Search results

I watched a youtube video on the Chernobyl zone a couple months back.  It is still contaminated but is currently the equivalent of a wildlife refuge.  While there are no people there the wildlife are thriving (relatively speaking), almost assuredly because there are no people there.  If...

Maybe, maybe not.  Cornyn has proven himself to be one of the most worthless and despicable people to ever set foot in the Senate.  Kamala Harris showed what a complete clown he is.  If I was the Dems I would put some serious resources into this race and start now.  Maybe ask Bloomberg to help...

Hegar is an awesome candidate.  She deserves all the support she needs to get rid of Cornyn.  Even though I’m not from TX I’ve donated to her campaign and will again.  She is absolutely worthy and is exactly what this country needs.  Cornyn, on the other hand, is exactly what this country does...

You might want to do a quick web search on this subject.  Try a search for something like "dem vs rep stock market returns".   Any similar search terms should produce the same results.  You should find your answer on who is better for the markets.  But, if you are serious about getting the best...

You support a traitor and a criminal.  No question about it.  Do you consider that better than copping out to just being unhinged?  Again, I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here.

You support a traitor and a criminal, one of the most, if not the most, despicable people to ever walk in the White House.  Do you have a better explanation?  I'm actually trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here.  Am I wrong in doing that?

Honestly, she doesn't seem all that much more unhinged than an everyday run of the mill republican/trump supporter.  She even has being a criminal in common with trump.  Fits right in with those folks.

In spite of these decades of “rumors” and seemingly endless investigations the right has never found anything legitimate on H Clinton.  It has been sop for the right to try to denigrate their opponents for decades.  Truth doesn’t matter.  It is reprehensible but that is the modern day right in...

You make my point for me, though I have no doubt you don't understand that.  You are correct that the red states are never going to agree to change a system that unfairly benefits them.   But, still the system is unfair and it will change one way or the other.  If you have any knowledge of...

You can believe whatever you want but I'm gonna bet on the people who already generate 64% of the nations GDP.  One of the major differences between you and us is that we search for solutions to problems and you succumb to them.  It's why the best and the brightest almost invariably come with...

We are going to have to agree to disagree on this.  I have absolutely no doubt that our current system is not sustainable.  The majority is not going to tolerate minority governance much longer.  It is un-American.  The only question is when and how, not if, it will end.

LOL, I understand exactly how the system works.  People in small states have votes that count more than those in big states.  For example people in WY have 1 representative for every 586,300 people .  The average in Cal is 1 per 754,283.  The senators are 1 for every 293,054 people in WY and 1...

That is very true.  The question then becomes is that system sustainable, especially considering the economic production these states generate relative to the over-represented states. 

Are you suggesting that the votes of people from California and New York shouldn't count or count less than other peoples votes?  Consider that these two places are two of the biggest economic engines the world has ever known.   Do they not deserve representation in your view?

No matter how many times this is repeated it will always be a lie.  The choice was exactly what Bloomberg said it was.  Sane and competent vs insane and incompetent.  Clinton vs Trump was as simple as that.  Anyone claiming different is just a coward who needs an excuse for what they have done.

You're full of ####.  The GOP, under McConnell, vowed to oppose anything Obama tried to accomplish and they had the #'s to do it when the Garland nomination came up.  So, they did it.  There was not a damn thing Obama could have done.  To claim anything different is to be extremely ignorant or a...

Maybe his reputation wasn't attacked because: 1)  The GOP wouldn't even consider his nomination and 2)  He didn't try to rape a 15 year old girl. 

There are certain Cardinal Rules of life. 1)  Treat others as you would wish to be treated. 2)  You will reap what you sow. When the pubs refused to even consider Garland they laid the groundwork for inevitable and justified retribution (disregarding that Kavanaugh looks to be an attempted...

When Reid did away with the filibuster it was because the Pubs under McConnell refused to approve any of Obama’s judicial nominations.  Ever.  When this countries obituary is written the blame is almost exclusively McConnell’s.  He is one of the most vile humans ever born.

That is not comparable.  That act involved one person at a protest/rally, one not even associated with that protest.   As I explained to you I am looking for a reason why organized terrorists have so comfortably found a home in the Republican Party.  To the point of having their members as part...