Noone is expecting Michaels to replicate Murray's numbers. Cmon man.
No. Some are expecting better.....
On a per game basis I am if he ever gets the same amount of touches. I think he's better than Murray.
I asked this before but nobody was willing to answer......
Based on what exactly?????
I would think reasonable expectations would be he could be the RB1 in Dallas, with Randle as a COP and Dunbar as the 3rd down RB.
It's good work, if you can get it.
Yeah, I get that the RB1 job in Dallas has plenty of FF potential. And it looks like C-Mike will get his shot sooner rather than later.
I'm just trying to figure out what it is about him that is 115 page thread, "better than than DeMarco Murray," worthy? I just don't see it. Not saying he doesnt have that type of talent, I just havent seen it yet. So its an honest question.
I asked for highlights and analysis and the only response I got was a youtube clip I'd already seen over half of which was him rapping, showing off his gold chain, and making people miss in a half speed practice drill. I've watched some of his cutups from A&M and have been relatively unimpressed. Again, he could very well have that type of talent. He was the 3rd rated RB in the country coming out of HS.
But I would just love to see a little more analysis on why people are SO high on Michael. Could be buried somewhere in the previous 110 pages but a little more substance other than whats been on the last 30 pages or so would be great.