Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
While I don't doubt this is likely the case, it's possible your two QBs are Tannehill and Newton as well. Newton wasn't very good until half way through the season, and Tannehill looks like a solid QB prospect at this point. Even in a 2QB league, you are better off getting a good player. I think its Lacy in a landslide for the #1 right now.
Me too. I'm going QB #1 no matter what in a start 2 league. Geno - assuming he's the first QB taken - will get his shot.
I'm skeptical you have ever played in a 2QB league.
If you continue these, might want to separate the standard/PPR leagues from the 2QB-leagues. It's clear that people that don't play in these leagues just voted anyway.
I like the suggestion of splitting out the 2 QB poll. I think I might do that for the polls after the NFL draft takes place.I wouldn't rule out the possibility that somebody picking with the 1.01 isn't sold on any of the QBs in this year's class being their choice, and they could be weak at other spots like RB as well. Passing on a QB here will result in your picking from who ever is left over at the 2.01 pick, hoping that you can make a trade, or resigning yourself to hoping that you can land a player like Teddy Bridgewater in the 2014 rookie draft.It is also possible that some of the voters have multiple rookie picks in the first round, so they would select Lacy with the 1.01 and would then take a QB with another pick.I will make sure that the Rookie 1.02 poll goes up tonight!
I could see the argument that *some* people might not view 1.01 in a 2QB league as the top-rated QB. However, only 26 people out of 140 or so respondents reported that they didn't play in 2QB leagues (which is silly -- these type of leagues are quite uncommon). Based on that, and the overall poor results of that poll, I don't think its going out on a limb to suggest that *most* of the voters for Lacy aren't/never had played in 2QB leagues.
Generally this.Everyone has their own philosophy about it, but when it comes right down to it the best decision is to draft the QB unless you have Adrian Peterson / Calvin Johnson type players sitting there in a draft class that houses mediocre QB talent.
And in Fantasy when there are only 32 QB's to choose from (and probably only 20 of those starting QB's you want to start anyways) taking a guy like Geno can give you some good trade value down the line.
Per Roto...Alabama RB Eddie Lacy will miss the Crimson Tide's March 13 Pro Day due to "lingering" tightness in his hamstringPer ESPN's Adam Schefter, Lacy's workout date is now "TBD." The lingering nature of Lacy's injury is becoming increasingly concerning, even if he has plenty of time before Week 1. Hamstring injuries are highly susceptible to setbacks.Source: Adam Schefter on TwitterMar 9 - 11:23 PM
Not sure I'd do that just yet. Lacy will still run and go through all the bells and whistles. It will just get moved to a later date now.
I just dealt 1/13/20/25 for 5/7/15/42
I traded #2 for #5 & #7 a couple of weeks ago.
Same thoughts but only for PPR and ending up with the right offense (not jets).
If you get return yardage points I wouldn't sleep on Patterson. There's a good chance he will be returning punts if he struggles picking up the WR game in the NFL. He and Austin are immensely more valuable in that scoring IMO.
Insanity
this is Ponders last year at QB, dont let short term situation dictate not taking a player. IF you believe in Cordarrelle, Podner shouldnt matter.
