LOLDavenport has more TD's then Parker this year.As was to be expected at times.Its exactly what they did in the camp and preseason.Davenport got increased time with the #1 unit in goalline situations. Nothing new.Parker will still get some goalline carries. Just Davenport will get some as well.
Yes. Davenport was basically spelling him after a 20 yard run to the 1.Didn't see the game but didn't atleast one of those come after a long Parker run?
Parker is a disappointment this year.
They even TALKED about this during the game. The commentary was that Parker was still the goaline back according to the coach and coordinator, and Parker only gets pulled when tired, which unfortunately happened twice at the wrong times, today.Just saw when Pitt was down low Davenport was in at goaline... Wasn't Parker supposed to be the goaline back as well
Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker. Even last week when I pointed this SAME thing out everyone was like, oh yeah he'll get his 10 don't worry. Yeah, my bet is about 4. Saem thing I predicted for Henry a couple of weeks ago and I'm willing to bet I grossly overestimated there.Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
Davenport caught a pass on that play. The second TD Dav got stuffed the first time and went over the top on the second try, so its pretty much a wash.FWP did get one goal line carry and was stuffed. Davenpoop came in and went in almost untouched. If FWP is going to be the goalline back, that one sure didn't help his case any.
Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker. Even last week when I pointed this SAME thing out everyone was like, oh yeah he'll get his 10 don't worry. Yeah, my bet is about 4. Saem thing I predicted for Henry a couple of weeks ago and I'm willing to bet I grossly overestimated there.Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
I didn't promise you anything, guy.Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker. Even last week when I pointed this SAME thing out everyone was like, oh yeah he'll get his 10 don't worry. Yeah, my bet is about 4. Saem thing I predicted for Henry a couple of weeks ago and I'm willing to bet I grossly overestimated there.Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
Yep. Bring out the universal icon of truth proving the invalidity of projections and study.Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker. Even last week when I pointed this SAME thing out everyone was like, oh yeah he'll get his 10 don't worry. Yeah, my bet is about 4. Saem thing I predicted for Henry a couple of weeks ago and I'm willing to bet I grossly overestimated there.Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
![]()
I see no reason to oppose this statementWe don't take kindly to Willie Parker bashing around these parts, ya hear?
Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
Fine. Throw out projection and study. Magic eight balls cost about as much as a FBG subsription. Are you still here?ScoobyDoo said:Yep. Bring out the universal icon of truth proving the invalidity of projections and study.mbuehner said:ScoobyDoo said:Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker. Even last week when I pointed this SAME thing out everyone was like, oh yeah he'll get his 10 don't worry. Yeah, my bet is about 4. Saem thing I predicted for Henry a couple of weeks ago and I'm willing to bet I grossly overestimated there.The Scientist said:tandl71 said:Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
![]()
Koya said:They even TALKED about this during the game. The commentary was that Parker was still the goaline back according to the coach and coordinator, and Parker only gets pulled when tired, which unfortunately happened twice at the wrong times, today.Just saw when Pitt was down low Davenport was in at goaline... Wasn't Parker supposed to be the goaline back as well
Exactly. After those runs to the goaline you could even see FWP signal to the sidelines that he needed a blow. I'm a FWP owner and just as disspointed as all of the other owners in this thread. However, I don't believe Davenport is the GL back and I'm still confident that FWP will get his. With that said, I'm thinking of offering him up for LJ this week!Koya said:They even TALKED about this during the game. The commentary was that Parker was still the goaline back according to the coach and coordinator, and Parker only gets pulled when tired, which unfortunately happened twice at the wrong times, today.Just saw when Pitt was down low Davenport was in at goaline... Wasn't Parker supposed to be the goaline back as wellAnyone who watched the game knows that this is the closest thing to reality in this thread.
come on, see the light . . .that replay took at least three minutes . . . you're telling me he was still too tired to score from 1 yd out??Exactly. After those runs to the goaline you could even see FWP signal to the sidelines that he needed a blow. I'm a FWP owner and just as disspointed as all of the other owners in this thread. However, I don't believe Davenport is the GL back and I'm still confident that FWP will get his. With that said, I'm thinking of offering him up for LJ this week!Koya said:They even TALKED about this during the game. The commentary was that Parker was still the goaline back according to the coach and coordinator, and Parker only gets pulled when tired, which unfortunately happened twice at the wrong times, today.Just saw when Pitt was down low Davenport was in at goaline... Wasn't Parker supposed to be the goaline back as wellAnyone who watched the game knows that this is the closest thing to reality in this thread.
![]()
Perhaps Tomlin made his call as Parker was coming out, and as the play was being challenged, simply decided to stick with the initial call and players he had on the field. It was, after all, obviously a good call.come on, see the light . . .that replay took at least three minutes . . . you're telling me he was still too tired to score from 1 yd out??
Exactly.The Scientist said:tandl71 said:Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
He is a team player. He isn't concerned about Fantasy teams, and since Davenport was going in to spell him, why would would he say "I have my breath back now since the replay is taking so long, so take Davenport back out." Davenport is good in short yardage situations, and their goal is to score, which they did.come on, see the light . . .that replay took at least three minutes . . . you're telling me he was still too tired to score from 1 yd out??Exactly. After those runs to the goaline you could even see FWP signal to the sidelines that he needed a blow. I'm a FWP owner and just as disspointed as all of the other owners in this thread. However, I don't believe Davenport is the GL back and I'm still confident that FWP will get his. With that said, I'm thinking of offering him up for LJ this week!Koya said:They even TALKED about this during the game. The commentary was that Parker was still the goaline back according to the coach and coordinator, and Parker only gets pulled when tired, which unfortunately happened twice at the wrong times, today.Just saw when Pitt was down low Davenport was in at goaline... Wasn't Parker supposed to be the goaline back as wellAnyone who watched the game knows that this is the closest thing to reality in this thread.
![]()
Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
Oh I've noticed, I own Parker in 2 leagues. But he's not "being pulled at the goal line".Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
Oh I've noticed, I own Parker in 2 leagues. But he's not "being pulled at the goal line".Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
The two things are not mutually exclusive. The facts on the ground are that he was pulled at the goalline. You all can spin it any way you want, but that's what happened. That's two more TD's you can take off his projections for the year.Oh I've noticed, I own Parker in 2 leagues. But he's not "being pulled at the goal line".Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
For the last time, he is NOT being pulled at the goal line. He comes out when he needs a breather. This week that happened at the goal line. His decision, not the coaches.The two things are not mutually exclusive. The facts on the ground are that he was pulled at the goalline. You all can spin it any way you want, but that's what happened. That's two more TD's you can take off his projections for the year.Oh I've noticed, I own Parker in 2 leagues. But he's not "being pulled at the goal line".Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
It doesn't matter whose decision it was. We all can live in la la land if we want but every time he doesn't score a TD (this is a fantasy site), I don't score one and his projections go down. What happens next time he's at the goal line? The few times I remember this year he's either been stuffed or being spelled. So, all I'm asking is that people stop telling me he's going to get his because by the time he does it'll be too late anyway.For the last time, he is NOT being pulled at the goal line. He comes out when he needs a breather. This week that happened at the goal line. His decision, not the coaches.The two things are not mutually exclusive. The facts on the ground are that he was pulled at the goalline. You all can spin it any way you want, but that's what happened. That's two more TD's you can take off his projections for the year.Oh I've noticed, I own Parker in 2 leagues. But he's not "being pulled at the goal line".Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
Someone promised you something about TD totals? And you believed them?ScoobyDoo said:Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker.The Scientist said:tandl71 said:Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
Last week all the talk on Parker was he was going to go for 10+ this year, just be patient. Now this week he just needed a blow. Every week there is an excuse and those excuses are justified because it's the player, but if an excuse comes out about a fantasy team then you get the universal icon of truth.Someone promised you something about TD totals? And you believed them?ScoobyDoo said:Yeah, it's lovely to have that excuse for him. Maybe Hamper boy can go for the 10+ TD's that I was promised when I drafted Parker.The Scientist said:tandl71 said:Parker is a disappointment this year.But most the 1st round RB's have been. At least he isn't on IR.
I didn't see Parker get any goal line carries... I saw him get one carry at the 5...FWP did get one goal line carry and was stuffed. Davenpoop came in and went in almost untouched. If FWP is going to be the goalline back, that one sure didn't help his case any.
I didn't see Parker get any goal line carries... I saw him get one carry at the 5...FWP did get one goal line carry and was stuffed. Davenpoop came in and went in almost untouched. If FWP is going to be the goalline back, that one sure didn't help his case any.
I thought this too until I watched the game yesterday.For the last time, he is NOT being pulled at the goal line. He comes out when he needs a breather. This week that happened at the goal line. His decision, not the coaches.The two things are not mutually exclusive. The facts on the ground are that he was pulled at the goalline. You all can spin it any way you want, but that's what happened. That's two more TD's you can take off his projections for the year.Oh I've noticed, I own Parker in 2 leagues. But he's not "being pulled at the goal line".Of course you fail to notice that the TD number continues to spiral downward every week.Might help if you left the analysis to people who have actually watched the games.Such as.... being pulled at the goal line? lolParker's lack of TDs have been strictly due to the circumstances. He could easily go for 8-10 TDs the rest of the way.
Wait. My bad.Parker did get one carry at the one yard line...and he carried it all the way out to the 5 to set up 2 and 6...I didn't see Parker get any goal line carries... I saw him get one carry at the 5...FWP did get one goal line carry and was stuffed. Davenpoop came in and went in almost untouched. If FWP is going to be the goalline back, that one sure didn't help his case any.![]()
![]()
![]()
Wait. My bad.Parker did get one carry at the one yard line...and he carried it all the way out to the 5 to set up 2 and 6...I didn't see Parker get any goal line carries... I saw him get one carry at the 5...FWP did get one goal line carry and was stuffed. Davenpoop came in and went in almost untouched. If FWP is going to be the goalline back, that one sure didn't help his case any.![]()
![]()
![]()