ShamrockPride
Footballguy
So then he's a 3rd option. You think he's gonna come in and unseat Edelman? Just my opinion but I think Brady seriously favors dudes he's worked with.that's not what I said
So then he's a 3rd option. You think he's gonna come in and unseat Edelman? Just my opinion but I think Brady seriously favors dudes he's worked with.that's not what I said
Are you talking about dynasty or redraft?So then he's a 3rd option. You think he's gonna come in and unseat Edelman? Just my opinion but I think Brady seriously favors dudes he's worked with.
interesting strategy... guys just running in circles... guess we will see if it pays off for themJosh Gordon had a good year and I can see Harry filling that spot plus some. The offense will revolve now that Gronk is out.
I did. We just disagree on the analysis here. It’s ok.Read my response. Thanks.
It'll do a 360.interesting strategy... guys just running in circles... guess we will see if it pays off for them
Obviously it's missing that clear #1, but picks 1.02 through 1.08 in last year's "loaded" rookie draft were 1.27 in the NFL or later.Dude. The nfl is basically telling you the RBs and Wrs aren’t top prospects.
picks 5 and later in rookie drafts are same as always but at the top this class sucks...really bad.
No analysis. It was a question. Do you think he will come in and fill Gronk's role (in this case we'll say from a purely fantasy point perspective)?I did. We just disagree on the analysis here. It’s ok.
ya, but they were all RB's drafted early/mid 2nd round. This year i highly doubt we have a run of RB's like we saw last year.Obviously it's missing that clear #1, but picks 1.02 through 1.08 in last year's "loaded" rookie draft were 1.27 in the NFL or later.
Edelman will be 33 and in the last year of his contract. Unless, of course, he's extended but that's the opposite of the Patriot M.O.I'd say dynasty.
Are you ever right about anything?Here comes a WR to Seattle....
So the offensive players aren't that great?This is really an unprecedented defensive draft. I mean CRAZY good. And there's only 32 spots...
No. They're just not as coveted as the defenders.So the offensive players aren't that great?
He won’t play 1:1 on Gronks role but he will pick up some Gronk seam, some Patterson gadget, some Hogan deep routes. There’s tons of opportunity there and he’s a really impressive prospect with lots of experience outspent and in the slot.No analysis. It was a question. Do you think he will come in and fill Gronk's role (in this case we'll say from a purely fantasy point perspective)?
I they were good, they would be coveted.No. They're just not as coveted as the defenders.
Surely you see the difference.
If you offer me a choice between a milkshake and a steak and I choose the milkshake it doesn't mean the steak isn't good. It just means I prefer the milkshake.I they were good, they would be coveted.
Great. Now I want a milkshake.If you offer me a choice between a milkshake and a steak and I choose the milkshake it doesn't mean the steak isn't good. It just means I prefer the milkshake.
unfortunately there are no steaks or milkshakes this year. Best you can hope for is an unripe banana.If you offer me a choice between a milkshake and a steak and I choose the milkshake it doesn't mean the steak isn't good. It just means I prefer the milkshake.
I think he sees the difference, but dont call him ShirleyNo. They're just not as coveted as the defenders.
Surely you see the difference.
Fight the good fight bro. I just don't see this class measuring up to past classes.If you offer me a choice between a milkshake and a steak and I choose the milkshake it doesn't mean the steak isn't good. It just means I prefer the milkshake.
which I dont understand why they spend so much time in a thread about players they hate. it's just to argueI'm stopping here. We get it guys. You don't like this group of offensive players.
We really, really, really, REALLY get it.
Yup...and we get it. You dynasty wonks prefer two in the bush.I'm stopping here. We get it guys. You don't like this group of offensive players.
We really, really, really, REALLY get it.
the NFL teams don't like them either. i'll listen to them.I'm stopping here. We get it guys. You don't like this group of offensive players.
We really, really, really, REALLY get it.
I'll start a unicorn and rainbow thread for you guys to discuss how the 2019 prospects will be better than Kamara, McCaffrey, Barkley, OBJ, etc.which I dont understand why they spend so much time in a thread about players they hate. it's just to argue
NFL teams seem to like Josh Jacobs more than Nick Chubb, Derrius Guice, Sony Michel, and Kerryon Johnson. You listening to them on that one too?the NFL teams don't like them either. i'll listen to them.
The best fantasy minds around here have downgraded this class relative to other class (albeit redraft) in the FBg survivor leagues. They are going as far to draft TEs who historically do nothing in year one of redraft over the WRs and RBs.the NFL teams don't like them either. i'll listen to them.
Based on the Raiders (ran by a media scout) taking him he's a solid #1 pick in dynasty drafts. They are gonna feed him. picks 2-5 are where it's pathetic. you're gonna be picking a WR drafted 32nd or other 2nd round WR's with picks 2-5. Maybe a 3rd round RB.NFL teams seem to like Josh Jacobs more than Nick Chubb, Derrius Guice, Sony Michel, and Kerryon Johnson. You listening to them on that one too?
The actual comp would be Barkley.NFL teams seem to like Josh Jacobs more than Nick Chubb, Derrius Guice, Sony Michel, and Kerryon Johnson. You listening to them on that one too?
Trade it and a bag of magic beans to Andy for Barkley or McCaffrey.Bad year to have the 1.1, dunno what I would do if I had it.
Fair enough but I think these guys fell a bit based on the historically good defensive talent available.Based on the Raiders (ran by a media scout) taking him he's a solid #1 pick in dynasty drafts. They are gonna feed him. picks 2-5 are where it's pathetic. you're gonna be picking a WR drafted 32nd or other 2nd round WR's with picks 2-5. Maybe a 3rd round RB.
The draft class is awful at the top for FF. that's a fact based on the draft.
good points. i'm just talking about how i feel about the players at the present time. i can't remember a year where 2nd round WR's or 3rd or later RB's got drafted with top 5 rookie picks.Fair enough but I think these guys fell a bit based on the historically good defensive talent available.
Additionally it's worth noting that over the last 6 years more top fantasy WRs have come out of the 2nd round than the 1st. If we skip the historic 2014 class then the 2nd round has blown away the 1st in other years. Yes 2nd round WRs haven't been great as a whole but the reality is that WRs have been hitting at a horrible rate as a whole over the last half decade if not a little longer. The 2nd round has actually kind of been the sweet spot.
My opinion is also admittedly somewhat tainted by my main leagues being TE premium, which obviously get a big boost this year.
That's fair. And I think I would agree with that if we amend it to RBs just taken in the 2nd in general, not necessarily early/mid.Of course some of these guys will end up good/great, but with a top 5 pick i'm used to taking WR's drafted in the top 15 of the NFL draft or RB's taken in the 1st or high/mid 2nd. This year we don't have that.
I want sprinkles and glitter too.I'll start a unicorn and rainbow thread for you guys to discuss how the 2019 prospects will be better than Kamara, McCaffrey, Barkley, OBJ, etc.
What happens when Metcalf goes to the Chiefs? No I'm not saying that will happen but don't you think that's an instant 1.01 candidate? I think a top WR in Seattle will look awfully good, too.Based on the Raiders (ran by a media scout) taking him he's a solid #1 pick in dynasty drafts. They are gonna feed him. picks 2-5 are where it's pathetic. you're gonna be picking a WR drafted 32nd or other 2nd round WR's with picks 2-5. Maybe a 3rd round RB.
The draft class is awful at the top for FF. that's a fact based on the draft.
it's basically a fact if tomorrow a bunch of RB's don't go in the 2nd.which I dont understand why they spend so much time in a thread about players they hate. it's just to argue
Mehhhh. Just like Baltimore, Seattle doesn't excite me for a WR. Especially of this class. Only NFL team that runs more than 50% of their plays.What happens when Metcalf goes to the Chiefs? No I'm not saying that will happen but don't you think that's an instant 1.01 candidate? I think a top WR in Seattle will look awfully good, too.
no. a WR drafted in the 2nd round should never be considered a solid 1.01 dynasty rookie pick.What happens when Metcalf goes to the Chiefs? No I'm not saying that will happen but don't you think that's an instant 1.01 candidate? I think a top WR in Seattle will look awfully good, too.
Well I think to your point, this year it may be the case. I'm not really arguing about whether this class sucks compared to previous years. I mostly agree. I'm just saying if the Chiefs take a top WR, especially Metcalf, pairing him with Mahomes is scary. Adds some cream to the top of the rookie draft board. I think there are a couple other spots for WRs and my boy Henderson, that the top 5 will look better than you think.no. a WR drafted in the 2nd round should never be solid 1.01 dynasty pick.