I thinks its highly unlikely that he is the starting RB for SD, he was ok for a couple of weeks, then hit a wall.sniffer (or anyone else) what are your thoughts on oliver?
saw you grabbed terrance west on the biggest disaster team in the league over him which was a strong sign you dont like his situation I suppose
Not BSS obviously, but I took West over Oliver in WSL1, and didn't have to think for five seconds about it ...sniffer (or anyone else) what are your thoughts on oliver?
saw you grabbed terrance west on the biggest disaster team in the league over him which was a strong sign you dont like his situation I suppose
7.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Steve Smith, WR44, BAL1.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Dez Bryant, WR2 DAL
2.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Jeremy Hill, RB10 CIN
3.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Martellus Bennett, TE5 CHI
4.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Andre Ellington, RB19 ARI
5.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Ben Roethlisberger, QB9 PIT
6.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Colin Kaepernick, QB19, SF
Took the approach of getting a stud WR, 2 strong Top 20 RBs and a Top 5 TE.
Added 2 QBs at a position where things get sketchy after 22-25 guys go off the board.
Chosen shortfall (as you must choose one in 16-team leagues) is WR. I think WR is very deep and that I can recover from it. Time (and the next several rounds) will tell.
8.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Charles Johnson, WR51, MIN
9.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Legarrette Blount, RB35 NEP
10.08 Jeff Pasquino -- James Jones, WR59, OAK
Loaded up on WR depth, as you might expect after taking just Dez in first 6 rounds. Gives me 4 reasonable options that can all find the end zone and are the most consistent targets on their respective teams (as of December).
Was slightly sniped on Vereen vs. Blount (Vereen better in PPR as we saw Sunday) but Blount is the TD guy, so he's still worth a RB3 pick.
Definitely sniped on J. Blackmon - nice pick - and if it wasn't for being in WSL3 (trailing the other drafts) he might have lasted. Oh well, I still don't know if Goodell will reinstate him after a Mary Jane arrest last July (he has to be clean for a year, according to the reinstatement policy). We'll see, but I think he will be in Stage 3 and not back until around October. He's a WR1 when active though, so worth a gamble. If he gets reinstated for Week 1, he will be a Top 40 pick for sure, so worth a pick this late.
My team is OK - not loving the WRs, but still the goal is not to win every week, just not be last.
QB: Nick Foles, Alex SmithMatt Forte
Jeremy Maclin
DeAndre Hopkins
Martavis Bryant
Roddy White
This draft is setting up as a WR minimalist.
I hate this team.I know everybody likes their teams as they draft
I really like your team ref.Stinkin Ref said:3.10 Peyton Manning QB(5) DEN
11.10 Ryan Mallett QB(29)
1.10 DeMarco Murray RB(6)
2.07 Adrian Peterson RB(9)
9.10 Frank Gore RB(36)
4.07 Julian Edelman WR(25) NE
5.10 Vincent Jackson WR(33) TB
7.10 Eric Decker WR(45) NYJ
10.07 Justin Blackmon WR(58) JAC
12.07 Justin Hunter WR(68) TEN
13.10 Kenny Britt WR(73)
6.07 Jason Witten TE(8) DAL
8.07 Jordan Reed TE(15) WAS
14.07 Chandler Catanzaro PK(10) ARZ
15.10 Caleb Sturgis PK(21) MIA
(11) Mallett: I think I #### the bed here and rushed this pick. Was targeting Mettenberg after continually passing on QB and when he went I think I pushed the panic button way too early. Not that I don't like Mallett and I don't think he will start, I just have a feeling I could have gotten him much later (as indicated by other drafts, he may not even get drafted). I think he resigns with HOU and is pulling the trigger. I debated between Mallett and Latimer here and should have gone the other way. Pretty big hiccup here.
(12) Hunter: I know everybody likes their teams as they draft, but I really liked what I had done up until the Mallett pick. Think I recovered here in the next two rounds and took a little heat off passing on Latimer by adding Hunter and Britt. I'm not ready to turn the page on Hunter, while he disappointed many last year I think the talent is there and can be used next year with Mettenberg's big arm and Hunter being given a chance to make more plays downfield. I'm still a believer, maybe way off base, but I could see him outperforming this draft slot (WR68).
(13) Britt: Seems to have figured things out and he will play somewhere probably back in saint lewey. Hunter/Britt remind me of each other. I think my last 3 WR's (Blackmon, Hunter, Britt) ooze big week top shelf WR talent and scream best ball value after round 10. Think I have a good best ball mix at WR right now. Might add a steady eddie later.
(14) (15) Catanzaro/Sturgis: After suffering through a couple survivors last year trying to find a PK at the end of the draft I decided I didn't want to do that dance anymore. Felt like I had a pretty solid core allowing me to go ahead and dedicate back to back picks here at PK. Both these guys finished in top 11 of FG's made and in top 20 overall.
Overall: Recent news said Manning is coming back. I think Mallett will start somewhere, heard that HOU would like him to come back but he may have to compete, which is ok, I think he comes out on top. None of my RB's have homes, but talent is there and will play somewhere. Could be the best 1-2 punch in this league when smoke clears. I'd roll into most leagues right now with my WR core, I have some stability mixed in with some high risk pop. I realize I'm rolling the dice with guys like Blackmon and Britt, but I'm not playing for second place. Love my TE combo in a year where there are 2 top guys and then anybody's guess after that. Not sure I'd rather have any other combo that doesn't include Gronk or Graham. Only regret overall is the Mallett pick and not adding something else there, hell even a DST would have been better value at this point.
Pretty solid just about everywhere other than RB2Matthew Stafford
Teddy Bridgewater
CJ Anderson
Branden Oliver
Dan Herron
Jerrick McKinnon
Roy Helu
Desean Jackson
Mike Evans
Anquan Boldin
Robert Woods
Cole Beasley
Antonio Gates
Owen Daniels
Hauschka
Suisham
Philly
I kept looking at Pitta but I don't think I would have taken him. I might not have taken a TE at all but when you grabbed him, I felt the 3 other teams would fill their TE2 slot before it got back to me so I grabbed mine, in Rodgers.Any thoughts on Dennis Pitta?
Would he have lasted another round, or no?
I think not with Rodgers going.
Well, I saw a few teams still needed a 2nd TE, and he had gone in this range in the other 2 drafts, so I thought that now was the time. My only risk was a big run on PK and not getting any that have a sure job - which I survived with getting Forbath in WASH, who is actually pretty decent.I kept looking at Pitta but I don't think I would have taken him. I might not have taken a TE at all but when you grabbed him, I felt the 3 other teams would fill their TE2 slot before it got back to me so I grabbed mine, in Rodgers.Any thoughts on Dennis Pitta?
Would he have lasted another round, or no?
I think not with Rodgers going.
Besides... 30yo TE coming off 2 hip locations doesn't seem to be the ideal candidate for an NFL player any longer. I was more upset at Fiddles taking Daniels. Planned on him being my third TE.
11.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Mohamed Sanu, WR63, CIN7.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Steve Smith, WR44, BAL1.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Dez Bryant, WR2 DAL
2.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Jeremy Hill, RB10 CIN
3.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Martellus Bennett, TE5 CHI
4.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Andre Ellington, RB19 ARI
5.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Ben Roethlisberger, QB9 PIT
6.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Colin Kaepernick, QB19, SF
Took the approach of getting a stud WR, 2 strong Top 20 RBs and a Top 5 TE.
Added 2 QBs at a position where things get sketchy after 22-25 guys go off the board.
Chosen shortfall (as you must choose one in 16-team leagues) is WR. I think WR is very deep and that I can recover from it. Time (and the next several rounds) will tell.
8.08 Jeff Pasquino -- Charles Johnson, WR51, MIN
9.09 Jeff Pasquino -- Legarrette Blount, RB35 NEP
10.08 Jeff Pasquino -- James Jones, WR59, OAK
Loaded up on WR depth, as you might expect after taking just Dez in first 6 rounds. Gives me 4 reasonable options that can all find the end zone and are the most consistent targets on their respective teams (as of December).
Was slightly sniped on Vereen vs. Blount (Vereen better in PPR as we saw Sunday) but Blount is the TD guy, so he's still worth a RB3 pick.
Definitely sniped on J. Blackmon - nice pick - and if it wasn't for being in WSL3 (trailing the other drafts) he might have lasted. Oh well, I still don't know if Goodell will reinstate him after a Mary Jane arrest last July (he has to be clean for a year, according to the reinstatement policy). We'll see, but I think he will be in Stage 3 and not back until around October. He's a WR1 when active though, so worth a gamble. If he gets reinstated for Week 1, he will be a Top 40 pick for sure, so worth a pick this late.
My team is OK - not loving the WRs, but still the goal is not to win every week, just not be last.
12.08 Jeff Pasquino -- New England Patriots DST5
Added first defense and a WR5.
Wanted depth at WR, and grabbed the last WR that had at least 5 TDs last season, which is a big factor for me. I think Sanu had more targets than Green.
Are they in Philadelphia?The writer in me wonders if it is "flyers" or "fliers"....
I wasn't going to touch him. Think hes done.Well, I saw a few teams still needed a 2nd TE, and he had gone in this range in the other 2 drafts, so I thought that now was the time. My only risk was a big run on PK and not getting any that have a sure job - which I survived with getting Forbath in WASH, who is actually pretty decent.I kept looking at Pitta but I don't think I would have taken him. I might not have taken a TE at all but when you grabbed him, I felt the 3 other teams would fill their TE2 slot before it got back to me so I grabbed mine, in Rodgers.Any thoughts on Dennis Pitta?
Would he have lasted another round, or no?
I think not with Rodgers going.
Besides... 30yo TE coming off 2 hip locations doesn't seem to be the ideal candidate for an NFL player any longer. I was more upset at Fiddles taking Daniels. Planned on him being my third TE.
For me, TE30/Rd15 for Pitta is good risk/reward. If and when he plays, he's a certain TE1.
As for OD, he's not even signed for Baltimore again so it's not certain they even bring him back.
I wouldn't touch Pitta in WSL's.....good chance, not just a chance, but a good chance, he may not even play....he may retire.....his injury (x2) ain't no joke....I'd revisit come MBSL's but still probably wouldn't even sniff him as a TE2/3....roster spots are pretty valuable in these.....I get the whole risk/reward thing.....but I check that at the door a little when it comes to injuries/situations like this in a draft and done format....it's one thing in leagues that allow you to take a risk and then make a move later if it doesn't pan out....here not so much.....Well, I saw a few teams still needed a 2nd TE, and he had gone in this range in the other 2 drafts, so I thought that now was the time. My only risk was a big run on PK and not getting any that have a sure job - which I survived with getting Forbath in WASH, who is actually pretty decent.I kept looking at Pitta but I don't think I would have taken him. I might not have taken a TE at all but when you grabbed him, I felt the 3 other teams would fill their TE2 slot before it got back to me so I grabbed mine, in Rodgers.Any thoughts on Dennis Pitta?
Would he have lasted another round, or no?
I think not with Rodgers going.
Besides... 30yo TE coming off 2 hip locations doesn't seem to be the ideal candidate for an NFL player any longer. I was more upset at Fiddles taking Daniels. Planned on him being my third TE.
For me, TE30/Rd15 for Pitta is good risk/reward. If and when he plays, he's a certain TE1.
Good debate (which is really the point of these drafts, IMHO).I wouldn't touch Pitta in WSL's.....good chance, not just a chance, but a good chance, he may not even play....he may retire.....his injury (x2) ain't no joke....I'd revisit come MBSL's but still probably wouldn't even sniff him as a TE2/3....roster spots are pretty valuable in these.....I get the whole risk/reward thing.....but I check that at the door a little when it comes to injuries/situations like this in a draft and done format....it's one thing in leagues that allow you to take a risk and then make a move later if it doesn't pan out....here not so much.....Well, I saw a few teams still needed a 2nd TE, and he had gone in this range in the other 2 drafts, so I thought that now was the time. My only risk was a big run on PK and not getting any that have a sure job - which I survived with getting Forbath in WASH, who is actually pretty decent.I kept looking at Pitta but I don't think I would have taken him. I might not have taken a TE at all but when you grabbed him, I felt the 3 other teams would fill their TE2 slot before it got back to me so I grabbed mine, in Rodgers.Any thoughts on Dennis Pitta?
Would he have lasted another round, or no?
I think not with Rodgers going.
Besides... 30yo TE coming off 2 hip locations doesn't seem to be the ideal candidate for an NFL player any longer. I was more upset at Fiddles taking Daniels. Planned on him being my third TE.
For me, TE30/Rd15 for Pitta is good risk/reward. If and when he plays, he's a certain TE1.
and to say he is "a certain TE1" when he comes back seems way over the top.....you have no idea if he will still be able to perform at a fantasy TE1 level when he returns (which may not even happen).....IMO that is being wayyyy too optimistic and sounds like someone grasping for straws to justify the pick.....this early in the year in a draft and done format I completely disagree that "TE30/Rd15 for Pitta is good risk/reward".....there are no wasted spots in these leagues....I laugh every time I see someone type "well it was an _____ round pick, so if he doesn't play, it didn't cost me too much"....
yeah...I just feel that these situations are a little different than say other risk/reward picks, like suspension guys....not sure all risk/reward picks can be dumped in the same risk/reward barrel...and for me it's more of a format (draft and done and weekly elimination) factor that comes in from a strategy perspective.....Jeff Pasquino said:Good debate (which is really the point of these drafts, IMHO).
Pitta was a TE1 in 2012 (TE8 in PPR), and he's a favorite target of Joe Flacco.
Pitta was supposed to be a TE1 entering both 2013 and 2014, and offers TE1 upside - when healthy and in that 2012 form. Can he re-attain it? That's the big question. If he does, this is a great pick. If he doesn't, that's a waste. Big ceiling and floor here.
Good pick. Had I realized he was still on the board, I would have taken him in the 15th.Wasn't planning on a 5th RB with Bell, Spiller, Ball, and Davis already on the roster, but Pierre Thomas seemed like too much of a bargain to pass in a ppr league.
First off, welcome aboard and I hope you're enjoying the WSL drafts.Can i get a breakdown of my first draft.
qb brees bortles
rb charles crowell vereen ivory
wr benjamin wallace cooper greenbeckham austin
te miller donnell
k prater nugent
d carolina
I'm with you on the value of a roster spot, but at the same time this isn't Anarchy where (I'm guessing) a late-round donut could completely hose you, and with 20 rounds here you can afford a flier, maybe two ... in fact in order to win one of these I feel like you really have to take a couple of low-percentage shots and hope one or two of them hit ... whether that's a guy like Pitta coming back and rounding somewhat into form or a Duron Carter type nosing his way onto a roster and having a December breakout. At least Pitta has shown he can play with the big boys in the past.yeah...I just feel that these situations are a little different than say other risk/reward picks, like suspension guys....not sure all risk/reward picks can be dumped in the same risk/reward barrel...and for me it's more of a format (draft and done and weekly elimination) factor that comes in from a strategy perspective.....Jeff Pasquino said:Good debate (which is really the point of these drafts, IMHO).
Pitta was a TE1 in 2012 (TE8 in PPR), and he's a favorite target of Joe Flacco.
Pitta was supposed to be a TE1 entering both 2013 and 2014, and offers TE1 upside - when healthy and in that 2012 form. Can he re-attain it? That's the big question. If he does, this is a great pick. If he doesn't, that's a waste. Big ceiling and floor here.
this ain't Gronk.....is TE8 upside in the 15th worth the risk and something that will help you win......I guess maybe, but I think his ceiling is not as high and difference making as his floor could be low.....I don't know....to each his own.....but I do know the downside of a donut
I agree 100% with this....I would love to see 20 as the standard.....with really the point of these (besides winning) being to generate discussion/see values of players/gain insight from differnt angles on guys we are not sure about/etc.....adding 2 more rounds and an additional 32 position players to the mix seems like a no brainer and a great way to go.....cause it would basically be 32 "position" players (mostly RB/WR/TE) because all of the 32 DST and PK and QB's are going to get drafted for the most part no matter what the roster size........it's pretty easy for us to crank out the guys at the top.....it's the later round guys where it gets a little interesting to see who likes who and why, so we can maybe take that kind of info back to our home leagues when we draft etc.....[soapbox]
This is why IMO 20 rounds is sooo much better than 18 for these survivors ... in the latter you're kind of locked into a 2/4/6/2/2/2 structure and as a result can't afford to take too many chances, while with 20 you can throw a little extra something at the wall at one or two positions to see what sticks. Just two additional picks, but a whole lot more flexibility.
[/soapbox]
We already get plenty deep with 18 x 16 once the draft shakes out. We went 22 once and it really was pretty stupid. IMO make your play with picks 17/18 and show your acumen. Exhausting every rosterable player really isn't skill, it's just more of a chance that someone will luck out when ADP gets suspended. I also like to see the different strategies with 18 once FA and the draft are over. We also get a a lot less of the "runs" when people are unlikely to take 3 QB/Def/K. Anyone on the outside watching us rip off 14 kickers in a row in the 14th round would be laughing at us. Just watch the QBs fall in the SSL and MBSL relative to these drafts. I really like the drafts where it's more about making a good pick then trying to predict a run.I agree 100% with this....I would love to see 20 as the standard.....with really the point of these (besides winning) being to generate discussion/see values of players/gain insight from differnt angles on guys we are not sure about/etc.....adding 2 more rounds and an additional 32 position players to the mix seems like a no brainer and a great way to go.....cause it would basically be 32 "position" players (mostly RB/WR/TE) because all of the 32 DST and PK and QB's are going to get drafted for the most part no matter what the roster size........it's pretty easy for us to crank out the guys at the top.....it's the later round guys where it gets a little interesting to see who likes who and why, so we can maybe take that kind of info back to our home leagues when we draft etc.....[soapbox]
This is why IMO 20 rounds is sooo much better than 18 for these survivors ... in the latter you're kind of locked into a 2/4/6/2/2/2 structure and as a result can't afford to take too many chances, while with 20 you can throw a little extra something at the wall at one or two positions to see what sticks. Just two additional picks, but a whole lot more flexibility.
[/soapbox]
Interested to see what happens with Bradford, but you really won't need him. You could really struggle finding a RB2 score each week and if Lacy has a bad week, Luck better go off. I like Stills as a part of this group, no bona fide big pop #1 unless Watkins cranks it up, but some reception guys here which will always keep you in the hunt. Solid TE especially if Davis comes back strong. This team leaning heavily on Luck and Lacy. As a KC fan I hope Kelce is allowed to take over some games and if Reid cuts him lose he will will really help this team.Final Product
QB - Andrew Luck, Sam Bradford
RB - Eddie Lacey, Bishop Sankey, Terrence West, Ronnie Hillman, Darren McFadden
WR - Sammy Watkins, Larry Fitzgerald, Jarvis Landry, Kenny Stills, Marqis Lee, Sammie Coatees ®, Riley Cooper
TE - Travis Kelce, Vernon Davis
K - Nick Novak, Seabass Janikowski
D - Baltimore, Minnesota
I Like this squad a decent amount, could have issues at RB2, but everyone will .
Hard to comment here with so much invested in rookies and some unproven guys. Like two picks Beckham/HIlton, but hard to get inspired by much else. Jones coming off of foot injury and Richardson shredded a previously injured knee and may not play, meaning Bailey and Brown might really need to step it up for you. I'm not so sure Sanu concedes the WR2 role back to Jones as easliy as some may think, quite honestly I will be surprised if that happens. I will be looking to target Sanu in some drafts if that continues to be the vibe. Not a huge fan of what you did here, you may be doing the dance on the cut line most weeks.Cam Newton
Jameis Winston
Mark Ingram
Todd Gurley
Charles Sims
Damien Williams
James White
Odell Beckham
TY Hilton
John Brown
Stedman Bailey
Marvin Jones
Paul Richardson
(Josh Gordon)
Dwayne Allen
Eric Ebron
San Fran D/ST
Titans D/ST
Cairo Santos
Shayne Graham
Let's see how Griffin responds, is he content with being just another guy or does he have the drive to be better. Healthy Palmer can put up points. Bell missing a couple games hurts, but no bye weeks piling on to that, so could be ok. I like the RB's. Decent group of WR's for what you spent, really liked the Williams pick. Thomas is going to make or break some teams this year. Like the 3 DST direction. How the QB's situation shakes out for you could be the difference in advancing/elimination each week because everywhere else you should post decent scores.QB - Palmer, RG3
Below average pair with big upside. Grade D-
RB - Bell, Spiller, Davis, Ball, P. Thomas
Got the consensus number one back. Should be able to cobble together a second score with the other four. Huge upside. Grade B+
WR - Sanders, Floyd, Adams, Williams, Amendola, Carter, Hill
7 guys with no consistency week to week. Feels like an average group although the performance will be up and down all year. Grade C
TE - Thomas, Cook
Grade C+ on name recognition. Could flame out big time
K - Bullock
Saw value elsewhere so I only took one. Grade F
D - Denver, Oakland, New Orleans
Should cover my K weakness. Grade A
Not one of my better efforts. I like most of the picks on their own, but it doesn't seem to come together as a team. An 80 pt effort early in the year will doom this team.