Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (20 Viewers)
- Thread starter Gottabesweet
- Start date
jeaton6
Footballguy
jeaton6
Footballguy
jeaton6
Footballguy
Aunt Jemima
Footballguy
Thats...really bad. Now if it were D.J. Moore instead of Samuels, I could get on board with that.
Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
ffmail4me
Footballguy
2 nice picks for sure but I'd hold Guice. I think he's easily the 1.1 this year and in a good spot long term
ghostguy123
Footballguy
Easy deal to make for hillNever been more nervous about a trade I just made, 12 team PPR dynasty
Gave: Golladay and Eifert
Got: T. Hill
With my luck, he'll be cut within hours
Concept Coop
Footballguy
I agree. I’m not sold that Golladay is a future #1. He’s a nice piece, but this is a good gamble, considering Tyreek is a top 10 asset if and when he makes it back to the field.
Edit: I tried trading Thielen for Hill without luck.
Last edited by a moderator:
mcintyre1
Footballguy
I'm Team B, Team A offered the trade. I'm pretty down on this rookie class, but I thought that was a fair price for my pick of this litter of runts. With my luck I'll pick wrong, though.
I'm taking over an orphan that had JuJu, Lockett, Boyd, Ridley, Edelman, and Funchess at WR, so I wanted to cash in on one of those WRs that had high TD/high YPC years. Will probably take the WR in the best situation with the 1.01, though if a RB lands in an ideal spot, I could be swayed.
Last edited by a moderator:
That's how I see it. Right now I'd take Guice at 1.1, a chance exists he could drop to 2 after the draft but don't see it worse then that and it might be the gap between him and the guy who will actually go 1.1 in drafts is sizeable. Only thing I'd hate about the trade losing fun angle of having those two picks but I suppose that's why they call it rookie fever, I get struck with it every year.
I like the gamble and unless Hill got banned for life, even if things went so south he'd got cut and banished for a year, I'd still take Hill.Never been more nervous about a trade I just made, 12 team PPR dynasty
Gave: Golladay and Eifert
Got: T. Hill
With my luck, he'll be cut within hours
FreeBaGeL
Footballguy
1.6 for me, easily.
It's possible there ends up being no or little difference between the guys at 1.6 and 1.11 but that is a very cheap price to pay in case there is, which I think is the more likely scenario anyway.
Hankmoody
Footballguy
Why the third degree? You don't worry about rosters in April, you worry about value. Give me the better side of the trade every time and I'll have a ton more equity to work with come September when you need to worry about filling starting lineups. Personally I couldn't care less about the league and owners involved, those are just ways to rationalize bad decisions.
Hankmoody
Footballguy
Kleck
Footballguy
Me too. Since the OP stated he needed to make roster space I think it makes even more sense.
Interseptopus
Footballguy
Unless that 2020 was not a powerhouse team, one that looked like sure thing 10-12 type pick, I'd for sure go the other way and take Cohen, who gave you 90% of the production of Allen last year, and the pick.
Zyphros
Footballguy
I'm confident enough that Cohen had his career best year and won't repeat. Allen is still a top WR asset. You can have Cohen at his 57 ADP, I'll take Keenan at his 21 ADP.
Yea I'm not confident that 23 year old out of tiny NC A&T had his best season and would in fact argue heavily against it. Cohen was RB14 in PPG and Allen WR18 so Cohen was every bit as much of a top RB asset last year as Allen was a WR and don't really see that changing myself and yes I'd certainly feel value of Cohen at 57 trumps value of Allen at 21.
Aunt Jemima
Footballguy
FFPC
AJ Green
for
Lockett, 1.9
AJ Green
for
Lockett, 1.9
Snorkelson
Footballguy
I struggle with what to make of Lockett so saying that it seems like a fair deal but unless I'm rebuilding I'd take AJG. Actually made a somewhat similar offer, one I'd label a tad weaker, in our league for AJG a few weeks ago and obviously was rejected.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
Yes. Philly will be an RBBC until proven otherwise. Howard isn't going to be the guy that changes that. He has value but I wouldn't even want him on my roster to be honest. That said I'm not sure I wouldn't take the Allen side anyway.
Snorkelson
Footballguy
I feel Howard is way better than their committee guys. Even last year he topped 1000 total yards. It’s a pretty good offense, and the guys there haven’t exactly proven effective. Seems like a good buy low candidate to me.
Dez
Footballguy
The pick could really be anywhere. That team finished in 4th place last year but the year before finished in 10th place the year before.
skinfanjon
Footballguy
jeaton6
Footballguy
Cohen was so inconsistent for a second straight year. His scoring std deviation is very high. 5 games under 10 and 5 over 20. Give me Allen’s significantly more consistent output with only 1 or 2 under 10 and 4-5 over 20. I don’t think many would agree he’s as much a top RB asset as Allen is WR. Perhaps more opportunity this year....the draft will sort that out a bit.
Right now I’ll take the Allen side easily.
ffmail4me
Footballguy
kittenmittens
Footballguy
No way. Allen is worth 3 Cohens. The 2020 1st doesn't do enough to get you from Cohen to Allen.
Howard and Ballage are about equally worthless right now, but Ballage has more upside.
skinfanjon
Footballguy
kittenmittens
Footballguy
I believe that is a rather hot take unless I'm out of the loop on consensus player valuation.
Eta: in my last 2 recent SF startups, Cohen went in the 6th and 7th and Allen went in the 3rd in both.
Last edited by a moderator:
skinfanjon
Footballguy
I feel like we're comparing a top 10-15 WR to a top 10-15 RB. Allen has more track record which is why I'm giving the .25
Totally aware of the startup data but this is my take, hot or not.
