but I went back to week 10. To my surprise, (Scoring systems are relative.) these are the defensive scores each week vs Oakland:

week 10 - Panthers D scores - 17 points

11 - @Miami D scores - 15

12 - @ Denv D scores 3

13 - KC - 15

14 - @ SD - 18

15 - NE - 13

Here's where you have to trust my analysis, but I'm pretty happy with 9 or 10 points, minimally. In my league the top defense (Ravens) this year averaged almost 14 points per week, with the Steelers and Eagles closer to 13. The 12th highest D (Cards) averaged almost 11 for whatever average is worth. The Texans scored a bit more than 8 per week. The bottom team, the Lions, have averaged a tad more than 6 per week. I'm starting to like Houston with its offense clicking vs Oakland. Now do I have the ballz to play them?

Check these Defensive scores in your own leagues.

I love your analysis here and just to give another perspective from my league which doesnt count yardage:Week 10 -Panthers D scores -18 pts against Raiders (1FF, 5 sacks, 2 Ints, 6pts allowed)

Week 11: Miami D scores 9 points (6 sacks, 15 pts allowed) yes, six sacks...

Week 12: Denver scores ZERO (Denver D is raked 32nd Def/ST in my league)

Week 13: KC D scores 17 points (1 Def TD, 2 Fumble Rec, 13pts allowed_

Week 14: SD scores 18 points (3 Ints, 1 Forced Fumble, 3 sacks, 7 points allowed)

Week 15: NE scores 12 points ( 1 Def TD, 1 Int, 2 Sacks, 1 Blocked Extra Pt, 26 pts allowed)

I must thank Boss Superman, for as I just broke down defenses against the Raiders,

I can see clearly that I WILL start Houston D in the Superbowl, and IMO, you should too.

Combining this with.....

December 18, 2008, 01:09

Raiders :: WR, TE, LB

Raiders Update: WRs Lelie, Curry Doubtful

David White, San Francisco Chronicle - [Full Article]

The Raiders will likely be without starting receivers Ashley Lelie (calf) and Ronald Curry (turf toe). Both are listed as doubtful for Week 16 against the Titans. Second-year receiver Johnnie Lee Higgins and rookie Chaz Schilens will likely start, with backups Jonathan Holland and Todd Watkins hoping to make their first NFL catches. In addition, TE Zach Miller (shoulder) and FB Luke Lawton (concussion) were limited in practice Wednesday. Also, the team released LB Robert Thomas and signed WR D.J. Hall to the practice squad.

.... and Houston Texans are the answer this week.

Go with kicker Kris Brown as well.

by all regarding Houston.I currently have them slated to start in one of my Super Bowls. Dallas in the other.

I also see that Kickermania has Kris Brown ranked #1.

Really going to need this to come through.

 

[heidbrink]

Browns

 

[Ron_Mexico]

I picked up the Browns and I'm trying to decide between the Browns and the Cowboys. My fear with the Cowboys is to me and take heart I have not seen a ton of the Cowboys, but when Romo is not feeling up to bar and not playing well the Def gives up a lot more points. I have a feeling this is going to be a tight game and a slug fest. Romo scares me and if he gets pulled.....Ouch...I see the Ravens getting a ton of good field possessions which leads to points.Browns in a rival game in the sleet/snow. Dorsey is a problem as well and they gave up 30 to the Eagles, but 7 came from a pick and they have Cribs returning kicks and punts. Fitz is playing in Cleveland in a hostile enviroment against a defense that plays pretty tough. Cincy beat Washington on their home field and Cincy wins this game they might lose a higher pick...hmmmm funny how that might play out. I like the Browns defense this week against my beloved Bengals. Cribs plays a big part for me. In this type of waether he could break one easy if he has a open lane. It's very difficult as a defensive player to catch a guy who can still make 1 or 2 cuts in bad weather. Cribs can do that. I'll be watching the injury report for Cribs and Romo.

The Browns defense could be on the field for a good long timewith Dorsey going 3 and out all day.

 

[the spanker]

I picked up the Browns and I'm trying to decide between the Browns and the Cowboys. My fear with the Cowboys is to me and take heart I have not seen a ton of the Cowboys, but when Romo is not feeling up to bar and not playing well the Def gives up a lot more points. I have a feeling this is going to be a tight game and a slug fest. Romo scares me and if he gets pulled.....Ouch...I see the Ravens getting a ton of good field possessions which leads to points.Browns in a rival game in the sleet/snow. Dorsey is a problem as well and they gave up 30 to the Eagles, but 7 came from a pick and they have Cribs returning kicks and punts. Fitz is playing in Cleveland in a hostile enviroment against a defense that plays pretty tough. Cincy beat Washington on their home field and Cincy wins this game they might lose a higher pick...hmmmm funny how that might play out. I like the Browns defense this week against my beloved Bengals. Cribs plays a big part for me. In this type of waether he could break one easy if he has a open lane. It's very difficult as a defensive player to catch a guy who can still make 1 or 2 cuts in bad weather. Cribs can do that. I'll be watching the injury report for Cribs and Romo.

The Browns defense could be on the field for a good long timewith Dorsey going 3 and out all day.

So you'r saying Fitzpatrick and Cincy O will be on the field all day? Highly unlikely

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Had Indy and Tampa. Started Tampa, so far.

Could grab SF or Denver but doubt I'll pull the trigger, although my gut says Denver does well (like returning one).

 

[Trap Play]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

Would you mind rattling off your top five or ten ranked Ds for this week in here? No projections necessary.

The Jets are close, with their big plays guys + LWash, and the chance of weather playing a role in Seattle this week.

As someone mentioned in the Week 16 kicker thread, Seattle has a retractable domed stadium, so unless they plan to leave the dome open I don't see weather being a factor. Given this possibility, do you still like the Jets this weekend?

 

[chihawk]

Picked up Dallas off waivers to choose between them and the NYJ. All things point to another solid game for the defense who seems to be juiced up. Mason/Clayton/Heap to me is the same as Hixon/Smith/Boss and the CBs didn't do that bad of a job in coverage. I think I am rolling with the Cowboys after what they did to Big Blue last weekend.

I dont do defensive projections, but if I did, that D would be in my top 5 this week. They smell blood in the water, and the secondary has really stepped up.

Would you mind rattling off your top five or ten ranked Ds for this week in here? No projections necessary.

The Jets are close, with their big plays guys + LWash, and the chance of weather playing a role in Seattle this week.

As someone mentioned in the Week 16 kicker thread, Seattle has a retractable domed stadium, so unless they plan to leave the dome open I don't see weather being a factor. Given this possibility, do you still like the Jets this weekend?

yeah, it's about as retractable as soldier field, so I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one....definitely not a retractable domed stadium.

 

[Trap Play]

yeah, it's about as retractable as soldier field, so I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one....definitely not a retractable domed stadium.

OK. Thanks. I don't watch too many Seahawks games, so I assumed (we all know what that gets you) the person who said it was a retractable dome knew what they were talking about.Given that the weather may be a factor again, I think I'm leaning Jets this weekend over the Browns, Colts, and Viking defenses this week.

 

[ScottNorwood]

As of now I'm rolling with the Colts D. The last time Jax scored over 20 points was 6 weeks ago. Although GB is on waivers and staring me in the face right now.

Well I went with Indy. It looked like a horrible decision until the last 5-6 minutes.

 

[GSteps]

Struggling between Philly @ Was or Tampa Bay hosting the Chargers.

Who would you play and why? TIA.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

As of now I'm rolling with the Colts D. The last time Jax scored over 20 points was 6 weeks ago. Although GB is on waivers and staring me in the face right now.

Well I went with Indy. It looked like a horrible decision until the last 5-6 minutes.

I dropped them this week, but would have been happy with 11 points from my DST.

 

[Pooch]

Any Cleveland homers here with an updated weather outlook for Sunday?

ETA: Never mind. Found this on another thread:

Cleveland locals can chime in but this looks like it could be brutal. Houshmandzadeh owners and maybe Edwards owners need to watch this closely.

From RotoWorld:

The National Weather Service is calling for falling temperatures throughout the day Sunday in Cleveland with shifting winds out of the West reaching 30 miles per hour and possibly more.

Owners of Housh and Braylon Edwards will want to keep an eye on the weather, as winds of 30 mph are more than enough to shut down the arms of Ken Dorsey and Ryan Fitzpatrick.

Source: Bengals.com

Related: Braylon Edwards

 

[Ron_Mexico]

I picked up the Browns and I'm trying to decide between the Browns and the Cowboys. My fear with the Cowboys is to me and take heart I have not seen a ton of the Cowboys, but when Romo is not feeling up to bar and not playing well the Def gives up a lot more points. I have a feeling this is going to be a tight game and a slug fest. Romo scares me and if he gets pulled.....Ouch...I see the Ravens getting a ton of good field possessions which leads to points.Browns in a rival game in the sleet/snow. Dorsey is a problem as well and they gave up 30 to the Eagles, but 7 came from a pick and they have Cribs returning kicks and punts. Fitz is playing in Cleveland in a hostile enviroment against a defense that plays pretty tough. Cincy beat Washington on their home field and Cincy wins this game they might lose a higher pick...hmmmm funny how that might play out. I like the Browns defense this week against my beloved Bengals. Cribs plays a big part for me. In this type of waether he could break one easy if he has a open lane. It's very difficult as a defensive player to catch a guy who can still make 1 or 2 cuts in bad weather. Cribs can do that. I'll be watching the injury report for Cribs and Romo.

The Browns defense could be on the field for a good long timewith Dorsey going 3 and out all day.

So you'r saying Fitzpatrick and Cincy O will be on the field all day? Highly unlikely

True, this could be a punting fest.I still think there are much better options out there.

 

[gkza]

I picked up the Browns and I'm trying to decide between the Browns and the Cowboys. My fear with the Cowboys is to me and take heart I have not seen a ton of the Cowboys, but when Romo is not feeling up to bar and not playing well the Def gives up a lot more points. I have a feeling this is going to be a tight game and a slug fest. Romo scares me and if he gets pulled.....Ouch...I see the Ravens getting a ton of good field possessions which leads to points.Browns in a rival game in the sleet/snow. Dorsey is a problem as well and they gave up 30 to the Eagles, but 7 came from a pick and they have Cribs returning kicks and punts. Fitz is playing in Cleveland in a hostile enviroment against a defense that plays pretty tough. Cincy beat Washington on their home field and Cincy wins this game they might lose a higher pick...hmmmm funny how that might play out. I like the Browns defense this week against my beloved Bengals. Cribs plays a big part for me. In this type of waether he could break one easy if he has a open lane. It's very difficult as a defensive player to catch a guy who can still make 1 or 2 cuts in bad weather. Cribs can do that. I'll be watching the injury report for Cribs and Romo.

The Browns defense could be on the field for a good long timewith Dorsey going 3 and out all day.

So you'r saying Fitzpatrick and Cincy O will be on the field all day? Highly unlikely

True, this could be a punting fest.I still think there are much better options out there.

Browns punter is hurting. I dont know why everyone thinks the browns are good here. With Benson and Henry emerging, the bengals have more offensive opportunities.Browns have 3rd string QB and TE going...

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

This sucks. I have too many to choose from.

 

[Ron_Mexico]

This sucks. I have too many to choose from.

There's a freaking blizzard in New England, plus Boldin isn't playing.Arizona has no running game.I think NE may be a solid play even with the ragtag bunch on defense.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Had Indy and Tampa. Started Tampa, so far. Could grab SF or Denver but doubt I'll pull the trigger, although my gut says Denver does well (like returning one).

Tough one. But I WILL get back to you on it.

Thanks man.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

This sucks. I have too many to choose from.

There's a freaking blizzard in New England, plus Boldin isn't playing.Arizona has no running game.I think NE may be a solid play even with the ragtag bunch on defense.

They're on the list. Minnesota, Cleveland, Houston, and NE.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Had Indy and Tampa. Started Tampa, so far. Could grab SF or Denver but doubt I'll pull the trigger, although my gut says Denver does well (like returning one).

Tough one. But I WILL get back to you on it.

Thanks man.

Nigel is so consumed, the guy doesn't even know I'm here.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

Had Indy and Tampa. Started Tampa, so far.

Could grab SF or Denver but doubt I'll pull the trigger, although my gut says Denver does well (like returning one).

Tough one. But I WILL get back to you on it.

Thanks man. :(

Nigel is so consumed, the guy doesn't even know I'm here.

What the ...?

I'd lean Tampa in the Superbowl. Then SF. Then Denver. Denver's just been so bad, I'd be afraid to rely on them in the biggest game of the year.