#2 a near-perfect ####pal, #1 hotter but 417% more likely to saw off your Emerson while you sleep
I'd like to see your calculations. I only got 381%#2 a near-perfect ####pal, #1 hotter but 417% more likely to saw off your Emerson while you sleep
my protractor is more sensitive to measuring cheekbubbles and their relation to castrational angst than most.I'd like to see your calculations. I only got 381%
Valid points. But, did you remember to readjust for the Feldman effect regarding the level of dilation in the pupils?my protractor is more sensitive to measuring cheekbubbles and their relation to castrational angst than most.
ETA: and the ever-important eyebrow curvature could be thrown off by the angle of the image. i projected a little there.
Watch this stuff. What are you trying to do, get us all banned? 'Murica#1!1 by a kilometer.
I don't find the other one at all attractive.
I have to disagree here GB. #1 but would be concerned about wikkid's observation.#2 by a mile
You're wrong on most of these with this being the most abhorrent example.otb_lifer said:#2 by a mile
No one named Feldman is making anything dilate...northern exposure said:Valid points. But, did you remember to readjust for the Feldman effect regarding the level of dilation in the pupils?
cool beans, capYou're wrong on most of these with this being the most abhorrent example.
She's not smart enoughwikkidpissah said:#2 a near-perfect ####pal, #1 hotter but 417% more likely to saw off your Emerson while you sleep
definitely twinsEYLive said:They're not twins? They look the same to me.![]()
21 years ago. They would have been kids. Homer alias?definitely twins
i had them together one night back in '96. Milwaukee. what a time to be alive.
#2 a near-perfect ####pal, #1 hotter but 417% more likely to saw off your Emerson while you sleep
If you look closely, the one's esophagus is about 4.4 mm too long. Another turnoff.Their feet are too big = total turnoff.
Not twins. Girl on left is Carmen Electra, girl on right is Beatrice manschwalski, hooker.