ClownCausedChaos2
Footballguy
Your good buddy would be cooking it.If I choose death and I want steak for my last meal, are they going to some effort or are they just picking up from Applebee's?
Your good buddy would be cooking it.If I choose death and I want steak for my last meal, are they going to some effort or are they just picking up from Applebee's?
Sure it is. I answered the hypothetical clearly -- death sentence. The only variation was a brief explanation for why I chose the way I chose. Christo didn't like the "why".That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Last season on Chopped they had a theme show pitting four death caterers cooking three courses using nothing but last-meal-requested ingredients.If I choose death and I want steak for my last meal, are they going to some effort or are they just picking up from Applebee's?
If I killed people the way Dexter did I would continue my work in prison.If I killed someone like Dexter did, I'd have no shame and would live my life in prison. In choosing between living and dying, the only thing I'd care about is my kids feelings. As long as they didnt have a reason to be ashamed, I'd rather be alive to see them.
Because it made an unnecessary assumption.Sure it is. I answered the hypothetical clearly -- death sentence. The only variation was a brief explanation for why I chose the way I chose. Christo didn't like the "why".That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Ok. You and ghost guy just make my choice and explain to me why I chose. Thanks.Because it made an unnecessary assumption.Sure it is. I answered the hypothetical clearly -- death sentence. The only variation was a brief explanation for why I chose the way I chose. Christo didn't like the "why".That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
You killed your father and had sex with your mother. Classic scenario. No wonder you want to die.Ok. You and ghost guy just make my choice and explain to me why I chose. Thanks.Because it made an unnecessary assumption.Sure it is. I answered the hypothetical clearly -- death sentence. The only variation was a brief explanation for why I chose the way I chose. Christo didn't like the "why".That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Nope, not a possible debate. No other ####### details, gguy.That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Just a chip and a.... chair?As long as you have even one chip to play you are still in the game.
In September 2011, the state of Texas abolished all special last-meal requests after condemned prisoner Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a huge last meal and did not eat any of it, saying he was not hungry. His last-meal request was for a plate of two chicken-fried steaks with gravy and sliced onions, a triple-patty bacon cheeseburger, a cheese omelet with ground beef, tomatoes, onions, bell peppers and jalapeños, a bowl of fried okra with ketchup, a pound of barbecued meat with half of a loaf of white bread, a portion of three fajitas, a meat-lover’s pizza (topped with pepperoni, ham, beef, bacon, and sausage), a pint of Blue Bell, a serving of ice cream, a slab of peanut-butter fudge with crushed peanuts, and a serving equivalent to three root beers. The abolition followed a complaint by a Texas Senator, John Whitmire (Democrat, of Houston), who called the meal "inappropriate". The tradition of customized last meals is thought to have been established around 1924 in Texas.
Option 1, prison for lifeNope, not a possible debate. No other ####### details, gguy.That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Stay classy, ghostguyYou killed your father and had sex with your mother. Classic scenario. No wonder you want to die.Ok. You and ghost guy just make my choice and explain to me why I chose. Thanks.Because it made an unnecessary assumption.Sure it is. I answered the hypothetical clearly -- death sentence. The only variation was a brief explanation for why I chose the way I chose. Christo didn't like the "why".That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Im upset that instead of them admitting it was stupid to fulfill that guys obviously excessive request and granting only smaller meals, they just ban them completely and try to blame the prisoner.This is great.
In September 2011, the state of Texas abolished all special last-meal requests after condemned prisoner Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a huge last meal and did not eat any of it, saying he was not hungry. His last-meal request was for a plate of two chicken-fried steaks with gravy and sliced onions, a triple-patty bacon cheeseburger, a cheese omelet with ground beef, tomatoes, onions, bell peppers and jalapeños, a bowl of fried okra with ketchup, a pound of barbecued meat with half of a loaf of white bread, a portion of three fajitas, a meat-lovers pizza (topped with pepperoni, ham, beef, bacon, and sausage), a pint of Blue Bell, a serving of ice cream, a slab of peanut-butter fudge with crushed peanuts, and a serving equivalent to three root beers. The abolition followed a complaint by a Texas Senator, John Whitmire (Democrat, of Houston), who called the meal "inappropriate". The tradition of customized last meals is thought to have been established around 1924 in Texas.
They spent, what $2M to execute him. But the $100 or so to give him his last meal was wasteful.Im upset that instead of them admitting it was stupid to fulfill that guys obviously excessive request and granting only smaller meals, they just ban them completely and try to blame the prisoner.This is great.
In September 2011, the state of Texas abolished all special last-meal requests after condemned prisoner Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a huge last meal and did not eat any of it, saying he was not hungry. His last-meal request was for a plate of two chicken-fried steaks with gravy and sliced onions, a triple-patty bacon cheeseburger, a cheese omelet with ground beef, tomatoes, onions, bell peppers and jalapeños, a bowl of fried okra with ketchup, a pound of barbecued meat with half of a loaf of white bread, a portion of three fajitas, a meat-lovers pizza (topped with pepperoni, ham, beef, bacon, and sausage), a pint of Blue Bell, a serving of ice cream, a slab of peanut-butter fudge with crushed peanuts, and a serving equivalent to three root beers. The abolition followed a complaint by a Texas Senator, John Whitmire (Democrat, of Houston), who called the meal "inappropriate". The tradition of customized last meals is thought to have been established around 1924 in Texas.
Let's not.Option 1, prison for lifeNope, not a possible debate. No other ####### details, gguy.That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.
Option 2, death
Seems really simple. The reasons you are in prison are irrelevant. Could be anything. If you want to lay out a specific scenario, lay it out for us, and we can pick. Maybe start a new thread for each specific example. 10 million prison or death threads. Let's do it. You start.
Oh come nowThey spent, what $2M to execute him. But the $100 or so to give him his last meal was wasteful.Im upset that instead of them admitting it was stupid to fulfill that guys obviously excessive request and granting only smaller meals, they just ban them completely and try to blame the prisoner.This is great.
In September 2011, the state of Texas abolished all special last-meal requests after condemned prisoner Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a huge last meal and did not eat any of it, saying he was not hungry. His last-meal request was for a plate of two chicken-fried steaks with gravy and sliced onions, a triple-patty bacon cheeseburger, a cheese omelet with ground beef, tomatoes, onions, bell peppers and jalapeños, a bowl of fried okra with ketchup, a pound of barbecued meat with half of a loaf of white bread, a portion of three fajitas, a meat-lovers pizza (topped with pepperoni, ham, beef, bacon, and sausage), a pint of Blue Bell, a serving of ice cream, a slab of peanut-butter fudge with crushed peanuts, and a serving equivalent to three root beers. The abolition followed a complaint by a Texas Senator, John Whitmire (Democrat, of Houston), who called the meal "inappropriate". The tradition of customized last meals is thought to have been established around 1924 in Texas.
Umm, okStay classy, ghostguyYou killed your father and had sex with your mother. Classic scenario. No wonder you want to die.Ok. You and ghost guy just make my choice and explain to me why I chose. Thanks.Because it made an unnecessary assumption.Sure it is. I answered the hypothetical clearly -- death sentence. The only variation was a brief explanation for why I chose the way I chose. Christo didn't like the "why".That's not how that played out at all.Tennessee_ATO said:Huh? I started w/ the premise of I'm either guilty or not and gave my answers. I got challenged by you for basically not thinking it through enough and responded, and that means I'M the one overthinking it?
It's real simple. Prison for life, or die. There are no other details regarding who you killed, why, or chances of getting off. There is no getting out of prison here.
The only details for this that I could see as a possible debate are just how horrific the prison experience would be. White collar prison or mexican prison would make a bit of a difference.