I'm not sure what your point is here. The original point you were objecting to was that Hopkins went at 10 and Robinson at 14 or later. Robinson was on the poll at 12 and 13 but didn't win. Are you contending that if he were an option at 10 he would have won, even though he didn't win at 12 or 13?
Agreed. When ARob or anyone else was added was irrelevant unless you think he would have won a poll that occurred before he was added. Note that even now, at poll #14 where he has the top slot on the list and is certainly a familiar name having been in three straight polls, ARob has only a single vote lead over Gronk....who was added
after ARob, BTW...
Also note that the players selected with the first 12 picks were landslide winners over the players remaining afterwards.
Even after the top 13 players have been eliminated from the competition and AROB has the top slot on the list, he has only currently garnered
13 votes in the current poll with 65 votes have been cast (the exact same number of votes he had last poll, BTW). Six other players are within 8 votes of him (His lead is 1,3,6, 6, 7 & 8) .
By comparison, NONE of the top 12 players selected ever had a single player currently on the list ever come within 8 votes of them with the exception of Sammy Watkins being only seven votes behind Nuke (10-3) in poll #9 (they finished 4th and 5th in that poll).
The community has spoken and ARob is exactly where he belongs... in contention for the 14th spot overall (including rookie picks 1.1 and 1.2), and the 12th player taken.
Further, there appears to be a significant tier break after Gurley.