JulioNicksJohnsonJenningsWhiteJacksonHow would you rank the receivers below based on thier dynasy value over the next 3-5 years?A. JohnsonH. NicksG. JenningsR. WhiteJ. JonesV. Jackson
VJax not even worth mentioning?!NicksJulioJenningsRoddyAndre
PPR - yes. Standard, I am torn between he and Julio.Am I correct in assuming that AJ Green is ahead of all those guys?
Nicks - #1 WR on his team and youngJackson - #1 WR on his team (in his prime)Jennings - #1 WR on his team and they like to throw the ball a lot. Has other good receivers to compete with.Andre - #1 WR on his team. Would be higher but age and injuries are a factorWhite - #1 WR on his team and has to compete with Julio. Loss of Mularkey brings questionsJones - #2 WR on his team. He and Roddy negate each other. Loss of Mularkey.How would you rank the receivers below based on thier dynasy value over the next 3-5 years?A. JohnsonH. NicksG. JenningsR. WhiteJ. JonesV. Jackson
And VJax is an unrestricted FA this season, right?Food for thought, Jennings is a free agent after next season.
I don't think anyone disrespected him here. The OP asked for a five year prospectus and at age 30, that leaves Roddy being prospected out to age 35 while all the other guys are younger and a few are much younger. Combine that Roddy has Julio to compete with as the #1 WR on that team and Atlanta, as a team, is the one that has the most question marks in terms of the coaching and surrounding talent (their ages) and it just makes him hard to forecast out highly relative to the others on the list when we are talking about 5 years from now. Speaking of Julio. The guy has a bright future but I'm really surprised people are putting him on as high a pedestal as some are. He had a nice last month but it wasn't "special". It was no better than the month Colston, Jordy Nelson, or some guys like that turned in. I think people need to realize that this is a different NFL and things are very situational as to when and how teams are playing. For a little used rookie to come in and have a very nice month doesn't impress me nearly as much as when you visually see and know a guy has just taken another step (like Antonio Brown this year or Fitz in that playoff year where he just became unstoppable). Honestly, during the final month of the season, the guy that really caught my eye was Percy Harvin. but I understand, its more fashinable to talk about rookies upside than it is to talk about other guys usually.Always get a chuckle out of how little respect Roddy gets in these discussions. People always seems to be a good reason to justify his dynasty rank, yet, when it is all played out, there he is in the top 5 again. AGAIN.![]()
He got 30% of his teams targets - highest in the NFL. How long do you think that continues, when Jones is more productive per target?Always get a chuckle out of how little respect Roddy gets in these discussions. People always seems to be a good reason to justify his dynasty rank, yet, when it is all played out, there he is in the top 5 again. AGAIN.![]()
Here's why I am high on Julio.I don't think anyone disrespected him here. The OP asked for a five year prospectus and at age 30, that leaves Roddy being prospected out to age 35 while all the other guys are younger and a few are much younger. Combine that Roddy has Julio to compete with as the #1 WR on that team and Atlanta, as a team, is the one that has the most question marks in terms of the coaching and surrounding talent (their ages) and it just makes him hard to forecast out highly relative to the others on the list when we are talking about 5 years from now. Speaking of Julio. The guy has a bright future but I'm really surprised people are putting him on as high a pedestal as some are. He had a nice last month but it wasn't "special". It was no better than the month Colston, Jordy Nelson, or some guys like that turned in. I think people need to realize that this is a different NFL and things are very situational as to when and how teams are playing.Always get a chuckle out of how little respect Roddy gets in these discussions. People always seems to be a good reason to justify his dynasty rank, yet, when it is all played out, there he is in the top 5 again. AGAIN.
![]()
For a little used rookie to come in and have a very nice month doesn't impress me nearly as much as when you visually see and know a guy has just taken another step (like Antonio Brown this year or Fitz in that playoff year where he just became unstoppable). Honestly, during the final month of the season, the guy that really caught my eye was Percy Harvin. but I understand, its more fashinable to talk about rookies upside than it is to talk about other guys usually.
*snip*I think the "WRs start to decline at age __________" trope is the wrong way of looking at it. I think a much better way of looking at it is "every year after age 28, WRs have an X% chance of seeing a major decline in NFL talent". In other words, a WR's chances of still being elite at 29 are (1-X), while his chances of still being elite at 30 are (1-X)^2, and his chances at age 31 are (1-X)^3, and so on down the line. I believe this model more accurately reflects real-world NFL trends, where elite WRs experience their dropoffs at wildly disparate times- 28 for Andre Rison, 30 for Amani Toomer and Eric Moulds, 32 for Torry Holt, 33 for Joe Horn and Randy Moss, 34 for Hines Ward, 35 for Marvin Harrison, 36 for Rod Smith, 37 for Isaac Bruce and Joey Galloway, 38 for Terrell Owens, 41 for Jerry Rice, etc. Instead of envisioning WRs as smooth and predictable trend lines (we envision young players' future careers as a steady upward slope, followed by a plateau, followed by a steady downward slope), I think it's more instructive to think of WRs as ticking time bombs. You know at some point there is going to be a sudden and unpredictable erosion in their skills which will decimate their fantasy value. You have no idea when this erosion will come. Therefore, holding onto WRs becomes a game of craps, where you roll the dice every season and hope they don't come up snake eyes. Andre Johnson might continue being productive until well after his 35th birthday, like Terrell Owens... or he might wind up imploding in 2 years, like Torry Holt. At this point, we have no idea which shape his career will take, but we can be certain that dismissing his age as irrelevant essentially amounts to failing to accurately price risk into our evaluation of him, which is not a good thing.Of course, at the same time, similar risks apply to young players like Jones. It's easy for us to anticipate steady improvement, but the simple fact is that a lot of young WRs simply don't improve in a straight line like you'd expect. Guys like Brandon Lloyd, Michael Clayton, Michael Crabtree, Roy Williams, Rod Gardner, etc. have all failed to show the improvements that dynasty owners assumed were essentially their birthrights early in their careers. And even some guys who have grown into their full potential such as Andre Johnson have done so in major fits and starts.First, I don't think it is worthwhile to try to project beyond 3 years. There was a long discussion of this in the dynasty thread about four years ago and that was the conclusion. The reason being that injuries, changes in offense, changes in personnel, etc, make it hard to predict performance beyond a three year horizon.So, given three years, and given the fact that elite WRs start to decline around age 32-33, I would rank these guys thus.
not to hijack thread, but..3-5 years? I think you toss out Andre Johnson and V. Jackson, and addD. Thomas and K. BrittJohnson is going to be a great value pick in the years to come, but with his injury history, his days as a top WR are numbered ..Thomas is the next great NFL WR, IMO, and K. Britt is an up-n-coming stud WR as we witnessed during the first few games of this past season, he was a beast..these guys will be around for a long long time..for your list I'd goJulio - was there a better WR in terms of TD/reception ratio in the entire NFL? don't have the stats, but I doubt anyone was better..JenningsWhite - proven commodityNicks - streakyAJ - injuries and lack of TDs ( how many years has he had double-digit TDs, if any)Vjax... never has been never will be.How would you rank the receivers below based on thier dynasy value over the next 3-5 years?A. JohnsonH. NicksG. JenningsR. WhiteJ. JonesV. Jackson
'jurb26 said:J. Jones - only Calvin and Green are ahead of him on my list right now.Nicks - would be nice to see some consistency out of this guy but I think he's the best of this group.Jennings - top WR on one of the top offenses with the best QB in the game.A. Johnson - super talent, needs to stay healthy.V. Jackson - underrated IMO.White - will soon be supplanted by Jones, maybe already has.