What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why do we have kickers in Fantasy Football? (1 Viewer)

One of my leagues this year doesn't. I love it. Haven't missed them at all.
:goodposting:
We moved to IDP's and didn't see the point in having two extra spots for kickers.
Not a bad idea...A couple of my leagues have IDP, and a couple have no D/ST. Maybe axing Ks is next.
Actually... I like Ks in the IDP leagues, but in basic leagues I think I'd prefer no K, and no D/ST.
 
Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).

Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.

 
I have been trying for years to eliminate kickers from my league or at least decrease their value a bunch so they make little impact. I would rather be in a FF league that rewards skill and not dumb luck.

Kickers should not be treated the same as the other positions. You can predict many players decently. There are always great players that are shut out each week or unknown players that go off. However, nobody can predict what any kicker is going to do on a consistent basis.

 
I have been trying for years to eliminate kickers from my league or at least decrease their value a bunch so they make little impact. I would rather be in a FF league that rewards skill and not dumb luck. Kickers should not be treated the same as the other positions. You can predict many players decently. There are always great players that are shut out each week or unknown players that go off. However, nobody can predict what any kicker is going to do on a consistent basis.
I don't agree with this at all. I think there are obvious kickers that do better than others. Some kickers are more accurate than others, and I like my league that penalizes kickers who miss, more than just a straight reward for kicks made.The scoring system I like and prefer is 6 pts for 60+, 5 pts for 50+, 4 pts for 40+, 3 for under 40, and -0 for 60+ miss, -1 for 50+ miss, -2 for 40+ miss, and -3 for an under 40 miss. Plus a minus 2 for an XP.We also award a plus 5 each week to the K who has the longest FG each week (in addition to most pass yds, most rush yds and most rec yds).... yeah, it's a bit random, but you'd be surprised how many repeat names make that plus 5 list each week.Just my $.02
 
3nOut said:
Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).

Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
:goodposting: part of the game. Many times I have been on the edge of my seat hoping my kicker made a long field goal for a win. You shouldn't remove kickers any more than you should remove WRs or any other position.
 
I hate the traditional team defense scoring - my leagues just award defenses points on turnover and sacks - a good defense like the JEts is near the bottom despite shutting many teams down with TOs and sacks....

 
Rick James said:
Seems to only add to the randomness of the game.
Seriously?I guess we are going to have two or three of these threads every year....BUT they are pointless....kickers like every other position on NFL teams that score points are represented in FF lineups....BUT if you and your league don't like it then Change YOUR rules.Kickers don't add randomness any more than any of the other facets of FF or NFL.........sounds like you lost a game because your opponent's kicker had a good game and yours didn't........if his quarterback got knocked out after scoring only five points and you won because of that, would that be random?
 
3nOut said:
Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
If FF is trying to mimic real football it's not doing a very good job or I wouldn't be starting Kyle Orton or Ryan Fitzpatrick ever!
 
3nOut said:
Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).
I don't think most FF leagues do try to mimic real football at all. Point per reception, point per carry? QB's that get 4 points for a TD while everyone else get 6 points? Most FF leagues mess with point systems to try and balance out all the postitions, so you can draft a winning team in many different ways. Taking out kickers would just make FF even less like the real game.TD heavy league point systems are probably the closest to real football.
 
The reason kickers don't belong in FF is because more timie than not, the difference between the #2 kicker in the league and #15 is about 20 points /thread

 
3nOut said:
Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
If FF is trying to mimic real football it's not doing a very good job or I wouldn't be starting Kyle Orton or Ryan Fitzpatrick ever!
Why not? If you only had Orton and Tebow on your roster you wouldn't start Orton? NFL teams don't have the luxury of having Manning, Vick, and Orton on the same team where you can afford to bench Orton. If you had a 32 team league (not saying I do) you may well have to resort to that.I'm not saying FF tries to mimic the NFL exactly, but it should at least try to address all aspects of the game.
 
The reason kickers don't belong in my FF league is because more timie than not, the difference between the #2 kicker in the league and #15 is about 20 points /thread
Thats better.Are you saying that its a big difference so its not a fair position to have, or a small one so it doesn't matter? A 20 point difference is only slightly more than 1pt a game, so I don;t see what the big deal is.

 
I'm in a league that has dumped both kickers and defenses in the last couple of seasons. Best thing we've ever done.

I've floated the idea in other leagues I'm in and people resist, but don't offer much rationale for their resistance - it always sounds to me like "let's keep them because we've always had them". Um, ok.

 
Kickers don't add randomness any more than any of the other facets of FF or NFL.........sounds like you lost a game because your opponent's kicker had a good game and yours didn't........if his quarterback got knocked out after scoring only five points and you won because of that, would that be random?
I was going to post something along those lines.
I'm in a league that has dumped both kickers and defenses in the last couple of seasons. Best thing we've ever done.
How so? What specifically made it the best thing ever?
 
I can't say I'd MISS having kickers, but I'll agree with the guy above that said it adds a level of excitement. The reason I like K is because it's the only position where you KNOW something's about to happen. The Falcons stall on the 25, I know Bryant will be lining it up for another 5 pts. It makes that phase of the game entertaining so I really can't see a reason to do away with it.

If you're looking to eliminate randomness - I'd suggest chess.

 
Mello said:
Sabertooth said:
I'd love to do no K and no ST, but my league mates that are not as into it as I am want the randomness I think.
Same here. K and ST just add more variance into a game where it's already high. I'd like to try a league without them, but league mates seem to want them because that's the way it has always been. The only real answer to why we have kickers is:

PolishNorbi said:
To piss us off.
Really? I would think the kicker spot offers the least variance of any position in FF - unless I'm not understanding something correctly about variance...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The reason kickers don't belong in my FF league is because more timie than not, the difference between the #2 kicker in the league and #15 is about 20 points /thread
Thats better.Are you saying that its a big difference so its not a fair position to have, or a small one so it doesn't matter? A 20 point difference is only slightly more than 1pt a game, so I don;t see what the big deal is.
My point is there's not much of a difference between #2 and #15, so boot the kickers to the curb. Sorry if I wasn't more clear.
 
Addai said:
Because they score tons of points.
I've heard this a lot, but I've never been in a league with a scoring system that backs it up.
In my PPR league the highest scoring K is Sebastian Jenikoski (sorry if i butchered the spelling of the name, but i'm going off memory) who has 97 points so far. That puts him right around Chris Johnson level, who has 100 points so far. He is around the 25th highest scorer of any position in the league not including defense. So there are a good number of points available to Kickers.
 
If you think having PK's are bad, try a league using Punters :hifive: Now that there is fun I don't care who you are

 
Maybe this will help make my point about how random kickers are and why kickers add a lot of luck to FF.

In my league, the kickers are chosen in the last 2 rounds. Sure, there are a few that folks go after but most guys just go down their list and take the K next on the list without much thought to it.

Janikowski is another good point. I doubt he was one of the first 6 kickers picked but he is the leading K in some leagues. Just luck.

 
got rid of kickers in the leagues I commish about 5 or 6 years ago. been happy about it ever since. silly kickers.

 
Maybe this will help make my point about how random kickers are and why kickers add a lot of luck to FF.In my league, the kickers are chosen in the last 2 rounds. Sure, there are a few that folks go after but most guys just go down their list and take the K next on the list without much thought to it. Janikowski is another good point. I doubt he was one of the first 6 kickers picked but he is the leading K in some leagues. Just luck.
And where was Arian Foster taken? The leading RB in my league currently. Just luck.
 
Maybe this will help make my point about how random kickers are and why kickers add a lot of luck to FF.In my league, the kickers are chosen in the last 2 rounds. Sure, there are a few that folks go after but most guys just go down their list and take the K next on the list without much thought to it. Janikowski is another good point. I doubt he was one of the first 6 kickers picked but he is the leading K in some leagues. Just luck.
And where was Arian Foster taken? The leading RB in my league currently. Just luck.
I was just coming in to make a similar point. Not that I could care whether kickers are part of any of my leagues, but this year in general seems pretty random.Top 5 QB1. Rivers2. Rogers3. Brees4. Manning5. OrtonTop 5 HB1. Foster2. AP3. McFadden4. Hillis5. GoreTop 5 WR1. Owens2, Nicks3. Roddy4. Lloyd5. MegatronTop 5 TE1. Gates2. Witten3. Keller4. Z. Miller5. DavisThis is from a standard scoring league with 0.5 ppr and 6 pts TD for all.
 
Team A: 49 points, kicker gets 7. Team B: 9 points, kicker gets 9. It's the only position where opportunity and talent don't ever correspond.

 
The draft is just the beginning. As the season develops you will find waiver wire gems in kickers and defenses that will put your team over the top.

See my previous post, he will win you games.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Addai said:
Because they score tons of points.
I've heard this a lot, but I've never been in a league with a scoring system that backs it up.
50+ = 6pts40-49 = 4pts0-39 = 3ptsPAT = 3pts.
Wow, 3 points for a PAT.My league awards Field Goals the distance/10. So a 45 yard field goal is 4.5 points. That way instead of an 18 yarder and a 39 yarder both being worth 3 points, they are worth 1.8 and 3.9 repectively. Also, PAT's are only one point.
 
I can't say I'd MISS having kickers, but I'll agree with the guy above that said it adds a level of excitement. The reason I like K is because it's the only position where you KNOW something's about to happen. The Falcons stall on the 25, I know Bryant will be lining it up for another 5 pts. It makes that phase of the game entertaining so I really can't see a reason to do away with it. If you're looking to eliminate randomness - I'd suggest chess.
:goodposting: Kickers are totally random, but they do add a little something to the game. This is my first year streaming kickers, and I've started a different kicker every week for the most part. There is a little bit of fun in trying to figure out which K from the WW will put up good numbers that week. Results have been mixed for me but it's just another entertaining aspect of fantasy football.
 
FYI everyone, you can only ask this question about kickers or DST. Any other position and your post will get deleted.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
3nOut said:
Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).

Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
:goodposting: This is also the reason why most leagues don't allow you to start 4 RBs, and there aren't many start 2 QB leagues. For many people, it takes away from the point of fantasy football.

If you don't like the luck element, move to a rotisserie format.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top