A few from the last couple of days.
Gave 2.4, 2.5, ‘21 1st for Jacobs, 4.2
Gave 1.5 (Akers), 1.8 (Jefferson), 3.8 for Drake, Chark, 2.4 for a win-now team
Gave Julio, Parker, Hooper for Adams, Lazard
A few rookie draft trades OTC in 12 team PPR QRRWWWT:
Team A gave 1.04, 2.08, Deebo, Team B gave 1.06, 1.11, 2.04 Deebo side
I think team A wanted to get one of Jefferson or Reagor at 11 for Deebo, and didn't care which of Dobbins, Swift, Akers he got. He ended up with Akers. Dobbins was 4.
Team A gave 1.11 and 2.04, Team C gave 1.10 and 2.07
I'd need to see who they took. Close
I'm team C. Reagor and Jefferson were available, and I slightly preferred Reagor but was happy to let the other guy choose for me (he took Jefferson).
Team C gave 2.04 and 3.06, Team D gave 21 1st (mid to late)
Depends how stacked Team C is.....if he needs WR I like the 2.04 spot. There's a good one there.
2.04 was Higgins. I wanted to draft him, but I had a later 2nd that I didn't have roster space for. So I get to keep Anthony McFarland (2.10 pick) as a result of this trade.
Gordon is burnt toast.Gave: Melvin Gordon, Deebo Samuel and 2.6
Received: 1.1
I had Gordon and traded him for 2021 1.xx and 2.7, plus a handcuff. I was happy with that.Gordon is burnt toast.
So I'd rather have the 1.1 versus DS/2.6.
interesting trade hereGave Irv Smith and 2021 3rd
Got Austin Hooper and 2021 2nd
1.1 by a lotGave: Melvin Gordon, Deebo Samuel and 2.6
Received: 1.1
I don't hate that at all, Jefferson is my 8th ranked player and who I took when I could not trade out.Well damn now I feel like a dolt for dealing my 2021 1st for 2.01 in FFPC when Justin Jefferson was still on the board.
Gave: Melvin Gordon, Deebo Samuel and 2.6
Received: 1.1
That seems to be the consensus. I think 1.1 is just not as valuable this year because there is no definitive #1 pick.1.1 by a lot
####, reverse that.interesting trade here
I wouldve thought the hooper owner wouldnt have had to add the higher pick
Need to get a lot more when you are dealing the 1.1...Gordon can help but he is not trending in the right direction and you also have Lindsay there...no way should he be the centerpiece of dealing away the 1.1... love Deebo and think he will help but he just feels like he is gonna be a better real football player then fantasy football player in San Fran...2.6 is not moving the needle...when you are dealing away a big time asset you just can't allow the other owner to nibble around the edges of his roster, they need to give up some of the meat.Gave: Melvin Gordon, Deebo Samuel and 2.6
Received: 1.1
It's between two guys and Swift isn't one of them.That seems to be the consensus. I think 1.1 is just not as valuable this year because there is no definitive #1 pick.
I was just on the other side of this as I moved off of 1.1 for 1.8, 2.3 and 3.1. It turned out to be Justin Jefferson, Brandon Aiyuk and Van Jefferson. For that team, those three players work a lot better for my rebuilding plan than taking Swift who I think is the 1.1.
I love the Jacobs and Adams trades. Great value. The win-now trade makes sense but seems like a lot to pay for Drake/Chark but to be fair, I'm not really high on either of them.A few from the last couple of days.
Gave 2.4, 2.5, ‘21 1st for Jacobs, 4.2
Gave 1.5 (Akers), 1.8 (Jefferson), 3.8 for Drake, Chark, 2.4 for a win-now team
Gave Julio, Parker, Hooper for Adams, Lazard
I'd say 1.1 here pretty easily personally. Gordon doesn't hold much value especially as this trade ages. I'm a 9er fan and like Deebo but I don't see him ever reaching WR1 territory in fantasy. 2.6 is a good throw in but not sure this is quite enough. I got a similar offer for 1.2 and turned it down.Gave: Melvin Gordon, Deebo Samuel and 2.6
Received: 1.1
Gave: Melvin Gordon, Deebo Samuel and 2.6
Received: 1.1
The person selling 1.1 didn't earn it, he finished 3rd in the standings and lost in the championship game.I'd say 1.1 here pretty easily personally. Gordon doesn't hold much value especially as this trade ages. I'm a 9er fan and like Deebo but I don't see him ever reaching WR1 territory in fantasy. 2.6 is a good throw in but not sure this is quite enough. I got a similar offer for 1.2 and turned it down.
You guys give the 1st overall pick to the team that loses in the championship game? Seems flawed a bit. I guess I'm new to dynasty but we do reverse order in the loser's bracket (so everyone has something to play for the entire season) so the winner of consolation bracket gets 1.1 and the last place team gets 1.6. Then 1.7-1.12 goes to the playoff teams in order of finish the the champ gets the worst pick. Seems more fair to me.The person selling 1.1 didn't earn it, he finished 3rd in the standings and lost in the championship game.
I don't think a scenario exists in this deal were I'd give up Jacobs if I did not think the 2021#1 has a reasonable shot of being one of the top picks . On the flip side I don't think I'm paying a top pick and chance to likely draft two young WR's(strength of 2.4/2.5 in most drafts) for Jacobs if I think my team is so bad it's going to be a high pick after this trade. So if my team is contending or not, where that pick is expected to land are key factors here.A few from the last couple of days.
Gave 2.4, 2.5, ‘21 1st for Jacobs, 4.2
Gave 1.5 (Akers), 1.8 (Jefferson), 3.8 for Drake, Chark, 2.4 for a win-now team
Gave Julio, Parker, Hooper for Adams, Lazard
I 100% agree with everything you are saying but I'd still have done the deal.I wouldn't have done that deal, but I think Gordon is getting seriously slept on right now. That offense could be prolific this year and if that comes to pass hes as good a lock for 10+ TDs as anyone. Id say his outlook for the next two years is that of an RB1 rather easily.
I am 99% sure he meant that the team that earned the 1.01 by being the worst (or had earned it in the toilet bowl like you described) had already traded said pick to the guy in this trade. The dude that took 3rd would have earned the 1.10.You guys give the 1st overall pick to the team that loses in the championship game? Seems flawed a bit. I guess I'm new to dynasty but we do reverse order in the loser's bracket (so everyone has something to play for the entire season) so the winner of consolation bracket gets 1.1 and the last place team gets 1.6. Then 1.7-1.12 goes to the playoff teams in order of finish the the champ gets the worst pick. Seems more fair to me.
Ok. Makes sense. Not sure why that didn't click.I am 99% sure he meant that the team that earned the 1.01 by being the worst (or had earned it in the toilet bowl like you described) had already traded said pick to the guy in this trade. The dude that took 3rd would have earned the 1.10.
Looking again, I may have said it backwards. Meant that I'd prefer the 1.01 to Gordon, Deebo, and 2.06. Starts getting interesting for me at 1.02 though. If I'm win now I probably prefer the package to Taylor. Akers would be interesting as I think he has more rookie year production than JT.I 100% agree with everything you are saying but I'd still have done the deal.
When I said he didn’t earn it, I meant he got the pick through a trade. He gave up his 2019 1.9 for a 2020 1st which turned into 1.1.You guys give the 1st overall pick to the team that loses in the championship game? Seems flawed a bit. I guess I'm new to dynasty but we do reverse order in the loser's bracket (so everyone has something to play for the entire season) so the winner of consolation bracket gets 1.1 and the last place team gets 1.6. Then 1.7-1.12 goes to the playoff teams in order of finish the the champ gets the worst pick. Seems more fair to me.
Would immediately offer it back to him and take it.Was just offered Sanders for 1.5/Singletary. Got me thinking some..but declined.
Hate the worst team in the league getting the 1.06. Just go by points scored. Least points scored gets the 1.01.You guys give the 1st overall pick to the team that loses in the championship game? Seems flawed a bit. I guess I'm new to dynasty but we do reverse order in the loser's bracket (so everyone has something to play for the entire season) so the winner of consolation bracket gets 1.1 and the last place team gets 1.6. Then 1.7-1.12 goes to the playoff teams in order of finish the the champ gets the worst pick. Seems more fair to me.
Ya....I think i take this too.Would immediately offer it back to him and take it.
Ok, didn't think it was this slam dunk. Even as an Eagles fan, considering the value at 1.5Would immediately offer it back to him and take it.
I read that backwards. Do not trade Singletary. My bad.Ok, didn't think it was this slam dunk. Even as an Eagles fan, considering the value at 1.5
Approximate 4 year age gap between Adams and Julio, which is enormous.I don't think a scenario exists in this deal were I'd give up Jacobs if I did not think the 2021#1 has a reasonable shot of being one of the top picks . On the flip side I don't think I'm paying a top pick and chance to likely draft two young WR's(strength of 2.4/2.5 in most drafts) for Jacobs if I think my team is so bad it's going to be a high pick after this trade. So if my team is contending or not, where that pick is expected to land are key factors here.
Picking up Drake and Chark for a win now team makes total sense, plus the way a lot of drafts went that 2.4 over the 3.8 should not be overrated, most drafts that's a healthy difference in tiers. Still I prefer the Akers/Jefferson side in the old vacuum, but makes sense for both sides.
I prefer the Julio side on that last deal but again can see both sides. I see nothing in Lazard. I do have Adams a little over Julio for this year just a tad but to me the major difference between the them is the approximate 2 year age gap, which is not nothing. Since I don't know how their games or supporting cast age the best I can do is put them on the same trajectory. So using that thought process, which I admit has a lot of faults but best I can do, I'm getting two extra years out of Adams vs Julio at a cost of Parker and Hooper. I'm pretty flat on Hooper but I still lean Parker/Hooper over 2 years of Adams but it's not that far off.
Corrected, looked at that all twisted. That does make a big difference.Approximate 4 year age gap between Adams and Julio, which is enormous.
some how i got Akers here after passing on him at 1.03 and 1.06 (Dobbins n Swift)trying to consolidate picks:
gave 2.03 and 2.10
got 1.09
should get a good WR there, so many WRs in that 2nd and 3rd tier
was able to trade back from the 1.07 so this is the net results:took over a rebuild with only two pieces (Jackson and Kupp) and somehow finished well enough to get 1.06, etc.
12 team graded PPR (0.5, 1.0, 1.5)
Sent Kupp
Got 1.07. 2.07, Washington (Pit) and Cohen (i have Montgomery)
If there is no one you are high on I see the thinking...that being said I would like more then a player who needs an injury to be productive to make this deal, especially since you are also giving up the 3.10.Gave: 1.10, 3.10
Got: 2021 1st (mid), Mattison
Big dropoff after the top 9 for me (pick was on the clock and the usual top 7 plus Reagor/Jefferson were all gone), and on top of that I'm a big fan of trading late 1sts for future 1sts because the time value doesn't bother me in a sturdy league.
Don't own Cook but Mattison is a nice wildcard.
Does that shift your preference to the Adams side?Corrected, looked at that all twisted. That does make a big difference.
Yes.Does that shift your preference to the Adams side?
Tend to agree with bolded, some exceptions ,but tend to agree and as such I like the trade. If I was in your shoes I'm probably picking Pittman at 10 but I'd rather take a shot on higher 2021 first if I can.Gave: 1.10, 3.10
Got: 2021 1st (mid), Mattison
Big dropoff after the top 9 for me (pick was on the clock and the usual top 7 plus Reagor/Jefferson were all gone), and on top of that I'm a big fan of trading late 1sts for future 1sts because the time value doesn't bother me in a sturdy league.
Don't own Cook but Mattison is a nice wildcard.
Gotta reverse this. Obvious mistake and not good for the league to let one team get better for free. FFPC is pretty good about this so I assume it already has been switched back.Something a little different
FPC Startup 250 (BB)
Team A gives (made offer)
10.11
16.11
Team B Gives (accepts)
11.11
18.11
Team A realizes quickly that they made mistake giving 10.11 instead of 12.11 and asks B to reverse and B says go pound sand. I know what I think should or shouldn't happen (already has) and im just curious what the consensus is.
For those that care, 2.05 turned into Viska who I was targeting when I made the trade.I had pick 8 in 3 different leagues and tried hard to get this exact kind of deal. Lost track of how many rejections I encountered. I asked for less then this and people got insulted on me. I ended up just offering the 1.8 straight up for a 2021#1, but limited myself to non-powerhouse teams, and still could not get a taker.doowain said:Gave: 1.08
Got: 2.05/2021 1st (team had 1.02 this year)
So good deal and if I were you I'd feel fortunate to get this done
Haven't seen him later than 1.07 in 5 drafts. I'm finding that is pretty standard in non superflex.I thought Jeudy was in line for the 1.08 or so?
@Vandelayouch. obvious error. needs to be reversed. bad form to say go pound sand. not a guy I'd probably ever deal with, so that's not good for the longevity of that relationship...
Not crazy. Give me Dak.I thought this was crazy in a 1 QB league but it is 6 point passing TDs and the team getting Dak had too many picks for his taxi squad so needed to consolidate:
Dak Prescott
for
Matt Ryan
2.7
3.7
2021 2nd (most likely mid-late)
# of teams? Fair offer in my opinion, what other QB, if any, did the team with Dak have. I am leaning towards Dak side.I thought this was crazy in a 1 QB league but it is 6 point passing TDs and the team getting Dak had too many picks for his taxi squad so needed to consolidate:
Dak Prescott
for
Matt Ryan
2.7
3.7
2021 2nd (most likely mid-late)
I think it is a quality move...If you believe in Dak (and I do) this trade means you don't have to deal with your QB situation (at least as far as a starter is concerned) for a good amount of time...you didn't give up a high pick this year, have time to get that 2021 back and the fact about consolidation is a very big deal, I will always over-pay a little to get one guy when it means not having to cut another guy that I really like.I thought this was crazy in a 1 QB league but it is 6 point passing TDs and the team getting Dak had too many picks for his taxi squad so needed to consolidate:
Dak Prescott
for
Matt Ryan
2.7
3.7
2021 2nd (most likely mid-late)