karmarooster
Footballguy
Yeah that's why I didn't stack with Maclin, but have him in other games. There's $100 left over so could easily upgrade JMatt to Maclin, but I don't really want any more exposure there. Maclin and Jones are higher up on the value chart than Matthews, and since I don't want the stack, Jones might be the play. Just hope they don't stick him on Sherman. Typically GB puts a 3rd WR on Sherman every time and ignores him (has been Adams role in the past). I would think they would do the same with Ty, and let Jones work the other side of the field with Cobb in the slot doing his thing.I keep coming to the smith, charles, santos combo too, also some with maclin. My problem is having that much exposure to 1 game. The bears are horrible, but if the defense decides to show up it would kill your LU.Working on a high-floor, low-variance lineup strictly for cash games and the survivor. Think I've put together something pretty solid:
Smith
Charles
Forsett (alt Freeman)
Edelman
Fitz
Matthews (alt Jones)
Witten
Santos
Ravens
Mainly built on the Smith-Charles-Santos combo, which should result in points for any kind of KC score other than a Knile Davis TD followed by an unsuccessful 2 pt attempt. Other guys are high volume target machines with a lean to PPR volume rather than TDs (Edelman, Matthews, Witten). Would love to hear anyone 'tear this one down' if you could point out a weakness.
Sounds like Bell is the more popular pick over Charles? Bell looks to be at about 36% in a large Double Up versus Charles at 20%.
Gracias! I saw that blurb on RW about Forsett too. Both him and Freeman are pretty safe solid mid range options playing at home. Freeman has a tougher rushing matchup, and might cede a few carries to Coleman (if active), but has been hot and the offense figures to produce. Forsett OTOH has the backfield to himself, in a softer matchup, but yeah CLE should try to force them to throw. Forsett hasn't had the high floor I would've expected due to receptions. Not sure which I feel more confident about, on balance.My attempt... Forsett hit value once in 4 weeks, and it took 27 carries. Twice in his last 7 games. He doesn't score tds. CLE will be putting like a million guys in the box as Forsett is the only weapon. Last week Matthews got 30% target share against one of the worst passing defenses and he put up 6.7 points. 7.9 the week before that. Nick Foles is literally the bottom ranked qb this week. I think there's a 0% chance Witten hits value without a td and Belichick isn't going to let that happen. The Ravens D is just bad and the Browns are on a roll. McCown with 2 straight 350 and 2 outings.Working on a high-floor, low-variance lineup strictly for cash games and the survivor. Think I've put together something pretty solid:
Smith
Charles
Forsett (alt Freeman)
Edelman
Fitz
Matthews (alt Jones)
Witten
Santos
Ravens
Not sure your point re Foles, did you mean Bradford? Matthews did have a crap game last week at 6.5. Could easily pivot off him to Jones.
On Witten, his season low was 7.7 points, but think he's a pretty safe high floor in garbage time, not expecting a TD but something like 5-6 for 50-60 yards. Other options here are Gates (great MNF matchup, but first game back and splitting with Green, so not really what I want for cash/survivor), or Clay who is another high floor option at the exact same price (season low of 6.3 in week 1, after that 9.4 against NE). A little unclear with Watkins. Could easily turn to:
Smith
Charles, Freeman
Edelman, Fitz, Jones
Clay, Bryant, NYG
Last edited by a moderator: