Anarchy99
Footballguy
You are aware TE's = 1 ppr, right?"That's a bold strategy, Cotton."
You are aware TE's = 1 ppr, right?"That's a bold strategy, Cotton."
Well, we know one thing is certain.
Anarchy's 2017 Christmas Card list:
freeannyong
Sadly, yes - I can't even plead ignorance as an excuse.You are aware TE's = 1 ppr, right?
Not many people play in 32 team leagues. Most teams aren't going to look great, as that's what happens when there are so many teams. Gostkowski was probably a little earlier, but you will reap the benefits of a having a decent kicker that other teams will not. Realistically, most teams will have 2-3 good players, a handful of decent ones, and the last few will be wishes and prayers. I think there were 108 receivers drafted in this league last year. By the end of the draft, we will all be struggling to find guys worth picking.I have not done this league before and never have done a 32-teamer. I am not a fan of my team at this point at all. I like it even less after being unable to find any level of value and taking the Patriot PK. Go Pats all the way to the Super Bowl.
It does block other teams from having a good TE who can compete with either of your starters and you should get good production out of your flex if they both do well.Sadly, yes - I can't even plead ignorance as an excuse.
I suspect I blundered fairly badly with my 2nd-rounder in relying too heavily on the prior year's draft to assume that I couldn't get a top-8 TE coming back to me at 3.15. But I wasn't going to throw good money after bad by letting the far-and-away BPA left on the board in the 3rd fall past me just because of positional constraints.
Ummm ... I've got a rookie WR1. But he's a really highly drafted rookie WR1.It does block other teams from having a good TE who can compete with either of your starters and you should get good production out of your flex if they both do well.
Question is what will you get at the other starting spots for this advantage to really work in your favor?
This is the same for any fantasy league and it applies even more in larger leagues because the big hits later MATTER EVEN MORE.Corey Davis is really good but he hasn't been healthy enough to really show it yet. Kind of a log jam of competition with the Titans right now who I still expect to run the ball a lot.
I think that was a risky pick but the players talent justifies it in my view. In the short term he hasn't been able to earn much playing time yet so he is off to a slow start.
@Stephen Holloway the good players are basically already gone by now and we still have many picks to do. You aren't going to like your team (or any team) from this draft as all of them will have serious holes, reaches and prayers on them.
I like the format because of how challenging it is. That makes it fun.
I could be wrong and we don't have much history of this league to base evaluations of this on, but my guess is the teams who have solid early picks AND find some productive players with their later picks will distance themselves from the other teams. As with the other Anarchy leagues this requires a good deal of luck in regards to not having players injured or benched. Deep roster diving can give some owners an edge in this format.
I went back to review my title team from last year and was surprised at how generally mediocre they were. I thought I'd see a bunch of guys who well-outperformed their ADPs, but my top pick (AJ Green) finished WR38 due to injury and seven of my other picks either failed to exceed their ADP or did so by a negligible amount.I could be wrong and we don't have much history of this league to base evaluations of this on, but my guess is the teams who have solid early picks AND find some productive players with their later picks will distance themselves from the other teams. As with the other Anarchy leagues this requires a good deal of luck in regards to not having players injured or benched. Deep roster diving can give some owners an edge in this format.
I don't mind this team at all. Almost makes me wish I waited and went QB-Fleener on 4-5 turn and kept my Bell thought but those 550 pts stared me in the face. Issue was at 2-3 turn, I did not like any wr or Rb and why the Ertz pick. Did not like spot 1 at all. Plus a Packer homerI'm pretty happy with this start from the 2 hole........first time doing a 32-teamer.
QB - Chiefs
RB - Johnson, David
WR - Sanders
WR - Diggs
TE - Witten
Fair enough. I was looking primarily at rank of finish but re-evaluating it, if I take the TMQB drafted either before me (Titans, 342 pts) or after me (Texans, 250 pts) I lose a minimum of 180 points and I'm not even sniffing contention.Stinkin Ref said:I started typing a post a while ago about how you need to average around 180 points per roster spot to have a shot....the 530 points ATL QB put up last year can help cover up a ton of warts and make up those lost points under the 180 mark.....that 530 was 55 points higher than the next highest NE and 188 points higher than TMQB16....so serious value there at QB23 and league winning type stuff...
Guess you got your Def already!!!Man I didnt realize defenses could actually score negative points in this league and CLE actually finished the season with -1 point...
Haven't quite figured out the love for kickers and lack of love for defenses in this league. Defenses infinitely more valuable because you are stuck with a poor defense. If you guess wrong in a camp kicker battle, you can always swap out to the kicker that won out.Man I didnt realize defenses could actually score negative points in this league and CLE actually finished the season with -1 point...
I think I my have in A2. At least Steve thinks so.Haven't quite figured out the love for kickers and lack of love for defenses in this league. Defenses infinitely more valuable because you are stuck with a poor defense. If you guess wrong in a camp kicker battle, you can always swap out to the kicker that won out.
It's possible that you could pick a playoff defense and LOSE points because of it.
It's been all over today that Smallwood is the current favorite to be the lead back and Blount has been bloated and floundering. I would have taken Smallwood one pick later.Freeann, I want to know if my pick of Phila RB Pumphrey influenced your pick of of Smallwood. Or are we both just smart enough to know one of them is going to win that spot.
Each of my three WRs are very special talents on teams with significant playoff potential ... and gigantic health / usage-related question marks. If one of the three becomes a fantasy stud, I'm likely to break even on my overall investment. If two do, I have a shot at contending."Well, I figured ... what the hell."
So you are against Cook because of combine metrics?1.15 15 Mr. Irrelevant McCoy, LeSean BUF RB - RB6
2.18 50 Mr. Irrelevant Olsen, Greg CAR TE - TE4
3.15 79 Mr. Irrelevant Reed, Jordan WAS TE - TE7
4.18 114 Mr. Irrelevant Davis, Corey TEN WR - WR48
5.15 143 Mr. Irrelevant Lockett, Tyler SEA WR - WR59
6.18 178 Mr. Irrelevant Murray, Latavius MIN RB - RB52
7.15 207 Mr. Irrelevant 49ers, San Francisco SFO TMQB - TMQB28
8.18 242 Mr. Irrelevant Hauschka, Steven BUF PK - PK20
9.15 271 Mr. Irrelevant Colts, Indianapolis IND Def - Def26
10.18 306 Mr. Irrelevant Samuel, Curtis CAR WR - WR102
Murray is a bet against the rookie RB I'm lowest on of the four in redraft (mediocre athlete, defensive-minded coach, abysmal OL). He should be a fair bet to outperform ADP even if his ceiling is capped. Ditto Hoyer, who should be a perfectly serviceable placeholder on a team that, having tossed Chip Kelly overboard, should get better faster than people expect.
I like how this team looks and your strategy of waiting on defense and QB helps that I think. Question is if those RB and WR can make enough of a difference to make up for the points your not getting from QB. That said the Bears may not be bad as Trubisky has looked decent. They will surely be behind a lot and need to throw.Pick Ovr Franchise Selection
1.26 26 BusMan Howard, Jordan CHI RB
2.07 39 BusMan Allen, Keenan LAC WR
3.26 90 BusMan Anderson, C.J. DEN RB
4.07 103 BusMan Brown, John ARI WR
5.26 154 BusMan Engram, Evan NYG TE
6.07 167 BusMan Rodgers, Jacquizz TBB RB
7.26 218 BusMan Boswell, Chris PIT PK
8.07 231 BusMan Lee, Marqise JAC WR
9.26 282 BusMan Jets, New York NYJ Def
10.07 295 BusMan Bears, Chicago CHI TMQB
Very little in the way of playoff potential with this group, so I need to make serious hay in the regular season. Waited until my last two picks to grab a DEF and QB, since I knew those positions were mandated to still be available by the league rules. I know see that is likely a huge error.
Figured RB would be the first position to dry up and went Howard in the first, despite being on a bad team. Overall I like my RB/WR positions, provided John Brown returns to the field sooner rather than later. Engram is a dart throw at TE.
This smells like a middle of the pack squad at best. Fun times would draft again.
While it wasn't intentional on my part my picks of Watkins and Parker had their fates change soon after my drafting of them.Watkins being traded to the Rams and the Dolpins adding Jay Cutler. i tend to think both acts of god will work in my favor, at least thats what she told me.1.28 28. Biabreakable Saints, New Orleans NOS TMQB
2.05 37. Biabreakable Watkins, Sammy LAR WR
3.28 92. Biabreakable Parker, DeVante MIA WR
4.05 101. Biabreakable Henry, Hunter LAC TE
5.28 156. Biabreakable Foreman, D'Onta HOU RB
6.05 165. Biabreakable Crosby, Mason GBP PK
7.28 220. Biabreakable Kamara, Alvin NOS RB
8.05 229. Biabreakable Treadwell, Laquon MIN WR
9.28 284. Biabreakable Boyd, Tyler CIN WR
10.05 293. Biabreakable Redskins, Washington WAS Def
Yeah I guess we shall see just how bad Washington can be.Waiting on a defense is a decent strategy in the other Anarchy Leagues as it probably won't hurt that much. In this one, however, it could be a team killer if you get stuck with a really dreg of a defense. At least in the other leagues, you are guaranteed positive points. The difference from the #1 to #2 defense in those leagues was 118 points last year. In ABLC, that range was 174 points in 2016 and 233 the year before. The 3 prior years were 187, 227, and 212.
Charles SIms is an interesting player and did score some good points in 2015 as you mention. I think Martin and Rodgers may prevent Sims from having much opportunity but I generally think Sims is a better bet than McNichols but maybe not. Similar players in my view.46 - Steelers PIT TMQB8 . . . Ranked 5th in 2016
PIT offense should be more explosive once Bryant gets reinstated and should be in line for playoff points. IMO, Top 5 with upside this year.
83 - Mark Ingram NOS RB22 . . . Ranked 9th in 2016
I am not sure how much ADP has left in the tank, if he can stay healthy, and what that means to Ingram's role. Not many reliable RB's were left by this point.
275 - Charles Sims TBB RB67 . . . Ranked RB21 in 2015
Sims appears to have fallen off the radar and I am not 100% sure why. He had 180 points in his format two years ago with over 1,000 YFS and 50+ catches.
19 - T.Y. Hilton IND WR10 . . . Ranked WR9 in 2016
Well, at the time, Luck seemingly was looking ready to come back, I thought the Colts had an outside shot at a playoff berth, and Hilton looked like a safe pick. Now, not so much.
110 - Eric Decker TEN WR45 . . . Ranked WR16 in 2015
I still think Decker gets more targets, yardage, and usage than he is getting projected for. Might get a playoff game or two as well. Could end up ranked in the 20's.
211 - Anquan Boldin BUF WR72 . . . Ranked WR47 in 2016
He looked liked a decent pick . . . before he retired. Was in line to start and get a lot of targets. Better now then mid-season as I can replace him.
238 - Terrance Williams DAL WR79 . . . Ranked WR61 in 2016
He ranked in the 40's the year before. Probably will get a few playoff points. If Zeke actually has to sit out, maybe there are a few more receiving points to go around.
302 - Tyler Higbee LAR TE37 . . . Ranked TE65 in 2016
Went as early as 142, 159, and 172 in the regular Anarchy drafts. Getting talked up as the west coast Jordan Reed. Great, so he'll miss a ton of games. Just what I needed.
174 - Matt Bryant ATL PK4 . . . Ranked PK1 in 2016
The Falcons might not score 648 points again this year (that is a CRAZY number), but Bryant should still get a lot of scoring opportunities.
147 - Seahawks SEA DEF2 . . . Ranked DEF9 in 2016
Probably too early, as they only scored 138 points last year. But they scored 214, 220, 279, and 217 the years before that. Maybe they bounce back some this year and again should make a playoff run.
Overall, I think I have pieces of 6 playoff teams (PIT, TBB, TEN, DAL, ATL, SEA). Will have to find a flex in the player swap. Would have been much more of an issue if I had waited and got a camp battle kicker that lost his job. Don't love this team, don't hate this team. Will stand a chance of competing if ADP is a dud, Sims goes back to being a receiving back, and Higbee gets a lot of targets.
I am surprised with more picks at RB than WR.So far for flex
11 RB, 8 WR, 3 TE with 10 undecided
Ha! I had a private bet with myself on the O/U of posts before you jumped in on Cook at 2.5. I oughta be a bookieSo you are against Cook because of combine metrics?
A defensive minded coach is generally a good thing for a RB to have, game scripts tend to be more favorable if the defense is good.
The offensive line might only suck instead of being abyss level.
Wouldn't points two and three also negatively impact the back up RB you drafted? To me that negates those arguments and all you are left with is hating Cook for his combine scores.
Bad bet. I like the rest of your draft a bit better than this part of it. You need to hope Murray gets goal line carries because he isn't going to be doing much else. Zimmer and Shurmur have both said Cook is capable of all roles. Goal line opportunity for Murray is just pure speculation, not based on anything the coaches have said.
A saw a couple of articles where Reed was brought up . . . mostly due to the Sean McVay / Matt LeFleur Redskins connection. He's 6'6", 250. Has been said to been uncoverable in the red zone, a standout in camp, and playing with the starters. Saw comments from the coaching staff saying he would play a big role this year / on the field a lot / blah blah blah. Probably just coach speak, but it sounds like he will start the season as the TE getting the most snaps. I don't think he will be Reed, but I am hopeful he is worth more than the TE37 spot I picked him at.Who has been talking about Higbee as west coast Jordan Reed? I am pretty sure Gerald Everett deserves that comparison a bit more than Higbee does, but who knows?
I see.A saw a couple of articles where Reed was brought up . . . mostly due to the Sean McVay / Matt LeFleur Redskins connection. He's 6'6", 250. Has been said to been uncoverable in the red zone, a standout in camp, and playing with the starters. Saw comments from the coaching staff saying he would play a big role this year / on the field a lot / blah blah blah. Probably just coach speak, but it sounds like he will start the season as the TE getting the most snaps. I don't think he will be Reed, but I am hopeful he is worth more than the TE37 spot I picked him at.
It sounds like they want to implement a two TE system and Everett (like 99% of rookies) has been just trying to get acclimated to the NFL. IIRC, he went to a small school (South Alabama?) and apparently sometimes the learning curve is tougher coming from those types of programs. I would guess Higbee has done better than they expected and is a lot harder to cover than they were prepared for. And I think Everett hasn't exactly absorbed the offense and what they want him to do so far. For now, I don't think either one is very proficient at blocking. As far as my selection of Higbee goes, if he is half of Reed for just this year, I would be happy based on getting him 300+ picks in to the draft.I see.
If that is the case then Everett will be a wasted pick, although he likely already was because rookie and TE do not go well together most of the time.
I haven't spent much time reading about the Rams in years. Although it is likely more tolerable now that the coaches have changed.
If Higbee was all that though... why did they use their first pick on Everett?
Probably my favorite team of those posted so far. Brees gives you a solid floor almost all by himself and each of your next three picks have genuine stud upside, especially Henry, who I want all the shares of this season.1.28 28. Biabreakable Saints, New Orleans NOS TMQB
2.05 37. Biabreakable Watkins, Sammy LAR WR
3.28 92. Biabreakable Parker, DeVante MIA WR
4.05 101. Biabreakable Henry, Hunter LAC TE
5.28 156. Biabreakable Foreman, D'Onta HOU RB
6.05 165. Biabreakable Crosby, Mason GBP PK
7.28 220. Biabreakable Kamara, Alvin NOS RB
8.05 229. Biabreakable Treadwell, Laquon MIN WR
9.28 284. Biabreakable Boyd, Tyler CIN WR
10.05 293. Biabreakable Redskins, Washington WAS Def
LOL. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Not a huge fan of Watkins, Parker, Hunter, Foreman, Kamara, Treadwell, or Boyd and think waiting so long on a defense was a mistake. IMO, Watkins always an injury risk and went to an offense even worse than BUF, Parker has been more hype than production, Gates still a way bigger piece of the TE pie for LAC, Foreman to me is just a back up (so not worth more than other back ups), who knows what role Kamara will serve and the Saints have multiple backs, Treadwell in the mix but not a starter in MIN, Boyd the WR4 on a team with a top TE.Probably my favorite team of those posted so far. Brees gives you a solid floor almost all by himself and each of your next three picks have genuine stud upside, especially Henry, who I want all the shares of this season.
Second-year post-hype sleepers are some of my favorite picks in these formats and both Treadwell and Boyd were stupid value where you snagged them. Kamara and Foreman are a good pairing in this format, kind of like my WRs - if you hit one on one of the two you're probably ahead on your draft capital invested.
Not a huge amount of playoff potential and that might be what ultimately brings you up short, but IMO you did great work here.
I like that all of your players will be producing points.I like Anarchy's analysis format, so I'll steal it. Got a few playoff guys here, so think it's a decent team, though unlikely a great one.
219 - LA Rams TMQB29 . . . Ranked TMBQ32 in 2016
Waited late for a QB, and think that the Rams passing situation shows more upside than the others that were left (Chi, Cle, NYJ), given the coaching and the new receivers.
91 - Duke Johnson CLE RB29 . . . Ranked RB31 in 2016
With the reception volume potential, seemed a reasonable pick after I went WR/WR first two rounds.
102 - Terrence West BAL RB31 . . . Ranked RB24 in 2016
Liked him being there when I took him, not so much later when I saw Buck Allen run better than him with the first teamers in the second preseason game. Thought about stacking Allen as my flex, but think that’s more of playing for 5th than for 1st strategy.
27 - Michael Crabtree OAK WR14 . . . Ranked WR13 in 2016
Is becoming the healthier of the Oakland WRs, and has playoff potential.
38 - Tyreek Hill KCC WR17 . . . Ranked WR25 in 2016
Decided to buy into the hype, and the Alex Smith downfield hope, given the playoff potential.
230 - Chris Hogan NEP WR75 . . . Ranked WR37 in 2016
I understand the drop due to the Cooks hype and Gronk’s return, but with the January games he seemed like a no-brainer WR3 at this point, and well worth kicking the kicker can down for road for.
283 - Kendell Wright CHI WR93 . . . Ranked WR83 in 2016
I went in thinking that, having the 6th free agent pick, I’d take flex last, but the five teams after me had taken a kicker already, so no use waiting on a flex. Considered Boyd here, but I had just grabbed him at the end of a deep auction the day before. Dodds seems quite high on Wright, likely because of the playing opportunity and weak TE situation with the Bears.
155 - Cameron Brate TBB TE25 . . . Ranked TE8 in 2016
It looks like people are slowly realizing that Howard will not be an immediate impact player in fantasy, but are sleeping somewhat on what that means for Brate. The rookie TE are going too high, meaning there is value to be had in waiting for guys like Cook, Clay, and Brate.
166 - Broncos DEN DEF3 . . . Ranked DEF4 in 2016
Add me to those surprised defenses went so late, particularly as compared to past years. Knowing that, I might have gone QB earlier and waited on a defense.
294 - Connor Barth CHI PK31 . . Ranked PK29 in 2016
Seems likely to hold off Aguayo, but if not I’ll be able to grab a replacement.
Not even sure if that's scored in even this league.32 - Panthers, Carolina CAR TMQB7... Ranked QB26 in 2016
33 - Murray, DeMarco TEN RB10... Ranked RB6 in 2016
96 - Martin, Doug TBB RB31... Ranked RB262 in 2016
288 - Booker, Devontae DEN RB69... Ranked RB34 in 2016
97 - Maclin, Jeremy BAL WR37... Ranked WR71 in 2016
160 - Stills, Kenny MIA WR62... Ranked WR43 in 2016
161 - Gabriel, Taylor ATL WR63... Ranked WR50 in 2016
289 - Gresham, Jermaine ARI TE36... Ranked TE31 in 2016
224 - Dawson, Phil ARI PK17... Ranked PK23 in 2016
225 - Steelers, Pittsburgh PIT Def14... Ranked DEF11 in 2016
Lots of questions, not many answers with this rag tag bunch. Always a fun draft.