What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why would the Packers take Jordy Nelson over Limas Sweed (1 Viewer)

Sabertooth

Footballguy
Nobody, and I mean nobody saw that coming. I am trying to figure out what Ted saw in Nelson that he didn't see in Sweed? Anybody want to chime in on this? I don't follow the college game much, but this seemed a no brainer.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody, and I mean nobody saw that coming. I am trying to figure out what Ted saw in Nelson that he didn't see in Sweed? Anybody want to chime in on this? I don't follow the college game much, but this seemed a no brainer.
I don't pretend to know these things. I would assume TT feels he fits the scheme better.But here is a very interesting article on Nelson with rather extensive analysis: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/24292722/

 
Nobody, and I mean nobody saw that coming. I am trying to figure out what Ted saw in Nelson that he didn't see in Sweed? Anybody want to chime in on this? I don't follow the college game much, but this seemed a no brainer.
It really seems to be a 'style' issue to me. Sweed seems like a prototypical big target guy, but isn't a polished route runner. I take him as a go up and get it guy, but one who is going to have defenders near him at all time. He doesn't appear to like contact from what I've read. Not a slot receiver.Nelson seems like a little better route runner. He'll make his living in traffic, and is not as much of a go up and get it guy. The offense McCarthy runs thrive on run after catch, and from what I've seen of Nelson, he offers more of that than Sweed.

My two cents.

Check out the 53 second mark of this video. I've seen Greg Jennings do that quick spin numerous times and turn it into big gains. That seems to be what Thompson likes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody, and I mean nobody saw that coming. I am trying to figure out what Ted saw in Nelson that he didn't see in Sweed? Anybody want to chime in on this? I don't follow the college game much, but this seemed a no brainer.
I also don't follow college football much, but could it be the so-called intangibles: a character/smarts thing? Seems like the knocks I've read on Sweed are that he's a bit sloppy - relies too much on natural talent rather than hard work?You're right that nobody saw the Nelson pick coming, but after Greg Jennings & James Jones the past two years, I'll give Thompson the benefit of the doubt when it comes to drafting WRs early. Most analysts called both of those guys reaches where TT drafted them.
 
Because while Sweed's probably the better player right at this moment, Nelson has a better work ethic than probably anyone in the draft and his upside potential is pretty limitless. He's fast, big, overcame walk-on status to get to where he is, and he's already "settled down" and married.

Frankly, I think they made the right choice.

 
TT knows what he's doing. The rest of us may have trouble realizing it at times...but eventually, this decision will make perfect sense.
I'm not second guessing. I trust his judgment.
Really? My post was partly sarcasm. ;)In seriousness, I wonder if a guy like Sweed gets tainted by the Texas brand and comparisons to Roy Williams. Is Sweed a great route-runner? Thompson seems to place a high value on that stuff - more than the pure measureables (though Nelson has those too). :confused: Not really sure, but Roy Williams was the first thing that came to mind for me.
 
Great and unpopular move by Ted Thompson. Jordy Nelson will be a solid possession WR at the next level, the heir apparent to Donald Driver. He does two things very well that Sweed is awful at - running routes and catching the ball. Sweed has more upside and is a more exciting player to watch, but Nelson's a better WR.

 
Great and unpopular move by Ted Thompson. Jordy Nelson will be a solid possession WR at the next level, the heir apparent to Donald Driver. He does two things very well that Sweed is awful at - running routes and catching the ball. Sweed has more upside and is a more exciting player to watch, but Nelson's a better WR.
Is Sweed considered a bad route runner? I'm too lazy to confirm this, but it fits my suspicions.
 
When they took him it seemed to me that they are envisioning Nelson as the slot WR with Jennings and Jones split wide.

:goodposting:

 
Where did Sigmund and Cecil have Nelson ranked? Was he even in their top 10? He was the second or third WR selected.

 
When they took him it seemed to me that they are envisioning Nelson as the slot WR with Jennings and Jones split wide. :confused:
I believe you are correct with this plan.Nelson is going to be the Packers version of Wes Welker. He's fearless, and is going to run all the underneath stuff that many WRs shy away from. That is something that neither Koren Robinson or Ruvell Martin offered. They are decent WRs, but its' my guess that the Packers will be extremely difficult to cover with Jennings and Jones wide and Nelson out of the slot. It certainly seems like the Packers are going to have a very dynamic set of pass catchers for Rodgers/Brohm going forward.
 
Check out the 53 second mark of this video. I've seen Greg Jennings do that quick spin numerous times and turn it into big gains. That seems to be what Thompson likes.

That vid + the article posted above + me being a GB homer got me a little excited. I should be able to sneak him early third of rook dynasty considering the receivers the Pack allready have.
 
Great and unpopular move by Ted Thompson. Jordy Nelson will be a solid possession WR at the next level, the heir apparent to Donald Driver. He does two things very well that Sweed is awful at - running routes and catching the ball. Sweed has more upside and is a more exciting player to watch, but Nelson's a better WR.
Is Sweed considered a bad route runner? I'm too lazy to confirm this, but it fits my suspicions.
I've read a couple of reports stating so and based on my viewings of him last season (owned him on my college fantasy team before the injury) and this offseason I think he is a terrible route runner. Jordy's much more polished.
 
But I guess what I am asking is this, how come nobody had Nelson rated as a top prospect. It's not as if these two were considered neck and neck. Was the logjam at wideout this tight that the first rated prospect and the 10th rated prospect were really a coinflip?

 
But I guess what I am asking is this, how come nobody had Nelson rated as a top prospect. It's not as if these two were considered neck and neck. Was the logjam at wideout this tight that the first rated prospect and the 10th rated prospect were really a coinflip?
YesTruly depended on what a team was looking for- nelson is a much better fit in gb than sweed
 
I've read nothing but good things about Nelson and the comparison I like is Hines Ward. He's not flashy, but the Packers don't need him to be since they already have Jennings. I think Nelson ends up taking over Driver's role in the offense, to the detriment of James Jones.

 
Nelson is the guy that torched Talib for the long td reception in the Kansas game this year right? That was one of the most impressive plays I saw a wr make all year.

 
Nobody, and I mean nobody saw that coming. I am trying to figure out what Ted saw in Nelson that he didn't see in Sweed? Anybody want to chime in on this? I don't follow the college game much, but this seemed a no brainer.
It really seems to be a 'style' issue to me. Sweed seems like a prototypical big target guy, but isn't a polished route runner. I take him as a go up and get it guy, but one who is going to have defenders near him at all time. He doesn't appear to like contact from what I've read. Not a slot receiver.Nelson seems like a little better route runner. He'll make his living in traffic, and is not as much of a go up and get it guy. The offense McCarthy runs thrive on run after catch, and from what I've seen of Nelson, he offers more of that than Sweed.

My two cents.

Check out the 53 second mark of this video. I've seen Greg Jennings do that quick spin numerous times and turn it into big gains. That seems to be what Thompson likes.

Ted is drafting clones of what he has.
 
When they took him it seemed to me that they are envisioning Nelson as the slot WR with Jennings and Jones split wide. :thumbdown:
I believe you are correct with this plan.Nelson is going to be the Packers version of Wes Welker. He's fearless, and is going to run all the underneath stuff that many WRs shy away from. That is something that neither Koren Robinson or Ruvell Martin offered. They are decent WRs, but its' my guess that the Packers will be extremely difficult to cover with Jennings and Jones wide and Nelson out of the slot. It certainly seems like the Packers are going to have a very dynamic set of pass catchers for Rodgers/Brohm going forward.
Those are things that James Jones does. These players are pretty interchangeable. KRob and river are still there too. KRob may become a kick returner. Where will Nelson go in drafts? Since he's not a starter probably late. :thumbup:
 
But I guess what I am asking is this, how come nobody had Nelson rated as a top prospect. It's not as if these two were considered neck and neck. Was the logjam at wideout this tight that the first rated prospect and the 10th rated prospect were really a coinflip?
I've heard that NFL teams had Nelson in their top 3. The reason no one had him in their top 10 outside of the NFL is because mock drafts ruin our preceptions of players. Sweed is the sexy name pick that everyone expects. From a big school, lots of publicity, etc. Nelson was a walk on and has excelled to where he is now on his own merrit. Plus, don't get obsessed with Kiper's or Kirwans, or anyone else's rankings... people rank players based on their own SCHEMES. GB has a certain scheme. A top rated WR may fit awful into our scheme but great into another team's. A great example of this is OL. GB runs the zone blocking offense, so OL without experience in this or not built for this would do awful. I don't care if they're the #1 pick or not- but them in an offense that they are not used to and physically/mentally can not perform in and they will be a bust. Rankings are done by each team, and GB had Nelson ranked very high apparently. I think he's the best WR int he draft when you consider upside, character, and current talent. I didn't hear about him until GB took him, but further analysis of WRs taken round 2 and I think he was the best one
 
When they took him it seemed to me that they are envisioning Nelson as the slot WR with Jennings and Jones split wide. :thumbup:
I believe you are correct with this plan.Nelson is going to be the Packers version of Wes Welker. He's fearless, and is going to run all the underneath stuff that many WRs shy away from. That is something that neither Koren Robinson or Ruvell Martin offered. They are decent WRs, but its' my guess that the Packers will be extremely difficult to cover with Jennings and Jones wide and Nelson out of the slot. It certainly seems like the Packers are going to have a very dynamic set of pass catchers for Rodgers/Brohm going forward.
Those are things that James Jones does. These players are pretty interchangeable. KRob and river are still there too. KRob may become a kick returner. Where will Nelson go in drafts? Since he's not a starter probably late. :shrug:
Agreed that Jones is a strong WR as well, and can hold up well to the over the middle stuff. One thing seems certain is that Jennings will be one of the wides. It seems like Nelson may have better YAC ability than Jones. We'll see once he hits the field, but that would be my initial thinking. That would lead me to believe they want to put Nelson in the slot, and get him the ball on a lot of short stuff. Question also may be who is the odd man out this year? Probably only going to keep 5 maybe 6. JenningsDriverJonesNelsonRobinsonMartinSwain
 
The more I hear about this guy, the more I'm excited to have him in Green and Gold. I heard an interview with his coach, who said that K-state plays a west-coast offense and Nelson lined up in all three spots. He's also only been a WR for two years, starting out at Safety. To me, that is the most amazing part: he's that polished (according to reports) after only two years playing the position full-time. Also, his intangibles are top notch (2x captain, blue collar worker, all around great guy from what I hear). I think this was a great pick up even if it wasn't at a position of supposed need.

 
Because while Sweed's probably the better player right at this moment, Nelson has a better work ethic than probably anyone in the draft and his upside potential is pretty limitless. He's fast, big, overcame walk-on status to get to where he is, and he's already "settled down" and married.

Frankly, I think they made the right choice.
:lmao: Not that my opinion matters, but Nelson was the best WR in the draft in my view.

 
When they took him it seemed to me that they are envisioning Nelson as the slot WR with Jennings and Jones split wide. :lmao:
I believe you are correct with this plan.Nelson is going to be the Packers version of Wes Welker. He's fearless, and is going to run all the underneath stuff that many WRs shy away from. That is something that neither Koren Robinson or Ruvell Martin offered. They are decent WRs, but its' my guess that the Packers will be extremely difficult to cover with Jennings and Jones wide and Nelson out of the slot. It certainly seems like the Packers are going to have a very dynamic set of pass catchers for Rodgers/Brohm going forward.
Those are things that James Jones does. These players are pretty interchangeable. KRob and river are still there too. KRob may become a kick returner. Where will Nelson go in drafts? Since he's not a starter probably late. :lmao:
Agreed that Jones is a strong WR as well, and can hold up well to the over the middle stuff. One thing seems certain is that Jennings will be one of the wides. It seems like Nelson may have better YAC ability than Jones. We'll see once he hits the field, but that would be my initial thinking. That would lead me to believe they want to put Nelson in the slot, and get him the ball on a lot of short stuff. Question also may be who is the odd man out this year? Probably only going to keep 5 maybe 6. Jennings INDriver INJones INNelson IN Robinson BubbleMartin Bubble Swain Practice Squad
Seems like a long time since the Packers trotted out Brewster, Holliday, and Martin as their starters.
 
The more I hear about this guy, the more I'm excited to have him in Green and Gold. I heard an interview with his coach, who said that K-state plays a west-coast offense and Nelson lined up in all three spots. He's also only been a WR for two years, starting out at Safety. To me, that is the most amazing part: he's that polished (according to reports) after only two years playing the position full-time. Also, his intangibles are top notch (2x captain, blue collar worker, all around great guy from what I hear). I think this was a great pick up even if it wasn't at a position of supposed need.
Midwest kid too. He'll fit right into Green Bay and the northern Wisconsin culture. He was talking about his small town mentality in an interview I saw with him. Thompson stated that he'd tried to keep a lid on his interest in Nelson.
 
Sabertooth said:
JFT Ben said:
The more I hear about this guy, the more I'm excited to have him in Green and Gold. I heard an interview with his coach, who said that K-state plays a west-coast offense and Nelson lined up in all three spots. He's also only been a WR for two years, starting out at Safety. To me, that is the most amazing part: he's that polished (according to reports) after only two years playing the position full-time. Also, his intangibles are top notch (2x captain, blue collar worker, all around great guy from what I hear). I think this was a great pick up even if it wasn't at a position of supposed need.
Midwest kid too. He'll fit right into Green Bay and the northern Wisconsin culture. He was talking about his small town mentality in an interview I saw with him. Thompson stated that he'd tried to keep a lid on his interest in Nelson.
when we asked him what he did for fun at the senior bowl, he said "work on my farm"
 
Sabertooth said:
JFT Ben said:
The more I hear about this guy, the more I'm excited to have him in Green and Gold. I heard an interview with his coach, who said that K-state plays a west-coast offense and Nelson lined up in all three spots. He's also only been a WR for two years, starting out at Safety. To me, that is the most amazing part: he's that polished (according to reports) after only two years playing the position full-time. Also, his intangibles are top notch (2x captain, blue collar worker, all around great guy from what I hear). I think this was a great pick up even if it wasn't at a position of supposed need.
Midwest kid too. He'll fit right into Green Bay and the northern Wisconsin culture. He was talking about his small town mentality in an interview I saw with him. Thompson stated that he'd tried to keep a lid on his interest in Nelson.
when we asked him what he did for fun at the senior bowl, he said "work on my farm"
LOVED talking John Deere with that kid! :confused:The answer here is toughness and heart. Nelson has it, Sweed is questionable. Good pick Pack!
 
Kitrick Taylor said:
bcr8f said:
Kitrick Taylor said:
zadok said:
When they took him it seemed to me that they are envisioning Nelson as the slot WR with Jennings and Jones split wide. :thumbup:
I believe you are correct with this plan.Nelson is going to be the Packers version of Wes Welker. He's fearless, and is going to run all the underneath stuff that many WRs shy away from. That is something that neither Koren Robinson or Ruvell Martin offered. They are decent WRs, but its' my guess that the Packers will be extremely difficult to cover with Jennings and Jones wide and Nelson out of the slot. It certainly seems like the Packers are going to have a very dynamic set of pass catchers for Rodgers/Brohm going forward.
Those are things that James Jones does. These players are pretty interchangeable. KRob and river are still there too. KRob may become a kick returner. Where will Nelson go in drafts? Since he's not a starter probably late. :lmao:
Agreed that Jones is a strong WR as well, and can hold up well to the over the middle stuff. One thing seems certain is that Jennings will be one of the wides. It seems like Nelson may have better YAC ability than Jones. We'll see once he hits the field, but that would be my initial thinking. That would lead me to believe they want to put Nelson in the slot, and get him the ball on a lot of short stuff. Question also may be who is the odd man out this year? Probably only going to keep 5 maybe 6. JenningsDriverJonesNelsonRobinsonMartinSwain
KRob could be odd man out. Ruvell Martin sucks - his only value is on special teams, the guy offers zero upside at WR.
 
heard TT on the radio Sunday nite

he said that Nelson is basically a Koren Robinson clone in terms of body-type and size. he said that Nelson is tough, willing to go over the middle and excels catching the slant.

pretty much exactly what the Packers want.

 
How far will Jordy fall in dyno IDP drafts? I'm in a deep one and have the 14th, 18th, and 26th picks and I want him. I think I can wait until pick 18, but think waiting until 26 may be a huge gamble.

 
How far will Jordy fall in dyno IDP drafts? I'm in a deep one and have the 14th, 18th, and 26th picks and I want him. I think I can wait until pick 18, but think waiting until 26 may be a huge gamble.
IF we all shut up about him and erase the thread he might fall pretty far. LOL
 
How far will Jordy fall in dyno IDP drafts? I'm in a deep one and have the 14th, 18th, and 26th picks and I want him. I think I can wait until pick 18, but think waiting until 26 may be a huge gamble.
I got him at #28 so 26 is pushing it. There are so many WR's that he could fall anywhere in the 20's, especially to the Driver owner if he picks before you.
 
How far will Jordy fall in dyno IDP drafts? I'm in a deep one and have the 14th, 18th, and 26th picks and I want him. I think I can wait until pick 18, but think waiting until 26 may be a huge gamble.
I got him at #28 so 26 is pushing it. There are so many WR's that he could fall anywhere in the 20's, especially to the Driver owner if he picks before you.
Looks like if I decide to gamble and wait on him past pick 18 I'll have to get ahead of the guy picking directly in front of me as he is the Driver owner. I want to trade down from my 14th or 18th picks unless a value falls to recoup more picks, but we all know that's easier said than done and won't be able to plan ahead for. Would like to see where others have him ranked. I have him in the back end of my top 10. :hophead:
 
FunkyPlutos said:
Nelson returns punts.
And does a damn fine job of it too. I really love the way he uses his blockers on returns, doesn't outrun them, but waits for things to set up.By the end of the year the NFL will be saying Devin who? :confused:
 
nelson's floor is much higher. nfl teams saw how overrated sweed was and that why he fell to the bottom of the 2nd.

 
I believe teams just drafted wr that fit into their systems. Who would have thought that Avery would be the 1st wr drafted.

 
I know little of Nelson, but one reason Sweed fell was because he missed half the 2007 season due to a wrist injury which I believe required surgery at some point. He was easily a 1st rd pick going into the season and has that kind of talent. From what I've read of Sweed he isn't a great route runner, however, everything I've read says he has a pretty good work ethic. The comparison to Plax seems fair talent-wise, I just hope Sweed has a better attitude and is more willing to put up a fight for the ball when being challenged by DB's.

 
I have read that sweed had some drop issues as well.

And Ted seems to like those guys that make the catches and make them with their hands extended.

Also...the question might be similar to why did he pass on Chad Jackson and then draft Greg Jennings.

So far, I am quite glad he did.

 
Probably for similar reasons that they took Greg Jennings over Chad Jackson. Thompson made a great call on that one. He made the correct call this time too.

 
I agree on that Chad Jackson stuff. Thompson has nailed the pick on almost every wideout he has selected. Murphy showed promise, Jennings is an emerging stud, Jones was great in his role last season. Jordy will see the field some, and may develop into a Keyshawn Johnson type of player. I've read he has the frame to bulk up another 15 lbs to 230. That would be big.

 
Donald Driver

Jennings

James Jones

Jordy Nelson are basically the same player with variables. They go up and pluck the ball out of the air away from their bodies. That's what GB likes.

Nelson is taller, Jones stronger, but basically they run well with defenders all round them.

RAC. Jennings probably has the best in space quickness. He's amazing.

Watch him against the cowboys.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FavreCo said:
Probably for similar reasons that they took Greg Jennings over Chad Jackson. Thompson made a great call on that one. He made the correct call this time too.
He traded down(the Javon trade) and got 5 players in the end. He took Colston I think and Jennings later that round.
 
FavreCo said:
Probably for similar reasons that they took Greg Jennings over Chad Jackson. Thompson made a great call on that one. He made the correct call this time too.
He traded down(the Javon trade) and got 5 players in the end. He took Colston I think and Jennings later that round.
The Packers never drafted Colston.
 
FavreCo said:
Probably for similar reasons that they took Greg Jennings over Chad Jackson. Thompson made a great call on that one. He made the correct call this time too.
He traded down(the Javon trade) and got 5 players in the end. He took Colston I think and Jennings later that round.
The Packers never drafted Colston.
I suspect he meant Coston (Junius). But I think the player he's thinking of is actually Colledge - taken in the 2nd round before Jennings that year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top