Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I'm pretty sure when they went to Whole Foods before the last competition, you could clearly see Hosea patting Stefan on the back as they entered the doors. This didn't conform to the idea that Hosea is obsessed with beating Stefan. I know it's no big deal, but I just don't think that men go...
1) Fabio overcooked his meat2) and what I think everyone is missing here: did you see that "salad" he put together? link. look at image 13/22. That looks like something out of a school cafeteria. The guest judge even called him out on it and that's when Fabio argued.
3) The decisions are...
Torre plays favorites, and most often those favorites are veterans. I think Joe Torre is one of the worst possible managers for a team that's rebuilding, especially if they're trying to grow from within.
I remember being incensed when Torre benched half of the starters in the World Series against the D-Backs and Randy Johnson, so that "the matchups were right." Most of those guys hadn't even faced Johnson 10 times. He was trading 100+ OPS+ guys for second rate journeymen.And don't even get me...
As a Yankees fan, the only thing more painful than watching the game was to see how clueless Torre was afterwards saying "he's a great kid, it didn't faze him a bit." What game were you watching, Joe?
I'm not one to be quick to blame the manager, but in light of how awfully he handled the Joba midge situation in Cleveland, you have to imagine that he wasn't necessarily the best guy to keep the team from completely collapsing.
Too many quality OF on the market this season. Next year it will be quite different. I've heard this as a rationale for why the Matt Holliday trade was such a good idea for Billy Beane.
Pettitte wasn't worth what he wanted. Varitek too.
There was a number of OF available this year that brought down salaries in the OF, but I suppose economics have hit as well.
The Yankees suffered through the 80s for the same reasons they suffered the past 8 years: focus on signing high priced veterans past their peak, and disastrous starting pitching.The 90s dynasty Yankees were built upon the Steinbrenner suspension when Gene Michael was left to run the team.
To get this thread back on track, Pettitte is an innings eater, pitching 204 innings last year with an ERA+ of 98 (where league average is 100). This is exactly what the rotation needed, given Joba's innings limit, Hughes' inconsistency, and Burnett and Wang's injury histories (not to mention...
Injuries happen. You can mitigate them by limiting how much work a pitcher does (especially in any given game), but keeping Joba in the bullpen is essentially forgoing half the work he might be able to do in one year to lower his probability of any serious injury from a pretty small number to...
While Cano has little to no plate discipline, to insinuate that a 26 year old already has his best days behind him just because last year he had by far his worst season seems a little presumptuous.He might have just peaked early, but very few players have career trajectories like that. These...
You simply cannot make a good case for analysis by using RBIs and Wins (by Pitchers). And my point was, while injuries plague all teams, the Yankees got the bubonic plague last season. Sure, it's a factor of their being old, and this year the bench is once again abysmal, but on paper this team...
Making the argument that the Yankees are not a better team going into 2009 than they were in 2008 is a stretch. Taking injuries into account alone...this is how nomaas.org sums it up:
Wang and Posada being on the field a full 162 (or at least a good chunk of them) almost single handedly will...
This thread ignores the fact that they've seemingly improved both their offense and pitching while taking on LESS payroll than in 2008. Sure, their defense might be worse, but it wasn't so good last year either.
I think the Yankees start 2009 an improved team, even with these problems.
P/E ratio is a proxy for expected future growth. However, I'm not so sure it makes much sense to screen on it without thinking about other PE ratios in the same industry. In other words, the company with the lowest PE ratio in an industry has been deemed the one with the fewest growth...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.