What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Will There Be A Yankee Home Game Without A HR in 2009? (1 Viewer)

How Many Games At Yankee Stadium Without A HR In 2009

  • There Will Not Be A Game Without A HR

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • There Will Be One Game Without A HR

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • There Will Be Between 2 and 4 Games Without A HR

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • There Will Be At Least 5 Games Without A HR

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Limp Ditka

Footballguy
26th game in Coors East is being played today and there's already been a HR hit. This means that there has been a HR hit in every game ever played there.

Will we actually see a game there, that lasts the full 9 innings, without a HR hit?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some game a freak weather pattern will be pushing all the balls in, or you get some groundball/groundball pitcher face-off.

No way this lasts all season.

 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
 
i'm thinking 1-2 games this season. And i'll say one of those times is when Roy Halladay is pitching for the Jays.

 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
It's not "data"...it's data. It should only be in quotes if I'm looking for something that isn't really data but I'm calling it data. Now that aside...I would like to see how the stadium plays when the weather is warmer and/or the wind currents change or, oh I don't know, they knock down the 60,000 capacity giant building next door. That could maybe play a part perhaps. Do you always base your opinions off a sample size that represents less than two one thousandths of the total possible volume?
 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?

I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
It's not "data"...it's data. It should only be in quotes if I'm looking for something that isn't really data but I'm calling it data. Now that aside...I would like to see how the stadium plays when the weather is warmer and/or the wind currents change or, oh I don't know, they knock down the 60,000 capacity giant building next door. That could maybe play a part perhaps. Do you always base your opinions off a sample size that represents less than two one thousandths of the total possible volume?
:popcorn:
 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
It's not "data"...it's data. It should only be in quotes if I'm looking for something that isn't really data but I'm calling it data. Now that aside...I would like to see how the stadium plays when the weather is warmer and/or the wind currents change or, oh I don't know, they knock down the 60,000 capacity giant building next door. That could maybe play a part perhaps. Do you always base your opinions off a sample size that represents less than two one thousandths of the total possible volume?
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
It's not "data"...it's data. It should only be in quotes if I'm looking for something that isn't really data but I'm calling it data. Now that aside...I would like to see how the stadium plays when the weather is warmer and/or the wind currents change or, oh I don't know, they knock down the 60,000 capacity giant building next door. That could maybe play a part perhaps. Do you always base your opinions off a sample size that represents less than two one thousandths of the total possible volume?
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
Yeah not exactly sure why people get upset at this
 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
It's not "data"...it's data. It should only be in quotes if I'm looking for something that isn't really data but I'm calling it data. Now that aside...I would like to see how the stadium plays when the weather is warmer and/or the wind currents change or, oh I don't know, they knock down the 60,000 capacity giant building next door. That could maybe play a part perhaps. Do you always base your opinions off a sample size that represents less than two one thousandths of the total possible volume?
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
I agree. As long as the Yanks hit more homeruns...I don't care.
 
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
Yeah not exactly sure why people get upset at this
I don't get all the angst about the HRs. It's clearly something quirky about the physics that I'll never understand. But, it is what it is. In Coors, you can't do anything about the thin air. In Coors East, there's obviously some sort of draft effect going out in RF. Does it play favor to the Yanks? Perhaps. But, I don't think Yankee management is smart enough to know how to take advantage of this in either (a) stadium construction or (b) player development/acquisition. It is what it is. People need to get over it.
 
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
I agree. As long as the Yanks hit more homeruns...I don't care.
An A-A-A-A-A-A-A-BOMB from A-A-A-A-A-A-A-ROD!
I don't particularly like him. I don't think that he calls a good game at all...and let's not get into his partner in the booth. That being said, he does have a weird, goofy kind of uncle vibe about him that I don't dislike.
 
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
Yeah not exactly sure why people get upset at this
I don't get all the angst about the HRs. It's clearly something quirky about the physics that I'll never understand. But, it is what it is. In Coors, you can't do anything about the thin air. In Coors East, there's obviously some sort of draft effect going out in RF. Does it play favor to the Yanks? Perhaps. But, I don't think Yankee management is smart enough to know how to take advantage of this in either (a) stadium construction or (b) player development/acquisition. It is what it is. People need to get over it.
You mean like the free agent pitchers of 2010?The Yankees overpaid for talent in the past because they could. Just wait until they have to do it.

 
So it's a whiffle ball park...so what? Why do you guys get so uptight about this stuff?
Yeah not exactly sure why people get upset at this
I don't get all the angst about the HRs. It's clearly something quirky about the physics that I'll never understand. But, it is what it is. In Coors, you can't do anything about the thin air. In Coors East, there's obviously some sort of draft effect going out in RF. Does it play favor to the Yanks? Perhaps. But, I don't think Yankee management is smart enough to know how to take advantage of this in either (a) stadium construction or (b) player development/acquisition. It is what it is. People need to get over it.
You mean like the free agent pitchers of 2010?The Yankees overpaid for talent in the past because they could. Just wait until they have to do it.
They'll develop a new market for the first 20-game winners with 5.00+ ERAs.
 
that place is a joke.
Right, 27 games into what will be a stadium for around 100 years...I can see how this conclusion can be drawn already.Look, I'm not saying the HRs won't continue all season long and forever. But can we MAYBE get some more data about it before proclaiming it a joke? What if I say please?I voted that there will be at least 5 games without a HR.
How much more "data" you need?
Generally it takes 3 years to get an accurate sample size to determine park factors, but obviously after 27 games there's plenty of data to make definitive statements.
 
Limp Ditka said:
What drama. It sure didn't seem like it was going to happen tonight.
I still haven't seen enough proof.I'm waiting at least 3 years to declare this place a joke
 
Coors East Daily Report:

5 HRs tonight

7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.

Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :lmao:

 
Coors East Daily Report:5 HRs tonight7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :bowtie:
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
 
Coors East Daily Report:5 HRs tonight7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :lmao:
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
What's your damage? Why are you all riled up about this? Why do you make Yankee fans look like an insecure group of ninnies? Suck it up. We've got a whiffle ball park. It's Coors East. Big effin' deal. As an aside, this team is every bit as flawed today as it was in April. We are just as easily capable of giving away 6 games in the standings as we are making up the ground we have. I can't believe how excited some of you guys are getting to be atop the division at this point in the season. "Sole possession of first place in June." BFD.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Coors East Daily Report:5 HRs tonight7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :mellow:
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
What's your damage? Why are you all riled up about this? Why do you make Yankee fans look like an insecure group of ninnies? Suck it up. We've got a whiffle ball park. It's Coors East. Big effin' deal. As an aside, this team is every bit as flawed today as it was in April. We are just as easily capable of giving away 6 games in the standings as we are making up the ground we have. I can't believe how excited some of you guys are getting to be atop the division at this point in the season. "Sole possession of first place in June." BFD.
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..19 comeback wins....Best record in the AL. Best record in the AL East. Aside from being 0 -5 against another one of the best teams in the league... what can you honestly complain about?
 
Coors East Daily Report:

5 HRs tonight

7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.

Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :mellow:
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
What's your damage? Why are you all riled up about this? Why do you make Yankee fans look like an insecure group of ninnies? Suck it up. We've got a whiffle ball park. It's Coors East. Big effin' deal. As an aside, this team is every bit as flawed today as it was in April. We are just as easily capable of giving away 6 games in the standings as we are making up the ground we have. I can't believe how excited some of you guys are getting to be atop the division at this point in the season. "Sole possession of first place in June." BFD.
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..19 comeback wins....

Best record in the AL. Best record in the AL East.

Aside from being 0 -5 against another one of the best teams in the league... what can you honestly complain about?
Don't forget the errorless streak, too. Fundamentally, they've been making less mistakes than in years past.The comeback wins is also a huge thing that makes me optimistic. Maybe it's because it lends itself to my feelings about this team 10 years ago...that maybe there's some character here that we haven't had recently.

On the other hand, I'm still not convinced that (a) this whole "character" concept is real or created based on our interpretation of events and (b) if the latter, does this team really have what it takes to sustain this performance over the course of a full season? We've played what? Less than 60 games thus far? And, saying that we have the best record in the AL belies the fact that Boston is still just one game shy of that mark, as well. I prefer not to even pay attention to the standings at this point in the season and simply focus on how this team looks. They do look better. But, I'm still not convinced this is a team that can sustain itself for the duration of the season. We'll see.

But, this is all beside the point and more appropriate for a discussion in the *Official* thread. This is about the absurd HR pace in the new park. I think it's funny that Yankee fans take this as an assault to call it a "joke" or "absurd" as if it's a blight on this team. It has nothing to do with this team. But, it is absurd how many balls are flying out of this place. You can love the team and love the new stadium and still recognize that something either went terribly wrong--or wonderfully right--with the design that has allowed for this pace (depending on your perspective).

Me? I'm an NL fan trapped inside the body of a Yankee fan. Been rooting for this team since I was 8 years old. But, I've always appreciated NL style baseball, from an aesthetic pov, much more. So, when HRs are hit at this kind of ridiculous pace--as someone pointed out above, 5 of the 11 hits yesterday were HRs--it takes something away from the game that I enjoy. Might as well go down to the local softball field if I wanted to watch balls get jacked at this rate.

But, again, that's not the Yankees fault. So, I don't see the reason why it's incompatible to root for the team and, at the same time, mock a little bit the absurdity of a park--like Coors--that is making all of this possible...for BOTH teams...each night.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree that... "So it's wiffle ball park"....

Who cares????

Funny thing is, when the season started I read some posts where people were like uh oh, the Yankees blew it, that park is going to mess them up - what a mistake getting CC... etc etc etc...

But, Pitching is even more important and now listen to the radio and the local shows are all talking about how the new Shea stadium is ruining the Mets hitters that are now looking to hit line drives.....

Me??? I think it's all BS... The Mets, they're injured. The Yankees - They're playing GOOD BASEBALL.....

If you pitch, hit and play good defense, you win...

Personally, I haven't seen too many balls that I was shocked went out so far... Maybe there's some air current I can't judge... Jeter's ball last night I wasn't completely sold on but, was well deep....

You want to Cry about the New Yankee stadium and what's going on??? I'm pretty sure I saw the fans doing the Wave last night... Are you kidding me!!!!!!!!! THAT brings a tear to my eye.

 
Coors East Daily Report:

5 HRs tonight

7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.

Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :lmao:
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
What's your damage? Why are you all riled up about this? Why do you make Yankee fans look like an insecure group of ninnies? Suck it up. We've got a whiffle ball park. It's Coors East. Big effin' deal. As an aside, this team is every bit as flawed today as it was in April. We are just as easily capable of giving away 6 games in the standings as we are making up the ground we have. I can't believe how excited some of you guys are getting to be atop the division at this point in the season. "Sole possession of first place in June." BFD.
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..19 comeback wins....

Best record in the AL. Best record in the AL East.

Aside from being 0 -5 against another one of the best teams in the league... what can you honestly complain about?
Don't forget the errorless streak, too. Fundamentally, they've been making less mistakes than in years past.The comeback wins is also a huge thing that makes me optimistic. Maybe it's because it lends itself to my feelings about this team 10 years ago...that maybe there's some character here that we haven't had recently.

On the other hand, I'm still not convinced that (a) this whole "character" concept is real or created based on our interpretation of events and (b) if the latter, does this team really have what it takes to sustain this performance over the course of a full season? We've played what? Less than 60 games thus far? And, saying that we have the best record in the AL belies the fact that Boston is still just one game shy of that mark, as well. I prefer not to even pay attention to the standings at this point in the season and simply focus on how this team looks. They do look better. But, I'm still not convinced this is a team that can sustain itself for the duration of the season. We'll see.

But, this is all beside the point and more appropriate for a discussion in the *Official* thread. This is about the absurd HR pace in the new park. I think it's funny that Yankee fans take this as an assault to call it a "joke" or "absurd" as if it's a blight on this team. It has nothing to do with this team. But, it is absurd how many balls are flying out of this place. You can love the team and love the new stadium and still recognize that something either went terribly wrong--or wonderfully right--with the design that has allowed for this pace (depending on your perspective).

Me? I'm an NL fan trapped inside the body of a Yankee fan. Been rooting for this team since I was 8 years old. But, I've always appreciated NL style baseball, from an aesthetic pov, much more. So, when HRs are hit at this kind of ridiculous pace--as someone pointed out above, 5 of the 11 hits yesterday were HRs--it takes something away from the game that I enjoy. Might as well go down to the local softball field if I wanted to watch balls get jacked at this rate.

But, again, that's not the Yankees fault. So, I don't see the reason why it's incompatible to root for the team and, at the same time, mock a little bit the absurdity of a park--like Coors--that is making all of this possible...for BOTH teams...each night.
So if the Yankees give up a run in the top of the first and then score two in the bottom and win 2-1, isn't that considered a comeback win?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06092009/sport...ausi_173393.htm

It's a small field, after all.

After claims that the dimensions of the new Yankee Stadium were identical to the old, AccuWeather.com reported today that slight differences in the new park are mainly responsible for the record number of home runs.

The weather Web site says, "Taking into account the dimensions of the field and wall height, AccuWeather.com has calculated that 19 percent (20 out of 105) home runs would not have flown out of the old stadium."

The report by meteorologist Tim Buckley says losing a "gentle curve" in the fence as it extends from right field to center field, caused by a new scoreboard, has the ballpark playing up to 9 feet shorter in spots. Combined with 2-foot-shorter wall heigths, it has caused the home-run surge.

ACCUWEATHER.COM REPORT

BACK PAGE: Homer Problems

The stadium is on pace to see 293 home runs, threatening the major-league record of 303 hit at Denver's Coors Field in its opening season of 1999.

It has generated criticism throughout the game, with ESPN's Peter Gammons last month saying the new stadium is "the biggest joke in baseball."

The dimensions posted on the fences of the new Stadium are identical to the old one: 314 feet down the right-field line; 385 to right-center; 408 to center field; 399 to left-center; and 314 down the left-field line.

Yankee Stadium established new records for home runs hit during an opening series, and saw 75 homers in its first 20 games (3.75 per game). The pace has slowed very slightly, with 30 in the past nine games (3.33 per game).

AccuWeather says, "no consistent pattern [has been] observed in the wind speed and direction that would lead to an increase in home runs so far this year."

The Associated Press says 63 of the 105 have been hit to right field. There have been 10 games with at least five home runs, including Monday night.

The Yankees have hit 57 home runs, their opponents 48, going 18-11 in the first 29 games there.

 
The Associated Press says 63 of the 105 have been hit to right field.
Again, where do they uncover this stat? This has to be a staple in our stats lexicon, both for teams and--especially--individual players.Nice find, LD. I don't get the physics, but it amazes me how such seemingly small factors can contribute so much.
 
NY Post reports the New stadium is NOT the same size as the old one

POST STAFF REPORTA report analyzing all 105 home runs hit at the new Yankee Stadium cites shorter field dimensions for the record surge in homers.It's a small field, after all.After claims that the dimensions of the new Yankee Stadium were identical to the old, AccuWeather.com reported today that slight differences in the new park are mainly responsible for the record number of home runs.The weather Web site says, "Taking into account the dimensions of the field and wall height, AccuWeather.com has calculated that 19 percent (20 out of 105) home runs would not have flown out of the old stadium."The report by meteorologist Tim Buckley says losing a "gentle curve" in the fence as it extends from right field to center field, caused by a new scoreboard, has the ballpark playing up to 9 feet shorter in spots. Combined with 2-foot-shorter wall heigths, it has caused the home-run surge.ACCUWEATHER.COM REPORTThe stadium is on pace to see 293 home runs, threatening the major-league record of 303 hit at Denver's Coors Field in its opening season of 1999.It has generated criticism throughout the game, with ESPN's Peter Gammons last month saying the new stadium is "the biggest joke in baseball."The dimensions posted on the fences of the new Stadium are identical to the old one: 314 feet down the right-field line; 385 to right-center; 408 to center field; 399 to left-center; and 314 down the left-field line.Yankee Stadium established new records for home runs hit during an opening series, and saw 75 homers in its first 20 games (3.75 per game). The pace has slowed very slightly, with 30 in the past nine games (3.33 per game).AccuWeather says, "no consistent pattern [has been] observed in the wind speed and direction that would lead to an increase in home runs so far this year."The Associated Press says 63 of the 105 have been hit to right field. There have been 10 games with at least five home runs, including Monday night.The Yankees have hit 57 home runs, their opponents 48, going 18-11 in the first 29 games there.
 
NY Post reports the New stadium is NOT the same size as the old one

POST STAFF REPORTA report analyzing all 105 home runs hit at the new Yankee Stadium cites shorter field dimensions for the record surge in homers.It's a small field, after all.After claims that the dimensions of the new Yankee Stadium were identical to the old, AccuWeather.com reported today that slight differences in the new park are mainly responsible for the record number of home runs.The weather Web site says, "Taking into account the dimensions of the field and wall height, AccuWeather.com has calculated that 19 percent (20 out of 105) home runs would not have flown out of the old stadium."The report by meteorologist Tim Buckley says losing a "gentle curve" in the fence as it extends from right field to center field, caused by a new scoreboard, has the ballpark playing up to 9 feet shorter in spots. Combined with 2-foot-shorter wall heigths, it has caused the home-run surge.ACCUWEATHER.COM REPORTThe stadium is on pace to see 293 home runs, threatening the major-league record of 303 hit at Denver's Coors Field in its opening season of 1999.It has generated criticism throughout the game, with ESPN's Peter Gammons last month saying the new stadium is "the biggest joke in baseball."The dimensions posted on the fences of the new Stadium are identical to the old one: 314 feet down the right-field line; 385 to right-center; 408 to center field; 399 to left-center; and 314 down the left-field line.Yankee Stadium established new records for home runs hit during an opening series, and saw 75 homers in its first 20 games (3.75 per game). The pace has slowed very slightly, with 30 in the past nine games (3.33 per game).AccuWeather says, "no consistent pattern [has been] observed in the wind speed and direction that would lead to an increase in home runs so far this year."The Associated Press says 63 of the 105 have been hit to right field. There have been 10 games with at least five home runs, including Monday night.The Yankees have hit 57 home runs, their opponents 48, going 18-11 in the first 29 games there.
What would we do without you Righetti?
 
NY Post reports the New stadium is NOT the same size as the old one

POST STAFF REPORTA report analyzing all 105 home runs hit at the new Yankee Stadium cites shorter field dimensions for the record surge in homers.It's a small field, after all.After claims that the dimensions of the new Yankee Stadium were identical to the old, AccuWeather.com reported today that slight differences in the new park are mainly responsible for the record number of home runs.The weather Web site says, "Taking into account the dimensions of the field and wall height, AccuWeather.com has calculated that 19 percent (20 out of 105) home runs would not have flown out of the old stadium."The report by meteorologist Tim Buckley says losing a "gentle curve" in the fence as it extends from right field to center field, caused by a new scoreboard, has the ballpark playing up to 9 feet shorter in spots. Combined with 2-foot-shorter wall heigths, it has caused the home-run surge.ACCUWEATHER.COM REPORTThe stadium is on pace to see 293 home runs, threatening the major-league record of 303 hit at Denver's Coors Field in its opening season of 1999.It has generated criticism throughout the game, with ESPN's Peter Gammons last month saying the new stadium is "the biggest joke in baseball."The dimensions posted on the fences of the new Stadium are identical to the old one: 314 feet down the right-field line; 385 to right-center; 408 to center field; 399 to left-center; and 314 down the left-field line.Yankee Stadium established new records for home runs hit during an opening series, and saw 75 homers in its first 20 games (3.75 per game). The pace has slowed very slightly, with 30 in the past nine games (3.33 per game).AccuWeather says, "no consistent pattern [has been] observed in the wind speed and direction that would lead to an increase in home runs so far this year."The Associated Press says 63 of the 105 have been hit to right field. There have been 10 games with at least five home runs, including Monday night.The Yankees have hit 57 home runs, their opponents 48, going 18-11 in the first 29 games there.
What would we do without you Righetti?
To be fair, he's not going to have much to update in the 3000 thread.
 
Good stuff LD. I kind of mentioned the smaller dimensions in the Yankee Stadium thread but that report is enlightening. To think the Yanks made the fences 2 feet shorter and a straight line instead of a curve in RF and the Yankees hierarchy didnt think that would have an affect on HRs is mindboggling. 20 HRs! wow

 
Good stuff LD. I kind of mentioned the smaller dimensions in the Yankee Stadium thread but that report is enlightening. To think the Yanks made the fences 2 feet shorter and a straight line instead of a curve in RF and the Yankees hierarchy didnt think that would have an affect on HRs is mindboggling. 20 HRs! wow
That's what happens when two of the guys running the team are a lawyer with no baseball experience (who was in charge of building the stadium) and a guy who's basically there to grease the palm of city hall.
 
Coors East Daily Report:5 HRs tonight7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :moneybag:
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
What's your damage? Why are you all riled up about this? Why do you make Yankee fans look like an insecure group of ninnies? Suck it up. We've got a whiffle ball park. It's Coors East. Big effin' deal. As an aside, this team is every bit as flawed today as it was in April. We are just as easily capable of giving away 6 games in the standings as we are making up the ground we have. I can't believe how excited some of you guys are getting to be atop the division at this point in the season. "Sole possession of first place in June." BFD.
I'm not insecure about it. If you read up to my previous posts, I'll be first in line to admit that the park is skewed if the HR keep flying out of the park at the rate that they are. My issue isn't with people calling it a wiffle park or unfair or whatever...it's with people jumping to conclusions before we have enough to gauge it on. If the stadium were going to stand as constructed for the rest of the way, I'd be right there with you guys. I just don't get why people feel the need to proclaim something so definitively when the dynamic is about to change. By the end of the summer, there will be a HUGE building that currently stands next door that will no longer be there. Will it have an effect? I have no idea. But I think it's worth waiting to find out.As for the comment about not caring about being in first place in June...would you rather be in 4th? I don't get it dude. What is so flawed about this team? Your statements border on bizarre sometimes.
 
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the park gives up 3-4 homers a game. :popcorn:Serious question... does this earn Yankees players an * if Arod / Teix post 400 home runs over the next 8 years due to Whiffle Park? It seems guys like Giambi, Pettitte, Sheff, etc were forced to get off the juice so instead they built it right into the park. GENIUS! :mellow:As maurile would say.. the above post is only 40% Shtick.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[icon] said:
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the park gives up 3-4 homers a game. :thumbup:Serious question... does this earn Yankees players an * if Arod / Teix post 400 home runs over the next 8 years due to Whiffle Park? It seems guys like Giambi, Pettitte, Sheff, etc were forced to get off the juice so instead they built it right into the park. GENIUS! :excited:As maurile would say.. the above post is only 40% Shtick.
Serious responses:1. How many Runs per game are being scored in Yankee Stadium? Is it also the highest in baseball? You would think with more HRs there would be less doubles.2. I have a feeling they will be changing the dimensions, wall heights, or something to fix the problem next year.
 
[icon] said:
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the park gives up 3-4 homers a game. :goodposting: Serious question... does this earn Yankees players an * if Arod / Teix post 400 home runs over the next 8 years due to Whiffle Park? It seems guys like Giambi, Pettitte, Sheff, etc were forced to get off the juice so instead they built it right into the park. GENIUS! :lmao:

As maurile would say.. the above post is only 40% Shtick.
Serious responses:1. How many Runs per game are being scored in Yankee Stadium? Is it also the highest in baseball? You would think with more HRs there would be less doubles.

2. I have a feeling they will be changing the dimensions, wall heights, or something to fix the problem next year.
Yankees ERA is about .75 a run higher at Yankee Stadium (or was before last night)...currently the doubles (and triples for that matter) rate are the league lowest. So a whole bunch of doubles are being turned into HRs. Because of that its not playing at as a really extreme hitters park.
 
Straight away RF is a joke at this place, I think I mentioned that in my first write up here. Whereas it was 352, I'd be its inside of 340 right now. However, the ball does move to LF too, unless those dimensions are also off. There have been plenty of balls hit in the LF bleachers, which would be about the middle of the bullpen theoretically, at the old place. I'd be you'd see 5-8 balls all year in the middle of the pen and now, there have already been at least 5.

There is something to the wind here, plenty of adventures on pop-ups and the like. There are no easy fixes though, can't just raise the wall heights with all the seats right up on it.

 
[icon] said:
21 - 0 when they've given up three runs or less..
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the park gives up 3-4 homers a game. :goodposting: Serious question... does this earn Yankees players an * if Arod / Teix post 400 home runs over the next 8 years due to Whiffle Park? It seems guys like Giambi, Pettitte, Sheff, etc were forced to get off the juice so instead they built it right into the park. GENIUS! :lmao:

As maurile would say.. the above post is only 40% Shtick.
Serious responses:1. How many Runs per game are being scored in Yankee Stadium? Is it also the highest in baseball? You would think with more HRs there would be less doubles.

2. I have a feeling they will be changing the dimensions, wall heights, or something to fix the problem next year.
Yankees ERA is about .75 a run higher at Yankee Stadium (or was before last night)...currently the doubles (and triples for that matter) rate are the league lowest. So a whole bunch of doubles are being turned into HRs. Because of that its not playing at as a really extreme hitters park.
Cool, thats what I assumed.
 
The Ghost of Common said:
Michael Brown said:
Coors East Daily Report:

5 HRs tonight

7 of the 8 total runs scored via the long ball.

Again, the sample size is just too small right now to draw any conclusions. :(
Oh look everyone, it's the dude who essentially declared the Yankees dead and buried back in April only to see them hold sole possession of first place by June. Let's all listen to him as he jumps to conclusions again!
What's your damage? Why are you all riled up about this? Why do you make Yankee fans look like an insecure group of ninnies? Suck it up. We've got a whiffle ball park. It's Coors East. Big effin' deal. As an aside, this team is every bit as flawed today as it was in April. We are just as easily capable of giving away 6 games in the standings as we are making up the ground we have. I can't believe how excited some of you guys are getting to be atop the division at this point in the season. "Sole possession of first place in June." BFD.
I'm not insecure about it. If you read up to my previous posts, I'll be first in line to admit that the park is skewed if the HR keep flying out of the park at the rate that they are. My issue isn't with people calling it a wiffle park or unfair or whatever...it's with people jumping to conclusions before we have enough to gauge it on. If the stadium were going to stand as constructed for the rest of the way, I'd be right there with you guys. I just don't get why people feel the need to proclaim something so definitively when the dynamic is about to change. By the end of the summer, there will be a HUGE building that currently stands next door that will no longer be there. Will it have an effect? I have no idea. But I think it's worth waiting to find out.As for the comment about not caring about being in first place in June...would you rather be in 4th? I don't get it dude. What is so flawed about this team? Your statements border on bizarre sometimes.
To be fair, you are acting very insecure about it.
To be fair, I'd say the same thing about any other park...it's not a Yankee thing, it's a jump to conclusions thing. I guess I just don't get it. Seems like the need to be right BEFORE ANYBODY ELSE causes a whole lot of people to go nuts at the first sign of something being different. Like I said, if the HR continue at this rate after the old place comes down I'll have no trouble agreeing with all of you. I just don't feel the need to be right immediately, and am a bit more patient while waiting for the results of the demolition before making a call.And regardless of how it plays, I don't think any stadium should be called a joke. Just because it doesn't play like every other stadium in the game, that makes it a joke? That's weird. Is Petco a joke because of being extreme to the pitchers? Is Citi a joke because David Wright has 4 HR on June 10? No and no. Fenway and Wrigley have two of the most distinct features of any stadium in any sport ever, and they're two of the best we've got. It's not a joke just because it plays HR-happy (so far). It's just how it is. Fenway isn't a joke just because they've got a 37 foot wall in LF that's probably not even 300 feet from home. The Cubbies aren't a joke just because they've got a brick wall in the outfield that gets covered in ivy in the summer, making every ball hit to the wall an adventure. That's just baseball. The short porch has been a staple of Yankee Stadium since it was built. Just like Death Valley. Was that a joke because it took away probably about a hundred HR each from Mantle and DiMaggio?

I guess I don't get why people refer to any stadium as a joke. Perhaps it's just semantics, and they really mean it skews to the hitters. No big deal though, I'll stay out of everyone's way.

 
To be fair, I'd say the same thing about any other park...it's not a Yankee thing, it's a jump to conclusions thing. I guess I just don't get it. Seems like the need to be right BEFORE ANYBODY ELSE causes a whole lot of people to go nuts at the first sign of something being different. Like I said, if the HR continue at this rate after the old place comes down I'll have no trouble agreeing with all of you. I just don't feel the need to be right immediately, and am a bit more patient while waiting for the results of the demolition before making a call.And regardless of how it plays, I don't think any stadium should be called a joke. Just because it doesn't play like every other stadium in the game, that makes it a joke? That's weird. Is Petco a joke because of being extreme to the pitchers? Is Citi a joke because David Wright has 4 HR on June 10? No and no. Fenway and Wrigley have two of the most distinct features of any stadium in any sport ever, and they're two of the best we've got. It's not a joke just because it plays HR-happy (so far). It's just how it is. Fenway isn't a joke just because they've got a 37 foot wall in LF that's probably not even 300 feet from home. The Cubbies aren't a joke just because they've got a brick wall in the outfield that gets covered in ivy in the summer, making every ball hit to the wall an adventure. That's just baseball. The short porch has been a staple of Yankee Stadium since it was built. Just like Death Valley. Was that a joke because it took away probably about a hundred HR each from Mantle and DiMaggio?I guess I don't get why people refer to any stadium as a joke. Perhaps it's just semantics, and they really mean it skews to the hitters. No big deal though, I'll stay out of everyone's way.
BUT HOMERS ARE BEING HIT!!!!! AND IT"S THE YANKEEEEEEESSSSSS!!!!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top