Ilov80s
Footballguy
I know the community liked his game but lets not forget he was a 5th round pick.I saw the Bills replace him with 157 year old Beasley late in the year, so I’m not convinced there’s a ton to get excited about here.
I know the community liked his game but lets not forget he was a 5th round pick.I saw the Bills replace him with 157 year old Beasley late in the year, so I’m not convinced there’s a ton to get excited about here.
.Can we get a summary?Y'all can keep believing this guy ain't it Keep buying that other guy or a rookie.
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.www.instagram.com
If you can't watch, send Moulds a dm. Yes, he responded to me and I got access. Yes, that Moulds.
DK was definitely a blow to ShakirNow that the dust has settled, I'm curious to know what folks are thinking about Shakir. The first-round addition of TE Kincaid, on paper, feels like a blow to Shakir's volume, but TEs are notoriously slow to develop in the NFL.
Bills beat reporter Mark Gaughan writes, "Based on spring practices, [Khalil] Shakir is going to push hard for prime snaps in the Bills' three-receiver set, with Stefon Diggs and Gabe Davis."
Shakir flashed at various points during his rookie campaign, finishing the regular season with 10 receptions for 161 yards and one touchdown. In the Bills' two playoff games, he would catch five of seven targets for 91 yards while being used primarily in a part-time role. A strong offseason for Shakir could lead to him serving as the Bills' primary slot receiver, a role he's more than familiar with dating back to his days at Boise State.
SOURCE: BuffaloNews.com
Jun 14, 2023, 7:13 PM ET
The Athletic’s Joe Buscaglia believes Khalil Shakir has fallen to fifth on the Bills’ receiver depth chart.
The second-year pro entered camp as the favorite for slot duties between Stefon Diggs and Gabe Davis but has instead tumbled behind Trent Sherfield and Deonte Harty. Not exactly imposing competition. It’s also bad news for the Bills, who will once again lack a legitimate third weapon in the receiver corps. It places more pressure on first-rounder Dalton Kincaid to make an instant impact. Harty was the primary slot man in Saturday’s preseason game against the Steelers.
I didn’t see the game and just wonder if it was more of a product of a Knox being out. Did Kincaid play in-line? Liked Shakir more than most coming out but had given up when they added Kincaid.IDK 93.33% catch rate on the season seems good, no?
- first 5 games: 4-40-0 on 5 targets
- last 2 games: 4-35 & 6-92, caught all 10 targets he earned
Gonna be rough earning targets with Kincaid emerging, but at least he finally passed Sherfield in snaps (three straight games)
liked him coming out, last year seemed to be strictly developmental, hoping the light ball is coming on for him
I believe he's fools gold.
The reason I said that is because there are too many other options ahead of him in the pecking order for him to be a flex start under normal circumstances. Don't you agree?I believe he's fools gold.
yeah but you think that about everyone
Def going to be hard for him to move past Gabe + Kincaid. Haven't seen snap counts or alignment data yet, but I suspect Kincaid was moe Inline this game and Shakir got more run than his typical 23-25 snaps in the Slot (when Knox was healthy, the rookie TE led the team in Slot WR snaps.)
IF THAT HOLDS TRUE - Kincaid's 2nd half sees him operate more as an Inline - then there is a path for more production from the Slot bc his snap counts will increase dramatically. Gabe is always inconsistent and there's a world where he continues to be the boom / bust deep threat but Shakir becomes more of a security blanket for Josh.
The reason I said that is because there are too many other options ahead of him in the pecking order for him to be a flex start under normal circumstances. Don't you agree?I believe he's fools gold.
yeah but you think that about everyone
Def going to be hard for him to move past Gabe + Kincaid. Haven't seen snap counts or alignment data yet, but I suspect Kincaid was moe Inline this game and Shakir got more run than his typical 23-25 snaps in the Slot (when Knox was healthy, the rookie TE led the team in Slot WR snaps.)
IF THAT HOLDS TRUE - Kincaid's 2nd half sees him operate more as an Inline - then there is a path for more production from the Slot bc his snap counts will increase dramatically. Gabe is always inconsistent and there's a world where he continues to be the boom / bust deep threat but Shakir becomes more of a security blanket for Josh.
I just don't see it long term. That could change obviously. I suppose he is one of those guys to stash at the end of your bench in deep roster leagues; Somewhat like Sean Tucker.The reason I said that is because there are too many other options ahead of him in the pecking order for him to be a flex start under normal circumstances. Don't you agree?I believe he's fools gold.
yeah but you think that about everyone
Def going to be hard for him to move past Gabe + Kincaid. Haven't seen snap counts or alignment data yet, but I suspect Kincaid was moe Inline this game and Shakir got more run than his typical 23-25 snaps in the Slot (when Knox was healthy, the rookie TE led the team in Slot WR snaps.)
IF THAT HOLDS TRUE - Kincaid's 2nd half sees him operate more as an Inline - then there is a path for more production from the Slot bc his snap counts will increase dramatically. Gabe is always inconsistent and there's a world where he continues to be the boom / bust deep threat but Shakir becomes more of a security blanket for Josh.
Do these scenarios play out in perfectly linear fashion?
Of course what you are stating (which is rather obvious to anyone with a cursory understanding of football) is the likely outcome. I am proposing an alternative that is within the range of outcomes.
I'm trying to imagine how a fluid situation might play out. The Bills have been super inconsistent offensively and genuinely want/need a reliable number 2. They've said that publicly, recently. They know what they have in Gabe.
He had 4 targets this week. He’s averaged 4 targets/week over the past 5 weeks, with a high of 6 and low of 2.Is there a changing of the guard here or is this just an anomaly?
Probably not enough to generate consistency... Unless we think they're going to start giving him more work since he's been doing well with what they've given him so farHe had 4 targets this week. He’s averaged 4 targets/week over the past 5 weeks, with a high of 6 and low of 2.Is there a changing of the guard here or is this just an anomaly?
Should they? Yes. Will they? Meh.Probably not enough to generate consistency... Unless we think they're going to start giving him more work since he's been doing well with what they've given him so farHe had 4 targets this week. He’s averaged 4 targets/week over the past 5 weeks, with a high of 6 and low of 2.Is there a changing of the guard here or is this just an anomaly?
I think he is a great dynasty prospect. I don’t see them being able to pay Davis, although I am not sure what price tag he will command around the league.What are the dynasty thoughts on Shakir?
Diggs is still playing at a high level as the alpha, but maybe not as high as in years past and he’ll be 31 next year. Will he want out if the season gets away and they miss the playoffs?
As for Davis, some other team is probably going to overpay him in free agency.
Have to think another WR weapon or two will be brought in, but could be a much bigger opportunity for Shakir next year.
Good thoughts. Regarding the bolded on Davis, never underestimate the demand for second tier WRs Seeing fairly decent money thrown at guys like Lazard and MVS, it stands to reason that Davis will be paid if there aren’t too many big names in UFA beyond Higgins.I think he is a great dynasty prospect. I don’t see them being able to pay Davis, although I am not sure what price tag he will command around the league.What are the dynasty thoughts on Shakir?
Diggs is still playing at a high level as the alpha, but maybe not as high as in years past and he’ll be 31 next year. Will he want out if the season gets away and they miss the playoffs?
As for Davis, some other team is probably going to overpay him in free agency.
Have to think another WR weapon or two will be brought in, but could be a much bigger opportunity for Shakir next year.
Anyone drafted is going to be below Shakir. I can’t see them being active for any top WR free agents, their cap situation is not great and they are pretty thin on D with a lot of aging players. I think they only have two DEs under contract for next year, one is Von Miller
Next Gen Stats
Khalil Shakir caught all 6 of his targets for 105 yards in Week 18, recording a career-high +1.5 receptions over expected.
Shakir has caught a league-high +14.3% of his targets over expected this season (min. 40 targets).
#BUFvsMIA | #BillsMafia
Agree and I think it's going to happenThe guy is a playmaker, hope he gets a chance for a larger role next year.
Next Gen Stats
Khalil Shakir had just a 0.7% chance of scoring a TD when he caught the ball on his 17-yard TD reception (+14 YAC over expected).
Shakir has now caught 16 consecutive targets dating back to Week 16.
#PITvsBUF | #BillsMafia
Ian Hartitz
Last 10 Bills games
Receiving yards:
Khalil Shakir (462)
Stefon Diggs (422)
Targets:
Shakir (37)
Diggs (80)
There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
I think Shakir is viewed as a slot since they had Diggs and Davis playing outside. But he can play outside and will play outside with Samuel on board and Diggs and Davis gone.I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
Thomas DeLaus
I said it before and I'll say it again...
2024 is Khalil Shakir SZN
#BillsMafia
he is listed as their #1 right now, Samuels is #2, with Shorter as #3... Nothing against those guys, but that is not a strong core for a team that was a missed FG from going to the AFC title game.I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
Agreed - the team's window is closing (if not already) and I don't think the team will want to go into the season without a more meaningful replacement for the loss of Diggs.he is listed as their #1 right now, Samuels is #2, with Shorter as #3... Nothing against those guys, but that is not a strong core for a team that was a missed FG from going to the AFC title game.I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
I def think he gets an uptick, but I am just saying their WR room is nowhere near set yet.
Maybe you misread my original post. All I am saying is it a big opportunity for Shakir and I think he will see more targets. The Bill’s will add more bodies in the draft but he will get more volume and has shown real playmaking ability. The Bill’s are not typically a team that puts a ton of trust in rookies right away (in particular receiver), so it will be interesting how they proceed.he is listed as their #1 right now, Samuels is #2, with Shorter as #3... Nothing against those guys, but that is not a strong core for a team that was a missed FG from going to the AFC title game.I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
I def think he gets an uptick, but I am just saying their WR room is nowhere near set yet.
Maybe you misread my original post. All I am saying is it a big opportunity for Shakir and I think he will see more targets. The Bill’s will add more bodies in the draft but he will get more volume and has shown real playmaking ability. The Bill’s are not typically a team that puts a ton of trust in rookies right away (in particular receiver), so it will be interesting how they proceed.he is listed as their #1 right now, Samuels is #2, with Shorter as #3... Nothing against those guys, but that is not a strong core for a team that was a missed FG from going to the AFC title game.I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
I def think he gets an uptick, but I am just saying their WR room is nowhere near set yet.
I posted because I really like his talent and think he is still being overlooked after the Digg’s trade. He has an opportunity to gain a lot more looks and I think he can deliver. I do think he is best in the slot which poses an issue as they have numerous players that play inline. He can play outside as well and I think they will move him around as he is an intelligent player. I imagine they draft a couple guys but Buffalo is typically slow to put too much on rookie receivers. As of today he is their number one and will have an increased opportunity to show what he can do. I also expect Kincaid’s role to increase dramatically in the intermediate passing game. Much depends on what is added to the roster but I am betting on Shakir to hit a 1000 yards this season.Maybe you misread my original post. All I am saying is it a big opportunity for Shakir and I think he will see more targets. The Bill’s will add more bodies in the draft but he will get more volume and has shown real playmaking ability. The Bill’s are not typically a team that puts a ton of trust in rookies right away (in particular receiver), so it will be interesting how they proceed.he is listed as their #1 right now, Samuels is #2, with Shorter as #3... Nothing against those guys, but that is not a strong core for a team that was a missed FG from going to the AFC title game.I do not think he is a number one, however I think he is talented enough to garner quite a few more targets. Adding Boyd (with Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid who all play majority inline) seems redundant.There is no way Buffalo goes in with him as their #1.. LOLIf Digg’s does get moved, a big opportunity open’s up for Shakir. I have been a big fan of his since his rookie year, would love to see him get a chance at more targets. His game reminds me a bit of ARSB’s, but Shakir has a little bit more speed.
They will get a WR near or at the draft in a deal. Wouldn't be shocked if they also add BOYD.
I def think he gets an uptick, but I am just saying their WR room is nowhere near set yet.
This, Shakir is the “veteran” bills WR in the locker room right now. Going into his third year and balling out the last 4-5 weeks with hyper talented / critical huge plays, kid has talent. Why can’t he be the 1?
Diggs is 6’0” and 191
Shakir is 6’0” and 190