Give your honest answer. There have been several that are going crazy over the Steelers off-season and predicting gloom-and-doom. Give your honest answer to whether the defending champs will fall all the way below the .500 mark.
odds are against it.btw, why do you type everything so large?Mark this down:
6 in '06!
Burn it deep into your brain pan.
STEELERS WILL WIN IT ALL, AGAIN.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You didn't mention Bettis, oh that's right, they won't miss him at all.All reports are that Roethlisberger will be in camp on Day 1 and will likely play in at least 1 preseason game. His injury is to his jaw, not his arm or knees.
Their main loss in FA was Randel El, a receiver that only had 1 TD in the regular season and safety Chris Hope. Both have been replaced with pickups in FA and in the draft.
Other than center Jeff Hartings, they are still a very young team with playoff experience. If they remain healthy I do not see any reason why they would go into a tailspin.
amnesiac Posted Today, 11:11 AM
QUOTE(nightshift @ Jun 21 2006, 09:22 AM)
Mark this down:
6 in '06!
Burn it deep into your brain pan.
STEELERS WILL WIN IT ALL, AGAIN.
odds are against it.
btw, why do you type everything so large?
That would be a no vote, since the poll asks "Will Pittsburgh finish OVER .500 this year ?"Where's the poll choice for 8-8?
What's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.
You already established this in the other thread and you obviously despise the Steelers, but what evidence do you have to support this?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.
27-4 Overall22-3 Regular SeasonWhat's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.
You already established this in the other thread and you obviously despise the Steelers, but what evidence do you have to support this?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.
You already established this in the other thread and you obviously despise the Steelers, but what evidence do you have to support this?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.Wishfull thinking on the part of a Bengals fan. Just let him go.
Injuries can strike any team at any time, but the news on Roethlisberger has been nothing but positive and unless something changes between now and then, he's expected to be ready to go before the start of the season.
Given that, I don't see any reason to believe the 2006 version will be any weaker than the 2005 version. The offensive line is coming back intact, Bettis will be adequately replaced by Haynes and Staley, and Randle El's biggest contributions were on punt returns and gadget plays. Not that he won't be missed, but they have guys who can fill his shoes. Replacing Chris Hope at safety won't be terribly difficult, and I don't expect the defense to miss a beat.
Because past performance is indicative of future performance, right?What's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.
Its not?Because past performance is indicative of future performance, right?What's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.![]()
It's not the be-all, end-all, but, I think it is one of the main considerations when predicting someone's future success.Because past performance is indicative of future performance, right?What's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.![]()
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.Its not?Because past performance is indicative of future performance, right?What's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.![]()
I guess you wont be drafting LJ, LT, or SA this year given their performances last year then?
I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
I disagree with that statement absolutely. Nothing is certain. I never said that theres no chance that they'll fall below .500. But to say that past performance is not INDICATIVE of future performance is silly. I agree that alot of my projections about players has something to do with opportunity, but I think most will agree that we project a players stats mainly based on past performance. Furthermore, I think PM's statement may have held more water if he would have assumed that Ben may not be healthy, but to come out and say that they wont finish above .500 with Ben at 100% is justDo you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.Its not?Because past performance is indicative of future performance, right?What's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.![]()
I guess you wont be drafting LJ, LT, or SA this year given their performances last year then?
I seriously doubt you placeDo you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.
C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
You are right, the Steelers should be able to handle SD with Rivers at the helm. Atlanta in the dome and Denver at home sound like games they should win but lose anyway. I'll split the difference with you and say 12-4. How does that sound?C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
Fine, as long we end up with the SB win!You are right, the Steelers should be able to handle SD with Rivers at the helm. Atlanta in the dome and Denver at home sound like games they should win but lose anyway. I'll split the difference with you and say 12-4. How does that sound?C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
Pittsburgh wont muster 14 points against SD.C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
So your Chargers lose 10-0.. works for me!Pittsburgh wont muster 14 points against SD.C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
C'mon GB!... plus the Ravens drop both to us..
the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!
Obviously not.I mean, it's not like they went into San Diego on Monday night last year and won 24-22 with Big Ben going 17-26 for 225 and a TD with no INTs and a last minute drive for the game winning field goal.Pittsburgh wont muster 14 points against SD.C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
Won't score 14 points. It's a new season friend.Obviously not.I mean, it's not like they went into San Diego on Monday night last year and won 24-22 with Big Ben going 17-26 for 225 and a TD with no INTs and a last minute drive for the game winning field goal.Pittsburgh wont muster 14 points against SD.C'mon GB! We take down SD (Rivers is still green, so shut LT down), ATLANTA? toast!, Denver will take on the chin at home, plus the Ravens drop both to us..the Stillers are 13-3, Division champs, & will be on our way to our 6th SB win!I think this is pretty close although I see the Steelers beating KC at home for a 10-6 record.Week #1 vs Miami Win
Week #2 at Jax Win
Week #3 vs Cin Win
Week #5 at SD Loss
Week #6 vs KC Loss
Week #7 at Atl Loss
Week #8 at Oak Win
Week #9 vs Den Loss
Week #10 vs NO Win
Week #11 at Cle Win
Week #12 at Balt Loss
Week #13 vs TB Win
Week #14 vs Cle Win
Week #15 at Car Loss
Week #16 vs Balt Win
Week #17 at Cin Loss
Record 9 - 7
Finish in a three way tie with Cincinnati and Baltimore. Tie breakers become so confusing and irrational that Tags awards the division to Pittsburgh, Cincinnati is promised the division the following year and Baltimore is told to build a museum again by Tags as he still has hate in his heart for Charm City....
And it's not like they held Tomlinson to 62 yards and a TD at 3.4 YPC or stifled Brees to a 20-35-219-1-1 game.
But I'm sure San Diego will be a better team with Rivers in there instead of Brees.
dammit. guess i'll find something else to do those weekends.Week #11 at Cle WinWeek #14 vs Cle Win
is that you, PM?Won't score 14 points.
It's a new season friend.
Well, there it is. Why even play the season?27-4 Overall22-3 Regular SeasonWhat's Roethlesberger's regular season record again?This team as it is right now, assuming Ben is ready and 100% by the season opener, will finish 7-9.
2 AFC Championship Appearances
1 Super Bowl Appearance
1 Super Bowl Ring
Not a bad start.
I'm not even arguing that Pittsburgh will finish below .500... I voted Yes. It just struck me as a poor argument when Myrick responded to PM's assertion that Pittsburgh will finish 7-9 with nothing other than a reference to Ben's past record as a starter.I seriously doubt you placeDo you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.every time someone uses past experience to predict a future outcome. Nothing is certain, the 49'ers could win the super bowl next year, all the atoms of the planet could spontaneously cease to exist (total existence failure) so speaking in if then logic and certainties will pretty much end any conversation because nothing is certain except math, logic and existence. The trends are though that Big Ben and the Steelers past performances are a pretty good indicator of how well we'll do and this team is pretty well intact from last year in spite of what the media says. With the youth at the skill positions an extra year experienced from last year, and the continued veteran leadership in most any situation you could predict the Steelers being better then .500.
Really? What's wrong with that argument? I believe Roethlesberger's past record indicates that they are highly likely to finish above .500.I'm not even arguing that Pittsburgh will finish below .500... I voted Yes. It just struck me as a poor argument when Myrick responded to PM's assertion that Pittsburgh will finish 7-9 with nothing other than a reference to Ben's past record as a starter.I seriously doubt you placeDo you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.every time someone uses past experience to predict a future outcome. Nothing is certain, the 49'ers could win the super bowl next year, all the atoms of the planet could spontaneously cease to exist (total existence failure) so speaking in if then logic and certainties will pretty much end any conversation because nothing is certain except math, logic and existence. The trends are though that Big Ben and the Steelers past performances are a pretty good indicator of how well we'll do and this team is pretty well intact from last year in spite of what the media says. With the youth at the skill positions an extra year experienced from last year, and the continued veteran leadership in most any situation you could predict the Steelers being better then .500.
![]()
What's wrong with it is that you added no other context. His record doesn't stand alone. For example, what if every starter from last year's team except Ben was gone? What if Cowher retired after the Super Bowl? Would Ben's record mean much for predicting this year? I don't think so. Now, obviously that didn't happen. I assume you were taking other things like that into account. That was my point when I posted this:Really? What's wrong with that argument? I believe Roethlesberger's past record indicates that they are highly likely to finish above .500.I'm not even arguing that Pittsburgh will finish below .500... I voted Yes. It just struck me as a poor argument when Myrick responded to PM's assertion that Pittsburgh will finish 7-9 with nothing other than a reference to Ben's past record as a starter.I seriously doubt you placeDo you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.every time someone uses past experience to predict a future outcome. Nothing is certain, the 49'ers could win the super bowl next year, all the atoms of the planet could spontaneously cease to exist (total existence failure) so speaking in if then logic and certainties will pretty much end any conversation because nothing is certain except math, logic and existence. The trends are though that Big Ben and the Steelers past performances are a pretty good indicator of how well we'll do and this team is pretty well intact from last year in spite of what the media says. With the youth at the skill positions an extra year experienced from last year, and the continued veteran leadership in most any situation you could predict the Steelers being better then .500.
![]()
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.
Okay. I do agree with that statement as well.What's wrong with it is that you added no other context. His record doesn't stand alone. For example, what if every starter from last year's team except Ben was gone? What if Cowher retired after the Super Bowl? Would Ben's record mean much for predicting this year? I don't think so. Now, obviously that didn't happen. I assume you were taking other things like that into account. That was my point when I posted this:Really? What's wrong with that argument? I believe Roethlesberger's past record indicates that they are highly likely to finish above .500.I'm not even arguing that Pittsburgh will finish below .500... I voted Yes. It just struck me as a poor argument when Myrick responded to PM's assertion that Pittsburgh will finish 7-9 with nothing other than a reference to Ben's past record as a starter.I seriously doubt you placeDo you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.every time someone uses past experience to predict a future outcome. Nothing is certain, the 49'ers could win the super bowl next year, all the atoms of the planet could spontaneously cease to exist (total existence failure) so speaking in if then logic and certainties will pretty much end any conversation because nothing is certain except math, logic and existence. The trends are though that Big Ben and the Steelers past performances are a pretty good indicator of how well we'll do and this team is pretty well intact from last year in spite of what the media says. With the youth at the skill positions an extra year experienced from last year, and the continued veteran leadership in most any situation you could predict the Steelers being better then .500.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Because Ben Roethlisberger is 27-4 as a starter, it is certain that Pittsburgh will finish better than 7-9.