bicycle_seat_sniffer
Smells like chicken
wire is bare
I dropped Polk last week in a large league and now have to start McCluster### due to byes.giveup said:Foster owner. :( Blue and Polk are both available. Which one? Darkwa... Wow. Nice runs. Anything on him or was that just a fluke spell with Jennings/Vereen/Williams sucking?
will have to check, but he was grabbed in a couple small leagues late last week.BobbyLayne said:Ebron
I'm not dropping Hankerson yet, Atlanta's schedule is pretty favorable.I'm taking a flier on Amendola. I have zero expectations, but he has 100 or a TD in three of the last four. The last spot on my bench was Hankerson, who can't stay healthy and is playing in a fairly stagnant offense.
Wat?Edelman getting a lot of respect from defenses and the running game was sluggish. Grabbed him in a 14 man league where there was on the wire and it paid off.
Pretty sure he was referring to Ammendola.Wat?Edelman getting a lot of respect from defenses and the running game was sluggish. Grabbed him in a 14 man league where there was on the wire and it paid off.
How in the hell is a WR1 or at the LEAST a WR2 on the wire?!
Washington does seem interesting if Shorts remains out - 16 targets yesterday. There's going to be lots of passing, with or without Foster. Hopkins is a target monster, but there might be enough to support two receivers.Washington might still be out there.
Yeah. Garbage time seems to start early for the Texans. Washington is reliable but not exciting, certainly a savvy enough veteran to know what to do against soft prevent defenses. Hoyer might be good for some spot starts as well.Washington does seem interesting if Shorts remains out - 16 targets yesterday. There's going to be lots of passing, with or without Foster. Hopkins is a target monster, but there might be enough to support two receivers.Washington might still be out there.
Nopei have the #1 waiver and McFadden is sitting there. You guys think he's going to remain atop the Cowboys backfield ROS? Personally I have no idea what's going to happen week to week and wonder if I really want to get involved. Didn't see this coming.
They're saying Randle might be out a while.Nopei have the #1 waiver and McFadden is sitting there. You guys think he's going to remain atop the Cowboys backfield ROS? Personally I have no idea what's going to happen week to week and wonder if I really want to get involved. Didn't see this coming.
First off this is McFadden we are talking about. More carries = more risk getting hurt.
I think some like Randall.
As for CMike apparently nobody in two franchises likes him.
Go for it.. but I don't think any situation involving McFadden is solid.They're saying Randle might be out a while.Nopei have the #1 waiver and McFadden is sitting there. You guys think he's going to remain atop the Cowboys backfield ROS? Personally I have no idea what's going to happen week to week and wonder if I really want to get involved. Didn't see this coming.
First off this is McFadden we are talking about. More carries = more risk getting hurt.
I think some like Randall.
As for CMike apparently nobody in two franchises likes him.
If I can get 4-5 weeks of solid RB2 production out of my waiver-wire pickup, I'll be more than happy.
NFL Network's Rand Getlin reports Joseph Randle is dealing with an oblique injury.
Randle struggled with an oblique injury in training camp which forced him to miss the first preseason game. Getlin reports the Cowboys expect him to "miss some time." Darren McFadden dominated snaps on his way to 152 yards and a touchdown against the Giants Sunday. McFadden will be an RB2 even in a tough matchup against Seattle this week if Randle is forced to sit.
Source: Rand Getlin on Twitter
Oct 26 - 12:05 PM
Already did, got him in both leagues and decided to start him in PPR over that bum Abdullah yesterdayGo for it.. but I don't think any situation involving McFadden is solid.They're saying Randle might be out a while.Nopei have the #1 waiver and McFadden is sitting there. You guys think he's going to remain atop the Cowboys backfield ROS? Personally I have no idea what's going to happen week to week and wonder if I really want to get involved. Didn't see this coming.
First off this is McFadden we are talking about. More carries = more risk getting hurt.
I think some like Randall.
As for CMike apparently nobody in two franchises likes him.
If I can get 4-5 weeks of solid RB2 production out of my waiver-wire pickup, I'll be more than happy.
NFL Network's Rand Getlin reports Joseph Randle is dealing with an oblique injury.
Randle struggled with an oblique injury in training camp which forced him to miss the first preseason game. Getlin reports the Cowboys expect him to "miss some time." Darren McFadden dominated snaps on his way to 152 yards and a touchdown against the Giants Sunday. McFadden will be an RB2 even in a tough matchup against Seattle this week if Randle is forced to sit.
Source: Rand Getlin on Twitter
Oct 26 - 12:05 PM
Cmike is the most talented. Check your SPARQ scores bruh.Already did, got him in both leagues and decided to start him in PPR over that bum Abdullah yesterdayGo for it.. but I don't think any situation involving McFadden is solid.They're saying Randle might be out a while.Nopei have the #1 waiver and McFadden is sitting there. You guys think he's going to remain atop the Cowboys backfield ROS? Personally I have no idea what's going to happen week to week and wonder if I really want to get involved. Didn't see this coming.
First off this is McFadden we are talking about. More carries = more risk getting hurt.
I think some like Randall.
As for CMike apparently nobody in two franchises likes him.
If I can get 4-5 weeks of solid RB2 production out of my waiver-wire pickup, I'll be more than happy.
NFL Network's Rand Getlin reports Joseph Randle is dealing with an oblique injury.
Randle struggled with an oblique injury in training camp which forced him to miss the first preseason game. Getlin reports the Cowboys expect him to "miss some time." Darren McFadden dominated snaps on his way to 152 yards and a touchdown against the Giants Sunday. McFadden will be an RB2 even in a tough matchup against Seattle this week if Randle is forced to sit.
Source: Rand Getlin on Twitter
Oct 26 - 12:05 PM
He's the most talented RB on a team
Remember when they said Brian Bosworth and Tony Mandarich were both going to dominate football for a decade based on measurables? How'd that turn out?Cmike is the most talented. Check your SPARQ scores bruh.He's the most talented RB on a team
Ditto for me. I have always dropped my kicker in the past during a bye week. This year was the first time I carried 2 kickers just to cover a bye.I have McManus, and it's the first time in 8 years that I've ever rostered 2 kickers to keep from having to drop one on a bye. That kid can bomb the long FG and is worth a top waiver claim if he's out there.Zow said:James Starks.
See if McManus or Crosby got dropped.
Doesn't matter what the coaches think. This is Darren mcFadden we are talking about! He will be hurt before we know it and Michael will get his shot.Remember when they said Brian Bosworth and Tony Mandarich were both going to dominate football for a decade based on measurables? How'd that turn out?Cmike is the most talented. Check your SPARQ scores bruh.He's the most talented RB on a team
I don't care which one is more "talented." I'd rather have McFadden than C-Mike at the moment.
SPARQ scores, or any other score don't superseded opportunity and on-field performance.
Remember when they said Brian Bosworth and Tony Mandarich were both going to dominate football for a decade based on measurables? How'd that turn out?Cmike is the most talented. Check your SPARQ scores bruh.He's the most talented RB on a team
I don't care which one is more "talented." I'd rather have McFadden than C-Mike at the moment.
SPARQ scores, or any other score don't superseded opportunity and on-field performance.
Keep searching for that white whale...Doesn't matter what the coaches think. This is Darren mcFadden we are talking about! He will be hurt before we know it and Michael will get his shot.Remember when they said Brian Bosworth and Tony Mandarich were both going to dominate football for a decade based on measurables? How'd that turn out?Cmike is the most talented. Check your SPARQ scores bruh.He's the most talented RB on a team
I don't care which one is more "talented." I'd rather have McFadden than C-Mike at the moment.
SPARQ scores, or any other score don't superseded opportunity and on-field performance.
i think i'd take him as a flier.I think LaFell is a better pick up than Amendola despite all of the drops.
Sombody "up there" wants Michael to have his shot. Dallas RBs are dropping like flies, and McFadden is made of glass.Doesn't matter what the coaches think. This is Darren mcFadden we are talking about! He will be hurt before we know it and Michael will get his shot.Remember when they said Brian Bosworth and Tony Mandarich were both going to dominate football for a decade based on measurables? How'd that turn out?Cmike is the most talented. Check your SPARQ scores bruh.He's the most talented RB on a team
I don't care which one is more "talented." I'd rather have McFadden than C-Mike at the moment.
SPARQ scores, or any other score don't superseded opportunity and on-field performance.
i think Amendola only had a good game against the jets because of the hit on edelman. If you rematch the game he got crushed and wasn't the same. Dropped a touchdown pass that drive that was easy and also had another drop that i believe was on third down. I wouldn't be surprised if he was concussed but just never came of the field to get tested as he popped right back up. Gotta love this guys heart in the game but i wouldn't put much stock into amendolaIf Lewis is out I think Danny A. becomes a decent play again. The NE game plan is variable but the pass game seems to work on a triangle, there has to be a third corner there. With Lewis out it appears to be Amendola.
laflier would have been perfect there.i think i'd take him as a flier.I think LaFell is a better pick up than Amendola despite all of the drops.
LaFAillaflier would have been perfect there.i think i'd take him as a flier.I think LaFell is a better pick up than Amendola despite all of the drops.
What about the week before, when he had 105? Or two weeks before that, when he had 36 and a TD?i think Amendola only had a good game against the jets because of the hit on edelman. If you rematch the game he got crushed and wasn't the same. Dropped a touchdown pass that drive that was easy and also had another drop that i believe was on third down. I wouldn't be surprised if he was concussed but just never came of the field to get tested as he popped right back up. Gotta love this guys heart in the game but i wouldn't put much stock into amendolaIf Lewis is out I think Danny A. becomes a decent play again. The NE game plan is variable but the pass game seems to work on a triangle, there has to be a third corner there. With Lewis out it appears to be Amendola.
I do not believe this would cause the s###storm some might think. Rice has served his punishment and be contrite about the situation. I look at the Hardy situation, which was just as egregious, as the possible public reaction to signing Rice.Are you implying that Houston would sign him? Because yeah, when your season is already going down the toilet and your coach's seat is heating up, why not voluntarily take on a PR s###storm at the same time?seahawk 17 said:Ray Rice
Wondering if I should drop Tucker and make a Crosby claim.Ditto for me. I have always dropped my kicker in the past during a bye week. This year was the first time I carried 2 kickers just to cover a bye.I have McManus, and it's the first time in 8 years that I've ever rostered 2 kickers to keep from having to drop one on a bye. That kid can bomb the long FG and is worth a top waiver claim if he's out there.Zow said:James Starks.
See if McManus or Crosby got dropped.
I shouldn't have bothered because my bye week fill-in only had 2 points. Wasn't worth the roster spot.
Seems likely. I'm gonna keep starting Diggs over him until that run ends. Hoping the volume continues as I'm using him weeks 9 & 11 to cover byes.Lafell 8 targets, will get a bunch of snaps.
lol.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGNZnfKYnUI think Polk is the play in HOU.
I think he meant just avoid Houston backfield.lol.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGNZnfKYnUI think Polk is the play in HOU.
You like Alfred Blue?
Jerry Jones has repeatedly demonstrated he has precisely zero f###s to give, so the Hardy situation is hardly predictive. My guess is that with Rice it's a combo of all those things. His skills have deteriorated to the point where it wouldn't be worth the PR hit, especially for a team that's going nowhere like the Texans.32 Counter Pass said:I do not believe this would cause the s###storm some might think. Rice has served his punishment and be contrite about the situation. I look at the Hardy situation, which was just as egregious, as the possible public reaction to signing Rice.Are you implying that Houston would sign him? Because yeah, when your season is already going down the toilet and your coach's seat is heating up, why not voluntarily take on a PR s###storm at the same time?seahawk 17 said:Ray Rice
The more likely reason Rice has not been signed is because his skills have deteriorated.
Because you still have Alfred Morris on your rooster?Jack White said:Why?JHuber77 said:Starter on the waiver wire, If he stinks so be it, but i'd rather have him than a one week wonder.ponchsox said:Blue stinksAlfred Blue again
You could never start him with confidence (because, as a reminder, he sucks).
So why bother even rostering him?
THANK YOU!I'm not understanding a lot in this thread -- seems like a lot of conjecture over actual data.
Blue is the cuff; Polk is a COP, and Grimes used as the receiving back. When Foster was out the first 3 weeks, it was Blue that was the primary runner, with nearly twice as many attempts and 2.6x the yardage -- including his monster 31/139/1 game in week 3 against Tampa. Even after Foster returned, Blue still got more carries than Polk. So how is Blue not the guy here?
With Randle going out in the first quarter, you would think there would be no better situation to use CMike. Yet it was all McFadden -- DMac got the calls, and did fantastic with them. Meanwhile CMike did less with his 5 carries than Randle did with the two he got, then got outrushed by a no-name WR Lucky Whitehead. Yet CMike is a hold?
Amendola goes 8/86/1 but LaFell (with 2/25 and a few drops) is the better waiver play?
I'll be the first to admit that anything can happen, and in all three of these situations, the story isn't fully told. Can certainly see Polk challenging Blue if Blue struggles, or DMac getting injured, or the return of Lewis affecting Amendola's usage.
But it's headscratching why, at this point in time, with what we know of these teams, some are so convinced that bypassing a WW player who has already proven himself in situations already is the move.
- seconded by a few.Diggs (discussion again if not picked up due to bye) just because. There's no spot for him with Johnson returning and Coradelle around but, there should be. After next week's game, it might be 'oh he played a bunch over Coradelle and subbed in for Wallace and Johnson.' Today many just consider him back to being 4th WR.