What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Winter Storm Caesar (1 Viewer)

as someone said in another thread, won't snow benefit the offense, WRs and RBs because they kn9w where they are going; Defense doesnt

 
I would be more concerned if I had another option with a Sunday night or Monday night start I could substitute in if there is epic snow. As it is my options are start someone else with an early game or cross my fingers that the weather people are wrong again.

 
Just another December game in Lambeau. I don't think it will affect the Packers much since it doesn't sound like there will be a lot of wind. The field will be a little wet, but the snow will mostly melt away. The Packers have a hydronic heating system beneath the field that can keep the ground at 55* even if it's 0* outside, along with a drainage and irrigation system that can help control the amount of water beneath the field. Plus the field has artificial turf mixed into the grass to help keep it together.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
as someone said in another thread, won't snow benefit the offense, WRs and RBs because they kn9w where they are going; Defense doesnt
I don't think the defense ever knows where the offense is going.
Clearly you have not watched many Jaguars games, the defense allows seems to know where they are going. :)
A number of offenses don't know where they're going either. I mean the only thing better than watching a 7-6 game is watching it in a snow globe.
 
When did they go to naming storms?
I think last year... I lived in Wisconsin all my life and someone said a storm name to me that was from Kentucky and I thought he was high. I tell you they must be :banned: To the point though:Rodgers in December Regular Season @ Home: (excluding post season as it would be better teams than the Lions with more on the line)2008 -19/30 - 295 - 2 TD - 1 INT (21-24 Loss)21/31 - 308 - 3 TD - 0 INT (31-21 Win)2009 - 26/40 - 263 - 3 TD - 2 INT (27-14 Win)12/23 - 237 - 1 TD - 0 INT (48-10 Win)2010 -21/30 - 298 - 3 TD - 0 INT (34-16 Win)25/37 - 404 - 4 TD - 0 INT (45-17 Win)19/28 - 221 - 1 TD - 1 INT (10-3 Win)2011 -17/30 - 281 - 2 TD - 1 INT (46-16 Win)21/29 - 283 - 5 TD - 0 INT (35-21 Win)2012 - 27/35 - 286 - 1 TD - 1 INT (23-14 Win)Also its Favre and not Rodgers but one of the bigger snow storms Lambaeu has seen in years was in 2008:http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=280112009
 
Hurricane-envy
If the NWS ever gets on board, naming storms might help people prepare better. Still, on balance, I thought Americans in colder climates were much, much more used to winter storms that Gulf Coast folks are used to hurricanes.Named storms, in helping to "vet" the severity of a storm, might also help with procuring higher levels of federal recovery funding.
 
When did they go to naming storms?
I think last year... I lived in Wisconsin all my life and someone said a storm name to me that was from Kentucky and I thought he was high. I tell you they must be :banned: To the point though:Rodgers in December Regular Season @ Home: (excluding post season as it would be better teams than the Lions with more on the line)2008 -19/30 - 295 - 2 TD - 1 INT (21-24 Loss)21/31 - 308 - 3 TD - 0 INT (31-21 Win)2009 - 26/40 - 263 - 3 TD - 2 INT (27-14 Win)12/23 - 237 - 1 TD - 0 INT (48-10 Win)2010 -21/30 - 298 - 3 TD - 0 INT (34-16 Win)25/37 - 404 - 4 TD - 0 INT (45-17 Win)19/28 - 221 - 1 TD - 1 INT (10-3 Win)2011 -17/30 - 281 - 2 TD - 1 INT (46-16 Win)21/29 - 283 - 5 TD - 0 INT (35-21 Win)2012 - 27/35 - 286 - 1 TD - 1 INT (23-14 Win)Also its Favre and not Rodgers but one of the bigger snow storms Lambaeu has seen in years was in 2008:http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=280112009
Thanks for pulling the stats above. Very interesting. A couple observations:1. The issue isn't that this is a December game. The issue is that it will snow.2. In the specific game you referenced for Favre, the Pack threw 23 times and ran 35 times. That's exactly what people appear to fear this week.
 
When did they go to naming storms?
I think last year... I lived in Wisconsin all my life and someone said a storm name to me that was from Kentucky and I thought he was high. I tell you they must be :banned: To the point though:Rodgers in December Regular Season @ Home: (excluding post season as it would be better teams than the Lions with more on the line)2008 -19/30 - 295 - 2 TD - 1 INT (21-24 Loss)21/31 - 308 - 3 TD - 0 INT (31-21 Win)2009 - 26/40 - 263 - 3 TD - 2 INT (27-14 Win)12/23 - 237 - 1 TD - 0 INT (48-10 Win)2010 -21/30 - 298 - 3 TD - 0 INT (34-16 Win)25/37 - 404 - 4 TD - 0 INT (45-17 Win)19/28 - 221 - 1 TD - 1 INT (10-3 Win)2011 -17/30 - 281 - 2 TD - 1 INT (46-16 Win)21/29 - 283 - 5 TD - 0 INT (35-21 Win)2012 - 27/35 - 286 - 1 TD - 1 INT (23-14 Win)Also its Favre and not Rodgers but one of the bigger snow storms Lambaeu has seen in years was in 2008:http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=280112009
Thanks for pulling the stats above. Very interesting. A couple observations:1. The issue isn't that this is a December game. The issue is that it will snow.2. In the specific game you referenced for Favre, the Pack threw 23 times and ran 35 times. That's exactly what people appear to fear this week.
i don't fear that kind of balance today - the Pack couldn't run 35 times if they had to. But, if there is an impact on the passing game, that would be bad news. I am going with Rodgers, and expecting a heavy dose of short passes to Cobb if the weather is a factor.
 
Yur not gettin me again, with one of these Alomstfearfull storms..
How about a guy like Hanson today? He's been solid, been dome kickers in wintry conditions.... :no:
Question is will he be allowed to kick FGs? I think the Lions come in thinking its all or nothing wanting TDs...?My Hanson prediction:0/1 - missed 47 yarder3 - PATPackers 38 - Lions 21Rodgers - 330, 5 TDs
I think normally DET has enough firepower to keep it somewhat close but I am concerned about the conditions. If it's 21-7 or something in the 1st half, DET just isn't going to attempt many FG's. There's no one substantially above him in the FBG ranking available so I'll probably roll with him. Lots of poor conditions today.
 
Yes in Bad weather I would look for other Kicker options..
sometimes kickers have scored more points because offense stalls in red zone where there is less roomfor the record, by starting this thread I wasn't advising sitting anyone. Was just curious what others were doing
 
as someone said in another thread, won't snow benefit the offense, WRs and RBs because they kn9w where they are going; Defense doesnt
I don't think the defense ever knows where the offense is going.
It's really quite an advantage isn't it?
If you think about it, it really is remarkable how well some defenses play. I mean, for the most part it's all reactive. How a defender can stay with a WR even though that WR could be running any type of route, is simply amazing.
 
When did they go to naming storms?
I think last year... I lived in Wisconsin all my life and someone said a storm name to me that was from Kentucky and I thought he was high. I tell you they must be :banned: To the point though:

Rodgers in December Regular Season @ Home: (excluding post season as it would be better teams than the Lions with more on the line)

2008 -

19/30 - 295 - 2 TD - 1 INT (21-24 Loss)

21/31 - 308 - 3 TD - 0 INT (31-21 Win)

2009 -

26/40 - 263 - 3 TD - 2 INT (27-14 Win)

12/23 - 237 - 1 TD - 0 INT (48-10 Win)

2010 -

21/30 - 298 - 3 TD - 0 INT (34-16 Win)

25/37 - 404 - 4 TD - 0 INT (45-17 Win)

19/28 - 221 - 1 TD - 1 INT (10-3 Win)

2011 -

17/30 - 281 - 2 TD - 1 INT (46-16 Win)

21/29 - 283 - 5 TD - 0 INT (35-21 Win)

2012 -

27/35 - 286 - 1 TD - 1 INT (23-14 Win)

Also its Favre and not Rodgers but one of the bigger snow storms Lambaeu has seen in years was in 2008:

http://scores.espn.g...ameId=280112009
Thanks for pulling the stats above. Very interesting. A couple observations:1. The issue isn't that this is a December game. The issue is that it will snow.

2. In the specific game you referenced for Favre, the Pack threw 23 times and ran 35 times. That's exactly what people appear to fear this week.
i don't fear that kind of balance today - the Pack couldn't run 35 times if they had to. But, if there is an impact on the passing game, that would be bad news. I am going with Rodgers, and expecting a heavy dose of short passes to Cobb if the weather is a factor.
Maybe so, but then Cobb's wheels will be hard to tackle with defenders feet planted into snow.Big WRs and TEs seem to benefit like the little CBs gotta think about planting their feet before they leap and normally they just leap...but then they start to just keying their hits better and shellacking the big receiver right when he catches it.

Snow doesn't seem to affect FF at the end of the games. During it, it seems to while you're watching, but then they show stats on the TV screen and the totals are usually fairly normal.

 
Disregard all weather related threads whe thinking of who to tart and who not to start. Atmospheric Caesar my ####.

Fool me once...

 
as someone said in another thread, won't snow benefit the offense, WRs and RBs because they kn9w where they are going; Defense doesnt
I don't think the defense ever knows where the offense is going.
It's really quite an advantage isn't it?
It is very common for the D to know where the offense is going. Gibbs and BP took this tactic from old coaches and pushed it in the 80s, many coaches ever since especially current N former Steelers and Giants coaches. It can be extremely demoralizing to a D to know right where the RB is going to run, yet they are blocked so well the offense does well on the play. Enough of those in a row will force a D to play uncharacteristically poor, pointing fingers at each other etc. They want the DC to react and sub lesser players to stop the run, then they may have less athletic players in to stop the pass or to get outside for a different run play. It really dramatically affects a D when they do it and offensive linemen absolutely love it. It flat out fired up Gibbs' Hogs.
 
Shouldn't have a negative impact on anyone other than the Kickers and Cobb. Every other skill position player has the build to thrive in these conditions. If you're counting on Cobb tonight, you might want to take a peek at your other options.

(smaller receivers can get blown up at the line in slick, snowy conditions. they also typically count on their wheels rather than their strength, which hurts them in slippery conditions)

 
man, i'm nervous about Rodgers tonight.... and i need a pretty decent game out of him.

weather and fantasy football don't mix

 
man, i'm nervous about Rodgers tonight.... and i need a pretty decent game out of him.weather and fantasy football don't mix
Rodgers should be fine. The Jennings/Finley/Driver type receivers thrive in these kind of conditions.I'd feel better if he had a running game, but with the fireworks that Detroit is going to be able to put up today (Johnson/Pettigrew should have awesome games)Rodgers will almost be forced to put it up (against that bad D)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top