Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

****OFFICIAL 2021 IN- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, kutta said:

Why move Keenan if you’re a contender? He seems poised for a great year.

I'm pretty deep @ WR so I can afford to if I can better my lineup. ARob, Ridley, Allen, Sutton, AJ Brown, AB, Gallup, Aiyuk, Claypool, Coutee, D. Parker is my WR group. We start 3 WR, 2 RB + 2 flex.  My Starting RBs are now CMC & Zeke w/CEH as the 3rd. I could still use some RB depth in case of injuries...

My only TE worth a damn is Goedert

Edited by Helaire-ious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pained me to do it but FFPC

I gave up JuJu and Darrell Henderson

I got Engram

I needed a better TE option, figured he's undervalued and likely improved from last year. Arrow pointing up for his future and all that. JuJu was my WR3, 4 or 5 (depending on how you view the others I have), Henderson was a cut candidate. Going into the year with Tonyan, Engram, and OJ leaves me feeling much better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Helaire-ious said:

I'm pretty deep @ WR so I can afford to if I can better my lineup. ARob, Ridley, Allen, Sutton, AJ Brown, AB, Gallup, Aiyuk, Claypool, Coutee, D. Parker is my WR group. We start 3 WR, 2 RB + 2 flex.  My Starting RBs are now CMC & Zeke w/CEH as the 3rd. I could still use some RB depth in case of injuries...

My only TE worth a damn is Goedert

At the risk of getting all assistant coachy, I’d be willing to bet that Allen is your top 1 or 2 WR this year.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Zyphros said:

Pained me to do it but FFPC

I gave up JuJu and Darrell Henderson

I got Engram

I needed a better TE option, figured he's undervalued and likely improved from last year. Arrow pointing up for his future and all that. JuJu was my WR3, 4 or 5 (depending on how you view the others I have), Henderson was a cut candidate. Going into the year with Tonyan, Engram, and OJ leaves me feeling much better. 

😵

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kutta said:

At the risk of getting all assistant coachy, I’d be willing to bet that Allen is your top 1 or 2 WR this year.

I love Allen for 2021 as well, but I'd include him with AJ Brown, Claypool and Ridley in terms of that likelihood. And don't discount Arob and Aiyuk. I wouldn't bet against it but he is 29 this year and seems like a great time to sell if the owner has a competitive team. I think he does. He has enough depth to do it, too. But only if a good deal appears. I don't see people buying Allen right now and he is worth more in his boxscore than something below market, so it is a tight squeeze. If he can do it I would.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFPC SF

I gave 1.09, 2.09
I got 1.08, 2022 2nd (I'm thinking early)

I have offered the farm to the holders of 1.03-1.07 and this is as close as I'm going to get. This has the potential to be a tier jump trade and I love it. I hold the 2.03 and 2.05 as well so bumping the 2.09 to 2022 is also a no brainer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, barackdhouse said:

FFPC SF

I gave 1.09, 2.09
I got 1.08, 2022 2nd (I'm thinking early)

I have offered the farm to the holders of 1.03-1.07 and this is as close as I'm going to get. This has the potential to be a tier jump trade and I love it. I hold the 2.03 and 2.05 as well so bumping the 2.09 to 2022 is also a no brainer.

I love what you did. It’s early but I see a tier break there, as well. These are the small moves that can pay dividends

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

20 minutes ago, barackdhouse said:

FFPC SF

I gave 1.09, 2.09
I got 1.08, 2022 2nd (I'm thinking early)

I have offered the farm to the holders of 1.03-1.07 and this is as close as I'm going to get. This has the potential to be a tier jump trade and I love it. I hold the 2.03 and 2.05 as well so bumping the 2.09 to 2022 is also a no brainer.

FFPC SF same league. Followed that one with:

I gave 1.08, 2022 2nd & 3rd
I got 1.07, Ebron

I have a pretty bad need at TE and I think he stays in Pittsburgh and is cheap enough in this deal. Everyone hates him but only other TEs are Hooper and Bryant. 1.07 is the prize here anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took over a "rebuild" ....12 Team 0.5 PPR, 1QB/1RB/2WR/1TE & 2 Flex (RB/WR/TE)

 

I moved Corey Davis WR for 2.10 and 2022 3rd (mid?).

I know Davis is unlikely to return to Tenn, and rumors of GB, NE, NYG, Balt, SF & Clev interest.  Only GB would be a plus IMO. And with A Jones return, I don't see the $ to sign Davis in GB.   He is 26 yo and never demonstrated his Top 5 pick slot.  I consider him WR4 material at best.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JoeJoe88 said:

Who are you left with at QB?

Mahomes, Winston/Hill (I might move one or both before September), and I will probably draft one in May. Rookie or vet, maybe both. But I wasn't really in a position to acquire a better RB2 and now I have that. I don't see QB2 as big of a need in Superflex as people think. But RB2 is always important. Plus Winston/Hill may still play out for me. I think QB2 is easier to replace than RB2, basically. QB1 is a different story and I do like Tannehill but if I didn't get another strong RB I'd be wasting Mahomes/Adams/Waller. Also have CEH, Diontae, Hockenson and R Jones II is now my RB3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, barackdhouse said:

FFPC SF

I gave Tannehill
I got Montgomery

I would NOT expect the same product from Monty next year.... if Chi makes a QB move, who knows how many rec Cohen will get.  I think you could have done a little better, but I see with Mahomes, Tanny was not needed. 

Edited by Birdie048
edited to add "NOT"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, rockaction said:

David Montgomery's measurables are so bad that he screams "sell high" to me, rather than "buy now." But it is what it is and I don't hate barack's deal. 

Not quite 24 going into his 3rd year had 54 receptions last year over 1000 yards rushing 10 TDs. Finished as RB4. I know those aren't the measurables you're talking about and I know I'm not convincing people. The production is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFPC different leagues and not SF (for a change)

I gave Mike Evans
I got Mims, Perriman, 2022 1st (looks early to me)

I gave Keenan Allen, 1.11
I got McLaurin, 2.03

1st one is from my worst orphan by far and Evans isn't going to do anything for me there. Plus I don't really love him with the way Brady shares the ball. He is one of my favorite players and I love him and have him on many squads but I'm out. I love 2nd year WRs and I think Mims is going way underlooked right now. Perriman is a throw in.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, barackdhouse said:

FFPC different leagues and not SF (for a change)

I gave Mike Evans
I got Mims, Perriman, 2022 1st (looks early to me)

I gave Keenan Allen, 1.11
I got McLaurin, 2.03

1st one is from my worst orphan by far and Evans isn't going to do anything for me there. Plus I don't really love him with the way Brady shares the ball. He is one of my favorite players and I love him and have him on many squads but I'm out. I love 2nd year WRs and I think Mims is going way underlooked right now. Perriman is a throw in.

first is probably good cash out on Evans

2nd I like moving back a few spots to get way younger too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, IHEARTFF said:

I like Montgomery. only question is how much receiving/3rd down work does he cede to a healthy Cohen/other RB

Yeah that is a question for sure. I hate Cohen so much and I hope the Bears figure out how terrible he is. Even if Monty cedes some work to some other back, as a Bears fan I'm really hoping for a McKissic type. And not Cohen, who if you need someone to run parallel to the LOS for a 2 yard loss and to get out of bounds faster than anyone, he is your guy. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Laughing 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, IHEARTFF said:

ffpc orphan rebuild continues

I gave 1.2

I got 1.3, 3.3

 

I am happy with any of the big 3 RB or Chase or Pitts, so I will offer a similar deal to the 1.4 next. 

I liked this idea so I offered it in a Zealots league. 

The guy said "I don't feel like giving up two pick just to move up one spot."

Yes, I did let him know he was only "giving up" one pick.

  • Laughing 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, IHEARTFF said:

At least you know you should be trading with him more in the future

Unfortunately the league is full of them.  I'm done with it after this year. 

I very badly want to tell the guy "No wonder you've finished over .500 ONCE the last decade in this league." But I've decided to be a kindler, gentler Andy.

Edited by Andy Dufresne
  • Laughing 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Matt's Eagles said:

12 Team PPR, 1.75 TE PPR

Team A got Kittle, 2.06

Team B got DJ Moore, Trautman, 22 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th rounders (probably late)

 

 

I don’t play in TE premium leagues but in 1.75 ppr for TE this seems like an easy win for team getting Kittle.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chad Parsons said:

12tm PPR, slight TE premium, shallow devy

Austin Ekeler, 22 2nd

For

Darren Waller, Darrynton Evans, Darrell Henderson, Treylon Burks (Devy)

 

Fair deal. Assume team dealing Ekeler is deep at RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Andy Dufresne said:

Unfortunately the league is full of them.  I'm done with it after this year. 

I very badly want to tell the guy "No wonder you've finished over .500 ONCE the last decade in this league." But I've decided to be a kindler, gentler Andy.

But doesn't him declining just mean that he likes the 1.03 plus pick better than the 1.02...........which is the same side of the trade you prefer?   I mean his comment was dumb but essentially he likes the same side of the trade as you do.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gally said:

But doesn't him declining just mean that he likes the 1.03 plus pick better than the 1.02...........which is the same side of the trade you prefer?   I mean his comment was dumb but essentially he likes the same side of the trade as you do.  

Yeah that is kind of true. The response sounded dumb but in reality if he really doesn't want 1.02 any more than 1.03, and I can see that, then why give up anything at all to do it? Most of us all probably autosnap it but if you like all 3 RBs equally, for example, then why bother? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, barackdhouse said:

Yeah that is kind of true. The response sounded dumb but in reality if he really doesn't want 1.02 any more than 1.03, and I can see that, then why give up anything at all to do it? Most of us all probably autosnap it but if you like all 3 RBs equally, for example, then why bother? 

It seems like the consensus has been that everyone prefers the 1.03 plus pick side.  I am not sure it is an autosnap for the 1.02 at all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gally said:

It seems like the consensus has been that everyone prefers the 1.03 plus pick side.  I am not sure it is an autosnap for the 1.02 at all.  

Yeah I was just assuming most would. The only scenario I would is where I am specifically trying to get Chase. Or if it was SF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gally said:

But doesn't him declining just mean that he likes the 1.03 plus pick better than the 1.02...........which is the same side of the trade you prefer?   I mean his comment was dumb but essentially he likes the same side of the trade as you do.  

It wasn't the decline that bothered me but the snarkiness of him implying it was a bad deal because it required giving up two picks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Andy Dufresne said:

It wasn't the decline that bothered me but the snarkiness of him implying it was a bad deal because it required giving up two picks.

Yeah exactly, it's a weird way to frame that. They do it with every trade in the NFL draft and it drives me crazy. Like when a team moves say two future 1sts to go from 1.12 to 1.02 to take a top QB (IDK just spitballing) but it gets reported as they gave up 3 first rounders. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, barackdhouse said:

Yeah exactly, it's a weird way to frame that. They do it with every trade in the NFL draft and it drives me crazy. Like when a team moves say two future 1sts to go from 1.12 to 1.02 to take a top QB (IDK just spitballing) but it gets reported as they gave up 3 first rounders. 

Was going to mention this as well, pet peeve of mine nearly every year around the time of draft and during.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Gally said:

It seems like the consensus has been that everyone prefers the 1.03 plus pick side.  I am not sure it is an autosnap for the 1.02 at all.  

I prefer the 1.2 side and easily fwiw.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gottabesweet changed the title to ****OFFICIAL 2021 IN- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...