I'm a little surprised that the President's comments didn't touch off riots in some urban communities. He basically gave minorities carte blanche to do so.
Sure. But not because behaving that way is illegal.I don't know the disorder conduct laws but it seems, to me, safe to assume that a younger, poorer person that behaved the way the professor allegedly acted towards a cop could reasonably expected to wear a pair of cuffs and be taken down to the station to cool down. It's not a nationwide news story. Hell, in a college town, it's just a thursday night.No, it's not.seems to be disorderly conductBecause saying "yo mama" is illegal, or for some other reason? If the latter, what is the other reason?Umm I think the point is that once you say "yo mamma" to a police officer, you are going to spend a little time thinking that over at the station...
Exactly.When you are a doosh to most people, you can expect them to be a doosh back to you, although probably non-violently.I think most people here would agree that the main reason he was arrested was for being a doosh to the cop in front of a crowd and the officer's peers. When you disobey a police officer and then top it off by disrespecting him loudly in front of a gathering crowd, you should expect shoddy treatment. And if the officer is threatening to arrest you while you are doing this, it is safe to assume that he will follow thru on his threat.
You tell me. Between the two of us, you're the one who brought up racism.Secondly, if the dude was being a jerk about the situation, I can understand a cop abusing his power to bring the guy down to the station, But where does abuse of power = racism?
Sounds fair to me as well. But it's not the cop's job to dole out fair punishment (or any kind of punishment). It's the cop's job to enforce the law.This guy lost a couple hours of hours of his life for being a ####. Sounds like a fair trade off.
I'm curious if your answer would be the same had this not been a Harvard professor and had this not been in a quiet neighborhood.Let's instead move it to a high rise in Cabrini Green, Chicago. Say two white cops had been called to investigate a report of an intruder on the sixth floor of the high rise. They go to the door and knock. They hear someone inside and order the person out. Everything happens exactly the same. Including alleging racial bias on the part of the cops in a loud voice. But, instead of the cops being in the front yard with a few passers-by on the street overhearing the rant, we have two cops in a hallway with people coming out of their apartments. People who presumably share the same beliefs about cops as Mr. Gates.Cops have been killed in those high rises. Would the cops have been wrong to arrest the man under those circumstances?No, it's not.seems to be disorderly conductBecause saying "yo mama" is illegal, or for some other reason? If the latter, what is the other reason?Umm I think the point is that once you say "yo mamma" to a police officer, you are going to spend a little time thinking that over at the station...
I'm getting sick of the man putting white folk down.Rush Limbaugh adds some fuel to the fire:
Last week we saw white firefighters under attack by agents of Obama. This week we get white police under attack by Obama himself.
Double or nothing says it would be of a white man.I'll bet you one dollar that if we took the professor out of his swanky house and put him through police academy training, that he'd make an unlawful arrest within 6 months.We probably would have been jealous at the swanky free house Dr. Gates gets from Hahvahd.I wonder how opinions would change on both sides if we had video of this encounter.
Isn't that what this is all about? I won't deny the cop overstepped his bounds, but at the same time this is a major news story due to the race angle.If you're trying to argue that cops overstep from time to time, you probably won't get much argument. Is that the main point you are trying to hammer home here?You tell me. Between the two of us, you're the one who brought up racism.Secondly, if the dude was being a jerk about the situation, I can understand a cop abusing his power to bring the guy down to the station, But where does abuse of power = racism?Sounds fair to me as well. But it's not the cop's job to dole out fair punishment (or any kind of punishment). It's the cop's job to enforce the law.This guy lost a couple hours of hours of his life for being a ####. Sounds like a fair trade off.
Great, the Professor would not make a good cop either. Really not the point. For everyone's sake Im glad the Professor is not a cop and if more people that shouldn't be cops were not cops, the police would get a lot more respect.Double or nothing says it would be of a white man.I'll bet you one dollar that if we took the professor out of his swanky house and put him through police academy training, that he'd make an unlawful arrest within 6 months.We probably would have been jealous at the swanky free house Dr. Gates gets from Hahvahd.I wonder how opinions would change on both sides if we had video of this encounter.
It's a legit point. You've got enough people here saying the Professor was out of line (and he was) but let's give some equal time to the police.If you're trying to argue that cops overstep from time to time, you probably won't get much argument. Is that the main point you are trying to hammer home here?
is it good for the local police force to be verbally berated in front of the community they are supposed to protect?Abuse of power should not be taken lightly. I know that police have a stressful job but I really want to know that they are capable of making good judgement calls too. You can't defend the cop here either. This is exactly the kind of BS that you want a cop to be smart enough to back away but too many would make this same decision every time. This does not make the police look good either and I do think the Cambridge police should at least be addressing that much.
They probably both could have handled the situation better. However when I read that this cop is well respected and teaches a class on racial profiling, and at the same time the professor has made a deal to make money off this situation...I tend to think one had a reason to make this situation a bigger deal than what was warrented.It's a legit point. You've got enough people here saying the Professor was out of line (and he was) but let's give some equal time to the police.If you're trying to argue that cops overstep from time to time, you probably won't get much argument. Is that the main point you are trying to hammer home here?
Not good at all but he still has to walk away. There are many different ways the cop could have handled this without arresting the guy. A good police should know when flexing the muscle is warranted and when it is not, and should be smart enough to diffuse the situation another way.is it good for the local police force to be verbally berated in front of the community they are supposed to protect?Abuse of power should not be taken lightly. I know that police have a stressful job but I really want to know that they are capable of making good judgement calls too. You can't defend the cop here either. This is exactly the kind of BS that you want a cop to be smart enough to back away but too many would make this same decision every time. This does not make the police look good either and I do think the Cambridge police should at least be addressing that much.
And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...So do you propose that cops should enter situations in a more sensitive manner if the suspect is a minority?Not good at all but he still has to walk away. There are many different ways the cop could have handled this without arresting the guy. A good police should know when flexing the muscle is warranted and when it is not, and should be smart enough to diffuse the situation another way.is it good for the local police force to be verbally berated in front of the community they are supposed to protect?Abuse of power should not be taken lightly. I know that police have a stressful job but I really want to know that they are capable of making good judgement calls too. You can't defend the cop here either. This is exactly the kind of BS that you want a cop to be smart enough to back away but too many would make this same decision every time. This does not make the police look good either and I do think the Cambridge police should at least be addressing that much.
I've never mentioned the race angle; I don't think it's worth discussing. It's just mind-reading. Without any evidence that the cop is a racist (and I haven't seen any), I'll happily give him the benefit of the doubt. So, no, to me, this has nothing to do with racism.To me, this is about a cop making an improper arrest just because he has the power to do so. If Gates calls me a bunch of names, I can't cuff him. Or I guess I could cuff him, but I wouldn't get away with it. The cop can get away with it, which is why he did it. That's an abuse of power.Isn't that what this is all about? I won't deny the cop overstepped his bounds, but at the same time this is a major news story due to the race angle.If you're trying to argue that cops overstep from time to time, you probably won't get much argument. Is that the main point you are trying to hammer home here?You tell me. Between the two of us, you're the one who brought up racism.Secondly, if the dude was being a jerk about the situation, I can understand a cop abusing his power to bring the guy down to the station, But where does abuse of power = racism?Sounds fair to me as well. But it's not the cop's job to dole out fair punishment (or any kind of punishment). It's the cop's job to enforce the law.This guy lost a couple hours of hours of his life for being a ####. Sounds like a fair trade off.
It depends on whether he's yelling stuff that's calculated to provoke violence.In the Gates case, that didn't seem to be a realistic concern. Also, there was no report that any of the bystanders were disturbed or upset by Gates' ranting. It appears that nobody made a complaint.The only person the rant seemed to agitate was the cop. That's not disorderly conduct (especially since cops aren't supposed to be agitated as easily as civilians).Let's instead move it to a high rise in Cabrini Green, Chicago. Say two white cops had been called to investigate a report of an intruder on the sixth floor of the high rise. They go to the door and knock. They hear someone inside and order the person out. Everything happens exactly the same. Including alleging racial bias on the part of the cops in a loud voice. But, instead of the cops being in the front yard with a few passers-by on the street overhearing the rant, we have two cops in a hallway with people coming out of their apartments. People who presumably share the same beliefs about cops as Mr. Gates.Cops have been killed in those high rises. Would the cops have been wrong to arrest the man under those circumstances?
The arrest was borderline, but I don't think I'd call it an abuse of power, if this happened as the cop says it did (which may not be the case).With what cops go through, if a guy is following him as he's trying to leave, being verbally abusive, and will not stop with repeated, respectful warnings of getting cuffed, I've got no problem with the cop cuffing him just to get the situation back under control. It sounds like Gates wasn't going to let this situation end until it came to this.If this didn't happen the way the cop described, you could say the cop was out of order or abused his power.If it did, hard to fault the cop too much.Abuse of power should not be taken lightly. I know that police have a stressful job but I really want to know that they are capable of making good judgement calls too. You can't defend the cop here either. This is exactly the kind of BS that you want a cop to be smart enough to back away but too many would make this same decision every time. This does not make the police look good either and I do think the Cambridge police should at least be addressing that much.
I get what your saying, but in reality, the police have to draw the line somewhere. There is a proper and inproper way to act in front of a police officer. This Officer decided that "yo mamma" crossed the line. I can't blame him for that. Are you under the impression that as long as its verbal its ok?I've never mentioned the race angle; I don't think it's worth discussing. It's just mind-reading. Without any evidence that the cop is a racist (and I haven't seen any), I'll happily give him the benefit of the doubt. So, no, to me, this has nothing to do with racism.To me, this is about a cop making an improper arrest just because he has the power to do so. If Gates calls me a bunch of names, I can't cuff him. Or I guess I could cuff him, but I wouldn't get away from it. The cop can get away with it, which is why he did it. That's an abuse of power.Isn't that what this is all about? I won't deny the cop overstepped his bounds, but at the same time this is a major news story due to the race angle.If you're trying to argue that cops overstep from time to time, you probably won't get much argument. Is that the main point you are trying to hammer home here?You tell me. Between the two of us, you're the one who brought up racism.Secondly, if the dude was being a jerk about the situation, I can understand a cop abusing his power to bring the guy down to the station, But where does abuse of power = racism?Sounds fair to me as well. But it's not the cop's job to dole out fair punishment (or any kind of punishment). It's the cop's job to enforce the law.This guy lost a couple hours of hours of his life for being a ####. Sounds like a fair trade off.
It's not the worst thing in the world, but it's worth pointing out when it happens.
If the dude was white, with a white chauffeur, wearing a sport coat and a limo parked out front, I'm guessing this would have gone down differently.And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...Not good at all but he still has to walk away. There are many different ways the cop could have handled this without arresting the guy. A good police should know when flexing the muscle is warranted and when it is not, and should be smart enough to diffuse the situation another way.is it good for the local police force to be verbally berated in front of the community they are supposed to protect?Abuse of power should not be taken lightly. I know that police have a stressful job but I really want to know that they are capable of making good judgement calls too. You can't defend the cop here either. This is exactly the kind of BS that you want a cop to be smart enough to back away but too many would make this same decision every time. This does not make the police look good either and I do think the Cambridge police should at least be addressing that much.
You are trying to fight an argument from a "letter of the law" point of view and not seeing the application of law.I lived in Massachusetts for 39 years. I was arrested twice for disorderly conduct in my early 20's.I don't think the bolded part is true. I think the police all knew that Gates was innocent of criminally disorderly conduct.You talking in circles here. In your opinion what he did was not disorderly. In quite a number of other individuals (including the police on hand) opinions, he was disorderly. I think I'll side with the police's opinion on this because a). they were there and neither you or I were & b). this is what they do day in and day out.Maurile Tremblay said:Being belligerent is not illegal.
I'm not saying that he's factually innocent of disorderly conduct because the chargers were dropped. I'm saying he's factually innocent because he didn't do anything that even arguably amounted to criminal conduct under MA law. (Which is why the charges were dropped.)No, of course it isn't.'You are going to pay for this' is not inciteful or a physical threat?That he'd issue a negative press release, or possibly file a civil suit.What would any reasonable individual believe a man who was handcuffed shouting that phrase would mean?
Between the police and homeowner? Please go on...If the dude was white, with a white chauffeur, wearing a sport coat and a limo parked out front, I'm guessing this would have gone down differently.And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...Not good at all but he still has to walk away. There are many different ways the cop could have handled this without arresting the guy. A good police should know when flexing the muscle is warranted and when it is not, and should be smart enough to diffuse the situation another way.is it good for the local police force to be verbally berated in front of the community they are supposed to protect?Abuse of power should not be taken lightly. I know that police have a stressful job but I really want to know that they are capable of making good judgement calls too. You can't defend the cop here either. This is exactly the kind of BS that you want a cop to be smart enough to back away but too many would make this same decision every time. This does not make the police look good either and I do think the Cambridge police should at least be addressing that much.
His only point is that as long as it's legal it's ok. Otherwise the officer acted inappropriately in arresting Gates.Not all that hard to follow really.Are you under the impression that as long as its verbal its ok?
in that hypothetical scenario, there's probably a pretty good chance the cops never get called in the first place.Between the police and homeowner? Please go on...If the dude was white, with a white chauffeur, wearing a sport coat and a limo parked out front, I'm guessing this would have gone down differently.And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...
But the law doesn't require him to intend to provoke violence.Under Mass. law a disorderly person is defined as one who:It depends on whether he's yelling stuff that's calculated to provoke violence.In the Gates case, that didn't seem to be a realistic concern. Also, there was no report that any of the bystanders were disturbed or upset by Gates' ranting. It appears that nobody made a complaint.Let's instead move it to a high rise in Cabrini Green, Chicago. Say two white cops had been called to investigate a report of an intruder on the sixth floor of the high rise. They go to the door and knock. They hear someone inside and order the person out. Everything happens exactly the same. Including alleging racial bias on the part of the cops in a loud voice. But, instead of the cops being in the front yard with a few passers-by on the street overhearing the rant, we have two cops in a hallway with people coming out of their apartments. People who presumably share the same beliefs about cops as Mr. Gates.
Cops have been killed in those high rises. Would the cops have been wrong to arrest the man under those circumstances?
The only person the rant seemed to agitate was the cop. That's not disorderly conduct (especially since cops aren't supposed to be agitated as easily as civilians).
If I am reading Maurile's responses correctly, then am I to conclude that one can say whatever one wants to the police as long as I don't physically threaten them? Is it really this clear cut? Could I insult his wife, his mother, his sexual orientation, his religion, his appearance, etc. as loudly as I want to but refrain from actually threatening him bodily harm and still be on the right side of the law? Honest question. If this is the case it surprises me.It depends on whether he's yelling stuff that's calculated to provoke violence.In the Gates case, that didn't seem to be a realistic concern. Also, there was no report that any of the bystanders were disturbed or upset by Gates' ranting. It appears that nobody made a complaint.The only person the rant seemed to agitate was the cop. That's not disorderly conduct (especially since cops aren't supposed to be agitated as easily as civilians).Let's instead move it to a high rise in Cabrini Green, Chicago. Say two white cops had been called to investigate a report of an intruder on the sixth floor of the high rise. They go to the door and knock. They hear someone inside and order the person out. Everything happens exactly the same. Including alleging racial bias on the part of the cops in a loud voice. But, instead of the cops being in the front yard with a few passers-by on the street overhearing the rant, we have two cops in a hallway with people coming out of their apartments. People who presumably share the same beliefs about cops as Mr. Gates.Cops have been killed in those high rises. Would the cops have been wrong to arrest the man under those circumstances?
Yes. If I've already entered my own house through the back door with my own set of keys and I show the cops my identification I expect that the officer leaves without a peep and no more questions asked. I had this happen to me a few months ago. My alarm went off in my condo, the cops showed up and asked me if everything was okay. I was not asked for an ID, I just told them I accidentally set the alarm off.Between the police and homeowner? Please go on...If the dude was white, with a white chauffeur, wearing a sport coat and a limo parked out front, I'm guessing this would have gone down differently.And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...
so I'm asking if verbally assulting an officer is legal. Which is probably boardline. He was brought down, and no charges were pressed. how can anyone think this professor was mistreated?His only point is that as long as it's legal it's ok. Otherwise the officer acted inappropriately in arresting Gates.Not all that hard to follow really.Are you under the impression that as long as its verbal its ok?
Especially since he has been barking up the wrong tree this whole thread.MT is one patient man.
Its not the case.If I am reading Maurile's responses correctly, then am I to conclude that one can say whatever one wants to the police as long as I don't physically threaten them? Is it really this clear cut? Could I insult his wife, his mother, his sexual orientation, his religion, his appearance, etc. as loudly as I want to but refrain from actually threatening him bodily harm and still be on the right side of the law? Honest question. If this is the case it surprises me.It depends on whether he's yelling stuff that's calculated to provoke violence.In the Gates case, that didn't seem to be a realistic concern. Also, there was no report that any of the bystanders were disturbed or upset by Gates' ranting. It appears that nobody made a complaint.The only person the rant seemed to agitate was the cop. That's not disorderly conduct (especially since cops aren't supposed to be agitated as easily as civilians).Let's instead move it to a high rise in Cabrini Green, Chicago. Say two white cops had been called to investigate a report of an intruder on the sixth floor of the high rise. They go to the door and knock. They hear someone inside and order the person out. Everything happens exactly the same. Including alleging racial bias on the part of the cops in a loud voice. But, instead of the cops being in the front yard with a few passers-by on the street overhearing the rant, we have two cops in a hallway with people coming out of their apartments. People who presumably share the same beliefs about cops as Mr. Gates.Cops have been killed in those high rises. Would the cops have been wrong to arrest the man under those circumstances?
No, the point is that white people are NOT the most racist people in America right now, and it's not even close. They come in 4th, easily.Great, the Professor would not make a good cop either. Really not the point. For everyone's sake Im glad the Professor is not a cop and if more people that shouldn't be cops were not cops, the police would get a lot more respect.Double or nothing says it would be of a white man.I'll bet you one dollar that if we took the professor out of his swanky house and put him through police academy training, that he'd make an unlawful arrest within 6 months.We probably would have been jealous at the swanky free house Dr. Gates gets from Hahvahd.I wonder how opinions would change on both sides if we had video of this encounter.
In what way?Especially since he has been barking up the wrong tree this whole thread.MT is one patient man.
from the line of questioning, it seems like the officer did accept the fact that the professor was the homeowner. What the officer could not confirm is if someone had broken into the house prior to the homeowner's arrival, which is why he requested the homeowner to exit the house. At that point, the homeowner was the one who pushed the situation to a point where the cop had to bring out the cuffs.Yes. If I've already entered my own house through the back door with my own set of keys and I show the cops my identification I expect that the officer leaves without a peep and no more questions asked. I had this happen to me a few months ago. My alarm went off in my condo, the cops showed up and asked me if everything was okay. I was not asked for an ID, I just told them I accidentally set the alarm off.Between the police and homeowner? Please go on...If the dude was white, with a white chauffeur, wearing a sport coat and a limo parked out front, I'm guessing this would have gone down differently.And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...
I appreciate the kind words, Pat. Somehow, though, I have a feeling you didn't read everything I posted in this thread. If you want, go back and read some more. You might even agree with some of it.TIM YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY OUT OF YOUR MIND IN THIS THREAD. I THOUGHT YOU COULDNT BEAT THE TEDDY KENNEDY THREAT BUT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
really?I love threads like these.No, the point is that white people are NOT the most racist people in America right now, and it's not even close. They come in 4th, easily.Great, the Professor would not make a good cop either. Really not the point. For everyone's sake Im glad the Professor is not a cop and if more people that shouldn't be cops were not cops, the police would get a lot more respect.Double or nothing says it would be of a white man.I'll bet you one dollar that if we took the professor out of his swanky house and put him through police academy training, that he'd make an unlawful arrest within 6 months.We probably would have been jealous at the swanky free house Dr. Gates gets from Hahvahd.
I bet that thought is what's fueling much of the outrage. It has to be. That's only place in this timeline of events where racial profiling could even fit (if racial profiling applies to citizens).Too bad it's the cop who's career is on the line.The cop's got to be the scapegoat to make a racial issue out of this. Whether the lady would've called the cops on white men or not, it was reasonable for her to make that call. Can't get any mileage out of calling her out. (Wouldn't make for a very compelling PBS documentary either).in that hypothetical scenario, there's probably a pretty good chance the cops never get called in the first place.Between the police and homeowner? Please go on...If the dude was white, with a white chauffeur, wearing a sport coat and a limo parked out front, I'm guessing this would have gone down differently.And yet if this dude was white, no one would care...
Please post the list. TIANo, the point is that white people are NOT the most racist people in America right now, and it's not even close. They come in 4th, easily.
I've been in a similar situation and didn't get arrested even though I was a doosh to the cops. It just depends on the cop. This cop probably did follow all the rules and I don't think he acted unlawfully. But this is America and you should not reasonably expect to be arrested in your own home due to a misunderstanding or a clash of egos.Exactly.When you are a doosh to most people, you can expect them to be a doosh back to you, although probably non-violently.I think most people here would agree that the main reason he was arrested was for being a doosh to the cop in front of a crowd and the officer's peers. When you disobey a police officer and then top it off by disrespecting him loudly in front of a gathering crowd, you should expect shoddy treatment. And if the officer is threatening to arrest you while you are doing this, it is safe to assume that he will follow thru on his threat.
If you are a doosh to a thug or to certain cops (but not all cops), you can be expected to have force used against you -- unlawfully.
That means it's particularly stupid to be a doosh to a thug or a cop. But it doesn't mean that the thug or the cop should be free from criticism.
His career is not on the line. He's going to get investigated because this thing blew up so much but nothing is going to come of it. He's not even going to have to admit that he overstepped here.Too bad it's the cop who's career is on the line.
Are Asian and Pacific Rim different? Or can they be the Olsen Twins of my list?Please pst the list. TIANo, the point is that white people are NOT the most racist people in America right now, and it's not even close. They come in 4th, easily.
Because he didn't.His career is not on the line. He's going to get investigated because this thing blew up so much but nothing is going to come of it. He's not even going to have to admit that he overstepped here.Too bad it's the cop who's career is on the line.
Well I'm glad we got to the point but we should really save this for another thread.No, the point is that white people are NOT the most racist people in America right now, and it's not even close. They come in 4th, easily.