What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

*** Official 2015 College Football Thread *** (5 Viewers)

Just amazing that Chizik is about to get tossed two years after winning a championship.

Petrino? Auburn deserves a scumbag like him. It'll happen.

 
'Dickie Dunn said:
'cheese said:
What happens if Rutgers or Louisville run the table?

Fiesta Bowl? :unsure:
Has very little to do with them and everything to do with what happens around them. If they get enough help, they could be in the title game. If all the big schools keep this up, probably pushed all the way to Orange who has the last BCS pick (especially Rutgers). The only way the Sugar/Fiesta happen is if a school like Boise makes it that they want even less.
Have to keep an eye on Boise State and Ohio, as well. Not for the championship game, but potentially to crash a BCS bowl.All one needs to do is finish in the top 16 and ahead of at least one of the champions of an AQ conference. Boise currently is No. 21, Ohio 24. Their best bet, obviously, is that the eventual BE champion fades or a team like Cincy still manages to win the league. Less likely is that a team other than Florida State wins the ACC -- certainly possibly, since NC State would be in good shape to win its division if it beats Clemson.

Ohio has some interesting chances to gain some exposure coming up. After facing Miami (Ohio) on Saturday, their next three games all would be mid-week TV games on either ESPN2 or ESPNU.
They also could finish ahead of the B10 champ. With OSU eliminated, that's definitely possible.The only teams worried about them are the SEC/P12 and maybe Oklahoma. I see virtually 0 chance any other conference sends a non-champ to the BCS so those teams that aren't champs are the ones in danger of losing out to Boise/Ohio.

10 spots, 6 champs, probably ND, 2nd best SEC team, 2nd best P12 team, Boise/Ohio would take the place of SEC#3 (LSU/SCar?) or P12#3 (Oregon St/USC?). I could also see a 2 loss Oklahoma as the swing team. Kansas St needs 2 losses to not be the champ as far as I know so they're basically Fiesta Bowl or bust.
Great point on the B10 champ. I hadn't even considered that one.Only problem with your bolded is that you can't have more than two teams from one conference in a BCS bowl, unless somehow two teams from the same conference are in the title game and neither is the league champion (as improbable as that seems).

So assuming you have your six AQ champs and a non-AQ, you potentially would be looking at SEC #2, B12 #2, P12 #2 and ND for the final three spots.

 
Chizik's mother passed away today. So they will probably wait til next week.
I could see why they would wait a day or two....can't believe they'd wait another week thru another home game if the decision was made.
 
Now I've seen everything!

Mack Brown complains that the Longhorn Network is negatively affecting Texas … really, he did

It's tough to know where to start with this whopper: Mack Brown, according to Orangebloods.com, said the Longhorn Network is negatively affecting the Longhorns.

Yes, the same Longhorn Network that was to provide such a recruiting advantage that the use of high-school highlights on the network had to be banned after conference rivals revolted. The same LHN that gives Texas $15 million per year to pump into its athletic budget. The same network that is such an edge for Texas, it almost tore the Big 12 apart.

This network, Mack Brown insists, is suddenly bad for Texas.

Here's Chip Brown's full story, and it provides a strange glimpse into the mind of a coach that seems to be spending a lot of time worried about things that have nothing to do with his team winning or losing football games.

Brown complains about the time he takes doing interviews with the network. I'm sure he has a lot of obligations to the network, including taping three shows a week. ESPN is playing Texas $300 million (that number is still insane, no matter how many times you read it) over 20 years. That's going to require some extra time from Brown to chat about David Ash's throwing mechanics (I, like almost every other American, doesn't get the LHN, but I'm going to guess there's not much investigative journalism being done on those shows). That comes with the territory. It's worth noting Brown makes more than $5 million per season, even though he is 18-14 over the last three seasons. Texas went 5-7 the year before the Longhorn Network was launched, which is also worth noting.

But here's where Brown's concerns start to border on bizarre, from the Orangebloods.com story:

Brown even said if a player needs to have an ankle taped, the UT medical staff will tape both ankles so anyone watching LHN won't know if a player is injured.

Oh. That seems perfectly logical, and a great allocation of time. I'm sure the training staff loves getting that order. Nothing at all crazy about that.Consider that Texas's sports information staff keeps an eye on the network to make sure there are no competitive advantages being given away. The practice footage comes from the first eight periods of practice, which are assuredly done in a way to not give out any game-planning information (the first few periods of most college football practices are done on individual drills, the same type of drills every team does). To think that Oklahoma beat Texas 63-21 because of the network - which, again, provides Texas the kind of paycheck every other school dreams of and should allow the Longhorns to hire and retain the best assistants, build great facilities and have a huge recruiting budget - is flat out preposterous. To think that Texas can't tackle anyone this season because Mack Brown has to drive to the network studios to answer some questions is absurd. To think that opponents are winning because of things they pick up on the Longhorn Network - and keep in mind that Texas is having trainers tape healthy ankles to throw off opponents who might be watching the shows, so it's hard to believe any stone is being unturned there - is paranoia at its most extreme.

The whole thing comes off as whining in the worst way, like lottery winners complaining about how much they were taxed.

"I didn't ask for it," Brown said about LHN. "We were given a deal we had no input in."

As Texas safety Kenny Vaccaro told Yahoo! Sports' Eric Adelson, the Longhorns maybe need to get back to playing football and not "worrying about the stuff that you get distracted with at Texas like the Longhorn Network, all the fans, all the glory, Nike and all that stuff." His coach could benefit from that advice.

So, Texas fans, if you're upset your team is tied for fifth place in the Big 12 with a 2-2 mark, you know who to blame, and it's not Mack Brown. Blame the Longhorn Network instead. In fact, show some respect for Brown's meticulousness - if Texas trainers taped only injured ankles for practice, the Longhorns might not have even won those two conference games.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/mack-brown-complains-longhorn-network-negatively-affecting-texas-205045559--ncaaf.html :lmao:

BOOMER!

 
'Dickie Dunn said:
'cheese said:
What happens if Rutgers or Louisville run the table?

Fiesta Bowl? :unsure:
Has very little to do with them and everything to do with what happens around them. If they get enough help, they could be in the title game. If all the big schools keep this up, probably pushed all the way to Orange who has the last BCS pick (especially Rutgers). The only way the Sugar/Fiesta happen is if a school like Boise makes it that they want even less.
Have to keep an eye on Boise State and Ohio, as well. Not for the championship game, but potentially to crash a BCS bowl.All one needs to do is finish in the top 16 and ahead of at least one of the champions of an AQ conference. Boise currently is No. 21, Ohio 24. Their best bet, obviously, is that the eventual BE champion fades or a team like Cincy still manages to win the league. Less likely is that a team other than Florida State wins the ACC -- certainly possibly, since NC State would be in good shape to win its division if it beats Clemson.

Ohio has some interesting chances to gain some exposure coming up. After facing Miami (Ohio) on Saturday, their next three games all would be mid-week TV games on either ESPN2 or ESPNU.
They also could finish ahead of the B10 champ. With OSU eliminated, that's definitely possible.The only teams worried about them are the SEC/P12 and maybe Oklahoma. I see virtually 0 chance any other conference sends a non-champ to the BCS so those teams that aren't champs are the ones in danger of losing out to Boise/Ohio.

10 spots, 6 champs, probably ND, 2nd best SEC team, 2nd best P12 team, Boise/Ohio would take the place of SEC#3 (LSU/SCar?) or P12#3 (Oregon St/USC?). I could also see a 2 loss Oklahoma as the swing team. Kansas St needs 2 losses to not be the champ as far as I know so they're basically Fiesta Bowl or bust.
Great point on the B10 champ. I hadn't even considered that one.Only problem with your bolded is that you can't have more than two teams from one conference in a BCS bowl, unless somehow two teams from the same conference are in the title game and neither is the league champion (as improbable as that seems).

So assuming you have your six AQ champs and a non-AQ, you potentially would be looking at SEC #2, B12 #2, P12 #2 and ND for the final three spots.
Good point. I had forgotten about the 2 team limit. The B12 #2 then becomes the likely team affected by the Boise/Ohio scenerio unless ND completely derails.
 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.

 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
Florida at +800 ia best value.
 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
No such thing this year. I agree with you though that OU is the best value there.Also, Notre Dame beating USC would be even better for OU and mean that USC could win either or both Oregon game and it would be fine for OU.

 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
Florida at +800 ia best value.
This was my initial thought as well.
 
Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
That would require them winning a BCS game.
 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
No such thing this year. I agree with you though that OU is the best value there.Also, Notre Dame beating USC would be even better for OU and mean that USC could win either or both Oregon game and it would be fine for OU.
Don't really think OU is good value at all. This has nothing to do with the quality of the team but of the realities of their situation. They need to win out obviously. They likely need KSU to lose this weekend and Texas Tech winning out to win the Big 12. Otherwise, voters are going to hold it against them that they didn't win their conference, that the team that won their conference beat them on their home field, and that team has the same record. Computers will help some but KSU will get huge credit for that win and probably be tough to pass even with a later loss.

They'll never pass a 1-loss SEC champ so that means they would also need Oregon and Oregon State to lose at least one game and even then that might not be enough if it's a loss at USC and then a win vs USC later.

So I see their odds of even getting into the title game are very slim which makes them a pretty poor bet.

 
Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
ahh, just realized GM's mistake. The Big 12 only has 10 teams and it is a round robin format. There is no championship game so OU has no shot at redemption vs KSU.
 
What happens if Rutgers or Louisville run the table?

Fiesta Bowl? :unsure:
Has very little to do with them and everything to do with what happens around them. If they get enough help, they could be in the title game. If all the big schools keep this up, probably pushed all the way to Orange who has the last BCS pick (especially Rutgers). The only way the Sugar/Fiesta happen is if a school like Boise makes it that they want even less.
Have to keep an eye on Boise State and Ohio, as well. Not for the championship game, but potentially to crash a BCS bowl.All one needs to do is finish in the top 16 and ahead of at least one of the champions of an AQ conference. Boise currently is No. 21, Ohio 24. Their best bet, obviously, is that the eventual BE champion fades or a team like Cincy still manages to win the league. Less likely is that a team other than Florida State wins the ACC -- certainly possibly, since NC State would be in good shape to win its division if it beats Clemson.

Ohio has some interesting chances to gain some exposure coming up. After facing Miami (Ohio) on Saturday, their next three games all would be mid-week TV games on either ESPN2 or ESPNU.
They also could finish ahead of the B10 champ. With OSU eliminated, that's definitely possible.The only teams worried about them are the SEC/P12 and maybe Oklahoma. I see virtually 0 chance any other conference sends a non-champ to the BCS so those teams that aren't champs are the ones in danger of losing out to Boise/Ohio.

10 spots, 6 champs, probably ND, 2nd best SEC team, 2nd best P12 team, Boise/Ohio would take the place of SEC#3 (LSU/SCar?) or P12#3 (Oregon St/USC?). I could also see a 2 loss Oklahoma as the swing team. Kansas St needs 2 losses to not be the champ as far as I know so they're basically Fiesta Bowl or bust.
Great point on the B10 champ. I hadn't even considered that one.Only problem with your bolded is that you can't have more than two teams from one conference in a BCS bowl, unless somehow two teams from the same conference are in the title game and neither is the league champion (as improbable as that seems).

So assuming you have your six AQ champs and a non-AQ, you potentially would be looking at SEC #2, B12 #2, P12 #2 and ND for the final three spots.
Good point. I had forgotten about the 2 team limit. The B12 #2 then becomes the likely team affected by the Boise/Ohio scenerio unless ND completely derails.
think this really depends on who #2 is. They don't have to pick in order or anything so they pick who is most likely to sell tickets and draw ratings. If it's KSU or Tech, well, yeah, they probably get squeezed. If it's Oklahoma, they may jump the #2 Pac. If you are the Sugar Bowl and have the option of taking Oregon State or Oklahoma, who do you take? It's also why if Notre Dame qualifies, they will definitely be selected.

 
What happens if Rutgers or Louisville run the table?

Fiesta Bowl? :unsure:
Has very little to do with them and everything to do with what happens around them. If they get enough help, they could be in the title game. If all the big schools keep this up, probably pushed all the way to Orange who has the last BCS pick (especially Rutgers). The only way the Sugar/Fiesta happen is if a school like Boise makes it that they want even less.
Have to keep an eye on Boise State and Ohio, as well. Not for the championship game, but potentially to crash a BCS bowl.All one needs to do is finish in the top 16 and ahead of at least one of the champions of an AQ conference. Boise currently is No. 21, Ohio 24. Their best bet, obviously, is that the eventual BE champion fades or a team like Cincy still manages to win the league. Less likely is that a team other than Florida State wins the ACC -- certainly possibly, since NC State would be in good shape to win its division if it beats Clemson.

Ohio has some interesting chances to gain some exposure coming up. After facing Miami (Ohio) on Saturday, their next three games all would be mid-week TV games on either ESPN2 or ESPNU.
They also could finish ahead of the B10 champ. With OSU eliminated, that's definitely possible.The only teams worried about them are the SEC/P12 and maybe Oklahoma. I see virtually 0 chance any other conference sends a non-champ to the BCS so those teams that aren't champs are the ones in danger of losing out to Boise/Ohio.

10 spots, 6 champs, probably ND, 2nd best SEC team, 2nd best P12 team, Boise/Ohio would take the place of SEC#3 (LSU/SCar?) or P12#3 (Oregon St/USC?). I could also see a 2 loss Oklahoma as the swing team. Kansas St needs 2 losses to not be the champ as far as I know so they're basically Fiesta Bowl or bust.
Great point on the B10 champ. I hadn't even considered that one.Only problem with your bolded is that you can't have more than two teams from one conference in a BCS bowl, unless somehow two teams from the same conference are in the title game and neither is the league champion (as improbable as that seems).

So assuming you have your six AQ champs and a non-AQ, you potentially would be looking at SEC #2, B12 #2, P12 #2 and ND for the final three spots.
Good point. I had forgotten about the 2 team limit. The B12 #2 then becomes the likely team affected by the Boise/Ohio scenerio unless ND completely derails.
think this really depends on who #2 is. They don't have to pick in order or anything so they pick who is most likely to sell tickets and draw ratings. If it's KSU or Tech, well, yeah, they probably get squeezed. If it's Oklahoma, they may jump the #2 Pac. If you are the Sugar Bowl and have the option of taking Oregon State or Oklahoma, who do you take? It's also why if Notre Dame qualifies, they will definitely be selected.
For the exact reason you're giving, their is a VERY little chance the 2nd PAC choice would be Oregon St. It would take USC losing at least 2 more games and Oregon winning out. Otherwise, Oregon St is Rose Bowl or bust because they would rather have USC/Oregon than all but the most extreme scenerio. If you're the Sugar Bowl and you have the option of USC/Oregon or Oklahoma/Kansas St it looks a lot different. I never argued that it's impossible though. Certainly, there is a scenerio where Oregon beats Oregon St and hands USC 2 more losses and Kansas St goes undefeated and Oklahoma wins out and Boise/Ohio win out and they finish top 16 and they finish above a BCS champ.... where only 1 PAC goes. But my head just exploded typing all the criteria it would take.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
No such thing this year. I agree with you though that OU is the best value there.Also, Notre Dame beating USC would be even better for OU and mean that USC could win either or both Oregon game and it would be fine for OU.
Don't really think OU is good value at all. This has nothing to do with the quality of the team but of the realities of their situation. They need to win out obviously. They likely need KSU to lose this weekend and Texas Tech winning out to win the Big 12. Otherwise, voters are going to hold it against them that they didn't win their conference, that the team that won their conference beat them on their home field, and that team has the same record. Computers will help some but KSU will get huge credit for that win and probably be tough to pass even with a later loss.

They'll never pass a 1-loss SEC champ so that means they would also need Oregon and Oregon State to lose at least one game and even then that might not be enough if it's a loss at USC and then a win vs USC later.

So I see their odds of even getting into the title game are very slim which makes them a pretty poor bet.
I think there is a big difference between a team only splitting a conf championship and actually losing it entirely. In the case where KST finishes 11-1, do they even use tiebreakers for anything? They just give both teams a trophy right?
 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
No such thing this year. I agree with you though that OU is the best value there.Also, Notre Dame beating USC would be even better for OU and mean that USC could win either or both Oregon game and it would be fine for OU.
Don't really think OU is good value at all. This has nothing to do with the quality of the team but of the realities of their situation. They need to win out obviously. They likely need KSU to lose this weekend and Texas Tech winning out to win the Big 12. Otherwise, voters are going to hold it against them that they didn't win their conference, that the team that won their conference beat them on their home field, and that team has the same record. Computers will help some but KSU will get huge credit for that win and probably be tough to pass even with a later loss.

They'll never pass a 1-loss SEC champ so that means they would also need Oregon and Oregon State to lose at least one game and even then that might not be enough if it's a loss at USC and then a win vs USC later.

So I see their odds of even getting into the title game are very slim which makes them a pretty poor bet.
I think there is a big difference between a team only splitting a conf championship and actually losing it entirely. In the case where KST finishes 11-1, do they even use tiebreakers for anything? They just give both teams a trophy right?
If two teams are tied then h2h is the tiebreaker. If three teams are tied and the top two teams are within one spot of each other in the final standings then h2h between those two teams is used. If the top two are not within one sport of one another it's simply the team ranked the highest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A couple of other things to consider:

-- Any at-large team has to be in the top 14 of the final rankings.

-- Nos. 3-4 in the final standings, if not conference champs, are automatic at-larges as long as there isn't an at-large from the same conference in the title game (in essence, a "3rd" team from the conference, since there also would be a champion somewhere else in the picture).

Let's assume, just for conversation, that Alabama and Oregon finish 1-2, respectively. Meanwhile, K-State wins the Big 12.

Here is what we have:

Championship: Alabama vs. Oregon

Orange: ACC champ vs. ???

Fiesta: Kansas State vs. ???

Rose: Big 10 champ vs. ???

Sugar: (open)

The Sugar Bowl get the first choice, and you would have to assume would take the No. 2 team from the SEC (Florida or LSU?). Then the Rose Bowl gets the next pick. Is it safe to assume it would take the No. 2 team from the Pac-12 to keep the tradition?

That leaves the Fiesta-Sugar-Orange (in that order, 2013 rotation) to choose among the BE champ, B12 #2, ND and potentially a Boise/Ohio. So yes, it is possible that the Big 12 #2 gets screwed in this scenario, since ND would be a no-brainer choice for the Fiesta (they wouldn't pit another Big 12 against K-State) and the other two would have to be automatics.

Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.

Obviously still a lot left to be decided. And for the record, since I championed a 16-team playoff last year, I still believe there is plenty of room for these sort of debates when you are looking at only five potential at-large spots (which right now could be Florida, LSU, ND, Oklahoma and USC/Oregon State -- not bad).

 
Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
ahh, just realized GM's mistake. The Big 12 only has 10 teams and it is a round robin format. There is no championship game so OU has no shot at redemption vs KSU.
Bah, I didn't know that. Glad I didn't bet it. :thumbup: I did throw a C-Note on my Ducks, but I'm biased. I think they will win out and face Bama, though I'm concerned about KSU standing in their way. Much better SOS and the wins on the road at OU and WVU (who is a fraud) resonate more than anything Oregon has done or perhaps will do, unless USC and OSU win out and the Ducks beat them.

 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
No such thing this year. I agree with you though that OU is the best value there.Also, Notre Dame beating USC would be even better for OU and mean that USC could win either or both Oregon game and it would be fine for OU.
Don't really think OU is good value at all. This has nothing to do with the quality of the team but of the realities of their situation. They need to win out obviously. They likely need KSU to lose this weekend and Texas Tech winning out to win the Big 12. Otherwise, voters are going to hold it against them that they didn't win their conference, that the team that won their conference beat them on their home field, and that team has the same record. Computers will help some but KSU will get huge credit for that win and probably be tough to pass even with a later loss.

They'll never pass a 1-loss SEC champ so that means they would also need Oregon and Oregon State to lose at least one game and even then that might not be enough if it's a loss at USC and then a win vs USC later.

So I see their odds of even getting into the title game are very slim which makes them a pretty poor bet.
I think there is a big difference between a team only splitting a conf championship and actually losing it entirely. In the case where KST finishes 11-1, do they even use tiebreakers for anything? They just give both teams a trophy right?
If two teams are tied then h2h is the tiebreaker. If three teams are tied and the top two teams are within one spot of each other in the final standings then h2h between those two teams is used. If the top two are not within one sport of one another it's simply the team ranked the highest.
In a scenario where both KSU and OU end 11-1, there is going to be a certain contingent of voters that will vote OU below KSU because KSU went into Norman and won. The computers will also likely put KSU ahead of OU. However, OU's cache and the fact that they lost earlier will keep it pretty close imo which is actually bad for the Big 12 as a whole....they will be splitting the vote. Each conference is best off having one obvious choice. For instance if there is a clear cut 1-loss Pac champ, they probably stay ahead of both OU and KSU because of this vote splitting. So no matter if OU is the best team in the country, they aren't well set up to get to the title game which imo makes them a very bad bet.

 
A couple of other things to consider:

-- Any at-large team has to be in the top 14 of the final rankings.

-- Nos. 3-4 in the final standings, if not conference champs, are automatic at-larges as long as there isn't an at-large from the same conference in the title game (in essence, a "3rd" team from the conference, since there also would be a champion somewhere else in the picture).

Let's assume, just for conversation, that Alabama and Oregon finish 1-2, respectively. Meanwhile, K-State wins the Big 12.

Here is what we have:

Championship: Alabama vs. Oregon

Orange: ACC champ vs. ???

Fiesta: Kansas State vs. ???

Rose: Big 10 champ vs. ???

Sugar: (open)

The Sugar Bowl get the first choice, and you would have to assume would take the No. 2 team from the SEC (Florida or LSU?). Then the Rose Bowl gets the next pick. Is it safe to assume it would take the No. 2 team from the Pac-12 to keep the tradition?

That leaves the Fiesta-Sugar-Orange (in that order, 2013 rotation) to choose among the BE champ, B12 #2, ND and potentially a Boise/Ohio. So yes, it is possible that the Big 12 #2 gets screwed in this scenario, since ND would be a no-brainer choice for the Fiesta (they wouldn't pit another Big 12 against K-State) and the other two would have to be automatics.

Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.

Obviously still a lot left to be decided. And for the record, since I championed a 16-team playoff last year, I still believe there is plenty of room for these sort of debates when you are looking at only five potential at-large spots (which right now could be Florida, LSU, ND, Oklahoma and USC/Oregon State -- not bad).
I would think absolutely, especially if you have an Oregon State team with only 1 loss (to Oregon, though we are really putting the cart before the horse here).
 
Since I did this exercise last year, it's time to break out my bracket for a mythical 16-team playoff.

This doesn't make any assumptions for what can happen down the road, only things as they currently stand today. Current conference leaders are considered to be "champions", and tiebreaker is BCS standing and then Sagarin.

1. Alabama (at-large)

16. Tulsa (C-USA)

8. Oklahoma (at-large)

9. Florida State (ACC)

4. Oregon (P-12)

13. Utah State (WAC)

5. Notre Dame (at-large)

12. Michigan (B10)

2. Florida (SEC)

15. La.-Monroe (SB)

7. Oregon State (at-large)

10. Rutgers (BE)

3. Kansas State (B-12)

14. N. Illinois (MAC*)

6. LSU (at-large)

11. Boise State (MW)

Outside: No. 9 USC, No. 10 Georgia; No. 11 Mississippi State

(* Northern Illinois top MAC team in Sagarin in three-way tie with Toledo and Kent State; teams 13-16 seeded by Sagarin).

 
Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.
this is good analysis. I didn't want to have to look up the order of picks ;) In this scenario I think the Fiesta could pass on the Big 12 if it's not OU or UT. None of the rest have enough marketability. There's no RG3 or underdog story or anything. This isn't the Rose Bowl and the Fiesta has no need to keep the Big 12 happy at this point (they got shafted by the Champions setup). Notre Dame is a no-brainer and if the Fiesta has the first pick, they have to go there. The second pick though would be totally up in the air.
 
Since I did this exercise last year, it's time to break out my bracket for a mythical 16-team playoff.This doesn't make any assumptions for what can happen down the road, only things as they currently stand today. Current conference leaders are considered to be "champions", and tiebreaker is BCS standing and then Sagarin.16. Tulsa (C-USA)13. Utah State (WAC)14. N. Illinois (MAC*)
CUSA - think UCF wins this year but Tulsa is doing well right now and they get UCF at homeWAC - La Tech will go undefeated. Believe they are also higher in BCS (though not in top 25)MAC - Ohio is #24 in the BCS which I thought was your first tiebreak
 
If two teams are tied then h2h is the tiebreaker. If three teams are tied and the top two teams are within one spot of each other in the final standings then h2h between those two teams is used. If the top two are not within one sport of one another it's simply the team ranked the highest.
In a scenario where both KSU and OU end 11-1, there is going to be a certain contingent of voters that will vote OU below KSU because KSU went into Norman and won. The computers will also likely put KSU ahead of OU. However, OU's cache and the fact that they lost earlier will keep it pretty close imo which is actually bad for the Big 12 as a whole....they will be splitting the vote. Each conference is best off having one obvious choice. For instance if there is a clear cut 1-loss Pac champ, they probably stay ahead of both OU and KSU because of this vote splitting. So no matter if OU is the best team in the country, they aren't well set up to get to the title game which imo makes them a very bad bet.
I agree, I was just responding to cheese's question about tiebreakers. I think that KState is going to win the conference outright anyways. If OU wins out that KState game will end up being one of the more painful losses of the Stoops era.
 
Since I did this exercise last year, it's time to break out my bracket for a mythical 16-team playoff.

This doesn't make any assumptions for what can happen down the road, only things as they currently stand today. Current conference leaders are considered to be "champions", and tiebreaker is BCS standing and then Sagarin.

16. Tulsa (C-USA)

13. Utah State (WAC)

14. N. Illinois (MAC*)
CUSA - think UCF wins this year but Tulsa is doing well right now and they get UCF at homeWAC - La Tech will go undefeated. Believe they are also higher in BCS (though not in top 25)

MAC - Ohio is #24 in the BCS which I thought was your first tiebreak
Should have been a little more clear. I actually was using current conference standings ... Ohio at 3-0 is a half-game behind Northern Illinois, Toledo and Kent State. So I was using BCS and Sagarin as tiebreakers for conference standings. Utah State is 2-0 in the WAC right now while La. Tech (and Texas State, which I believe is ineligible as an FBS transition team) is 1-0.
 
If two teams are tied then h2h is the tiebreaker. If three teams are tied and the top two teams are within one spot of each other in the final standings then h2h between those two teams is used. If the top two are not within one sport of one another it's simply the team ranked the highest.
In a scenario where both KSU and OU end 11-1, there is going to be a certain contingent of voters that will vote OU below KSU because KSU went into Norman and won. The computers will also likely put KSU ahead of OU. However, OU's cache and the fact that they lost earlier will keep it pretty close imo which is actually bad for the Big 12 as a whole....they will be splitting the vote. Each conference is best off having one obvious choice. For instance if there is a clear cut 1-loss Pac champ, they probably stay ahead of both OU and KSU because of this vote splitting. So no matter if OU is the best team in the country, they aren't well set up to get to the title game which imo makes them a very bad bet.
I agree, I was just responding to cheese's question about tiebreakers. I think that KState is going to win the conference outright anyways. If OU wins out that KState game will end up being one of the more painful losses of the Stoops era.
Maybe. But I think that loss was the catalyst for what's happened since then. I don't think we would have seen the results we've seen had OU pulled out the KSU game and it's likely they would have dropped another one somewhere down the line. There's been a definite attitude adjustment with the players. And that's a good thing.
 
Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.
this is good analysis. I didn't want to have to look up the order of picks ;) In this scenario I think the Fiesta could pass on the Big 12 if it's not OU or UT. None of the rest have enough marketability. There's no RG3 or underdog story or anything. This isn't the Rose Bowl and the Fiesta has no need to keep the Big 12 happy at this point (they got shafted by the Champions setup). Notre Dame is a no-brainer and if the Fiesta has the first pick, they have to go there. The second pick though would be totally up in the air.
Not that it changes any of the scenarios, but I wonder if the Sugar would be married to grabbing the second SEC team with Notre Dame floating out there. It wouldn't matter in the big picture, because I assume the Fiesta would grab the other one either way.
 
btw, since some expressed interest last week when I posted details, tv ratings in the various time slots throughout the weekend this past weekend

noon

Virginia Tech-Clemson (or Purdue-Ohio State), ABC, 3.1

LSU-Texas A&M, ESPN, 2.8

330

South Carolina-Florida, CBS, 3.3

BYU-Notre Dame, NBC, 2.7

Nebraska-Northwestern (or South Florida-Louisville or Texas Tech-TCU), ABC, 2.4

Stanford-California, Fox, 0.7

primetime

Florida State-Miami (or Baylor-Texas), ABC 3.5

Alabama-Tennessee, ESPN, 2.6

Kansas State-West Virginia, Fox, 1.7

No other games had over a 1.0 share. The fact that KSU-WVU lost to cable is a catastrophe really. And given that, I'm not even sure what to say about the 330 slot on Fox. It's estimated that cable games, even on ESPN, would get about 50% higher ratings if placed on the networks.
:thumbup:
 
This week's college football TV schedule. Best/Important games bolded.

Tuesday, October 23rd

Arkansas State at Louisiana Lafayette 7:00 p.m. ESPN2 (HD) / espn3 *9

Thursday, October 25th

Clemson at Wake Forest 6:30 p.m. ESPN (HD) / espn3 *9

Delaware State at Morgan State 6:30 p.m. ESPNU (HD) / espn3 *9

DII: Valdosta State at Shorter 6:30 p.m. CSS (cable) / espn3

Friday, October 26th

Cincinnati at Louisville 7:00 p.m. ESPN2 (HD) / espn3 *9

Nevada at Air Force 7:00 p.m. CBSSN (HD)

Saturday, October 27th

Ball State at Army 11:00 a.m. CBSSN (HD)

Oyster Bowl: Delaware at Old Dominion 11:00 a.m. NBCSN (HD)

Indiana at Illinois 11:00 a.m. BTN (HD) / btn2go

Iowa at Northwestern 11:00 a.m. ESPN2 (HD) / espn3 *9

Kentucky at Missouri 11:00 a.m. ESPNU (HD) / espn3 *9

Northern Illinois at Western Michigan 11:00 a.m. ESPN-GP / ERTV (cable) / espn3

Temple at Pittsburgh 11:00 a.m. SNY / MASN / CSCA / ESPN-GP / ERTV / espn3

Texas at Kansas 11:00 a.m. FSN Affiliates (HD) / FCSC (cable)

Tennessee at South Carolina 11:00 a.m. ESPN (HD) (3D) / espn3 *9

Ole Miss at Arkansas 11:21 a.m. SEC Network *4 / ESPN-GP / espn3

North Carolina State at North Carolina 11:30 a.m. (ESPN-GP / espn3) *2 / ACC Network (HD) *3

Yale at Columbia 11:30 a.m. YES

Southern Miss at Rice 12:00 p.m. (CSNC / CSBA) *5 / CSS (cable)

BYU at Georgia Tech 2:00 p.m. (FSN Affiliates (HD) / ESPN-GP / espn3) *5

Colorado at Oregon 2:00 p.m. PAC-12 Network (HD) / pac-12.com

UCLA at Arizona State 2:00 p.m. FX (HD)

Youngstown State at South Dakota State 2:00 p.m. ESPN-GP / WFMJ (cable) / espn3

Boise State at Wyoming 2:30 p.m. CBSSN (HD)

Duke at Florida State 2:30 p.m. ESPNU (HD)

Eastern Michigan at Bowling Green 2:30 p.m. ESPN-GP / espn3 / BCSN

Florida vs. Georgia 2:30 p.m. CBS (HD) / cbssports.com

Fresno State at New Mexico 2:30 p.m. CSCA *5 / (Comcast / TW) (cable)

Idaho State at Montana 2:30 p.m. RSPI / RSRM / RSNW / DirecTV: 239-1

Kent State at Rutgers 2:30 p.m. SNY / MASN / ESPN-GP / ERTV / espn3

Liberty at Coastal Carolina 2:30 p.m. ESPN-GP / Flames Sports (cable) / espn3

Ohio at Miami Ohio 2:30 p.m. (ESPN-GP / STO) *2 / ERTV (cable) / espn3

Purdue at Minnesota 2:30 p.m. BTN (HD) / btn2go

Michigan State at Wisconsin 2:30 p.m. (ABC (HD) / ESPN2 (HD)) *7

TCU at Oklahoma State 2:30 p.m. FSN Affiliates (HD)

Texas Tech at Kansas State 2:30 p.m. FOX (HD)

Towson at Villanova 2:30 p.m. CSMA / TCN (cable)

USC at Arizona 2:30 p.m. (ABC (HD) / ESPN2 (HD)) *7

Sam Houston State at Lamar 3:00 p.m. ESPN-GP / SLCTV (cable / Video) / espn3

UTEP at Houston 3:30 p.m. CSBA *5 / CSS (cable)

Harvard at Dartmouth 4:00 p.m. CSNE

Illinois State at Northern Iowa 4:00 p.m. CSNC *5 / Mediacom (cable) / espn3

Ohio State at Penn State 4:30 p.m. ESPN (HD) / espn3

Washington State at Stanford 5:15 p.m. PAC-12 Network (HD) / pac-12.com

Baylor at Iowa State 6:00 p.m. FSN Affiliates (HD)

Hawaii at Colorado State 6:00 p.m. RSRM / KTVD (cable)

Texas A&M at Auburn 6:00 p.m. ESPNU (HD)

UMass at Vanderbilt 6:00 p.m. FS South (HD) / ESPN-GP / espn3

Louisiana Tech at New Mexico State 7:00 p.m. ESPN-GP / AggieVision / Comcast / espn3

Michigan at Nebraska 7:00 p.m. ESPN2 (HD)

Notre Dame at Oklahoma 7:00 p.m. ABC (HD)

Stephen F. Austin at McNeese State 7:00 p.m. ESPN-GP / SLCTV (cable / Video) / espn3

UCF at Marshall 7:00 p.m. CBSSN (HD)

DII: West Texas A&M at West Georgia 7:00 p.m. ESPN-GP / CSS (cable) / espn3

Mississippi State at Alabama 7:30 p.m. ESPN (HD)

California at Utah 8:45 p.m. PAC-12 Network (HD) / pac-12.com

Oregon State at Washington 9:15 p.m. PAC-12 Network (HD) / pac-12.com

Games online only or not yet scheduled for nationally available networks.

Akron at Central Michigan 2:30 p.m. TBA

Alabama A&M vs. Alabama State 2:30 p.m. espn3

Albany at Sacred Heart 12:00 p.m. NEC Front Row

Citadel at Wofford 12:30 p.m. espn3

Cal Poly at Sacramento State 7:00 p.m. Big Sky

Eastern Illinois at Eastern Kentucky 11:00 a.m. FCSA (cable)

Eastern Washington at Southern Utah 2:00 p.m. Big Sky

Fordham at Holy Cross 12:00 p.m. Charter TV3 (cable)

Furman at Elon 2:00 p.m. Video

Georgetown at Lafayette 5:00 p.m. LSN (cable)

Grambling at Texas Southern 4:00 p.m. KHOU (cable)

Maryland at Boston College 12:00 p.m. espn3

Memphis at SMU 2:00 p.m. TWC (cable)

Murray State at Jacksonville State 3:00 p.m. OVC

Navy at East Carolina 2:30 p.m. FCSA (cable)

North Dakota at Montana State 3:00 p.m. Max Media (cable) / Big Sky

North Texas at Middle Tennessee 2:30 p.m. espn3

Northern Arizona at Northern Colorado 2:30 p.m. Big Sky

Princeton at Cornell 11:30 a.m. TWC (cable)

Robert Morris at Wagner 12:00 p.m. NEC Front Row

Saint Francis (PA) at CCSU 11:00 a.m. NEC Front Row

South Alabama at Louisiana Monroe 6:00 p.m. Cox4 (cable) / espn3

South Dakota at Indiana State 1:00 p.m. espn3

Southeast Missouri at Austin Peay 4:00 p.m. OVC

Southern Illinois at North Dakota State 2:30 p.m. (ND NBC / FCSC) (cable)

Stony Brook at Presbyterian 12:00 p.m. espn3

Syracuse at South Florida 6:00 p.m. espn3

Tennessee Tech at Tennessee State 5:00 p.m. OVC

Texas State at San Jose State 3:00 p.m. TBA

Toledo at Buffalo 2:30 p.m. TWCS (cable)

Troy at Florida Atlantic TBA TBA

UAB at Tulane 2:30 p.m. TBA

UNLV at San Diego State 7:00 p.m. TW (cable)

Utah State at UTSA 1:00 p.m. espn3

UNLV at San Diego State 7:00 p.m. TW (cable)

Western Kentucky at Florida International 5:00 p.m. espn3

 
Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.
this is good analysis. I didn't want to have to look up the order of picks ;) In this scenario I think the Fiesta could pass on the Big 12 if it's not OU or UT. None of the rest have enough marketability. There's no RG3 or underdog story or anything. This isn't the Rose Bowl and the Fiesta has no need to keep the Big 12 happy at this point (they got shafted by the Champions setup). Notre Dame is a no-brainer and if the Fiesta has the first pick, they have to go there. The second pick though would be totally up in the air.
Not that it changes any of the scenarios, but I wonder if the Sugar would be married to grabbing the second SEC team with Notre Dame floating out there. It wouldn't matter in the big picture, because I assume the Fiesta would grab the other one either way.
They'd take whoever brought them the most money.
 
But here's where Brown's concerns start to border on bizarre, from the Orangebloods.com story:

Brown even said if a player needs to have an ankle taped, the UT medical staff will tape both ankles so anyone watching LHN won't know if a player is injured.
:lol:
 
ODDS TO WIN THE BCS - 10/22/12

Alabama +120

Kansas State +400

Oregon +450

Florida +800

USC +900

LSU +1000

OU +1200

Notre Dame +1500

Florida State +3000

Field +4000

Boy, I'm mildly tempted to take OU +1200....that's pretty enticing. Could happen, right? Beat KSU in the rematch and hope USC beats Oregon then loses to the Ducks in the PAC-12 Championship Game? I think OU has the best chance of anybody else to beat Bama. Yes, better than my Ducks, there I said it.
No Big 12 championship game this year.
 
'The Commish said:
'Dickie Dunn said:
'prefontaine said:
'Dickie Dunn said:
Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.
this is good analysis. I didn't want to have to look up the order of picks ;) In this scenario I think the Fiesta could pass on the Big 12 if it's not OU or UT. None of the rest have enough marketability. There's no RG3 or underdog story or anything. This isn't the Rose Bowl and the Fiesta has no need to keep the Big 12 happy at this point (they got shafted by the Champions setup). Notre Dame is a no-brainer and if the Fiesta has the first pick, they have to go there. The second pick though would be totally up in the air.
Not that it changes any of the scenarios, but I wonder if the Sugar would be married to grabbing the second SEC team with Notre Dame floating out there. It wouldn't matter in the big picture, because I assume the Fiesta would grab the other one either way.
They'd take whoever brought them the most money.
True, because they're going to get stuck with a much weaker second team, relatively speaking, unless the Boise/Ohio scenario doesn't happen. If they can't grab a second B12/P-12 team (whichever is left) for the other spot, the key will be whichever team ends up winning the Big East.
 
'The Commish said:
'Dickie Dunn said:
'prefontaine said:
'Dickie Dunn said:
Now, what if it is K-State at No. 2 instead of Oregon? Obviously, Oregon then goes to the Rose Bowl and then the Fiesta gets the second pick of teams. So essentially the Fiesta would get the next two picks, since it also has the first pick after choosing its championship replacement. So it could grab ND and then the second Big 12 team, leaving the Pac-12 #2 out in the cold.
this is good analysis. I didn't want to have to look up the order of picks ;) In this scenario I think the Fiesta could pass on the Big 12 if it's not OU or UT. None of the rest have enough marketability. There's no RG3 or underdog story or anything. This isn't the Rose Bowl and the Fiesta has no need to keep the Big 12 happy at this point (they got shafted by the Champions setup). Notre Dame is a no-brainer and if the Fiesta has the first pick, they have to go there. The second pick though would be totally up in the air.
Not that it changes any of the scenarios, but I wonder if the Sugar would be married to grabbing the second SEC team with Notre Dame floating out there. It wouldn't matter in the big picture, because I assume the Fiesta would grab the other one either way.
They'd take whoever brought them the most money.
I don't know for sure, but they may not. They have a long standing relationship with the SEC. They (New Orleans) bid a lot for SEC events. Even if they thought Notre Dame might make them more money (and they might), I think they'd pick an SEC team first assuming it wasn't a massive different (and it shouldn't be as the options will likely be one of LSU, Bama, or UF). It's good long term business especially since Notre Dame is about to be locked into the Orange.
 
Wow, that fishing trip went to multiple boards fast. I'll go ahead and tell you none of that's true. Everyone can ignore me, then next Tuesday when no article comes out, we'll all pretend it none of this happened.

 
Wow, that fishing trip went to multiple boards fast. I'll go ahead and tell you none of that's true. Everyone can ignore me, then next Tuesday when no article comes out, we'll all pretend it none of this happened.
I couldn't read the thread. I have no idea if it was a fishing trip or not. What I do know is Diamond had a short list of schools for a while, then at the end added Auburn. That's about all I know about him outside his comments regarding his visit to Michigan.
 
Wow, that fishing trip went to multiple boards fast. I'll go ahead and tell you none of that's true. Everyone can ignore me, then next Tuesday when no article comes out, we'll all pretend none of this happened.
I couldn't read the thread. I have no idea if it was a fishing trip or not. What I do know is Diamond had a short list of schools for a while, then at the end added Auburn. That's about all I know about him outside his comments regarding his visit to Michigan.
The guy who started the thread has been slamming Auburn for a few weeks on the main rivals board, changing his login name multiple times. It's on the Scout board as well now. No idea why the guy has such a hard on for Auburn.
 
Wow, that fishing trip went to multiple boards fast. I'll go ahead and tell you none of that's true. Everyone can ignore me, then next Tuesday when no article comes out, we'll all pretend none of this happened.
I couldn't read the thread. I have no idea if it was a fishing trip or not. What I do know is Diamond had a short list of schools for a while, then at the end added Auburn. That's about all I know about him outside his comments regarding his visit to Michigan.
The guy who started the thread has been slamming Auburn for a few weeks on the main rivals board, changing his login name multiple times. It's on the Scout board as well now. No idea why the guy has such a hard on for Auburn.
Because you guys bought Cam Newton and everyone in the entire college football world knows it and yet Auburn didn't even get a slap on the wrist? That might be the reason.
 
Wow, that fishing trip went to multiple boards fast. I'll go ahead and tell you none of that's true. Everyone can ignore me, then next Tuesday when no article comes out, we'll all pretend none of this happened.
I couldn't read the thread. I have no idea if it was a fishing trip or not. What I do know is Diamond had a short list of schools for a while, then at the end added Auburn. That's about all I know about him outside his comments regarding his visit to Michigan.
The guy who started the thread has been slamming Auburn for a few weeks on the main rivals board, changing his login name multiple times. It's on the Scout board as well now. No idea why the guy has such a hard on for Auburn.
Because you guys bought Cam Newton and everyone in the entire college football world knows it and yet Auburn didn't even get a slap on the wrist? That might be the reason.
:goodposting:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top