Very solid, 15.1 points in my ESPN league. #3 overall FF points for the week.I like the Chargers Def this week.
I added Indy for this whole opening stretch. I intend to play the matchup game at DEF this season, but it'll take more than one uninspiring performance for me to accelerate that process.I have the Colts right now, but looking at KC or AZ for this week. A little disappointed with IND DEF last week vs JAX. Either JAX is better than advertised, or IND just can't pull it together?
I am not.Pats were actually an okay play. But no way we can trust them against what Russel is cooking right?
I like the AZ defense this week. They did a good job against the 49ers and Haskins is horrible.I have the Colts right now, but looking at KC or AZ for this week. A little disappointed with IND DEF last week vs JAX. Either JAX is better than advertised, or IND just can't pull it together?
I didn't pull the trigger and I lost my week by 1.2. Footballs scored 15 in my league and Eagles 3. Ouch.I've got the Eagles DST against the Footballs but did the same thing last year and they did not impress. Now kind of wondering if I should pivot to Washington. RB Miles Sanders and OT Lane Johnson are both out, Jason Peters is back at LT because there is nobody else, and the Footballs drafted Chase Young to go along with all their other high draftees. Eagles DST is probably safer but Washington DST could surprise (this week only due to injuries on opposing offense).
Who are you not gonna start this week?I didn't pull the trigger and I lost my week by 1.2. Footballs scored 15 in my league and Eagles 3. Ouch.
There's actually 31 teams I'm not starting, but I am starting the Chiefs at the moment. Also thinking about the Buccs, Rams and Cardinals.VikingFrog said:Who are you not gonna start this week?
I’ll plug them in.
I agree. It's their defense that is likely to be their undoing this year. So I'd target offensive players going against the Jags, but not defenses.JFS171 said:I think the Jags are more dangerous on offense than anyone is giving them credit for. I’d be looking at the Cardinals or a Bucs this week, I think.
Starting to wonder how legit Tampa is. Got sniped on them in a few leagues, so went with Arizona.Raising Arizona and Tampa Bay in differing leagues over here.
Tampa was legit at the end of last year. How much of their trouble was facing NO and how much of it was a slow start to the year will be determined. Can't sleep too long with them, though. I will say this: Carolina with Bridgewater doesn't look to take shots and turn the ball over that often. Their problem is on defense.Starting to wonder how legit Tampa is. Got sniped on them in a few leagues, so went with Arizona.
I’ll be watching Washington closely this week too. Kyler Murray is very hard to get sacked, but that front seven for WFT looks nasty. We’ll see if they’re legit or if the Eagles are really that bad.
I get the thought process, but the back 7 is a mess.VikingFrog said:Anyone got the cajones to start the Browns.
Burrow is a rookie. Short week. Thursday games after opening week occasionally tend to be ugly and low scoring.
Might be a sneaky start if some of these other streaming defenses get taken.
Browns got tore up by the Ravens, but who wouldn’t?
Their front is so lethal Kerrigan is just a short side of the rotation player.Tampa was legit at the end of last year. How much of their trouble was facing NO and how much of it was a slow start to the year will be determined. Can't sleep too long with them, though. I will say this: Carolina with Bridgewater doesn't look to take shots and turn the ball over that often. Their problem is on defense.
Anyway, I think you're right, generally speaking. You've also pointed out something I've noticed that's been readily apparent. I am keeping an eye on Washington. The front seven looks legit with Young, Sweat, and Kerrigan sliding up to DE in the 4-3. Those are some feisty ends.
Yeah, he only got like 22 snaps or something like that.Their front is so lethal Kerrigan is just a short side of the rotation player.
How are their LBs and 2ndary? I haven't focused on the Deadskins in years, other than a brief romance with Scary Terry last year.I’ll be watching Washington closely this week too. Kyler Murray is very hard to get sacked, but that front seven for WFT looks nasty. We’ll see if they’re legit or if the Eagles are really that bad.
There are holes in the secondary but there is also Landon Collins and Kendall Fuller. Nothing head turning about the LB's, but there aren't any land mines either - they're functional. With such a top notch front a good DC can scheme around those deficiencies. Just have to be playing from ahead, which is why I think the offense will be the weekly question and not the back 7.How are their LBs and 2ndary? I haven't focused on the Deadskins in years, other than a brief romance with Scary Terry last year.
I'm considering it as the DLine is good enough to make Burrow panic and run a little. CIN OL is a mess. Plus injuries on the CIN Dline should bode well for Chubb to run all over. So maybe CLE can get into a nice lead forcing Joe to stand in the pocket to throw.I get the thought process, but the back 7 is a mess.
Set the Benny Hill music to Bobby Hart v Myles Garrett.I'm considering it as the DLine is good enough to make Burrow panic and run a little. CIN OL is a mess. Plus injuries on the CIN Dline should bode well for Chubb to run all over. So maybe CLE can get into a nice lead forcing Joe to stand in the pocket to throw.
I'm not expecting a lot, but I think they'll be a decent start. Better than most other teams on the WW.
Their front is so lethal Kerrigan is just a short side of the rotation player.
Yeah it’s kinda nuts, but this is exactly what Rivera did in Carolina. They stumbled upon Norman and Bradberry to some extent, though the latter was a small school second rounder. Rivera’s system has always focused on pressure with zone schemes to mask secondary deficiencies.Yeah, he only got like 22 snaps or something like that.
Not as good as the front line, but that’s where the zone concepts try to confuse the other team.How are their LBs and 2ndary? I haven't focused on the Deadskins in years, other than a brief romance with Scary Terry last year.
This.Really intrigued by the Washington Team of Football DST. I believe in Rivera to build a good defense.
Fuller didn’t play Sunday, so presumably one of their starting corners will be returning soon, hopefully for Sunday.There are holes in the secondary but there is also Landon Collins and Kendall Fuller. Nothing head turning about the LB's, but there aren't any land mines either - they're functional. With such a top notch front a good DC can scheme around those deficiencies. Just have to be playing from ahead, which is why I think the offense will be the weekly question and not the back 7.
Their front is great. But don't forget they just played a 40 year old LT and a rg and rt that had never played a snap of nfl football. This was actually the first nfl game driscoll had ever seen in person. And he got hurt and had to leave and another rt came in who also has zero nfl experience.Really intrigued by the Washington Team of Football DST. I believe in Rivera to build a good defense.
What does the Philly oline look like this week? Rams seem like a good play to me.Their front is great. But don't forget they just played a 40 year old LT and a rg and rt that had never played a snap of nfl football. This was actually the first nfl game driscoll had ever seen in person. And he got hurt and had to leave and another rt came in who also has zero nfl experience.
Cheese. Of the Swiss denomination.What does the Philly oline look like this week? Rams seem like a good play to me.
it should be better but donald is gonna have a huge game im sureWhat does the Philly oline look like this week? Rams seem like a good play to me.