it doesn't. 0 games is what will happen
Maybe he's a mutant, and his body produces THC. That's his power.maybe the DUI was weed and the nfl has those test results
Ten games totally screws the Browns. Gordon gets an accrued season, so he becomes a free agent a year earlier than if his suspension were 11 games, but playing in only six games isn't really enough to help the team all that much.
So that's probably the highest number the NFLPA was okay with then?Ten games totally screws the Browns. Gordon gets an accrued season, so he becomes a free agent a year earlier than if his suspension were 11 games, but playing in only six games isn't really enough to help the team all that much.
WTF.Its a good thing women reporting on football has always been terrible in every aspect.
You disagree?WTF.Its a good thing women reporting on football has always been terrible in every aspect.
that makes some senseSo that's probably the highest number the NFLPA was okay with then?Ten games totally screws the Browns. Gordon gets an accrued season, so he becomes a free agent a year earlier than if his suspension were 11 games, but playing in only six games isn't really enough to help the team all that much.
What are you Ray Rice's butler?You disagree?WTF.Its a good thing women reporting on football has always been terrible in every aspect.
Listening to women talk football makes me want to ray rice myself (slamming my head on a hand rail)What are you Ray Rice's butler?You disagree?WTF.Its a good thing women reporting on football has always been terrible in every aspect.
I've thought about it more, and I'm sticking to this interpretation until I read the actual language. Seems right to me.Okay... here's my thought on this:
If you tested positive OR you were disciplined after March 11, the standards are retroactively applied.
He tested positive March 5 - so that standard isn't retroactively applied.
But he was disciplined after that - so the discipline standard IS retroactively applied, and he gets 10 games for his 4th violation instead of a year.
yesYou disagree?WTF.Its a good thing women reporting on football has always been terrible in every aspect.
JG has to be one of the unluckiest guys aroundOkay... here's my thought on this:
If you tested positive OR you were disciplined after March 11, the standards are retroactively applied.
He tested positive March 5 - so that standard isn't retroactively applied.
But he was disciplined after that - so the discipline standard IS retroactively applied, and he gets 10 games for his 4th violation instead of a year.
Keep in mind that nearly everything being reported is wrong. There may be no truth to ten games.
She's piggybacking off of what Clayton/ESPN is saying on T.V. Schefter says 8, Clayton says 10, Feely possibly implied even less than 8.....ugh.Her information is way to specific to be false. I'm going with Mary Kay on this.
Maurile agrees with me. Lead pipe lock now.Keep in mind that nearly everything being reported is wrong. There may be no truth to ten games.
But it absolutely would make sense if the new policy gives a 10-game suspension for a fourth violation.
The ambiguous quote from Florio above says: "All players who tested positive or who were otherwise disciplined or placed into the drug or PED program will have retroactivity, with the new rules being reapplied as of March 11, 2014."
That could mean that anything (tests, suspensions, etc.) that happened on or after March 11 will be handled under the new policy rather than the old one.
Gordon's positive test happened before March 11, so it's still positive.
His suspension, however, happened after March 11, so instead of being suspended for a full year (under the old policy), he'll be suspended for only ten games (under the new policy).
i fully anticipate something going wrong and no vote and we are still here next week wonderingROFL...I agree now...best thread EVER@MaryKayCabot 1m
#Browns Gordon is getting no special treatment, lg source says. Just going by terms of the new policy. (4th violation equals 10 games).
This makes a lot of sense, and would explain the 10 game ban scenario. It would also make sense of MaryKay's tweet.Okay... here's my thought on this:
If you tested positive OR you were disciplined after March 11, the standards are retroactively applied.
He tested positive March 5 - so that standard isn't retroactively applied.
But he was disciplined after that - so the discipline standard IS retroactively applied, and he gets 10 games for his 4th violation instead of a year.
This does make sense for sure.Keep in mind that nearly everything being reported is wrong. There may be no truth to ten games.
But it absolutely would make sense if the new policy gives a 10-game suspension for a fourth violation.
The ambiguous quote from Florio above says: "All players who tested positive or who were otherwise disciplined or placed into the drug or PED program will have retroactivity, with the new rules being reapplied as of March 11, 2014."
That could mean that anything (tests, suspensions, etc.) that happened on or after March 11 will be handled under the new policy rather than the old one.
Gordon's positive test happened before March 11, so it's still positive.
His suspension, however, happened after March 11, so instead of being suspended for a full year (under the old policy), he'll be suspended for only ten games (under the new policy).
barely guilty is guiltyJG has to be one of the unluckiest guys aroundOkay... here's my thought on this:
If you tested positive OR you were disciplined after March 11, the standards are retroactively applied.
He tested positive March 5 - so that standard isn't retroactively applied.
But he was disciplined after that - so the discipline standard IS retroactively applied, and he gets 10 games for his 4th violation instead of a year.
goes 1 ng over the old limit, blows a .09 in his DUI, misses amnesty by 6 days, was drafted by the Browns
it's a quadruple whammy
I hear Josh Gordon has some free time.WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?!!?!? SOMEBODY HOLD ME!!!!!!
If true, I hope the player reps vote down the proposal. Feely correctly noted it's unfair to Gordon and others who failed tests prior to March 11.I've thought about it more, and I'm sticking to this interpretation until I read the actual language. Seems right to me.Okay... here's my thought on this:
If you tested positive OR you were disciplined after March 11, the standards are retroactively applied.
He tested positive March 5 - so that standard isn't retroactively applied.
But he was disciplined after that - so the discipline standard IS retroactively applied, and he gets 10 games for his 4th violation instead of a year.
According to the GM at the Sarchione Auto Group, time isI hear Josh Gordon has some free time.WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?!!?!? SOMEBODY HOLD ME!!!!!!
Really? Lock it up? This is just getting started.Sounds like its 10 games fellas. Lock it up.