phillzphan
Footballguy
Any shot at having upside on the Jets?
Last edited by a moderator:
And yet they didnt even want to offer him a minimum contract in the offseason to get him.It doesnt take a whole lot of interest to pick up a FA right now. Zach Hilton is as appealing to the Jets as Johnathan Smith was to the Pats, Tim Massaquoi was to the Dolphins, Jovan Haye was to the Browns, and Casey Cramer, Eric King, Josh Savage and DeQuincy Scott were to the Titans. If those players made you say, "who?", you're damn right.Before you say "here we go again....", I'm just providing the facts here.
ZH caught 35 passes on 56 targets (62.5% catch rate, good, not great for a TE) for 396 yards and 1 TD in 2005. He finished as the #22 TE.
The interesting things about him are (A) his size - he's 6'8" and 268 lbs, and (B) his numbers were mostly second half of '05. Prior to Week 11, his numbers were 5-36-0 on 12 targets. So in his last 7 games, he was 30-360-1. That's the interesting part.
Zach Hilton
It's easy to write this guy off considering what just went down in New Orleans. However, he has shown that he can catch the ball on short / medium passes in the NFL.
I'm glad he's getting a second look, regardless of the outcome. Someone else saw what many of us saw last winter.
I think you might be misunderstanding the flow of that page, the top to bottom/bottom to top listing.He's 4thThe Jet depth chart lists him as the starting TE.
Can anyone confirm this ?
I never thought Marcellius Rivers had a chance in Oakland eitherBefore you say "here we go again....", I'm just providing the facts here.
ZH caught 35 passes on 56 targets (62.5% catch rate, good, not great for a TE) for 396 yards and 1 TD in 2005. He finished as the #22 TE.
The interesting things about him are (A) his size - he's 6'8" and 268 lbs, and (B) his numbers were mostly second half of '05. Prior to Week 11, his numbers were 5-36-0 on 12 targets. So in his last 7 games, he was 30-360-1. That's the interesting part.
Zach Hilton
It's easy to write this guy off considering what just went down in New Orleans. However, he has shown that he can catch the ball on short / medium passes in the NFL.
I'm glad he's getting a second look, regardless of the outcome. Someone else saw what many of us saw last winter.
Hilton is inactive - not surprising given that they just signed him. Might be a good idea to grab him now for larger leagues. I think his role will increase as the season goes on.
DieselJets | Hilton releasedSat, 16 Sep 2006 06:00:15 -0700The New York Jets have released TE Zach Hilton.
DieselJets | Hilton releasedSat, 16 Sep 2006 06:00:15 -0700The New York Jets have released TE Zach Hilton.![]()
Slinger, I didn't say he acted humbly or politely stated his case or anything of that sort. The guy was right though. FWIW I was too and avoided that debate as we already went thru this a couple times in the spring and that was like the 3rd thread on it.(feel free to search) There's like 8-10 years worth of examples of Saints TEs that I've seen people get excited over only to fail. I have no idea why this fascination happens in FF but it does. Zach was just the next in line. We bash people that are wrong and it's only fair to give em' a thumbsup when they're right. (just like me) I'm sure diesel was wrong on plenty and right on plenty more. No need to dwell on any but for this brief moment, thumbs up diesel.DieselJets | Hilton releasedSat, 16 Sep 2006 06:00:15 -0700The New York Jets have released TE Zach Hilton.![]()
It's harder to pick out sleepers than to discount them. If saying that Zach Hilton won't be a Top 7 TE this year is your claim to fame then color me unimpress.
It's overIn the deepest of leagues is anyone still holding onto Zach? I am about to let go but curious to see if anyone expects him to sign somewhere else.