Rick James
Footballguy
Seems to only add to the randomness of the game.
One of my leagues this year doesn't. I love it. Haven't missed them at all.
We moved to IDP's and didn't see the point in having two extra spots for kickers.One of my leagues this year doesn't. I love it. Haven't missed them at all.![]()
Not a bad idea...A couple of my leagues have IDP, and a couple have no D/ST. Maybe axing Ks is next.We moved to IDP's and didn't see the point in having two extra spots for kickers.One of my leagues this year doesn't. I love it. Haven't missed them at all.![]()
Actually... I like Ks in the IDP leagues, but in basic leagues I think I'd prefer no K, and no D/ST.Not a bad idea...A couple of my leagues have IDP, and a couple have no D/ST. Maybe axing Ks is next.We moved to IDP's and didn't see the point in having two extra spots for kickers.One of my leagues this year doesn't. I love it. Haven't missed them at all.![]()
Same here. K and ST just add more variance into a game where it's already high. I'd like to try a league without them, but league mates seem to want them because that's the way it has always been. The only real answer to why we have kickers is:I'd love to do no K and no ST, but my league mates that are not as into it as I am want the randomness I think.
To piss us off.
I don't agree with this at all. I think there are obvious kickers that do better than others. Some kickers are more accurate than others, and I like my league that penalizes kickers who miss, more than just a straight reward for kicks made.The scoring system I like and prefer is 6 pts for 60+, 5 pts for 50+, 4 pts for 40+, 3 for under 40, and -0 for 60+ miss, -1 for 50+ miss, -2 for 40+ miss, and -3 for an under 40 miss. Plus a minus 2 for an XP.We also award a plus 5 each week to the K who has the longest FG each week (in addition to most pass yds, most rush yds and most rec yds).... yeah, it's a bit random, but you'd be surprised how many repeat names make that plus 5 list each week.Just my $.02I have been trying for years to eliminate kickers from my league or at least decrease their value a bunch so they make little impact. I would rather be in a FF league that rewards skill and not dumb luck. Kickers should not be treated the same as the other positions. You can predict many players decently. There are always great players that are shut out each week or unknown players that go off. However, nobody can predict what any kicker is going to do on a consistent basis.
I've heard this a lot, but I've never been in a league with a scoring system that backs it up.Addai said:Because they score tons of points.
3nOut said:Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).
Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
Seriously?I guess we are going to have two or three of these threads every year....BUT they are pointless....kickers like every other position on NFL teams that score points are represented in FF lineups....BUT if you and your league don't like it then Change YOUR rules.Kickers don't add randomness any more than any of the other facets of FF or NFL.........sounds like you lost a game because your opponent's kicker had a good game and yours didn't........if his quarterback got knocked out after scoring only five points and you won because of that, would that be random?Rick James said:Seems to only add to the randomness of the game.
50+ = 6pts40-49 = 4pts0-39 = 3ptsPAT = 3pts.I've heard this a lot, but I've never been in a league with a scoring system that backs it up.Addai said:Because they score tons of points.
If FF is trying to mimic real football it's not doing a very good job or I wouldn't be starting Kyle Orton or Ryan Fitzpatrick ever!3nOut said:Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
I don't think most FF leagues do try to mimic real football at all. Point per reception, point per carry? QB's that get 4 points for a TD while everyone else get 6 points? Most FF leagues mess with point systems to try and balance out all the postitions, so you can draft a winning team in many different ways. Taking out kickers would just make FF even less like the real game.TD heavy league point systems are probably the closest to real football.3nOut said:Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).
Why not? If you only had Orton and Tebow on your roster you wouldn't start Orton? NFL teams don't have the luxury of having Manning, Vick, and Orton on the same team where you can afford to bench Orton. If you had a 32 team league (not saying I do) you may well have to resort to that.I'm not saying FF tries to mimic the NFL exactly, but it should at least try to address all aspects of the game.If FF is trying to mimic real football it's not doing a very good job or I wouldn't be starting Kyle Orton or Ryan Fitzpatrick ever!3nOut said:Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.
Thats better.Are you saying that its a big difference so its not a fair position to have, or a small one so it doesn't matter? A 20 point difference is only slightly more than 1pt a game, so I don;t see what the big deal is.The reason kickers don't belong in my FF league is because more timie than not, the difference between the #2 kicker in the league and #15 is about 20 points /thread
I was going to post something along those lines.Kickers don't add randomness any more than any of the other facets of FF or NFL.........sounds like you lost a game because your opponent's kicker had a good game and yours didn't........if his quarterback got knocked out after scoring only five points and you won because of that, would that be random?
How so? What specifically made it the best thing ever?I'm in a league that has dumped both kickers and defenses in the last couple of seasons. Best thing we've ever done.
Really? I would think the kicker spot offers the least variance of any position in FF - unless I'm not understanding something correctly about variance...Mello said:Same here. K and ST just add more variance into a game where it's already high. I'd like to try a league without them, but league mates seem to want them because that's the way it has always been. The only real answer to why we have kickers is:Sabertooth said:I'd love to do no K and no ST, but my league mates that are not as into it as I am want the randomness I think.
PolishNorbi said:To piss us off.
My point is there's not much of a difference between #2 and #15, so boot the kickers to the curb. Sorry if I wasn't more clear.Thats better.Are you saying that its a big difference so its not a fair position to have, or a small one so it doesn't matter? A 20 point difference is only slightly more than 1pt a game, so I don;t see what the big deal is.The reason kickers don't belong in my FF league is because more timie than not, the difference between the #2 kicker in the league and #15 is about 20 points /thread
In my PPR league the highest scoring K is Sebastian Jenikoski (sorry if i butchered the spelling of the name, but i'm going off memory) who has 97 points so far. That puts him right around Chris Johnson level, who has 100 points so far. He is around the 25th highest scorer of any position in the league not including defense. So there are a good number of points available to Kickers.I've heard this a lot, but I've never been in a league with a scoring system that backs it up.Addai said:Because they score tons of points.
And where was Arian Foster taken? The leading RB in my league currently. Just luck.Maybe this will help make my point about how random kickers are and why kickers add a lot of luck to FF.In my league, the kickers are chosen in the last 2 rounds. Sure, there are a few that folks go after but most guys just go down their list and take the K next on the list without much thought to it. Janikowski is another good point. I doubt he was one of the first 6 kickers picked but he is the leading K in some leagues. Just luck.
I was just coming in to make a similar point. Not that I could care whether kickers are part of any of my leagues, but this year in general seems pretty random.Top 5 QB1. Rivers2. Rogers3. Brees4. Manning5. OrtonTop 5 HB1. Foster2. AP3. McFadden4. Hillis5. GoreTop 5 WR1. Owens2, Nicks3. Roddy4. Lloyd5. MegatronTop 5 TE1. Gates2. Witten3. Keller4. Z. Miller5. DavisThis is from a standard scoring league with 0.5 ppr and 6 pts TD for all.And where was Arian Foster taken? The leading RB in my league currently. Just luck.Maybe this will help make my point about how random kickers are and why kickers add a lot of luck to FF.In my league, the kickers are chosen in the last 2 rounds. Sure, there are a few that folks go after but most guys just go down their list and take the K next on the list without much thought to it. Janikowski is another good point. I doubt he was one of the first 6 kickers picked but he is the leading K in some leagues. Just luck.
Wow, 3 points for a PAT.My league awards Field Goals the distance/10. So a 45 yard field goal is 4.5 points. That way instead of an 18 yarder and a 39 yarder both being worth 3 points, they are worth 1.8 and 3.9 repectively. Also, PAT's are only one point.50+ = 6pts40-49 = 4pts0-39 = 3ptsPAT = 3pts.I've heard this a lot, but I've never been in a league with a scoring system that backs it up.Addai said:Because they score tons of points.
I can't say I'd MISS having kickers, but I'll agree with the guy above that said it adds a level of excitement. The reason I like K is because it's the only position where you KNOW something's about to happen. The Falcons stall on the 25, I know Bryant will be lining it up for another 5 pts. It makes that phase of the game entertaining so I really can't see a reason to do away with it. If you're looking to eliminate randomness - I'd suggest chess.
FYI everyone, you can only ask this question about kickers or DST. Any other position and your post will get deleted.
Hey RayRayRayOfSunshineJr.Not clicking on the thread saves you even more time.No, but seriously. It's a very interesting topic which has never been touched on before. Thought provoking. Almost useful as a WDIS posting. Do go on.
3nOut said:Because there are real kickers in the NFL? I think for the most part FF tries to mimic real football as much as possible. So as many positions as possible should be reflected in the scoring including D and ST, even if it means grouping them into TD/ST. If you decide to eliminate a position from your FF league why not try starting a league without QBs? Whats the difference? Or maybe make them a flex position (I bet a lot of Ks would be used as a flex as they are more consistent).
Bottom line is; if you don't like kickers, convince your league to drop them from your roster requirements. Its your choice.